Thoughts on the Great Origins Mystery

For some of us, solving the ‘origins mystery’ is like an addictive parlor game. We’re all playing this game because we don’t think the virus sleuths are looking at the most-important clues.

Maybe some master player for the popular board game can solve the mystery of our ages. For my money, the No. 1 suspect should perhaps be the lead investigator.

Correctly or plausibly investigated, the origins mystery would look at all possible origin locations and dates. Four years into this game of Clue, all we know is only one “origin” theory has been “investigated” … and this  alleged “investigation” strikes at least some of us as bogus or suspect.

According to the “authorized narrative,” the virus definitely originated in Wuhan; the only questions are when and where. 

At first, the “authorized narrative” was that the virus jumped species from a live market in Wuhan in mid-December 2019. 

This theory should carry great weight because that’s the theory the Powers that Be clearly wanted to push. In fact, anyone who didn’t go along with that theory was cancelled.

In May 2021, thanks largely to a very rare “narrative-changing’ article written by Nicholas Wade, it was okay to at least consider the lab-leak/escape theory. Still, the only lab anyone was looking at was the WIV.

“U.S. Intelligence” chimed in (as told by their “partners” at The Wall Street Journal) and said three lab workers at WIV got sick enough to be hospitalized in “November.” (We don’t know when in November - - which is odd, as there should be hospital records of these three people that tell us if they were admitted to a hospital and, if so, on what date).

Anyway, November 2019 is now “in play” as the possible birthdate of Covid spread.

I maintain The Wall Street Journal’s big “news scoop” is moot and irrelevant as my research shows that hundreds of people in multiple countries (and at least eight U.S. states) likely had Covid antibodies by November 2019 - and none of these people had been to Wuhan.

It’s simply bizarre no CDC, NIH or WHO officials have ever investigated any possible early cases that occurred outside of Wuhan. 

The fact such cases are taboo or off-limits to official investigators suggests to me that the key players are determined to ensure that the “Wuhan” origination theory remains the only possible/accepted theory.

While everyone focuses on one lab (the WIV), I think the dates of the alleged escape event (December or November 2019) are just as important to the official narrative.

If the virus did escape much earlier than November (in Wuhan or anywhere), common sense tells me some people know this. One would also think these people would know the place and the exact date of the original lab escape.

Giving Fauci et al the benefit of the doubt …

However, it’s at least possible the braintrust of the U.S. Science Establishment (Fauci, Collins, Birx, et al) didn’t know of any early lab leak or, for that matter, they were clueless that a “novel virus” could have been spreading around the world months earlier.

Remember that Chinese officials didn’t even report (to the WHO) a novel virus that was causing pneumonia symptoms until Dec. 31, 2019.

However, to me, it defies common sense that after this date, public health officials wouldn’t at least consider the possibility this virus had actually been infecting people for many weeks or months before this.

In my last big “Influenza-Like Illness” story, I included a section that showed that ILI reports in Georgia were far above national baseline figures for at least 12 weeks in a row, beginning in November 2019. 

By the last week in December 2019, the ILI percentage in Georgia was 12.2 percent (compared to the national baseline of 2.4 percent).

This means more than 12 percent of people who went to a doctor or emergency room in the state of Georgia this week reported ILI symptoms (fever, cough, etc), which are of course identical to Covid symptoms.

I also noted that most people who are sick don’t go to the doctor so the ILI reports are capturing only a fraction of “sick” people.

CDC employees were no doubt sick from

Covid before the Wuhan outbreak …

I mention the state of Georgia because the CDC is located in …. Atlanta, Georgia.

The thought occurs to me that among the thousands of CDC employees living in the Atlanta metro area, there must have been hundreds who were out sick …. With Covid symptoms in November, December 2019 and also in January 2020.

Question: It never occurred to one of these CDC employees that the symptoms that no doubt caused many of their employees to become “sick” in those months … might have been Covid?

I can make the same point about the state of Maryland, which is where the NIH and NIAID offices are located. This state also had dramatically elevated percentages of ILI beginning in November 2019 and continuing through December and January.

It’s virtually certain that large numbers of NIH employees were also sick with Covid symptoms … before the Chinese made their report to the WHO.

I actually can’t help but wonder if NIH and CDC employees didn’t save blood and tissue samples from when their own employees were sick … and then test them for antibodies or with a PCR test.

That is, “evidence of early spread” could probably be found among the labor force of the CDC and NIH. For all the public knows, that evidence might still exist and has been covered up for years.

If neither agency thought to test its own employees or investigate possible early cases, this would prove either professional incompetence, malfeasance or some form of epidemiological malpractice … charges that would be worth “proving” IMO.

Let’s go back to Wuhan …

Above, I mention possible “virus origination” dates in Wuhan, but only mention the months of December and November 2019.

As most people who peruse the the alternative press know, a big possible outbreak of “Covid” might have occurred in this city in mid-to-late October, when the city hosted the World Military Games (WMG).

From multiple sources, at least “hundreds” of athletes and visitors from numerous nations came down with ILI symptoms while at these Games. 

To this day, nobody knows definitely if all or some percentage of these athletes had “early” Covid. We don’t know this because we’ve never read of any big study of sick World Military Games athletes who later received Covid antibody tests.

Why were no World Military Games’ visitors tested for antibodies?

I’ve learned in my research that China was administering Covid antibody tests in January 2020.

So by January or certainly by February, someone could have easily identified every athlete who attended those games who became sick while at the games or shortly after leaving Wuhan.

Antibody tests given in February or even early March 2020 would have occurred four to five months after these athletes experienced “onset of symptoms.” This is not ideal as studies prove antibodies can fade in many people in two or three months.

Still, there’s no good reason that public health officials (or military doctors) couldn’t test every athlete who was sick for antibodies. In fact, it would have been thorough to go ahead and give all 10,000+ visitors to those games an antibody test. And also check their medical records and interview them about any symptoms they may have experienced in this time period.

To me, the fact this apparently never happened is a massive “red flag” that something stinks in every public health agency in the world.

Something that should have happened - and easily could have happened, but didn’t happen - is worth a few official questions … even today.

I also note that every one of these delegations travelled with military doctors, trainers and nurses.

I’ve also learned the U.S. military has the most comprehensive medical data base in the world. If any military member goes to a doctor with a cough, there’s a record of this in this mega database.

America is the land of the free, but it’s also the land of the never-ending “intelligence” agencies … and the military has myriad “intelligence” branches. 

Question: By January 2020, did no person in U.S. military “Intelligence” know that hundreds of people had gotten sick in Wuhan China - just two months before the infamous “live market” was held?

It doesn’t necessarily matter if these WMG visitors could be “proven” to have had early Covid via a belated antibody test. What jumps out to me is that nobody in the military or the public health establishment even thought this was worth investigating and, apparently, no antibody tests were administered.

If public health officials did investigate this, where’s the published paper showing their results and conclusions?

Needless to say, if one WMG participant who was sick with Covid symptoms tested positive for Covid antibodies, the entire Covid narrative would be blown up. If 30 athletes tested positive, the authorized narrative would be shown to be a complete sham.

My take-away from the WMG non-case study confirms my main Covid hypothesis, which is that our trusted public health officials will never investigate anything they don’t want to “confirm.”

Why did the military and ‘intelligence community’ co-opt so

many areas of a public health emergency?

The more I try to connect key Covid dots, the more convinced I am that military and “intelligence” officials played a much bigger role in orchestrating what’s probably a faux pandemic than most people realize.

For example, thanks to reporting of Substack authors like Sasha Latypova, we know that the military took over the real leadership in the “vaccine” program - and these shots shouldn’t even be considered “vaccines,” according to Sasha. 

I also keep finding reports that shady military or intelligence officials kept showing up at key pandemic events (which usually involved administering the new PCR tests to show proof of outbreaks).

If they were sincerely interested in solving the “origins” question, the military and its doctors would have been contacting every participant at the WMG … in early January 2020. 

They would also be scouring those military data bases to see if more service members were going to sick bay with ILI symptoms in late 2019 and the first two months of 2020.

And I don’t give Team Fauci a pass either, because I sense Dr. Fauci - the master career bureaucrat -  knows everything that’s going on in the government science world and was well aware that his agency and the military had merged many years earlier to do “vaccine” and “virus” research.

If a virus had escaped from any lab (either in Wuhan or Ft. Detrick or any of the other hundreds of labs funded by the U.S. tax payers), Fauci probably would have known this. If he didn’t know this by Dec. 31st, 2019, it would have occurred to him by, say … January 2nd.

What I currently think about all the origins’ speculation and conjecture …

The U.S. Science braintrust, probably including Fauci, either already knew or quickly figured out that this virus escaped from a lab(s) that had been heavily funded by several U.S. government agencies, including the NIH and NIAID.

The “Live Market Theory” was concocted and then heavily and fraudulently promoted to make sure any honest virus-origins investigators didn’t investigate the right things (including the possibility of much-earlier spread).

Even when the natural-origins theory was challenged , the Powers that Be still pushed the “virus origins” start-date of December 2019. Today, they also seem okay with the version that says a lab-leak might have occurred in Wuhan in November 2019.

The key point for the “authorized narrative” is that the virus definitely hadn’t infected anyone outside of China prior to November 2019.

It seems to me everyone is focussed primarily on either the “live market” or one bioweapons lab in Wuhan. 

Nobody is focussed on symptomatic potential cases that occurred at the same time or earlier in other places in the world. The fact the “timeline” being used by Clue detectives is restricted to just two months is clearly perfectly fine with the people who must know that timeline is off by months.

It’s hard to solve a “Who-Dunit?” when the virus detectives might be the real perpetrators of the crime. 

Regarding the Great Virus Origins Mystery, I’ve always had this question: Who is investigating the investigators?