That link above is found embedded in a sentence in the Foreign Affairs piece, "Mao responded with a “Patriotic Hygiene Campaign” in 1952. But the book itself is behind a paywall. This link takes you directly to the book behind they paywall:
And in that book you're in for a treat. Revelation of the plan to use "disease politics" to fundamentally transform a country of individualistic nationalists into a country of collectivist communists.
From the book's official description:
"Diseases are everyday, ordinary occurrences intimately related to people’s daily lives. However, as the metaphor of the “Sick Man of East Asia” emerged against the backdrop of a weak modern China, health care and the curing of diseases were turned into grand state politics with far-reaching implications. This book, starting with the argument for diseases being metaphors, describes and interprets such incidents in China’s history as the Abolishment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the Patriotic Hygiene Campaign and the Cooperative Medical Services. In an effort to reveal the internal logic of disease politics in the transformation of the state-people relationship, the book analyzes key aspects including the politicization and inclusion of diseases in state governance, the double disciplining of hygiene, legitimacy construction of the state, the remaking of the nationals, and the expansion of the “publicness” of the state. The book argues that disease politics in modern China has developed following the path from nationals to the people, and then to citizens, or from crisis politics and mobilization politics to life politics. In addition, a marked change has occurred in China’s state building: increasingly standard, rationalized and institutionalized means have been employed while the non-standard means, such as large-scale mobilization and ideological coercion, had been historically used in China."
It's a very long book. I've not read the entirety. But I selected chapter and section titles I read that would be of high interest to this audience in my Stack I wrote a year ago:
You, Paul, and others would find it fascinating if you haven't already encountered the material before. Even it's description of "internal discipline" and "external discipline" is illuminating. A concept found in martial arts, applied population wide. Using propaganda, indoctrination and soft-power to make self-sacrifice for the greater good of society an internal, desirable virtue in the young. Paired with force, punishment, fear to coerce the reluctant and oppositional forces as external discipline on the old. As the old resistance dies off or rots in prison the younger generation obeys internal discipline without requiring heavy-handed external discipline.
This is it, Paul. This is what guided every policy decision that was made after it was ordained by CFR powers. Using instruments like Birx, Fauci, Farrar, etc to fundamentally transform western liberal democracies filled with individualistic nationalists into collectivist authoritarian globalist regimes. Using infectious disease. Quite "logical" to them. It worked in China. And we should be more like them. They said so.
Let us not forget that NAIAD and Wuhan were acting in concert! Little reported on the two Chinese virologists arrested at the Detroit airport and the Harvard biologist who was arrested working behind the scenes with Wuhan.
Thing is, I don't believe there was ever a highly infectious virus that was released from the Wuhan lab or from a bat or any of that nonsense. I've come to view that entire debate as a distraction from the true point of origination: the 2019-2020 flu vaccine.
That year the WHO and others designing the next season's "vaccine" chose to use brand new technology, mammalian egg-based instead of bird egg-based. Live Attenuated Virus capable of reproduction, and an extremely severe variant found in the 2018-2019 flu season. Those who received the 2019-2020 had the worst "coronavirus" outcomes that winter. And were capable of infecting others due to the LAIV model. As we learned about the "Covid" jabs they themselves are capable of making people ill, die and shed to others. The 2019-2020 jabs no different.
What the misdirect at about Wuhan lab leak/bat market origin did was to create the fear of a bioweapon released by an adversary that required extreme measures to protect us from, loss of rights and freedom. That whole "logic of disease politics" thing using public health paired with mass movements to fundamentally transform western civilization.
I don't buy the Wuhan Chinese virologists, Baric, Fauci et al origin story one bit. They had the means, opportunity and motive already in place with the annual flu shot systems in place. Not a stretch to make a version that would create the results they were after.
As I read your description that pops up when I highlight your name I invite you to read my following comment that elaborates on this and invite your commentary given your career experience. Challenging my assertions or debunking them. I invite it.
There is so much subterfuge and miss direction and spin, unless you are an insider who can blow the whistle we may never know the true origin. All I know is I acquired it, had no medical treatment and it laid me low for three weeks and I am in the high risk category. Saving grace. My immune system is whole and I took nothing that would degrade it when I had it. In 2018, FAUCI stated that 80,000 Americans died of the flu. Then they back tracked and said it was only 59,000 Considering 165 Million Americans got the ineffective flu vaccine that year speaks volumes that flu vaccine is NOT the answer. So..did they try a new method and it was MORE virulent? You may be right.
I thought I was the only one who'd picked up on those ever-changing "flu death numbers." It was 80,000 deaths for more than a year, and then 61,000 and now I think it's 51,000.
If I remember correctly, The CDC estimated that 40 to 63 million Americans had Influenza Like Ilness in the flu season of 2019-2020 (right before Covid). I can't remember the exact range, but the media figure was 47.5 million cases. That would be more "flu cases" than in U.S. history. Then in early April 2020, they revised those numbers down to like 34 million cases. I think the estimate is now 36 million cases - but the current estimate is lower than their low-end estimate in March 2020.
My take-away is they just pick these numbers out of the air. I am confident that they didn't want anyone thinking that X percent of those ILI cases in 2019-2020 could have been early Covid.
I think they revised the death numbers from the 2017-2018 flu season so people couldn't say that just as many people died in a recent flu season as died from Covid. And remember flu deaths and cases all occur in just four or five months (basically November through mid-March). Covid is supposed to be spreading for 12 months.
I appreciate all of that. I was hoping you'd look into the new method that industry publications were describing to offer insights about the methodology they used as posing an increased toxicity and infectiousness. How plausible/likely is that as source?
All of that paired with the CNN Fauci "new emailable" biotech need for test subjects, "pioneers." That just so happened within 48 hours of the first "Covid" infection. That reads in hindsight like psychological priming.
Fauci was very open about the idea that rather than have a 6 months incubation period to scale up a flu shot, that the answer was in a RNA injection. I'm sure the RNA medicine men primed him on pushing this concept. I can't wrap my head around the concept of emailing a virus. Totally supports Fauci's unwavering push to inject humanity with the experimental RNA.
His duplicity and miss direction and lying is extensive.
After the results of his globally conscripted "pioneer" emailable lab rat study came in and were unsuccessful he penned this piece dreaming of an even newer concept: Aerosolized "vaccine" delivery, nasal spray, eye drops, perhaps inhaled from a mister. Designed to target our microbiome. The 70% of our immune system that protects us from most dangerous microbiology we coexist with in our environment. Given what his injectable biotech does to our own body's innate immune system, resulting in VAIDS, one only need apply those results to our microbiome. Turning it off and/or against the human host. The potential for horrors inflicted on humanity is severe. They have no business playing God with our species. This doesn't end well. Their arrogance! They'll murder billions with this. Is that the goal?
Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses
David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, Anthony S. Fauci
The scientists recognize the risk and we keep pushing the envelope and investing billions and billions in RNA! Ignoring the central role a whole and vibrant immune system plays in keeping us alive!
- This publication describes a brand-new style of flu vaccine that came online for the 2019-2020 flu season. Mammalian cell-based instead of egg-based. Claims that it was studied for efficacy...but no mention of safety trials:
"A new cell-based seasonal influenza vaccine has been issued marketing approval by the European Commission and will be available for the 2019/2020 flu season.
Flucelvax® Tetra (Seqirus) is the first cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) to be made available in Europe and is licensed for use in individuals aged nine years and older.
To date, there have been no randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of QIVc and standard egg-based quadrivalent vaccines (QIVe)"
“This real-world study, along with other emerging evidence, indicates that cell-based influenza vaccines may result in better influenza-related outcomes compared to standard egg-based vaccine options in some seasons"
"In the UK, the potential advantages of QIVc, which is cultured in mammalian cells rather than eggs"
“We are pleased to be bringing Flucelvax Tetra to the UK next season and have sufficient capacity at our cell-based manufacturing facility in the US to also ensure supply in September 2019"
- This article is interesting. It says that they added live-attenuated influenza vaccines to the schedule. It goes on to say that flu vaccines most definitely, positively, absolutely don't cause the flu, and by that definition won't shed...even after all of the science on vaccines admit that live-attenuated vaccines do shed. Curious:
"The 2019–2020 influenza vaccine recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) have remained mostly the same, with the exception of adding the LAIV to the immunization schedule."
- These articles tell us about what the WHO's process is and what they decided the 2019-2020 vaccine recommendations would be. I'll note that the first link speaks to concerns with preparing for H3N2 from the prior year, while the second link says they ended up not developing that specific strain of vaccines, after all, and the third link says they went ahead and included the H3N2 variant, after all. H3N2 was a "very severe" variant:
- Now, this is an interesting story from CNN that came out in November, 2019, an important time frame in the evolution of the covid story. Note the discussion about the need to develop a new type of all-purpose vaccine, a desire to test it widely, one that focused on a protein they link to a particular virus...like, say, a spike protein. Fauci is frequently quoted in it:
"But a universal flu shot would theoretically cover every strain of the flu using what’s known as an ice cream cone approach."
"Last spring, doctors at the NIH started testing universal flu shots on Sonn and other study participants to see how their bodies respond.
The research got an extra push in September when President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at developing a better flu vaccine.
Fauci said it could take less time – but still many years – to develop a semi-universal flu shot, which would protect against not all flu viruses, but rather a group of flu viruses."
"The faster and more precise method is not to grow the virus at all and instead just create the virus’ protein, he said.
“We clone the gene that codes for the specific protein we want,” Fauci said. “I don’t even want to see the virus. I just need the sequence of that virus, the genetic map of that virus. And you could send that to me by email.”
That’s the technology that’s being used to create the vaccines being trialed on participants like Sonn right now.
“We feel like we’re pioneers, and our volunteers are pioneers,” Ledgerwood said."
And there is a strong correlation between the 2019-2020 flu vaccine and COVID-19 susceptibility:
If you possess the data of what was in each one of those batches you will have a very robust dataset to learn from for future applications. There's your real-time human lab rat comparison study. Biggest drug/biotech dataset ever captured.
Informed consent?
"Bwaaahaahaaahaaahaa! Bwaaahaahaaahaa! As if?!?! Stupid human lab rats! You ain't got no rights, dummies!"
I don't believe the character, Sonn, in the story is real. I searched online, no presence. But it reads like a planted propaganda piece. Using a fictional character as a literary device to advance a narrative. A narrative planted in the public mind at the exact same time as a the first "case" was discovered. Exact same time.
Coincidences happen. But, some defy randomness and are inherently suspicious. Like I was suggesting, the timing of a first "case" would correspond with time after innoculation that adverse events are experienced. Using the experience of the "vaccine" as a guideline, about 2-3 weeks after an inoculation campaign, a global phenomenon that followed mass campaigns in nations, charts provided in RFK Jr's book, "The Real Anthony Fauci."
Same time lag following the Fall, 2019 flu "vaccine" push. Of a new recipe. More likely to shed, more severe variant, unpredictable replication process moving from avian to mammalian egg replication method, possible closer integration of foreign DNA from closer species than possible from avian transfer.
Your experience in Big Pharma could better inform this theory of the case. I just find it too easy to facilitate a more severe flu season that could be propagandized into a novel virus lab escape one that would provoke a heavy-handed government response. The infrastructure already was there for delivery into the general population. Among a vulnerable population. With corresponding worse outcomes in the population that received the 2019-2020 flu "vaccine." Coincidence?
Thanks for highlighting this theory. I need to do more research into this scenario. Basically, the flu shot of 2019-2020 was significantly different than previous flu shots?
That's what I gather from the links I provided in my post above. The reasons I highlight are:
- Mammalian egg based is different from avain egg (chickens) based growing medium. Closer genetic integration hazard questions.
- Known severe variant included in the quadrivalent, highly controversial, back and forth in the decision to include out of concern for risk of introducing a known severe variant to attempt to immunize against.
- LAIV platform, attenuated isn't supposed to shed infectious virus, but of all the platforms is considered the most likely to shed infectious virus...because it's "live." Previously had been only delivered via inactivated platform. I just searched for the different types of vaccine platforms, found this Pfizer information piece describing. Notice how the description for LAIV doesn't show influenza, but it does say Inactivated platform is used for influenza. Why did they design the 2019-2020 flu vaccine on LAIV instead of Inactivated platform?
Yes, I believe those are three material changes that combined make that year's shot significantly different than previous flu shots. My hope was that Thomas Braun could help enlighten, does he consider the differences I highlight to have the potential to result in significantly different outcomes?
The basic issue that needs to be explained is as follows: Why was the CDC through it's 3rd party Eco Health working in concert with the Chinese government in Wuhan developing
gain of function" pathogens. NAIAD had boots on the ground in Wuhan. They knew what the "bat lady" was working on. Did the Chinese military out smart the CIA? Was this project supposed to be a way of monitoring China's Biolab research. We don't know how many more Biolabs China has. We have many and every day, the risk of finding and developing and accidently releasing a pathogen that is unstoppable increases. Knowingly working with a foreign government on military related biowarfare development seems to me should be classified as colluding with the enemy. In my view, the realization that there is the potential of creating a lethal pathogen that destroys the human race calls for a global ban on this research.
What about the Chinese biolab in California? Going down the wrong road. RNA is of the same concern.
I understand those concerns. And they are concerning, worth knowing and exploring. But I still believe it to be red herring theory. Even the spread of it, leap-frogging neighboring nations in its slow march to our shores, the build up, crescendo as it finally arrived via air travel across the oceans in the comparatively minimal population traveling from outbreak nations to the US leaving entire neighboring cities and nations alone. No, I don't buy it. If it was that infectious everyone in the world would've caught it at roughly the same time and a real global pandemic with real people dropping dead in the streets would've occurred. Like the CCP's staged videos portrayed. If Patient Zero was found in Wuhan in October, 2019 there wouldn't have been a three-month lag to the world that then exploded from selected cities hopscotching its way to the US.
I call the lab escape theory hogwash. That's not how respiratory illness is spread. Defies logic. Doesn't mean the research into lethal pathogens isn't problematic or that it could lead to a real global emergency. But Covid-19 wasn't it. The debate is complete fabrication. To divert and distract attention away from the real source, real investigation. Like magicians use distraction to hide the pea under the shell. Asking the audience which shell it's under. While cupping the pea.
My theory of the case, that as far as I'm aware of nobody else is seriously investigating is that any bioweapon that entered human circulation came in from injections of biotech potions believed to be protective and distributed through ordinary channels, with none the wiser.
I question how they identified on day one a nursing home in Seattle Washington that had Covid raging within the facility and killing so many residents.
I remember reading story out of small town Wyoming in April, 2020 that supposedly had major outbreak in community. They supposedly traced it back to a few high school girls who had traveled internationally to participate in a sporting competition. They went through major cities, including Denver, then through Cheyenne, before they got home. NO outbreaks were experienced in their travel wake before their small town had the outbreak. Though they did have "outbreaks" several weeks/months later. How? How does it leapfrog? If it's that contagious that they could infect their entire community - very rural, comparatively low interaction vs large cities - in a matter of days, but their passage everywhere else they had been was still fine? Not logical. I don't buy it. Not one bit. Unless it was more propaganda deployed in service to a scripted narrative.
A subscriber just made this post at another one of my stories ("The flu shot is a scam.")
This post is germane to our discussions as it suggest the (new and different) flu "vaccine" in 2019-2020 might have CAUSED these outbreaks? It also provides more evidence the flu shots don't work. Thirdly, it's yet another compelling anecdote (personal opinion) that Covid might have been spreading widely in November, December 2019 and January 2020:
My husband got the flu shot in November of (2019) , by the end of December our small rural town was sick. Everyone was sick with flu like symptoms including myself. By January 2nd I was coming out of it, and my husband was getting sicker. Medical center was packed. I let him take my appointment at the health department. They gave him a z pack, and a steroid shot. He got better. We asked the Heath Dept why he got sick since they had given him a flu shot. They shrugged and said he probably got type A flu, and that they didn’t vaccinate against that.
What has bothered me the most is that this was before Covid. The whole town was sick sick sick, and we also had a friend 40 years old die from it. Everyone at his funeral was sick. All of us took it in stride.
Why did the government funded health department not test to find out the root cause of the obvious pandemic in our town? Not just guess that we all caught type A flu?
It is now my opinion that we all had the Covid.
Our town never really had a bad Covid outbreak. But we were damn sure all sick in late December and early January.
If our health system was any account, we would know what made us all sick, but to this day, no one seems to care.
It's not my research to hang my hat on. But it's information that appears to validate the anecdotal. Doesn't prove causality, but adds a great deal more to the circumstantial pile of evidence.
Note: Circumstantial evidence is sufficient to result in guilty verdicts. Including First Degree murder verdicts that result in the death penalty. Circumstantial evidence is sufficient. Just sayin'.
Thanks, Fox. You might be on to something very important here.
I've always thought the huge spike of of "cases" and "deaths" between November 2020 and February 2021 must have had something to do with that year's flu vaccine.
As I've posted before, I personally knew only three people who supposedly died from Covid. All three died in this time period ... and I strongly suspect all three had recently had their flu shot. At the minimum, we need some kind of study to see what percentage of Covid deaths in this time period were among people who had received the flu shot.
I recall in 2020 noting that Florida had a very low rate of covid coming into the summer time. My view was that Covid was in the same class as the flu bug that is seasonal and emerges due to more immune systems have been weakened during the low sunshine months. All of a sudden Florida exploded with Covid in June and July. My suspicious mind then questioned if they were seeding the virus via aerosol delivery. Don't know. Still believe Brix was on strings from Fauci. A smart manipulator always uses proxies to take the fall if all goes wrong. Used an over achiever to keep the narrative going down the preplanned route. Note: Fauci was attending all the meetings and evaluating the dialog and direction. When it was going off course did he intervene behind the scenes.? I think so.
Testing. That's how Florida exploded. The use of 95% proven false positive PCR testing produced a summer "outbreak." It was a function of the sheer number of tests that were done. It wasn't based on widespread severe illness that clogged up hospitals and funeral homes. That didn't come until after January, 2021 when they pushed the mRNA experimental biotech into arms. There was no significantly measurable excess deaths in Florida in Spring/Summer 2020. Just the phony metric without meaning "cases." Which were never indications of infection. PCR tests for dinosaur DNA in fossils. Not live dinosaurs. That's all the tests were picking up. Fossils.
Your understanding about seasonal immune weakening is accurate and remained accurate in Summer, 2020. Covid didn't violate that knowable and provable understanding of immune systems. How they measured it did. Want an outbreak? Dial up more fear to get more people to test. Want to make an outbreak go away? Stop talking about it, say the threat has passed so fewer people test. A pandemic of statistical manipulation. Even the supervirulent, superinfectious 2019-2020 flu shot resulted in only a small excess deaths blip. The experimental mRNA biotech - large excess death blip. That still hasn't come down to historical norms. Not attributed to a virus, just things like turbo cancers, thrombosis, myocarditis, etc.
Lie after lie after lie after lie. When Fauci claimed he told a lie about masks to make sure front line workers had them, and then proceeded to lie about them actually working, but that actual admission of lying - for a greater good - should have immediately discredited him. Once a liar always a liar. Believing him afterward is like the spouse staying with their cheating mate who admits to one affair they got caught in, while carrying on multiple others. BLM exception to pandemics? Since when? Lie after lie after lie after lie. Yet the spouse still trusts the cheater. Can't make it up how willing people are to deny they're being lied to by someone who they think cares about them.
This happened in March, 2020, Paul and others:
The Council on Foreign Relations gave its marching orders to the world:
Past Pandemics Exposed China’s Weaknesses
The Current One Highlights Its Strengths
Foreign Affairs, March 27, 2020
https://web.archive.org/web/20200328050913/https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2020-03-27/past-pandemics-exposed-chinas-weaknesses
And what was in that piece, disturbing enough on its own, is a link to this publication:
Rural Health Care Delivery
Modern China from the Perspective of Disease Politics
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2013
https://web.archive.org/web/20200329012125/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-39982-4_11
That link above is found embedded in a sentence in the Foreign Affairs piece, "Mao responded with a “Patriotic Hygiene Campaign” in 1952. But the book itself is behind a paywall. This link takes you directly to the book behind they paywall:
http://library.lol/main/DB87C08A174B849E1EB0476138787AED
('GET' .pdf download)
And in that book you're in for a treat. Revelation of the plan to use "disease politics" to fundamentally transform a country of individualistic nationalists into a country of collectivist communists.
From the book's official description:
"Diseases are everyday, ordinary occurrences intimately related to people’s daily lives. However, as the metaphor of the “Sick Man of East Asia” emerged against the backdrop of a weak modern China, health care and the curing of diseases were turned into grand state politics with far-reaching implications. This book, starting with the argument for diseases being metaphors, describes and interprets such incidents in China’s history as the Abolishment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the Patriotic Hygiene Campaign and the Cooperative Medical Services. In an effort to reveal the internal logic of disease politics in the transformation of the state-people relationship, the book analyzes key aspects including the politicization and inclusion of diseases in state governance, the double disciplining of hygiene, legitimacy construction of the state, the remaking of the nationals, and the expansion of the “publicness” of the state. The book argues that disease politics in modern China has developed following the path from nationals to the people, and then to citizens, or from crisis politics and mobilization politics to life politics. In addition, a marked change has occurred in China’s state building: increasingly standard, rationalized and institutionalized means have been employed while the non-standard means, such as large-scale mobilization and ideological coercion, had been historically used in China."
It's a very long book. I've not read the entirety. But I selected chapter and section titles I read that would be of high interest to this audience in my Stack I wrote a year ago:
https://freedomfox.substack.com/p/the-devious-use-of-infectious-disease
You, Paul, and others would find it fascinating if you haven't already encountered the material before. Even it's description of "internal discipline" and "external discipline" is illuminating. A concept found in martial arts, applied population wide. Using propaganda, indoctrination and soft-power to make self-sacrifice for the greater good of society an internal, desirable virtue in the young. Paired with force, punishment, fear to coerce the reluctant and oppositional forces as external discipline on the old. As the old resistance dies off or rots in prison the younger generation obeys internal discipline without requiring heavy-handed external discipline.
This is it, Paul. This is what guided every policy decision that was made after it was ordained by CFR powers. Using instruments like Birx, Fauci, Farrar, etc to fundamentally transform western liberal democracies filled with individualistic nationalists into collectivist authoritarian globalist regimes. Using infectious disease. Quite "logical" to them. It worked in China. And we should be more like them. They said so.
Let us not forget that NAIAD and Wuhan were acting in concert! Little reported on the two Chinese virologists arrested at the Detroit airport and the Harvard biologist who was arrested working behind the scenes with Wuhan.
Thing is, I don't believe there was ever a highly infectious virus that was released from the Wuhan lab or from a bat or any of that nonsense. I've come to view that entire debate as a distraction from the true point of origination: the 2019-2020 flu vaccine.
That year the WHO and others designing the next season's "vaccine" chose to use brand new technology, mammalian egg-based instead of bird egg-based. Live Attenuated Virus capable of reproduction, and an extremely severe variant found in the 2018-2019 flu season. Those who received the 2019-2020 had the worst "coronavirus" outcomes that winter. And were capable of infecting others due to the LAIV model. As we learned about the "Covid" jabs they themselves are capable of making people ill, die and shed to others. The 2019-2020 jabs no different.
What the misdirect at about Wuhan lab leak/bat market origin did was to create the fear of a bioweapon released by an adversary that required extreme measures to protect us from, loss of rights and freedom. That whole "logic of disease politics" thing using public health paired with mass movements to fundamentally transform western civilization.
I don't buy the Wuhan Chinese virologists, Baric, Fauci et al origin story one bit. They had the means, opportunity and motive already in place with the annual flu shot systems in place. Not a stretch to make a version that would create the results they were after.
As I read your description that pops up when I highlight your name I invite you to read my following comment that elaborates on this and invite your commentary given your career experience. Challenging my assertions or debunking them. I invite it.
There is so much subterfuge and miss direction and spin, unless you are an insider who can blow the whistle we may never know the true origin. All I know is I acquired it, had no medical treatment and it laid me low for three weeks and I am in the high risk category. Saving grace. My immune system is whole and I took nothing that would degrade it when I had it. In 2018, FAUCI stated that 80,000 Americans died of the flu. Then they back tracked and said it was only 59,000 Considering 165 Million Americans got the ineffective flu vaccine that year speaks volumes that flu vaccine is NOT the answer. So..did they try a new method and it was MORE virulent? You may be right.
I thought I was the only one who'd picked up on those ever-changing "flu death numbers." It was 80,000 deaths for more than a year, and then 61,000 and now I think it's 51,000.
If I remember correctly, The CDC estimated that 40 to 63 million Americans had Influenza Like Ilness in the flu season of 2019-2020 (right before Covid). I can't remember the exact range, but the media figure was 47.5 million cases. That would be more "flu cases" than in U.S. history. Then in early April 2020, they revised those numbers down to like 34 million cases. I think the estimate is now 36 million cases - but the current estimate is lower than their low-end estimate in March 2020.
My take-away is they just pick these numbers out of the air. I am confident that they didn't want anyone thinking that X percent of those ILI cases in 2019-2020 could have been early Covid.
I think they revised the death numbers from the 2017-2018 flu season so people couldn't say that just as many people died in a recent flu season as died from Covid. And remember flu deaths and cases all occur in just four or five months (basically November through mid-March). Covid is supposed to be spreading for 12 months.
I appreciate all of that. I was hoping you'd look into the new method that industry publications were describing to offer insights about the methodology they used as posing an increased toxicity and infectiousness. How plausible/likely is that as source?
All of that paired with the CNN Fauci "new emailable" biotech need for test subjects, "pioneers." That just so happened within 48 hours of the first "Covid" infection. That reads in hindsight like psychological priming.
Fauci was very open about the idea that rather than have a 6 months incubation period to scale up a flu shot, that the answer was in a RNA injection. I'm sure the RNA medicine men primed him on pushing this concept. I can't wrap my head around the concept of emailing a virus. Totally supports Fauci's unwavering push to inject humanity with the experimental RNA.
His duplicity and miss direction and lying is extensive.
After the results of his globally conscripted "pioneer" emailable lab rat study came in and were unsuccessful he penned this piece dreaming of an even newer concept: Aerosolized "vaccine" delivery, nasal spray, eye drops, perhaps inhaled from a mister. Designed to target our microbiome. The 70% of our immune system that protects us from most dangerous microbiology we coexist with in our environment. Given what his injectable biotech does to our own body's innate immune system, resulting in VAIDS, one only need apply those results to our microbiome. Turning it off and/or against the human host. The potential for horrors inflicted on humanity is severe. They have no business playing God with our species. This doesn't end well. Their arrogance! They'll murder billions with this. Is that the goal?
Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses
David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, Anthony S. Fauci
Cell Host Microbe, January 11, 2023
https://www.cell.com/cell-host-microbe/fulltext/S1931-3128(22)00572-8
The scientists recognize the risk and we keep pushing the envelope and investing billions and billions in RNA! Ignoring the central role a whole and vibrant immune system plays in keeping us alive!
- This publication describes a brand-new style of flu vaccine that came online for the 2019-2020 flu season. Mammalian cell-based instead of egg-based. Claims that it was studied for efficacy...but no mention of safety trials:
https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/news/first-cell-based-quadrivalent-vaccine-available-for-2019-2020-flu-season
"A new cell-based seasonal influenza vaccine has been issued marketing approval by the European Commission and will be available for the 2019/2020 flu season.
Flucelvax® Tetra (Seqirus) is the first cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) to be made available in Europe and is licensed for use in individuals aged nine years and older.
To date, there have been no randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of QIVc and standard egg-based quadrivalent vaccines (QIVe)"
“This real-world study, along with other emerging evidence, indicates that cell-based influenza vaccines may result in better influenza-related outcomes compared to standard egg-based vaccine options in some seasons"
"In the UK, the potential advantages of QIVc, which is cultured in mammalian cells rather than eggs"
“We are pleased to be bringing Flucelvax Tetra to the UK next season and have sufficient capacity at our cell-based manufacturing facility in the US to also ensure supply in September 2019"
- This article is interesting. It says that they added live-attenuated influenza vaccines to the schedule. It goes on to say that flu vaccines most definitely, positively, absolutely don't cause the flu, and by that definition won't shed...even after all of the science on vaccines admit that live-attenuated vaccines do shed. Curious:
https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/20192020-influenza-vaccine-update
"The 2019–2020 influenza vaccine recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) have remained mostly the same, with the exception of adding the LAIV to the immunization schedule."
- These articles tell us about what the WHO's process is and what they decided the 2019-2020 vaccine recommendations would be. I'll note that the first link speaks to concerns with preparing for H3N2 from the prior year, while the second link says they ended up not developing that specific strain of vaccines, after all, and the third link says they went ahead and included the H3N2 variant, after all. H3N2 was a "very severe" variant:
https://elemental.medium.com/inside-the-making-of-the-flu-vaccine-c5d6f8cd174c
https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/who-vaccine-recommendations-are-used-pharmaceutical-companies-develop-produce-and-license-influenza
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/918053
***********************************************************************************************************
- Now, this is an interesting story from CNN that came out in November, 2019, an important time frame in the evolution of the covid story. Note the discussion about the need to develop a new type of all-purpose vaccine, a desire to test it widely, one that focused on a protein they link to a particular virus...like, say, a spike protein. Fauci is frequently quoted in it:
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/29/health/universal-flu-vaccine/index.html
"But a universal flu shot would theoretically cover every strain of the flu using what’s known as an ice cream cone approach."
"Last spring, doctors at the NIH started testing universal flu shots on Sonn and other study participants to see how their bodies respond.
The research got an extra push in September when President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at developing a better flu vaccine.
Fauci said it could take less time – but still many years – to develop a semi-universal flu shot, which would protect against not all flu viruses, but rather a group of flu viruses."
"The faster and more precise method is not to grow the virus at all and instead just create the virus’ protein, he said.
“We clone the gene that codes for the specific protein we want,” Fauci said. “I don’t even want to see the virus. I just need the sequence of that virus, the genetic map of that virus. And you could send that to me by email.”
That’s the technology that’s being used to create the vaccines being trialed on participants like Sonn right now.
“We feel like we’re pioneers, and our volunteers are pioneers,” Ledgerwood said."
And there is a strong correlation between the 2019-2020 flu vaccine and COVID-19 susceptibility:
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/how-flu-vaccines-accidentally-reveal
We feel like we’re pioneers, and our volunteers are pioneers,” Ledgerwood said
Translation: Humans are now lab rats! We don't need comparison studies.
And here's the data for "pioneers" testing different mRNA "vaccine" formulations:
https://howbadismybatch.com/
If you possess the data of what was in each one of those batches you will have a very robust dataset to learn from for future applications. There's your real-time human lab rat comparison study. Biggest drug/biotech dataset ever captured.
Informed consent?
"Bwaaahaahaaahaaahaa! Bwaaahaahaaahaa! As if?!?! Stupid human lab rats! You ain't got no rights, dummies!"
Right!
I don't believe the character, Sonn, in the story is real. I searched online, no presence. But it reads like a planted propaganda piece. Using a fictional character as a literary device to advance a narrative. A narrative planted in the public mind at the exact same time as a the first "case" was discovered. Exact same time.
Coincidences happen. But, some defy randomness and are inherently suspicious. Like I was suggesting, the timing of a first "case" would correspond with time after innoculation that adverse events are experienced. Using the experience of the "vaccine" as a guideline, about 2-3 weeks after an inoculation campaign, a global phenomenon that followed mass campaigns in nations, charts provided in RFK Jr's book, "The Real Anthony Fauci."
Same time lag following the Fall, 2019 flu "vaccine" push. Of a new recipe. More likely to shed, more severe variant, unpredictable replication process moving from avian to mammalian egg replication method, possible closer integration of foreign DNA from closer species than possible from avian transfer.
Your experience in Big Pharma could better inform this theory of the case. I just find it too easy to facilitate a more severe flu season that could be propagandized into a novel virus lab escape one that would provoke a heavy-handed government response. The infrastructure already was there for delivery into the general population. Among a vulnerable population. With corresponding worse outcomes in the population that received the 2019-2020 flu "vaccine." Coincidence?
Thanks for highlighting this theory. I need to do more research into this scenario. Basically, the flu shot of 2019-2020 was significantly different than previous flu shots?
That's what I gather from the links I provided in my post above. The reasons I highlight are:
- Mammalian egg based is different from avain egg (chickens) based growing medium. Closer genetic integration hazard questions.
- Known severe variant included in the quadrivalent, highly controversial, back and forth in the decision to include out of concern for risk of introducing a known severe variant to attempt to immunize against.
- LAIV platform, attenuated isn't supposed to shed infectious virus, but of all the platforms is considered the most likely to shed infectious virus...because it's "live." Previously had been only delivered via inactivated platform. I just searched for the different types of vaccine platforms, found this Pfizer information piece describing. Notice how the description for LAIV doesn't show influenza, but it does say Inactivated platform is used for influenza. Why did they design the 2019-2020 flu vaccine on LAIV instead of Inactivated platform?
https://www.pfizer.com/news/articles/understanding_six_types_of_vaccine_technologies
Yes, I believe those are three material changes that combined make that year's shot significantly different than previous flu shots. My hope was that Thomas Braun could help enlighten, does he consider the differences I highlight to have the potential to result in significantly different outcomes?
The basic issue that needs to be explained is as follows: Why was the CDC through it's 3rd party Eco Health working in concert with the Chinese government in Wuhan developing
gain of function" pathogens. NAIAD had boots on the ground in Wuhan. They knew what the "bat lady" was working on. Did the Chinese military out smart the CIA? Was this project supposed to be a way of monitoring China's Biolab research. We don't know how many more Biolabs China has. We have many and every day, the risk of finding and developing and accidently releasing a pathogen that is unstoppable increases. Knowingly working with a foreign government on military related biowarfare development seems to me should be classified as colluding with the enemy. In my view, the realization that there is the potential of creating a lethal pathogen that destroys the human race calls for a global ban on this research.
What about the Chinese biolab in California? Going down the wrong road. RNA is of the same concern.
I understand those concerns. And they are concerning, worth knowing and exploring. But I still believe it to be red herring theory. Even the spread of it, leap-frogging neighboring nations in its slow march to our shores, the build up, crescendo as it finally arrived via air travel across the oceans in the comparatively minimal population traveling from outbreak nations to the US leaving entire neighboring cities and nations alone. No, I don't buy it. If it was that infectious everyone in the world would've caught it at roughly the same time and a real global pandemic with real people dropping dead in the streets would've occurred. Like the CCP's staged videos portrayed. If Patient Zero was found in Wuhan in October, 2019 there wouldn't have been a three-month lag to the world that then exploded from selected cities hopscotching its way to the US.
I call the lab escape theory hogwash. That's not how respiratory illness is spread. Defies logic. Doesn't mean the research into lethal pathogens isn't problematic or that it could lead to a real global emergency. But Covid-19 wasn't it. The debate is complete fabrication. To divert and distract attention away from the real source, real investigation. Like magicians use distraction to hide the pea under the shell. Asking the audience which shell it's under. While cupping the pea.
My theory of the case, that as far as I'm aware of nobody else is seriously investigating is that any bioweapon that entered human circulation came in from injections of biotech potions believed to be protective and distributed through ordinary channels, with none the wiser.
I question how they identified on day one a nursing home in Seattle Washington that had Covid raging within the facility and killing so many residents.
Meant previous comment here to another reply.
I remember reading story out of small town Wyoming in April, 2020 that supposedly had major outbreak in community. They supposedly traced it back to a few high school girls who had traveled internationally to participate in a sporting competition. They went through major cities, including Denver, then through Cheyenne, before they got home. NO outbreaks were experienced in their travel wake before their small town had the outbreak. Though they did have "outbreaks" several weeks/months later. How? How does it leapfrog? If it's that contagious that they could infect their entire community - very rural, comparatively low interaction vs large cities - in a matter of days, but their passage everywhere else they had been was still fine? Not logical. I don't buy it. Not one bit. Unless it was more propaganda deployed in service to a scripted narrative.
A subscriber just made this post at another one of my stories ("The flu shot is a scam.")
This post is germane to our discussions as it suggest the (new and different) flu "vaccine" in 2019-2020 might have CAUSED these outbreaks? It also provides more evidence the flu shots don't work. Thirdly, it's yet another compelling anecdote (personal opinion) that Covid might have been spreading widely in November, December 2019 and January 2020:
My husband got the flu shot in November of (2019) , by the end of December our small rural town was sick. Everyone was sick with flu like symptoms including myself. By January 2nd I was coming out of it, and my husband was getting sicker. Medical center was packed. I let him take my appointment at the health department. They gave him a z pack, and a steroid shot. He got better. We asked the Heath Dept why he got sick since they had given him a flu shot. They shrugged and said he probably got type A flu, and that they didn’t vaccinate against that.
What has bothered me the most is that this was before Covid. The whole town was sick sick sick, and we also had a friend 40 years old die from it. Everyone at his funeral was sick. All of us took it in stride.
Why did the government funded health department not test to find out the root cause of the obvious pandemic in our town? Not just guess that we all caught type A flu?
It is now my opinion that we all had the Covid.
Our town never really had a bad Covid outbreak. But we were damn sure all sick in late December and early January.
If our health system was any account, we would know what made us all sick, but to this day, no one seems to care.
And there is a strong correlation between the 2019-2020 flu vaccine and COVID-19 susceptibility:
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/how-flu-vaccines-accidentally-reveal
It's not my research to hang my hat on. But it's information that appears to validate the anecdotal. Doesn't prove causality, but adds a great deal more to the circumstantial pile of evidence.
Note: Circumstantial evidence is sufficient to result in guilty verdicts. Including First Degree murder verdicts that result in the death penalty. Circumstantial evidence is sufficient. Just sayin'.
Thanks, Fox. You might be on to something very important here.
I've always thought the huge spike of of "cases" and "deaths" between November 2020 and February 2021 must have had something to do with that year's flu vaccine.
As I've posted before, I personally knew only three people who supposedly died from Covid. All three died in this time period ... and I strongly suspect all three had recently had their flu shot. At the minimum, we need some kind of study to see what percentage of Covid deaths in this time period were among people who had received the flu shot.
I recall in 2020 noting that Florida had a very low rate of covid coming into the summer time. My view was that Covid was in the same class as the flu bug that is seasonal and emerges due to more immune systems have been weakened during the low sunshine months. All of a sudden Florida exploded with Covid in June and July. My suspicious mind then questioned if they were seeding the virus via aerosol delivery. Don't know. Still believe Brix was on strings from Fauci. A smart manipulator always uses proxies to take the fall if all goes wrong. Used an over achiever to keep the narrative going down the preplanned route. Note: Fauci was attending all the meetings and evaluating the dialog and direction. When it was going off course did he intervene behind the scenes.? I think so.
Testing. That's how Florida exploded. The use of 95% proven false positive PCR testing produced a summer "outbreak." It was a function of the sheer number of tests that were done. It wasn't based on widespread severe illness that clogged up hospitals and funeral homes. That didn't come until after January, 2021 when they pushed the mRNA experimental biotech into arms. There was no significantly measurable excess deaths in Florida in Spring/Summer 2020. Just the phony metric without meaning "cases." Which were never indications of infection. PCR tests for dinosaur DNA in fossils. Not live dinosaurs. That's all the tests were picking up. Fossils.
Your understanding about seasonal immune weakening is accurate and remained accurate in Summer, 2020. Covid didn't violate that knowable and provable understanding of immune systems. How they measured it did. Want an outbreak? Dial up more fear to get more people to test. Want to make an outbreak go away? Stop talking about it, say the threat has passed so fewer people test. A pandemic of statistical manipulation. Even the supervirulent, superinfectious 2019-2020 flu shot resulted in only a small excess deaths blip. The experimental mRNA biotech - large excess death blip. That still hasn't come down to historical norms. Not attributed to a virus, just things like turbo cancers, thrombosis, myocarditis, etc.
Lie after lie after lie after lie. When Fauci claimed he told a lie about masks to make sure front line workers had them, and then proceeded to lie about them actually working, but that actual admission of lying - for a greater good - should have immediately discredited him. Once a liar always a liar. Believing him afterward is like the spouse staying with their cheating mate who admits to one affair they got caught in, while carrying on multiple others. BLM exception to pandemics? Since when? Lie after lie after lie after lie. Yet the spouse still trusts the cheater. Can't make it up how willing people are to deny they're being lied to by someone who they think cares about them.
Master manipulation of the masses! The expertise of of the CIA!
👍😎🌈🙏