108 Comments
User's avatar
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

In one paragraph I write:

And what if “Science” stunned the world by doing real science with a real placebo group and concluded that vaccines almost certainly massively increase a child’s probability of developing autism?

Here I'm thinking of a control group like ... the Amish.

Expand full comment
J Boss's avatar

We already have a 120+ million COVID vaccine control group: the purebloods like me.

Expand full comment
J Boss's avatar

Ok, but a max $15K investment for a rich guy? This isn't Gates investing $50M a few months before a worldwide fake pandemic where govt buys billions and forces on citizens, then sells it a few months before buying stops and death tolls start leaking and making 5X his investment.

CRISPR has been around for decades, used many places for very specific, focused and tiny numbers. That's not to quite the same as 2 billion jabs for flu like variant with 99% survival rate.

Get more details that show specific interest as it connects to the COVID attack and you will have my attention.

Expand full comment
Angie's avatar

Follow these channels.

https://rumble.com/v5yo6kb-360566075.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

https://outraged.substack.com/p/cancer-nanovaccines

https://outraged.substack.com/p/nanotechnology-to-be-used-to-realize

Trump's Chief of Staff, Susie Wiles is a Big Pharma lobbyist (Mercury) whose clients are Pfizer and GAVI (Bill Gates). Tesla announced it is making mRNA "vaccines". Trump HIRED the swamp and just took $500 Billion for Stargate. It's always been about surveillance and biometric tracking. Don't fall for the health shtick again.

Expand full comment
Messenger17's avatar

This is getting spammy

Expand full comment
Buffalo_Ken's avatar

check this out - this is some serious science - I've only skimmed it - but it is well referenced - so I share this here with you Bill - and know this - I support your efforts of good journalism - tis like a breath of fresh air in Alabama after a serious storm passes by:

https://www.sott.net/article/497575-Opinion-Invalidity-of-Counterfactual-Models-of-Mortality-Averted-by-Childhood-Vaccination

~

BK

Expand full comment
Bill Rice, Jr.'s avatar

Cutting-room-floor text:

Quick aside: If the Senate rejects Kennedy, I guess it’s theoretically possible President Trump would nominate another person with the same skeptical or dissident views as Kennedy. However, this wouldn’t make sense as, presumably, a Kennedy clone or disciple would also be rejected by the same Senate.

Expand full comment
Owain Glyndŵr's avatar

Trump also has Recess Assignment potential. I'm not sure if that could still be brought into use though if RFKjr is rejected by the Senate in this round.

But, Trump could Recess in another pick, maybe a figurehead, with RFKjr as Under-Secretary perhaps.

Expand full comment
Irunthis1's avatar

He can force a recess while they are failing to vote to confirm and place him in there anyway. (I believe anyway otherwise what’s the point). It’s temporary but it may give rfkj the time he needs to demonstrate his ability to do the job and ultimately down the road get confirmed.

Expand full comment
Messenger17's avatar

Gene editing can also potentially be used to cure diseases such as Huntington's or sickle cell anemia. That's what I first thought of when hearing of this technology decades ago.

If he owned shares of Pfizer or Moderna, that would be most disingenuous.

Expand full comment
Steve the sailor's avatar

I would like to believe the same, but what human can have what it takes to withstand the barrage and the position, and yet take direction from RFKj?

Expand full comment
J Boss's avatar

True. But a strong person that knows RFK has superior knowledge can easily collaborate and seek his insights. Many of the best innovative problem solvers I've ever seen are brilliant at just that. Those don't have egos in my experience, so the political arena seems more difficult...

Expand full comment
Ron Gilbert's avatar

I think that if you had 10 clones of Kennedy, each successive one would get a wee bit more support. Human nature.

Expand full comment
Messenger17's avatar

And I'm sure there are at least half a dozen at the ready, should his nomination be rejected. Such as Dr. McCullough, and many more obsecure figures. The big pharma stooges should be careful what they wish for.

Expand full comment
Carl Eric Scott's avatar

Good to think about alternate scenarios, because I think there's not a snowball's chance in hell that he gets approved. We know how many crimes so many within the blob are guilty of--behind the scenes, they will do EVERYTHING they can.

Expand full comment
Messenger17's avatar

RFK Jr has become a symbol. A much lesser-known but like-minded nominee would give the less ardent pharma stooges a pass to get the nomination through. When Trump was elected, I was actully hoping for such a nominee, with RFK Jr to direct behind the scenes.

Expand full comment
Buffalo_Ken's avatar

I'm pretty sure if the "Trumpster" want him in - he will get "nominated" - that is the word I forgot yesterday - but really - who nominates Senator's - lately with the exception of a few, most of what I here them spew makes me PUKE.

~

I can count two exceptions in the halls of "Congress" - they both come from Kentucky - ain't McConnel - he is a traitor. One is "Rand Paul" - he gets the benefit of the doubt - the other is Thomas Massie - he needs no benefit of doubt - but he got no say on this nomination I reckon - but either way - if the Trumpster wants "him" in - he will get nominated - otherwise - twas a ruse - and truly - a shame if it goes down that way - and fool me once shame on you - fool me twice....it ain't gonna happen.

I hope he gets nominated - he has my vote - and Trump be advised to realize without Kennedy tis unlikely he would of been elected - so, if you don't support those who supported you - then faith can be lost rapidly - and all your good ideas go down the waterfall of faithlessness.

Expand full comment
Buffalo_Ken's avatar

Thanks Angie - how many times you gonna post this link I query - that in and of itself suggests.....suggestiveness and possibly propaganda to this "cynical" mind I have as a jaded ole man I'm becoming....I mean really - the message is out - if it resonates it does - if it don't then infer from that what you will - but no need to post it a zillion times on the same thread Angie - seriously....

Expand full comment
Teri Anglim's avatar

To me, the repetitiveness of the phrase, gold standard, is a way in which Kennedy is substantiating the claim he is pro vaccine: only IF they meet the gold standard and a way of rejecting any vaccine whether existing now or in the future.

To quote you: Kennedy must know that if real science suddenly comes back into vogue, said science will prove that vaccines are NOT “safe and effective.”

If he isn't confirmed, I fear we are in for a long and arduous situation and the harms will never be unveiled. Trump will most likely just go with the flow due to lack of understanding and genuine interest of what has actually transpired in the last four years. Those clots, for example, are just one after effect that people may have in the coming years and thousands have had already. His next choice I'm afraid will be one that will toe the established line.

Expand full comment
Messenger17's avatar

I do not share the same fear. If he's not confirmed, another who is lesser-known but has the same aims will eventually be. They cannot set all other business aside to keep rejecting nominees.

Expand full comment
Teri Anglim's avatar

I am glad you do not share the same fear. However, although he has several options that could carry the torch for bearing out the truth, they also would not get nominated.

Expand full comment
Messenger17's avatar

Trump will wear them down. He is not going to nominate another pharma shill, and the Senate can't spend the entire term on confirmation hearings. The key to getting them through will be the appearance of mainstream positions, and a very low profile.

Same goes for Tulsi and having an intelligence chief who repects consitutional rights of cicizens if they don't nominate her.

Expand full comment
Dee's meow's avatar

Pray he is confirmed, and good at 3 & 4D chess.

Expand full comment
Chief Justice of Nuremberg 2.0's avatar

RFK Jr. Announces $5.6 Quadrillion Lawsuit vs Vaccine Injuries, Covid Measures & Crimes Against Humanity vs Bernie Sanders in Senate Hearing citing VAERS & VSAFE. VAERS was 50,000 deaths and 1.5M injures. However, only 1% of people report vaccine injuries - Stanford. Or 4% in Australia, the acutal deaths and injuries would be 20-100X higher. https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/rfk-jr-announces-56-quadrillion-lawsuit

Expand full comment
Buffalo_Ken's avatar

Why not make it a quinta-billion lawsuit - the lawyers solve nothing.

If this is the pathway - then chaos beckons.

~

Some things can't be regulated - there can be no laws controlling them - and bans make no difference - DUH.....

~

lawyers in general are skum of the earth - and really - maybe tis just time to break up this enterprise from the ground up - cause dc is proven they got strings pulling on them and they could care less about "Joe-Public" - tis PROVEN.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice's avatar

Those "fearless" trial lawyers standing up for the Little Man aren't really "fearless."

Expand full comment
Buffalo_Ken's avatar

Exactly - want to know the best way to deal with a lawyer - I'll tell - a swift kick in the balls (or their other area genital if they got no balls) - 99 times out of 100 - they deserve it. Lawyers piss me off - most of em - seriously - check the data - the us of a has way too many of em - tis known - they are lizards and swamp creatures and maybe tis time for a drought upon them and let them perish there.

Expand full comment
mike Myhre's avatar

Don't forget recess appointments if the senate rejects him. Then Trump can appoint whoever he wants until the end of the current congressional session (two years).

Expand full comment
BonnieMae's avatar

When I hear him say "pro-vaxx", I am reminded of him making a statement about the IDEA behind vaccines, and not today's reality! So, since 2 things can be true at once, he has the ability to truthfully be pro-vaxx and against harmful, poorly-tested vaccines (which I'd venture to say that all of them are...

Expand full comment
Doug Young's avatar

Robert Barnes is saying that even if RFK Jr. isn't confirmed by the Senate, Trump will invoke a recess appointment, which would be good for the next 2 years, at least. Bobby can do a lot of work in 24 months.

Expand full comment
Ron Gilbert's avatar

All these confirmation hearings are a sham. Nominees have to lie and hedge positions to curry favor. Bloody waste of time.

Expand full comment
Doohmax's avatar

These hearings in today’s media infected world are nothing more than a chance for political preening by our self absorbed ruling class. Every Senator already knows how they will vote…..except for the ones allowing the bidding for their vote to continue until the last minute.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice's avatar

The Republicans most likely to vote 'no" weren't on any of these two committees. This means they didn't have to question Kennedy or make statements advertising the likelihood they might/would vote no. They didn't have to show their hands or real views or go on the record as to why they are going to vote no.

I think keeping these people off these two Confirmation Committees was probably intentional.

Expand full comment
Buffalo_Ken's avatar

The guy either gets approved by the Senate or not - or what is that term they use - the Senate authorizes his ass to be the Health Secretary - I mean who the hell authorizes the Senate I query.

And truly - if "Trump-team" wants him in he will be in - if not - tis a ruse - if a ruse - get ready for WAR.....or maybe let me just say - get ready for better ideas.

Vaccinations are harmful - tis evident and known.

Big harma and other entities own DC - if it don't stop now - then secession increases in probability Bill - cause it is KNOWN.

Not kidding around.

Expand full comment
Bill Rice's avatar

I've broached the S-word scenario in a couple of columns. That is the ultimate weapon for people or states who have "had enough." However, I know that no state or political leaders have the courage to push for this possible "solution."

I also think the Powers that Be know that secession is effectively off the table or not an option - so they act accordingly.

Expand full comment
Buffalo_Ken's avatar

I hear ya - but reality is - nothing is off the table....and so-called leaders and/or gubment that are actually "thieves of liberty" - they deserve secession for anybody with the mind of the Founders!

Best to you Bill,

Ken

Expand full comment
Carl Eric Scott's avatar

The initial steps should be "secession" from the GOP. https://substack.com/home/post/p-154905047

Expand full comment
Linelle MacDougal's avatar

Injection related . Just saw a clip of Matt Taibbi saying it was really stupid of Fauci to accept the pardon ( it assumes he has something to be guilty for... ya don't say) because they can go after him and he won't be allowed to plead the 5th . I'm wonder who has him in their cross hairs since he is THE SCIENCE.

Expand full comment
Linelle MacDougal's avatar

Did see that Angie … it is all interesting as to where things are going . Crisper isn’t new and suspect everything will come out in the news to normalizing everything that has been going on. Every since the world agreed to take an experimental injection - what’s there to be concerned about !

Expand full comment
ViaVeritasVita's avatar

Have been considering the possibilities, esp. after reading your comment on Jenna this a.m. I consider that the USA is blessed to have had the '20 steal, as the ensuing four years displayed, in "blazing technicolor", how evil and corrupt (well, guess corruption implies evil) is the Democrat Party. We needed that four years. So, in that vein, if RFK is not accepted, there will be another four years in which the American people not only can, but most likely will, become aware of the danger coming from vaccines. For myself, I have just recently truly learned the value of "waiting on the Lord", because when He deems the time right, the results are so much grander than I could possibly have imagined. Cf.. yesterday's Expanding Educational Freedom and Opportunity for Families--school choice is finally here!

Expand full comment
Messenger17's avatar

I figured the same about his "pro vax" comments. But disagree that the medical cartel would be safe to perpetuate the fraud if he's not confimed. Trump, with the advice and consent of RFK Jr himself, must have a far lesser-known propective nominee with the same aims in the wings, should that happen, who just might appoint RFK Jr to the highest position they can appoint. Or he may just act in an unofficial capacity. So I stronlgy suspect it's 4-D chess.

Expand full comment
Full Court Free Press's avatar

It would be interesting to go back and look at press coverage of vaccine exemptions from litigation that became law in 1986. Who objected? I am pretty sure it was a Democrat congressman, Henry Waxman, who wrote the bulk of the legislation. What was the vote on that bill? What media outlets questioned the wisdom of it?

There's a book in there somewhere.

Keep up the good work, Bill Rice Jr.!

Expand full comment
Bill Rice's avatar

Boy was that law important. It was a license to print money for Big Pharma.

Expand full comment
Ken Macko's avatar

I think there needs to be a distinction between “vaccines” and “covid vaccines”. The difference being covid vaccines were distributed without proper testing whereas other vaccines were, which allowed disclosure of possible side effects. Some have been proven to be successful.

I believe RFK stated he was for choice when it comes to vaccines not mandates.

Expand full comment