For some of us, solving the ‘origins mystery’ is like an addictive parlor game. We’re all playing this game because we don’t think the virus sleuths are looking at the most-important clues.
Fauci is getting ready to be interviewed. I wish someone would ask him this question: When did America's science community develop a Covid antibody test?
Follow-up question: Why didn't the Science Community start using this test ASAP as soon as it was developed?
Third question: When did the CDC actually test the first tranche of Red Cross "archived" blood (that was collected Dec. 13-16, 2019)?
We know a PCR Covid test had been developed by mid-January (although it was used only to test a few people who had returned from China). Couldn't our best and brightest scientists have also produced a Covid antibody test by some point in January as well?
I would think antibody tests are used all the time and are not that hard to create. I've found several published papers from Chinese scientists who reference Covid antibody tests they were giving patients in January 2020.
Congress questioners could nail Fauci on charges of "dereliction of duty" if they could prove scientists intentionally delayed using antibody tests, which of course could be used to provide evidence of "early infections'' - which equates to "early spread."
The point I'm getting at is that CDC officials could have already tested those early tranches of Red Cross blood days or weeks before they ordered the lockdowns. For all we know, those sera samples had already been tested ... which would mean officials knew evidence of "early spread" already existed .... and they still ordered the lockdowns.
More likely, though, is that they intentionally delayed testing that blood ... probably because they knew what those tests would/might reveal. That tells me some key players in this production knew "early spread" had already happened.
For those who might not know, the CDC published the results of the "Red Cross antibody study" on November 30, 2020 - 11 1/2 months AFTER the first tranche of "archived" blood had been collected (on Dec. 13-16, 2019).
In other words, it took almost a year to test and publish the results of just 1900 units of blood.
I think fewer than 2,000 units of blood could have been tested for antibodies in a couple of days - certainly before the lockdowns.
And if those results showed 2.03 percent "positives" (as they did), the next thing honest officials would have done based on those results is order the testing of a lot more tranches of archived blood - from all regions of the country and all weeks and months before "official Covid."
FWIW, 2.03 percent positive from one sample extrapolated to the entire country = 7.4 million possible early cases. And those cases wouldn't date to December 13-16, 2019, they'd date to November 2019 or earlier because it takes at least a week or two for antibodies to develop. In other words, those blood donors weren't infected with this virus they day before they donated blood.
It also occurs to me that it really wouldn't make sense for the virus to be intentionally released onto the world ... if they were just going to deny that a virus was previously spreading (which is what they did).
This quick thought leads me to conclude any "novel virus" accidentally escaped. They then turned lemons into lemonade when the China announced a new virus to the scientific community on Dec. 31, 2019?
Or, I guess, maybe someone wanted to see how the virus affected people after it had been released/escaped? Even if "they" knew a virus had escaped much earlier than reported, they would have been monitoring hospitals and morgues and funeral homes and would have quickly known their virus wasn't "deadly." I still think that's the most important fact they wanted to cover up and had to cover-up.
They wanted people to think the opposite - that this WAS a very deadly virus. When one starts thinking of all things they would have had to do to to prove that a non-deadly virus WAS "deadly," you get one sinister plot.
I always thought the whole point of the virus was to push the vaxx, and they had to change the start of the virus "escape-release" so that the virus could be detected everywhere, all at once to lock down the world, then roll out the vaxx to save humanity less than a year later.
Who knows all of the layers of this cake, though, really, outside of a few three letter agencies?
I'll offer $50 straight up for you copy of the game?
Is it a deal?
~
Merry Christmas and I hope Alabama beats the shit out of Michigan and Florida State got ripped off and now they are suing the ACC - pandemonium seems around the corner, but maybe wiser heads will prevail?
I know this - there is no way in hell the flu disappeared when they said it did - liars!
~
'24 is going to be better cause the pendulum is swinging back....
I hope Bama wins it all for one reason - it will prove the experts who didn't want Bama selected to the field were ... wrong. Most people - per the narrative - say it's a "travesty" FSU was left out. Well, what if Alabama wins two more games and prove they are the best team? Wouldn't it have been a real "travesty" to keep the best team out of the tournament?
... The suddenly disappearing flu is one of the whoppers of all the whoppers. NY State went from 17,400 "confirmed" flu tests to about 40 in a couple of weeks. Huh? How does that happen?
FSU got screwed - but how is anybody gonna pick the "4 teams" and you and I both know on any given day any given team could prevail....so there won't be too much to be concluded whatever the outcome is, but still - I hope Bama beats the daylights out of the wolverines - whats a wolverine anyhow - some sort of pretend wolf!
I like the Wolfpack out of NC State, but I'm biased.
~~~~~
Hey - lets drop this all for the moment and pretend the flu ain't happening (even though I think I just had it this last week...and I KNOW it did not "go away" - bs that is.....), and enjoy this fine music from the girl from Ipanema along with a fine drummer amazing and some dutch jazz artist:
That's why they created a Committee in the first place. Any decision was going to be subjective.
I thought Alabama had one of the best 4 teams last year. Alabama wouldn't have gotten blown out in the national title game 65-7 ... like TCU did. Alabama would have blown out TCU too.
I don't remember anyone saying last year that Alabama was screwed. And TCU was not even a conference champion. They were beat by Kansas State in the conference championship game - The same K-State Alabama beat by 30 points in the Sugar Bowl.
I don't deny Alabama has a good team - not at all. Nor do I deny they didn't earn a "ticket" to "Final 4" college football championship. Lastly, it is subjective, so you can't please everyone.....Still - must be hard to have a "perfect" record against decent opposition and NOT get an invite....oh well.
I haven't really been following things that closely, but I thought I read they are changing the "format" next year - this is it I think:
~
"The College Football Playoff will expand from four teams to 12 next season. This version of the playoff field will include the six highest-ranked conference champions. Those teams will receive automatic bids. The top four teams will receive a first-round bye to the quarterfinals."
~
That is not a bad idea and probably should diminish controversy associated with having to pick "just 4", but seems like that could be quite a few extra games for the teams that make it to the overall Championship game.
~
Regardless, sometimes it is nice to have diversions like watching a ball game.....
I think they deliberately painted the origin stories with a wide brush for the purpose of capturing as wide a demographic as possible.
Initially they ran with the novel natural origin bat-pangolin-wet market story. They kept it up even when some researchers expressed skepticism.
After they maxed out the arms full o serum on that story they shifted gears to the unnatural monster from the Wuhan Petri dish!
They got the remaining skeptics running to the needle on that story because if it’s man-made ANYTHING is possible!
Now it’s all swept under the rug because they want everyone believing whatever narrative suits them as long as they remain afraid of the spiky orb.
The stories have done their jobs. Variants are always lurking ‘round the corner. So don’t throw out your magic masks yet, there’s an overcycled fraudulent PCR test swab in a box somewhere awaiting our attention!
That's my conclusion too. Whatever the "narratives" were they worked.
I keep making a big deal about the Red Cross antibody study, which I say should have been publicized in the days before the lockdowns. It was easy to neutralize any fallout from that study ... they just delayed the publication of that paper until the end of November 2020 - actually after the election results.
By that time, lockdowns had been going on for seven months and the first vaccines were already in store rooms of some pharmacies.
When the story was published, it made hardly any splash. I doubt NBC Nightly News even ran a story ... or if they ran one it wasn't the top story of the day.
There's lots of ways to control awkward narratives. The easiest is don't investigate something ... but sometimes just delaying investigations is enough too.
Yes, manipulation raised to an art form. Most of the skilled TV watching crowd didn’t know what hit ‘em. For those that could see through the mist it was equal parts terrifying and frustrating. There ain’t no rest for the wicked.
Fauci shrugs off the almost total absence of pneumonia, bronchitis and influenza cases during Covid. Where’d they go? They imply masking and distancing rendered them defeated for the first time in history. I call bullshit. What happened is, they were all incorrectly diagnosed as Covid via the crap PCR tests. Those patients were treated with Remdesivir which did them no good. When they got worse they shoved a ventilator down their throat which killed most of them. Then chalked it up to a Covid death. It was fucking murder. But Medicare paid and extra 15% and Remdesivir is very expensive. Everybody wins. Except the dead people.
An alternative origins proposal, developed according to The Prime Directive of criminal research, which is to follow the money trail:
1) DARPA developed this virus in a lab located on premises of UNC at Chapel Hill NC. DARPA has (present tense) several similar labs operating; at least one of which was located in Ukraine. DARPA has partners in this research; among them are China and MI6. I do not believe Russia is (or ever has been) involved.
2) DARPA at the behest of the CDC pushed developmental research off to a jointly-owned facility in Wuhan, thus complying to the letter of Congressional rulings on the onshore development of lethality-enhanced viruses, avoiding scrutiny, and creating arm's-length plausible deniability.
3) Pfizer and Moderna (two of what may be many in the corporate world) were involved in this virus's development. Fauci's announcement of creating a gold rush for sale of stock in companies that developed "vaccines", and his comments about market growth for those products - made during 2020 and 2021 - strongly suggest that the virus and its "cures" were developed as a two-part endeavor.
4) Several western governments signed multi-million dollar purchase orders for products labeled as vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna - purchase orders that contained liability limitations for the vendors. These purchases were funded with someone else's money, that of the taxpayers, who had no say in this purchase.
5) The release from Wuhan was deliberate; the timing was designed to cripple the booming Trump economy prior to the next US election cycle. Trump's people were getting too close to succeeding in revealing the depth and spread of corruption in both the elected government and the bureaucratic state. FusionGPS's strategy had failed, so something more dramatic and powerful was needed. The virus/vax release was the only available option, one that offered the bonus of collateral economic benefits alongside a good chance of success in achieving its main goal, the defeat of Trump in 2020..
Excellent points. This one really jumps out at me: "... strongly suggest that the virus and its "cures" were developed as a two-part endeavor."
... You can't have a vaccine without a disease first. But, probably, it doesn't need to be a disease that's really going to wipe out the world - that might kill the Establishment players an their loved ones too.
6) The virus's spread was accelerated via the aforementioned military games, and by willing accomplices in DC such as Nancy Pelosi, who strolled through Chinatown crying racist! at anyone who suggested avoiding contact with new arrivals from the Wuhan region.
7) Y'all can consider the identity of the authors of this entire script. Consider the WHO, its patron saints in the WEF, the actuaries who are always looking for ways to reduce medicare expenses, et al.
I agree that wherever it originated, they knew about it.....and with the military games being in Wuhan, Wuhan does seem to be the place. They immediately jumped on Trump not so much as out of fear that China would be angry with us for his remarks, but to cover up their involvement in its creation ....IF that is where it occurred - Wuhan Virology Lab.
1. Soldiers are not civilians which makes it easier for control and more difficult to track down information.
2. Fauci was the highest paid Federal employee, because he was responsible for the military’s interactions (DARPA) with NIH... not Collins.
3. We are still using Fauci baselines like 21 days for incubation.
4. Kerry Mullis (invented PCR) hated Fauci to the core. Mullis said, all along, do not use the PCR as a diagnostic tool. PCR is used as a manufacturing technique. Mullis conveniently died in August 2019.
5. Wet markets are common place in China, the “outbreak” occurred in a city of 12M (Wikipedia distorts the population figures by using 2018 #’s instead of 2020 in order to make it look smaller) which is about the size of Los Angeles. Instead of focusing on the lab... they instead go to the wet market 6 months later to look for clues of a bat infection whose living colony is 750 miles away (El Paso, Texas to Los Angeles).
Military members get vaccines all the time and never question this. For some reason, they also have to provide blood samples all the time (at least once a year) - and these blood samples are saved in massive depositories. I still maintain this blood could have been tested for Covid antibodies.
And I have no doubt more military members were "sick" in the months before official Covid than in previous years. Military medical records would prove this ... if we could look at these records or someone did an analysis on ILI visits in November 2019 -February 2020 and compared these figures to prior years for the same months.
I believe the military is covering up evidence of "early spread" by covering up evidence of more "sick" military personnel. Plus, they have this great tranche of archived blood they could go back and test ... which they never did.
It's all the things they didn't do but should have done which make me so confident the military is covering up the real start date of virus spread (with the other alphabet health agencies).
However, I will set aside my frustration with the Tech, Med, Govern, Media and Money experts long enough to pay homage to Jesus, the reason for the season.
what a load of crap - so many words and the point is all the way down here in the comments... what a waste of time... go write novels or something.
Why are you running cover for them? Are you now sponsored by Pfizer?
"oh it was accidental" there was nothing accidental about it'... or perhaps I missed your point here mixed with all the nonsense.
Just take the short path to the answer, they told us it was going to happen, they war gamed it out, it happened and they all got in line and sang the same song....
It might be true that no novel "Covid virus" even exists. However, my evidence and research shows me that tens of millions more Americans than normal were sick of "something" in the weeks and months before official Covid.
So where is the theory that explains what was causing all of these extra "sick" people - right before official Covid?
Do the people who don't think a novel virus (or any virus) exists agree with me that more people were becoming sick in the winter of 2019-2020? One assumes people were going to the doctor and getting many more flu tests .... for some reason. They couldn't have all been imagining they were sick when they really weren't.
So we have a great unexplained "coincidence" of many more people coming down with ILI/Covid symptoms ... right before Covid. I agree this could be a coincidence, but it's an interesting one to me ... and one that hasn't gotten much attention ... or no convincing reason has been proffered that might explain this.
For its part, the CDC later (dramatically) revised its estimates of "sick people" in this particular flu season ... which is interesting to me as well.
If you're talking about China and Italy you're talking about people with atypical pneumonia caused by air pollution, a long-standing problem. We can also blame the media for all their fear porn which resulted in people running to the hospital when normally they would have stayed home. And how true were the reports of an increase in ill people? You cannot trust anything from the CDC. 99% of people with a positive Covid test were asymptomatic but they were all lumped together as a positive case based on tests that were not designed to measure infection. Furthermore a real-life isolated sample of the "virus" was never utilized. All cell cultures were contaminated and no controls were instituted. There is nothing unique about Covid. All the observable symptoms can be seen in other so-called infectious diseases. The only way they were able to declare that Covid was novel was through PCR tests that only meaured genetic fragnents and pieced together through competely speculative computer simulations. So no I think the entire "pandemic" was manufactured.
I agree 100 percent that the PCR test was the key to the operation to create a "deadly" virus. But before we had a "deadly virus," we just had a spreading virus - The deaths didn't come in large numbers until early March 2020 (in northern Italy) and then in New York City in late March and April 2020. There were hardly any "early deaths" in ... China (less than 200 by the end of January, if we believe Chinese reports).
I also agree we can't necessarily trust the CDC with its weekly ILI reports. However, to support my theory that MORE people were sick in the winter of 2019-2020 (than normal), I don't use only CDC data. I use all kinds of contemporaneous journalism from the time that quotes doctors as saying a lot of sick people were showing up in waiting rooms and emergency rooms.
I also resort back to my own personal memories and I know for a fact I was sick (and my two kids were sick) and about 1/3 of my town seemed to be sick of "something" in December 2019 and January 2020. It was my wife, a high school teacher, that told me that one half of her students were out sick in one day in late January 2020. That wasn't the CDC telling me that.
These students (and teachers) weren't skipping school for contrived reasons - they were really sick ... just like I was. And this wasn't happening just in Troy, Alabama.
Yep Turfseer, no actual proof of contagious/pathogenic viruses at all, ever.
Dr Stefan Lanka, German microbiologist, has proven this most definitively.
FYI In 2017-18 I was really sick over the holidays i(never get sick ordinarily) w/a really bad "body flu" on my visit home to OK. Aches, pains, fever & dry heaves - not a "typical flu" - & so had to delay my flight home another week. No-one freaked out then or quarantined or thought it was esp unusual at the time as lots of folks there had experienced this body flu.
So everyone just told me then, it's gonna be fine & is over in a week at most. No big deal. Btw - Look up the flu online during 2017-2018 & notice the MSM alarmism at the time.
> Flu broke records for deaths, illnesses in 2017-2018, new CDC numbers ...
> Sep 26, 2018 - Flu broke records for deaths, illnesses in 2017-2018, new CDC numbers show By Lena H. Sun
This hyped-up, over-arching flu alarmism has been going on now since at least 2009 with the so-called "swine flu epidemic" (that wasn't!) in order to sell lots of farma products - like the flu shot.
> Der Spiegel 2010: Reconstruction of the Swine Flu Mass Hysteria of 2009
The great hysteria pandemic attempt by the WHO and the governing classes that failed - Der Spiegel magazine - 2 Aug 20
So... we've had bad flus & bad respiratory illnesses etc over the years and these can be explained as our bodies' clearing toxins or chemicals - drugs & vaxx too - from our bodies as natural processes. Colds, flus, etc clearing toxins or poisons from our bodies as a regular, annual, seasonal process. Clearing out accumulated toxins - food additives, insecticides/pesticides, geoengineering chemicals in our air/water, the effects of EMFs/WiFi/5G on our bodies, etc. But viruses are the go-to coverups for industrial pollution.
...or...whatever it was came from the 2019 new biotech formulation of the flue jab...as I've dropped on your posts about this subject before with extensive documentation as to why that makes sense, that you've acknowledged and said warrants further investigation. So there's that.
I was sick in January 2020 - along with both my children. We never got the flu shots. However, your theory is probably that the flu shot was used to seed the virus so it really doesn't matter if 50 percent of the population didn't get this shot. If this is true, people who got sick were spreading virus to those people who hadn't gotten the shot ... so it seems possible.
And I still think the big spike in "Covid deaths "might be tied to the flu vaccines of the next flu season. My theory is Covid was spreading widely in November 2019 - with no noticeable deaths. I don't know why "Round 2" - a later wave - would be so much more lethal than the first wave of cases the prior year.
mRNA + weakened immune systems and self-infection from masking, that whole petri dish across faces thing. Bodies already fighting off serial infections, re-infections from continuous exposure to full spectrum of pathogens, meets up with vaccine, vaccine shedding, presents a bigger problem to it than normal functioning immune system capable of defending itself.
I completely agree w/Bill's description in his brief stack bio that the conventional wisdom aka "the Narrative" is often wrong. And in this case, the MSM narrative of the "origins mystery" is simply a big diversion & useless quest. Keeps everyone going around in circles while avoiding the crux of the scam-demic. Check out The Viral Delusion doc (bitchute etc) & Mike Stone'sViroLIEgy .com for valuable info.
One little tidbit to add to your Wuhan Military Games spread theory. When the Canadian Contingent came back with so many sick soldiers, they were told not to discuss their illness.
Would key swing states been able to change voting rules without legislative approval (the legal route) unless there was a “pandemic emergency” that required unprecedented levels of absentee voting? Which 2020 candidate benefited from mostly unsupervised voting and ballot counting in large suburban areas? Sometimes the simplest answer is the most viable.
Fauci is getting ready to be interviewed. I wish someone would ask him this question: When did America's science community develop a Covid antibody test?
Follow-up question: Why didn't the Science Community start using this test ASAP as soon as it was developed?
Third question: When did the CDC actually test the first tranche of Red Cross "archived" blood (that was collected Dec. 13-16, 2019)?
We know a PCR Covid test had been developed by mid-January (although it was used only to test a few people who had returned from China). Couldn't our best and brightest scientists have also produced a Covid antibody test by some point in January as well?
I would think antibody tests are used all the time and are not that hard to create. I've found several published papers from Chinese scientists who reference Covid antibody tests they were giving patients in January 2020.
Congress questioners could nail Fauci on charges of "dereliction of duty" if they could prove scientists intentionally delayed using antibody tests, which of course could be used to provide evidence of "early infections'' - which equates to "early spread."
The point I'm getting at is that CDC officials could have already tested those early tranches of Red Cross blood days or weeks before they ordered the lockdowns. For all we know, those sera samples had already been tested ... which would mean officials knew evidence of "early spread" already existed .... and they still ordered the lockdowns.
More likely, though, is that they intentionally delayed testing that blood ... probably because they knew what those tests would/might reveal. That tells me some key players in this production knew "early spread" had already happened.
For those who might not know, the CDC published the results of the "Red Cross antibody study" on November 30, 2020 - 11 1/2 months AFTER the first tranche of "archived" blood had been collected (on Dec. 13-16, 2019).
In other words, it took almost a year to test and publish the results of just 1900 units of blood.
I think fewer than 2,000 units of blood could have been tested for antibodies in a couple of days - certainly before the lockdowns.
And if those results showed 2.03 percent "positives" (as they did), the next thing honest officials would have done based on those results is order the testing of a lot more tranches of archived blood - from all regions of the country and all weeks and months before "official Covid."
FWIW, 2.03 percent positive from one sample extrapolated to the entire country = 7.4 million possible early cases. And those cases wouldn't date to December 13-16, 2019, they'd date to November 2019 or earlier because it takes at least a week or two for antibodies to develop. In other words, those blood donors weren't infected with this virus they day before they donated blood.
It also occurs to me that it really wouldn't make sense for the virus to be intentionally released onto the world ... if they were just going to deny that a virus was previously spreading (which is what they did).
This quick thought leads me to conclude any "novel virus" accidentally escaped. They then turned lemons into lemonade when the China announced a new virus to the scientific community on Dec. 31, 2019?
Or, I guess, maybe someone wanted to see how the virus affected people after it had been released/escaped? Even if "they" knew a virus had escaped much earlier than reported, they would have been monitoring hospitals and morgues and funeral homes and would have quickly known their virus wasn't "deadly." I still think that's the most important fact they wanted to cover up and had to cover-up.
They wanted people to think the opposite - that this WAS a very deadly virus. When one starts thinking of all things they would have had to do to to prove that a non-deadly virus WAS "deadly," you get one sinister plot.
I always thought the whole point of the virus was to push the vaxx, and they had to change the start of the virus "escape-release" so that the virus could be detected everywhere, all at once to lock down the world, then roll out the vaxx to save humanity less than a year later.
Who knows all of the layers of this cake, though, really, outside of a few three letter agencies?
Mr. Mustard in the Lobby with the knife.
I'll offer $50 straight up for you copy of the game?
Is it a deal?
~
Merry Christmas and I hope Alabama beats the shit out of Michigan and Florida State got ripped off and now they are suing the ACC - pandemonium seems around the corner, but maybe wiser heads will prevail?
I know this - there is no way in hell the flu disappeared when they said it did - liars!
~
'24 is going to be better cause the pendulum is swinging back....
Go Bama!
I hope Bama wins it all for one reason - it will prove the experts who didn't want Bama selected to the field were ... wrong. Most people - per the narrative - say it's a "travesty" FSU was left out. Well, what if Alabama wins two more games and prove they are the best team? Wouldn't it have been a real "travesty" to keep the best team out of the tournament?
... The suddenly disappearing flu is one of the whoppers of all the whoppers. NY State went from 17,400 "confirmed" flu tests to about 40 in a couple of weeks. Huh? How does that happen?
FSU got screwed - but how is anybody gonna pick the "4 teams" and you and I both know on any given day any given team could prevail....so there won't be too much to be concluded whatever the outcome is, but still - I hope Bama beats the daylights out of the wolverines - whats a wolverine anyhow - some sort of pretend wolf!
I like the Wolfpack out of NC State, but I'm biased.
~~~~~
Hey - lets drop this all for the moment and pretend the flu ain't happening (even though I think I just had it this last week...and I KNOW it did not "go away" - bs that is.....), and enjoy this fine music from the girl from Ipanema along with a fine drummer amazing and some dutch jazz artist:
https://youtu.be/13YKO0Vwz8E
(for the sake of being respectful - tis Astrud Gilberto - she recently passed - she has tone)
****
edit - just checked out the wolverine - that thing looks like a badger to me...
Go Pack!
That's why they created a Committee in the first place. Any decision was going to be subjective.
I thought Alabama had one of the best 4 teams last year. Alabama wouldn't have gotten blown out in the national title game 65-7 ... like TCU did. Alabama would have blown out TCU too.
I don't remember anyone saying last year that Alabama was screwed. And TCU was not even a conference champion. They were beat by Kansas State in the conference championship game - The same K-State Alabama beat by 30 points in the Sugar Bowl.
I don't deny Alabama has a good team - not at all. Nor do I deny they didn't earn a "ticket" to "Final 4" college football championship. Lastly, it is subjective, so you can't please everyone.....Still - must be hard to have a "perfect" record against decent opposition and NOT get an invite....oh well.
I haven't really been following things that closely, but I thought I read they are changing the "format" next year - this is it I think:
~
"The College Football Playoff will expand from four teams to 12 next season. This version of the playoff field will include the six highest-ranked conference champions. Those teams will receive automatic bids. The top four teams will receive a first-round bye to the quarterfinals."
~
That is not a bad idea and probably should diminish controversy associated with having to pick "just 4", but seems like that could be quite a few extra games for the teams that make it to the overall Championship game.
~
Regardless, sometimes it is nice to have diversions like watching a ball game.....
~
Merry Christmas to you and yours!
BK
Karma... FSU lobbied vigorously against the 12 team playoff to begin in 2023.
Last year ’Bama lost 2 games by a collective total of 3 points. One of the losses came on the last play of the game.
Mean Mr. Mustard?
What about polythene Pam?
(ha, ha)
~
BK
I think they deliberately painted the origin stories with a wide brush for the purpose of capturing as wide a demographic as possible.
Initially they ran with the novel natural origin bat-pangolin-wet market story. They kept it up even when some researchers expressed skepticism.
After they maxed out the arms full o serum on that story they shifted gears to the unnatural monster from the Wuhan Petri dish!
They got the remaining skeptics running to the needle on that story because if it’s man-made ANYTHING is possible!
Now it’s all swept under the rug because they want everyone believing whatever narrative suits them as long as they remain afraid of the spiky orb.
The stories have done their jobs. Variants are always lurking ‘round the corner. So don’t throw out your magic masks yet, there’s an overcycled fraudulent PCR test swab in a box somewhere awaiting our attention!
That's my conclusion too. Whatever the "narratives" were they worked.
I keep making a big deal about the Red Cross antibody study, which I say should have been publicized in the days before the lockdowns. It was easy to neutralize any fallout from that study ... they just delayed the publication of that paper until the end of November 2020 - actually after the election results.
By that time, lockdowns had been going on for seven months and the first vaccines were already in store rooms of some pharmacies.
When the story was published, it made hardly any splash. I doubt NBC Nightly News even ran a story ... or if they ran one it wasn't the top story of the day.
There's lots of ways to control awkward narratives. The easiest is don't investigate something ... but sometimes just delaying investigations is enough too.
Yes, manipulation raised to an art form. Most of the skilled TV watching crowd didn’t know what hit ‘em. For those that could see through the mist it was equal parts terrifying and frustrating. There ain’t no rest for the wicked.
Those damn test - full of false positives - the fact they still use them - tis most incriminating - proves complicity.
If you imply PCR, I'm aware of very little "testing" with the likely-valid 15 "cycles" (doubling amplifications). It was mostly 44 cycles.
Exactly - false positives - the whole thing is a sick joke upon humanity - courtesy the effing DoD.
Fauci shrugs off the almost total absence of pneumonia, bronchitis and influenza cases during Covid. Where’d they go? They imply masking and distancing rendered them defeated for the first time in history. I call bullshit. What happened is, they were all incorrectly diagnosed as Covid via the crap PCR tests. Those patients were treated with Remdesivir which did them no good. When they got worse they shoved a ventilator down their throat which killed most of them. Then chalked it up to a Covid death. It was fucking murder. But Medicare paid and extra 15% and Remdesivir is very expensive. Everybody wins. Except the dead people.
An alternative origins proposal, developed according to The Prime Directive of criminal research, which is to follow the money trail:
1) DARPA developed this virus in a lab located on premises of UNC at Chapel Hill NC. DARPA has (present tense) several similar labs operating; at least one of which was located in Ukraine. DARPA has partners in this research; among them are China and MI6. I do not believe Russia is (or ever has been) involved.
2) DARPA at the behest of the CDC pushed developmental research off to a jointly-owned facility in Wuhan, thus complying to the letter of Congressional rulings on the onshore development of lethality-enhanced viruses, avoiding scrutiny, and creating arm's-length plausible deniability.
3) Pfizer and Moderna (two of what may be many in the corporate world) were involved in this virus's development. Fauci's announcement of creating a gold rush for sale of stock in companies that developed "vaccines", and his comments about market growth for those products - made during 2020 and 2021 - strongly suggest that the virus and its "cures" were developed as a two-part endeavor.
4) Several western governments signed multi-million dollar purchase orders for products labeled as vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna - purchase orders that contained liability limitations for the vendors. These purchases were funded with someone else's money, that of the taxpayers, who had no say in this purchase.
5) The release from Wuhan was deliberate; the timing was designed to cripple the booming Trump economy prior to the next US election cycle. Trump's people were getting too close to succeeding in revealing the depth and spread of corruption in both the elected government and the bureaucratic state. FusionGPS's strategy had failed, so something more dramatic and powerful was needed. The virus/vax release was the only available option, one that offered the bonus of collateral economic benefits alongside a good chance of success in achieving its main goal, the defeat of Trump in 2020..
Excellent points. This one really jumps out at me: "... strongly suggest that the virus and its "cures" were developed as a two-part endeavor."
... You can't have a vaccine without a disease first. But, probably, it doesn't need to be a disease that's really going to wipe out the world - that might kill the Establishment players an their loved ones too.
6) The virus's spread was accelerated via the aforementioned military games, and by willing accomplices in DC such as Nancy Pelosi, who strolled through Chinatown crying racist! at anyone who suggested avoiding contact with new arrivals from the Wuhan region.
7) Y'all can consider the identity of the authors of this entire script. Consider the WHO, its patron saints in the WEF, the actuaries who are always looking for ways to reduce medicare expenses, et al.
I agree that wherever it originated, they knew about it.....and with the military games being in Wuhan, Wuhan does seem to be the place. They immediately jumped on Trump not so much as out of fear that China would be angry with us for his remarks, but to cover up their involvement in its creation ....IF that is where it occurred - Wuhan Virology Lab.
1. Soldiers are not civilians which makes it easier for control and more difficult to track down information.
2. Fauci was the highest paid Federal employee, because he was responsible for the military’s interactions (DARPA) with NIH... not Collins.
3. We are still using Fauci baselines like 21 days for incubation.
4. Kerry Mullis (invented PCR) hated Fauci to the core. Mullis said, all along, do not use the PCR as a diagnostic tool. PCR is used as a manufacturing technique. Mullis conveniently died in August 2019.
5. Wet markets are common place in China, the “outbreak” occurred in a city of 12M (Wikipedia distorts the population figures by using 2018 #’s instead of 2020 in order to make it look smaller) which is about the size of Los Angeles. Instead of focusing on the lab... they instead go to the wet market 6 months later to look for clues of a bat infection whose living colony is 750 miles away (El Paso, Texas to Los Angeles).
Great points.
Military members get vaccines all the time and never question this. For some reason, they also have to provide blood samples all the time (at least once a year) - and these blood samples are saved in massive depositories. I still maintain this blood could have been tested for Covid antibodies.
And I have no doubt more military members were "sick" in the months before official Covid than in previous years. Military medical records would prove this ... if we could look at these records or someone did an analysis on ILI visits in November 2019 -February 2020 and compared these figures to prior years for the same months.
I believe the military is covering up evidence of "early spread" by covering up evidence of more "sick" military personnel. Plus, they have this great tranche of archived blood they could go back and test ... which they never did.
It's all the things they didn't do but should have done which make me so confident the military is covering up the real start date of virus spread (with the other alphabet health agencies).
Merry Christmas Bill!
"I can't get no... Satisfaction."
However, I will set aside my frustration with the Tech, Med, Govern, Media and Money experts long enough to pay homage to Jesus, the reason for the season.
Thank you.
(Roll Tide!)
Merry Christmas and RTR to you too!
Only one problem. NO virus has EVER been isolated. So, this is just another psyOp. No jab will ever be "safe" or "effective", period.
"Isolating a virus" means rinsing out the nasal passages and sinuses with alcohol, then preserving it with dry ice. You first.
what a load of crap - so many words and the point is all the way down here in the comments... what a waste of time... go write novels or something.
Why are you running cover for them? Are you now sponsored by Pfizer?
"oh it was accidental" there was nothing accidental about it'... or perhaps I missed your point here mixed with all the nonsense.
Just take the short path to the answer, they told us it was going to happen, they war gamed it out, it happened and they all got in line and sang the same song....
I am not buying any of this because "Covid" has never been proven to exist despite what the virologists say. Steve Kirsch attempted to defend the position that there is such a thing as pathogenic viruses but failed miserably. Watch this "informal" debate. https://rumble.com/v1dcl8l-i-interview-virus-denier-patrick-gunnels-to-clarify-his-views.html?fbclid=IwAR0WAazaKuhf0_7KDnYOu27HCU0004VMkrR0NAPY9_N3g9AW9GcgLkrynn0
It might be true that no novel "Covid virus" even exists. However, my evidence and research shows me that tens of millions more Americans than normal were sick of "something" in the weeks and months before official Covid.
So where is the theory that explains what was causing all of these extra "sick" people - right before official Covid?
Do the people who don't think a novel virus (or any virus) exists agree with me that more people were becoming sick in the winter of 2019-2020? One assumes people were going to the doctor and getting many more flu tests .... for some reason. They couldn't have all been imagining they were sick when they really weren't.
So we have a great unexplained "coincidence" of many more people coming down with ILI/Covid symptoms ... right before Covid. I agree this could be a coincidence, but it's an interesting one to me ... and one that hasn't gotten much attention ... or no convincing reason has been proffered that might explain this.
For its part, the CDC later (dramatically) revised its estimates of "sick people" in this particular flu season ... which is interesting to me as well.
If you're talking about China and Italy you're talking about people with atypical pneumonia caused by air pollution, a long-standing problem. We can also blame the media for all their fear porn which resulted in people running to the hospital when normally they would have stayed home. And how true were the reports of an increase in ill people? You cannot trust anything from the CDC. 99% of people with a positive Covid test were asymptomatic but they were all lumped together as a positive case based on tests that were not designed to measure infection. Furthermore a real-life isolated sample of the "virus" was never utilized. All cell cultures were contaminated and no controls were instituted. There is nothing unique about Covid. All the observable symptoms can be seen in other so-called infectious diseases. The only way they were able to declare that Covid was novel was through PCR tests that only meaured genetic fragnents and pieced together through competely speculative computer simulations. So no I think the entire "pandemic" was manufactured.
I agree 100 percent that the PCR test was the key to the operation to create a "deadly" virus. But before we had a "deadly virus," we just had a spreading virus - The deaths didn't come in large numbers until early March 2020 (in northern Italy) and then in New York City in late March and April 2020. There were hardly any "early deaths" in ... China (less than 200 by the end of January, if we believe Chinese reports).
I also agree we can't necessarily trust the CDC with its weekly ILI reports. However, to support my theory that MORE people were sick in the winter of 2019-2020 (than normal), I don't use only CDC data. I use all kinds of contemporaneous journalism from the time that quotes doctors as saying a lot of sick people were showing up in waiting rooms and emergency rooms.
I also resort back to my own personal memories and I know for a fact I was sick (and my two kids were sick) and about 1/3 of my town seemed to be sick of "something" in December 2019 and January 2020. It was my wife, a high school teacher, that told me that one half of her students were out sick in one day in late January 2020. That wasn't the CDC telling me that.
These students (and teachers) weren't skipping school for contrived reasons - they were really sick ... just like I was. And this wasn't happening just in Troy, Alabama.
So what! Go back a few years and you'll see articles talking about how the hospitals were overloaded with flu patients with comparable symptoms.
Even if your assumption is correct that there were MORE than usual sick people there is no proof that it was due to pathogenic viruses.
Read Mike Stone's ViroLIEgy Newsletter which has all kinds of scientific information why the pathogenicity of viruses is unproven.
The fraud goes back to the beginning. Just look at the history.
Yep Turfseer, no actual proof of contagious/pathogenic viruses at all, ever.
Dr Stefan Lanka, German microbiologist, has proven this most definitively.
FYI In 2017-18 I was really sick over the holidays i(never get sick ordinarily) w/a really bad "body flu" on my visit home to OK. Aches, pains, fever & dry heaves - not a "typical flu" - & so had to delay my flight home another week. No-one freaked out then or quarantined or thought it was esp unusual at the time as lots of folks there had experienced this body flu.
So everyone just told me then, it's gonna be fine & is over in a week at most. No big deal. Btw - Look up the flu online during 2017-2018 & notice the MSM alarmism at the time.
> Flu broke records for deaths, illnesses in 2017-2018, new CDC numbers ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/last-years-flu-broke-records-for-deaths-and-illnesses-new-cdc-numbers-show/2018/09/26/97cb43fc-c0ed-11e8-90c9-23f963eea204_story.html
> Sep 26, 2018 - Flu broke records for deaths, illnesses in 2017-2018, new CDC numbers show By Lena H. Sun
This hyped-up, over-arching flu alarmism has been going on now since at least 2009 with the so-called "swine flu epidemic" (that wasn't!) in order to sell lots of farma products - like the flu shot.
> Der Spiegel 2010: Reconstruction of the Swine Flu Mass Hysteria of 2009
The great hysteria pandemic attempt by the WHO and the governing classes that failed - Der Spiegel magazine - 2 Aug 20
https://anti-empire.com/der-spiegel-2010-reconstruction-of-the-swine-flu-mass-hysteria-of-2009/
So... we've had bad flus & bad respiratory illnesses etc over the years and these can be explained as our bodies' clearing toxins or chemicals - drugs & vaxx too - from our bodies as natural processes. Colds, flus, etc clearing toxins or poisons from our bodies as a regular, annual, seasonal process. Clearing out accumulated toxins - food additives, insecticides/pesticides, geoengineering chemicals in our air/water, the effects of EMFs/WiFi/5G on our bodies, etc. But viruses are the go-to coverups for industrial pollution.
You nailed it.
THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG. The Germ Theory Opposed in Song. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-chicken-or-the-egg
...or...whatever it was came from the 2019 new biotech formulation of the flue jab...as I've dropped on your posts about this subject before with extensive documentation as to why that makes sense, that you've acknowledged and said warrants further investigation. So there's that.
It's on my (too long) list to "investigate" such as I can. You stay on it too!
I was sick in January 2020 - along with both my children. We never got the flu shots. However, your theory is probably that the flu shot was used to seed the virus so it really doesn't matter if 50 percent of the population didn't get this shot. If this is true, people who got sick were spreading virus to those people who hadn't gotten the shot ... so it seems possible.
And I still think the big spike in "Covid deaths "might be tied to the flu vaccines of the next flu season. My theory is Covid was spreading widely in November 2019 - with no noticeable deaths. I don't know why "Round 2" - a later wave - would be so much more lethal than the first wave of cases the prior year.
mRNA + weakened immune systems and self-infection from masking, that whole petri dish across faces thing. Bodies already fighting off serial infections, re-infections from continuous exposure to full spectrum of pathogens, meets up with vaccine, vaccine shedding, presents a bigger problem to it than normal functioning immune system capable of defending itself.
Working theory, anyways.
Correct
I completely agree w/Bill's description in his brief stack bio that the conventional wisdom aka "the Narrative" is often wrong. And in this case, the MSM narrative of the "origins mystery" is simply a big diversion & useless quest. Keeps everyone going around in circles while avoiding the crux of the scam-demic. Check out The Viral Delusion doc (bitchute etc) & Mike Stone'sViroLIEgy .com for valuable info.
Thanks for keeping us informed Bill.
The clowns you wrote about have zero funny qualities. They are, however, "laughable" in a certain sense.
One little tidbit to add to your Wuhan Military Games spread theory. When the Canadian Contingent came back with so many sick soldiers, they were told not to discuss their illness.
Would key swing states been able to change voting rules without legislative approval (the legal route) unless there was a “pandemic emergency” that required unprecedented levels of absentee voting? Which 2020 candidate benefited from mostly unsupervised voting and ballot counting in large suburban areas? Sometimes the simplest answer is the most viable.