My wife just told me a tragic story that makes me glad I published this story today. Apparently, a 14-year-old boy in our town (who goes to the same middle school as my daughter) was found dead this morning. I don't know for sure, but it sounds like it's most likely a suicide.
From details of this child's life story, I wouldn't be surprised if he was on some kind of anti-depressant/anti-anxiety medicine and/or a drug like Ritalin. These drugs can CAUSE suicide or "suicidal thoughts."
This is one taboo story the mainstream press refuses to tell. (I remember Tucker Carlson aired several stories about this possibility).
Of course, maybe this 8th grade child wasn't on any drugs, but increasing numbers of younger and younger children are ... and suicides and suicide attempts are increasing.
It would follow that Big Pharma does NOT want any narrative-changing stories to "go viral" about the negative effects of these drugs ... And none have.
I also just read that the 14-year-old son of a former NY Yankee just died suddenly "in his sleep" while on a vacation to Florida. This sounds like it could be another vaccine death. All I know is we used to not hear about so many sudden deaths of 13 and 14 year-olds.
DR. ROCHAGNÉ KILIAN: NBC News reported on October 26, 2021 4:18 pm [Reading] FDA advisory panel OKs Pfizer vaccine for children 5 to 11 years old. [Stops reading]
And this one I'm going to read from their own piece of paper.
[Reading] FDA advisory panel OKs Pfizer vaccine for children 5 to 11 years. A smaller dose of the Pfizer BioNTech covid 19 vaccine cleared its first regulatory hurdle Tuesday. For use in young children after Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committee voted to recommend it for Emergency Use Authorization for those aged 5 to 11. The 17 - zero vote with one abstention will now go to the FDA which is expected to make a a final ruling in the coming days. If authorized, the move would make nearly the entire US population eligible for a covid shot. Only children ages 4 and younger would remain ineligible.
Despite the vote in favor, deciding whether the benefits of vaccination for young kids outweigh potential risks appeared to weight heavily on the advisors. [Stops reading]
May it weight heavily on their conscience forever.
[applause, whistling, cheers]
14:30
They stated [reading] this is a much tougher one I think than we had expected coming into, said committee member Eric Rubin, editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine. The data show that the vaccine works and it's pretty safe. [stops reading]
His own words.
[Reading] We're worried about a side effect that we can't measure yet. [stops reading]
His own words. And he referred to a condition called myocarditis.
[Reading] Also at issue was whether the vaccinations were needed at all given the generally lower risk of covid to children. [Stops reading] On October 26 in a NBC article.
15:34.
Let me just get my speech again. So despite the hesitations, the FDA approved Pfizer's EUA for children ages 5 to 11. The following is a quote by one of the voting members, H. Cody Meissner, prior to voting.
[Reading] We simply don't know what the side effects are going to be. [stops reading]
H. Cody Meissner.
I can tell you as en ER physician what I saw in adults with this same vaccine that you're planning on using in our children. Is it reasonable to presume that we might see the same adverse effects in our children? And possibly worse?
Let me move forward a couple of days later, spotted in Whitby on a Durham Transit bus, there we go, thank you Ryan. [Holds up and reads from photograph of sign on bus] ]Kids have strokes too. Know the warning signs.
16:43
I am still a doctor. The CPSO did not give me my title. So I tell you, unequivocally, strokes in kids are not normal.
[loud applause, cheers]
Myocarditis in adults, not even speaking about children, is not normal. Heart attacks in kids are not normal. But they might become the new normal if we allow this to go forward.
So now I've been coming— I've kind of had some fame thrown my way because I've asked questions. So I'm going to end my speech today about asking some questions.
Do you think the FDA is willing to risk the life of your child?
AUDIENCE: Yes!
DR. ROCHANGÉ KILIAN: I think we've made it very clear from their own words.
Do you think Dr. Tam, Dr. Dinshaw, Dr. Moore, Dr. Henry, Dr. Ian Arra, is willing to risk the life of your child?
AUDIENCE: Yes!
MAN'S VOICE: Traitors! Liars!
DR. ROCHAGNÉ KILIAN: It really doesn't matter what they answer. I've got one question for you, for every single parent here today. Are you willing to sacrifice your child?
MANY VOICES: No! No! No! No!
DR. ROCHAGNÉ KILIAN: And after you've patiently listened to me today, I'm going to teach you something about the health care that I'm personally going to be working on when we get through this. I'm going to teach you the role of the physician and what my role should be. In my 16 years as a physician I have not told one parent to vaccinate their child.
[applause]
Yes, CTV, quote me. But I have also not told one parent not to vaccinate their child. Because you know what, it wasn't my right to do either.
[applause, cheers]
It was my responsibility to give them the information so that they make that decision for themselves.
So when you go home today, forget about everything I said. I've got the trust of the public at this moment. Stop putting your trust in people. Put it in yourself and put it in your heavenly Father.
[applause]
I do not have the authority to tell you to vaccinate or not vaccinate your child. There is one person only, two people only, that can stand up in protection of their child, and that is the parents. That is where the authority starts and that's where the authority stops.
So I'm going to leave you with one more question. Were you willing to rise in protection of your child when they forced them to wear masks? Did you rise in protection of your child when they forced them to isolate? Did you rise in protection of your child they were taught a new normal of socialization that we still haven't seen the effects of in our children?
This is the next battle. Are you willing to rise in protection of your children to stop them from injecting them with an experimental biologic? Nobody can answer question that except you.
Thank you, Transcriber B. The vaccination of children is certainly one of the greatest crimes of our Covid era. There's so many crimes, though. And they were all pushed by Big Pharma and the Health Care Establishment. People need to think about that.
Bill— you're right. I would add though that their pushing found a ready response in so many people who so ardently wanted to believe it all— that they could just turn to an "expert" and get the injection of the "modern" potion and then their fears would melt away...
It has been amazing to witness the past few years. I wouldn't have said this in 2020, but now I do: I can only conclude that for so many people "vaccines" are actually a secular religious belief, their doctors serving as some kind of clergy. In the faithfuls' way of thinking, if you take the "vaccines" the "experts" / doctors /high priests offer, then you're "good" / modern / clean / pious; if you don't, then you're "bad" / backwards / dirty / impious.
It's absurd, these covid jabs are so obviously ineffective and killing and injuring people, but there you have it.
Exactly as planned. Divide us over a 'life and death' issue. We choose sides. "They" cause the hostility between us. Job done. We have lost a daughter (mentally not physically) over this evil nonsense. She has vowed to have no children or have anything to do with us ever again. The evil is real and walking among us.
My stories almost always run long, but I do cut some text. For example, I cut out this paragraph where I expound on psycho paths. My thought is that psychopaths are smart enough to know they shouldn't be viewed as such a person:
At some level, psychopaths and sociopaths sense they are different than other people and recognize that, to prosper in the world, it is vital that peers and neighbors NOT identify/expose them as such a person.
The nightmare outcome of important “Pack journalism” will never occur if the entire pack is/was “captured.”
…. The type stories I’m referencing would tell the world that the Bad Guys were people and companies most citizens probably once viewed as the Good Guys.
Many years ago, an astute person coined the term “pack journalist,” a term which explains how journalists all focus on the same topics or support or accept the same authorized narratives.
However, once in a while, the best journalists also respond in pack mode after they become aware of a scandal that rings true to them.
When this happens, numerous smart journalists - all seeking to expose villains (and perhaps make a splash in their profession) work as a team to expose villains.
If and when this pack approach to “exposing important truths” commences, real villains could suddenly find themselves in dire straits.
I don't think they are psychopaths. They are just self centered egotistical humans that believe they can improve on god's design. Throwing a mRNA money wrench into the complex human cells is criminal.
God has already addressed each member of "the lucrative racket" - 1 Timothy 6:10 For the love of money is the root of ALL evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and PIERCED themselves through with many sorrows.
Thanks for this link. The payoffs (bribes) are endemic across all sectors. And they get to "print" the money to come up with these bribes ... which causes inflation, another silent killer and stress producer.
I just came across your articles a few weeks ago. I very much enjoy your writing, I find it rational and compelling.
I am sorry I can't pay you anything for your work, you certainly deserve paying but I am in New Zealand and have no means of transferring funds across borders on a regular basis.
I have a theory about all of this that may be of interest, or not. I think that they may have been after a Merriks Chicken disease type situation, but for humans. The use of a leaky vaccine caused it to become so lethal that while a vaccinated chicken can tolerate the disease, any unvaccinated chicken that comes into contact with it is dead within days. Think of the profits to be made.
Also, in recent years, a passport was given as a reward for compliance. With a Merricks situation, that could be flipped on it's head, so that they could demand you accept a pass in order to get your "life saving" jabs.
That was certainly a potential outcome but NOT the target. Even though the globalists are happy to sacrifice any number of regular folk they do draw the line at indiscriminate danger being in society. Those things that cannot be avoided on a personal level are removed (asbestos, mercury, lead, firearms, free speech, free movement) on a global level by regulation so that the globalists can live in healthy environment even if it costs the regular folk more to live but does not affect the globalists negatively.
In the same way they are only to happy to recommend and mandate jabs for the masses but CAN and WILL avoid them personally. A uncontrolled viral strain that would kill everyone who is not jabbed with a dangerous product is NOT on their list of goals.
This same reason is why the whole chemtrail psy-op is a joke. No self centered globalist would poison the air they breathe, sure they are more than happy if you believe this is the case (and almost certainly encourage the divisive propaganda) but they do not NEED to actually poison the air, it is enough that they let a block of people THINK the air is poisoned and waste everyone's time and increase the level of fear for the gullible.
You make a solid point. I do so appreciate having a conversation with another thinker because sometimes you'll pick up things you've missed when you see something through someone else's eyes. People in general seem less and less able to do this nowadays. Thankyou for the input.
I still think that the digital gulag is one of their main end games, I just don't see how they thought that they would get there with the tools that they used.
Digital gulag is a viable goal. It does not affect them as they will have special status either as visiting diplomats or some other handy privilege.
The digital control is going to be hard to achieve globally. While GSM and StarLink coverage is near global it does not cover everywhere and is going to be very hard to cover those who choose not to participate.
In the past you could be homeless in many countries and have a Poste-restante address where you could be reached by mail. You might have need of a physical address (with linked utility bill) to be able to open a regular bank account. Still if you wanted to you were able to live most anywhere if you were in a free country.
With digital control they would want to manage your freedom and dictate that you be permanently connected to the net. This is very handy but cannot be trivially mandated because payments via phone or purchase of road tolls and parking or commuter tickets does need an alternative due to network outages. It does not matter how fast and widespread the 5G network it you still need to be able to use an alternative when there are outages. When this is realised the outages will increase and the value of cash and a passive transit pass will become obvious to workers who want to get to work.
So yes, the digital gulag is a very convenient way to control but it will not have total cover. GPS tracking location services do not work around military installations due to spoofing, load shedding causes sporadic network outages, vandalism will increase and the overhead of maintaining the growing number of 5G and eventually 6G microcells will become uneconomic to maintain. Mesh networking via th users devices may be considered but I don't think it is viable for high bandwidth and gives the users too much control (Faraday cage bags by everyone in a region would shut down the mesh network.
The mistake the globalists made is that they thought everyone was trapped into the legacy media and that they could censor the social media well enough but that did not happen. Now there are tens of millions of cautious and skeptical people globally that KNOW the system is bad, they will question things and spread dissent just by being alive.
“The “pill-and-vaccines-for-every-ill” racket could continue indefinitely - or at least for several more decades until current Big Pharma executives were dead and gone.”
Bill there are hundreds and thousands of wannabes being pumped out of universities waiting to take their place.
I pray that the MAHA movement outlaws Pharma advertising. This might move the journalism needle to expose the "make em sick forever" catastrophe we created.
Propaganda well done is stronger than any religion. It can turn previously reasonable people into mindless sheep. Without any evidence to support it. We have witnessed it. I have had absolutely NO luck countering the propaganda with my words.
Something needs to be done, big Pharma has a stranglehold over us and they’re using our children to do it. They use fear to make us comply. We can’t deny that many pharmaceuticals have saved lives. There needs to be some accountability.
My wife just told me a tragic story that makes me glad I published this story today. Apparently, a 14-year-old boy in our town (who goes to the same middle school as my daughter) was found dead this morning. I don't know for sure, but it sounds like it's most likely a suicide.
From details of this child's life story, I wouldn't be surprised if he was on some kind of anti-depressant/anti-anxiety medicine and/or a drug like Ritalin. These drugs can CAUSE suicide or "suicidal thoughts."
This is one taboo story the mainstream press refuses to tell. (I remember Tucker Carlson aired several stories about this possibility).
Of course, maybe this 8th grade child wasn't on any drugs, but increasing numbers of younger and younger children are ... and suicides and suicide attempts are increasing.
It would follow that Big Pharma does NOT want any narrative-changing stories to "go viral" about the negative effects of these drugs ... And none have.
I also just read that the 14-year-old son of a former NY Yankee just died suddenly "in his sleep" while on a vacation to Florida. This sounds like it could be another vaccine death. All I know is we used to not hear about so many sudden deaths of 13 and 14 year-olds.
Relatedly:
Dr. Rochagné Kilian speaks in Collingwood, Ontario 10/30/21
Free Speech Media, posted Oct 30, 2021
https://rumble.com/vohmnh-dr.-rochagn-kilian-speaks-in-collingwood-ontario-103021.html
TRANSCRIPT - EXCERPT
12:45
DR. ROCHAGNÉ KILIAN: NBC News reported on October 26, 2021 4:18 pm [Reading] FDA advisory panel OKs Pfizer vaccine for children 5 to 11 years old. [Stops reading]
And this one I'm going to read from their own piece of paper.
[Reading] FDA advisory panel OKs Pfizer vaccine for children 5 to 11 years. A smaller dose of the Pfizer BioNTech covid 19 vaccine cleared its first regulatory hurdle Tuesday. For use in young children after Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committee voted to recommend it for Emergency Use Authorization for those aged 5 to 11. The 17 - zero vote with one abstention will now go to the FDA which is expected to make a a final ruling in the coming days. If authorized, the move would make nearly the entire US population eligible for a covid shot. Only children ages 4 and younger would remain ineligible.
Despite the vote in favor, deciding whether the benefits of vaccination for young kids outweigh potential risks appeared to weight heavily on the advisors. [Stops reading]
May it weight heavily on their conscience forever.
[applause, whistling, cheers]
14:30
They stated [reading] this is a much tougher one I think than we had expected coming into, said committee member Eric Rubin, editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine. The data show that the vaccine works and it's pretty safe. [stops reading]
His own words.
[Reading] We're worried about a side effect that we can't measure yet. [stops reading]
His own words. And he referred to a condition called myocarditis.
[Reading] Also at issue was whether the vaccinations were needed at all given the generally lower risk of covid to children. [Stops reading] On October 26 in a NBC article.
15:34.
Let me just get my speech again. So despite the hesitations, the FDA approved Pfizer's EUA for children ages 5 to 11. The following is a quote by one of the voting members, H. Cody Meissner, prior to voting.
[Reading] We simply don't know what the side effects are going to be. [stops reading]
H. Cody Meissner.
I can tell you as en ER physician what I saw in adults with this same vaccine that you're planning on using in our children. Is it reasonable to presume that we might see the same adverse effects in our children? And possibly worse?
Let me move forward a couple of days later, spotted in Whitby on a Durham Transit bus, there we go, thank you Ryan. [Holds up and reads from photograph of sign on bus] ]Kids have strokes too. Know the warning signs.
16:43
I am still a doctor. The CPSO did not give me my title. So I tell you, unequivocally, strokes in kids are not normal.
[loud applause, cheers]
Myocarditis in adults, not even speaking about children, is not normal. Heart attacks in kids are not normal. But they might become the new normal if we allow this to go forward.
So now I've been coming— I've kind of had some fame thrown my way because I've asked questions. So I'm going to end my speech today about asking some questions.
Do you think the FDA is willing to risk the life of your child?
AUDIENCE: Yes!
DR. ROCHANGÉ KILIAN: I think we've made it very clear from their own words.
Do you think Dr. Tam, Dr. Dinshaw, Dr. Moore, Dr. Henry, Dr. Ian Arra, is willing to risk the life of your child?
AUDIENCE: Yes!
MAN'S VOICE: Traitors! Liars!
DR. ROCHAGNÉ KILIAN: It really doesn't matter what they answer. I've got one question for you, for every single parent here today. Are you willing to sacrifice your child?
MANY VOICES: No! No! No! No!
DR. ROCHAGNÉ KILIAN: And after you've patiently listened to me today, I'm going to teach you something about the health care that I'm personally going to be working on when we get through this. I'm going to teach you the role of the physician and what my role should be. In my 16 years as a physician I have not told one parent to vaccinate their child.
[applause]
Yes, CTV, quote me. But I have also not told one parent not to vaccinate their child. Because you know what, it wasn't my right to do either.
[applause, cheers]
It was my responsibility to give them the information so that they make that decision for themselves.
So when you go home today, forget about everything I said. I've got the trust of the public at this moment. Stop putting your trust in people. Put it in yourself and put it in your heavenly Father.
[applause]
I do not have the authority to tell you to vaccinate or not vaccinate your child. There is one person only, two people only, that can stand up in protection of their child, and that is the parents. That is where the authority starts and that's where the authority stops.
So I'm going to leave you with one more question. Were you willing to rise in protection of your child when they forced them to wear masks? Did you rise in protection of your child when they forced them to isolate? Did you rise in protection of your child they were taught a new normal of socialization that we still haven't seen the effects of in our children?
This is the next battle. Are you willing to rise in protection of your children to stop them from injecting them with an experimental biologic? Nobody can answer question that except you.
Thank you.
[applause, cheers]
21:03
Thank you, Transcriber B. The vaccination of children is certainly one of the greatest crimes of our Covid era. There's so many crimes, though. And they were all pushed by Big Pharma and the Health Care Establishment. People need to think about that.
Bill— you're right. I would add though that their pushing found a ready response in so many people who so ardently wanted to believe it all— that they could just turn to an "expert" and get the injection of the "modern" potion and then their fears would melt away...
It has been amazing to witness the past few years. I wouldn't have said this in 2020, but now I do: I can only conclude that for so many people "vaccines" are actually a secular religious belief, their doctors serving as some kind of clergy. In the faithfuls' way of thinking, if you take the "vaccines" the "experts" / doctors /high priests offer, then you're "good" / modern / clean / pious; if you don't, then you're "bad" / backwards / dirty / impious.
It's absurd, these covid jabs are so obviously ineffective and killing and injuring people, but there you have it.
I think your assessment is correct. That is what I have observed as well.
Exactly as planned. Divide us over a 'life and death' issue. We choose sides. "They" cause the hostility between us. Job done. We have lost a daughter (mentally not physically) over this evil nonsense. She has vowed to have no children or have anything to do with us ever again. The evil is real and walking among us.
My stories almost always run long, but I do cut some text. For example, I cut out this paragraph where I expound on psycho paths. My thought is that psychopaths are smart enough to know they shouldn't be viewed as such a person:
At some level, psychopaths and sociopaths sense they are different than other people and recognize that, to prosper in the world, it is vital that peers and neighbors NOT identify/expose them as such a person.
Final tranche of cutting-room floor text ....
The nightmare outcome of important “Pack journalism” will never occur if the entire pack is/was “captured.”
…. The type stories I’m referencing would tell the world that the Bad Guys were people and companies most citizens probably once viewed as the Good Guys.
Cutting-room-floor text:
Many years ago, an astute person coined the term “pack journalist,” a term which explains how journalists all focus on the same topics or support or accept the same authorized narratives.
However, once in a while, the best journalists also respond in pack mode after they become aware of a scandal that rings true to them.
When this happens, numerous smart journalists - all seeking to expose villains (and perhaps make a splash in their profession) work as a team to expose villains.
If and when this pack approach to “exposing important truths” commences, real villains could suddenly find themselves in dire straits.
I don't think they are psychopaths. They are just self centered egotistical humans that believe they can improve on god's design. Throwing a mRNA money wrench into the complex human cells is criminal.
If they are not psychopaths, they must be sociopaths? They are NOT like "normal" people with a conscience and basic morality.
Agree. They are amoral and believe experimenting on humans is their God given right!
God has already addressed each member of "the lucrative racket" - 1 Timothy 6:10 For the love of money is the root of ALL evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and PIERCED themselves through with many sorrows.
Good one. It certainly explains a lot.
There are also the "We Can Do This" direct payments made by the government to MSM to support the jabs campaign.
See:
https://docpruyne.substack.com/p/on-journalism-i-know-why-the-caged
See also:
https://www.covid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Paid%20Media%20List%20for%20Posting%207.12.22_508c.pdf
Thanks for this link. The payoffs (bribes) are endemic across all sectors. And they get to "print" the money to come up with these bribes ... which causes inflation, another silent killer and stress producer.
I just came across your articles a few weeks ago. I very much enjoy your writing, I find it rational and compelling.
I am sorry I can't pay you anything for your work, you certainly deserve paying but I am in New Zealand and have no means of transferring funds across borders on a regular basis.
I have a theory about all of this that may be of interest, or not. I think that they may have been after a Merriks Chicken disease type situation, but for humans. The use of a leaky vaccine caused it to become so lethal that while a vaccinated chicken can tolerate the disease, any unvaccinated chicken that comes into contact with it is dead within days. Think of the profits to be made.
Also, in recent years, a passport was given as a reward for compliance. With a Merricks situation, that could be flipped on it's head, so that they could demand you accept a pass in order to get your "life saving" jabs.
That was certainly a potential outcome but NOT the target. Even though the globalists are happy to sacrifice any number of regular folk they do draw the line at indiscriminate danger being in society. Those things that cannot be avoided on a personal level are removed (asbestos, mercury, lead, firearms, free speech, free movement) on a global level by regulation so that the globalists can live in healthy environment even if it costs the regular folk more to live but does not affect the globalists negatively.
In the same way they are only to happy to recommend and mandate jabs for the masses but CAN and WILL avoid them personally. A uncontrolled viral strain that would kill everyone who is not jabbed with a dangerous product is NOT on their list of goals.
This same reason is why the whole chemtrail psy-op is a joke. No self centered globalist would poison the air they breathe, sure they are more than happy if you believe this is the case (and almost certainly encourage the divisive propaganda) but they do not NEED to actually poison the air, it is enough that they let a block of people THINK the air is poisoned and waste everyone's time and increase the level of fear for the gullible.
You make a solid point. I do so appreciate having a conversation with another thinker because sometimes you'll pick up things you've missed when you see something through someone else's eyes. People in general seem less and less able to do this nowadays. Thankyou for the input.
I still think that the digital gulag is one of their main end games, I just don't see how they thought that they would get there with the tools that they used.
Digital gulag is a viable goal. It does not affect them as they will have special status either as visiting diplomats or some other handy privilege.
The digital control is going to be hard to achieve globally. While GSM and StarLink coverage is near global it does not cover everywhere and is going to be very hard to cover those who choose not to participate.
In the past you could be homeless in many countries and have a Poste-restante address where you could be reached by mail. You might have need of a physical address (with linked utility bill) to be able to open a regular bank account. Still if you wanted to you were able to live most anywhere if you were in a free country.
With digital control they would want to manage your freedom and dictate that you be permanently connected to the net. This is very handy but cannot be trivially mandated because payments via phone or purchase of road tolls and parking or commuter tickets does need an alternative due to network outages. It does not matter how fast and widespread the 5G network it you still need to be able to use an alternative when there are outages. When this is realised the outages will increase and the value of cash and a passive transit pass will become obvious to workers who want to get to work.
So yes, the digital gulag is a very convenient way to control but it will not have total cover. GPS tracking location services do not work around military installations due to spoofing, load shedding causes sporadic network outages, vandalism will increase and the overhead of maintaining the growing number of 5G and eventually 6G microcells will become uneconomic to maintain. Mesh networking via th users devices may be considered but I don't think it is viable for high bandwidth and gives the users too much control (Faraday cage bags by everyone in a region would shut down the mesh network.
The mistake the globalists made is that they thought everyone was trapped into the legacy media and that they could censor the social media well enough but that did not happen. Now there are tens of millions of cautious and skeptical people globally that KNOW the system is bad, they will question things and spread dissent just by being alive.
“The “pill-and-vaccines-for-every-ill” racket could continue indefinitely - or at least for several more decades until current Big Pharma executives were dead and gone.”
Bill there are hundreds and thousands of wannabes being pumped out of universities waiting to take their place.
Hopefully JF. Kennedy Jr. reads your post ...🤞🤞🤞
...and gets the best body-guards available on the planet ASAP ...
Edit 25.03.25: RFK Jr.
John Kennedy, Jr. already died in a plane crash many years ago. I don't think bodyguards will help him at this point.
RFK. Jr of course !!! my bad ....
West Virginia Please share.
Vaccine Exemptions FAILED 👇
https://www.weirtondailytimes.com/news/local-news/2025/03/vaccine-exemption-bill-fails-in-west-virginia-house-of-delegates/
I pray that the MAHA movement outlaws Pharma advertising. This might move the journalism needle to expose the "make em sick forever" catastrophe we created.
You nailed it.
Propaganda well done is stronger than any religion. It can turn previously reasonable people into mindless sheep. Without any evidence to support it. We have witnessed it. I have had absolutely NO luck countering the propaganda with my words.
I don't see how anyone can intelligently argue against your analysis, but they will of course. Stupidity or shills?
Something needs to be done, big Pharma has a stranglehold over us and they’re using our children to do it. They use fear to make us comply. We can’t deny that many pharmaceuticals have saved lives. There needs to be some accountability.