I am so thankful for your work. I went to subscribe to your substack but they only had free subscriptions which is unusual for substack. Is there a way to pay for your substack as I like to support such hard work and dedication to getting the truth out there.
Thank you, Fred Jewett, this is so kind of you to say. What I do is a gift and yes, indeed, that is unusual for a substack. But I decided from the very beginning that I would ask for no money, nor take any. But I would suggest subscribing to hard working reporters who cover free speech issues, such as Bill Rice Jr. here. We really need more of this!
Fred was one of my first paid subscribers and one of my greatest supporters and benefactors. It's nice to know so many good people want to help others who are working for the same goals.
Great idea. Have you seen the Canadian healthcare workers’ video that Jessica Rose pointed to the other day? Horrendous testimony on what has happened in Canada.
Do you think they will be interested in publishing Australia's gain of function research program? No one in Australia will pick it up. I don't want recognition. I just want people to know about this.
While Fauci and Rand Paul were arguing in Senate hearings whether the US 'did gain of function,' Australia was openly modifying lethal organisms to make them even more lethal and transmissable - doing exactly what they were arguing about. Rand Paul wasn't even interested when I sent him my article. No one really seems to be. It's so hot that no one wants to touch it, even though it is completely out in the open. https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australias-gain-of-function-research
I appreciate Citizen Free Press picking up this story. While many Substack regulars are very familiar with Transcriber B, most of the world (sadly) knows nothing about her important work. By linking to this story, "Citizen Kane" is helping change that. IMO CFP has played a huge and brave role in educating millions of people about the real Covid story.
Your Hotez piece is fabulous--just discovered you as a writer, via Brownstone, which I'm trying to follow more. Perhaps you'll look at my latest, which really is my second or third most epic and greatest? https://pomocon.substack.com/p/adjunct-suppressors
Thanks for your kind comment, Duchess. In answer to your questions:
1. I work alone, however anyone can do what I do, and no doubt many people are. If you, or anyone reading this, would like to transcribe, I would suggest picking a specific subject and/or geographic area and/or time frame, and go to it. It's important to respect legal fair use, so best to avoid transcribing anything behind a pay wall, and if you're not sure, just stick with doing a brief excerpt (usually that falls within legal fair use). My other advice would be to always, always, whenever you can, give the source URL and title. Oh, and another thing: more isn't necessarily better. A small selection of well-selected and carefully made transcripts may prove more likely to survive and more useful to a future historian than a stack of stuff.
P.S. One area I haven't seen much of: lockdown testimonies 2020.
2. Yes I do have print outs and digital backups.
3. Thank you for your kind words, they make my day.
Thank you for this work. It is so important. I have a testimony you may want. My husband was targeted and spied on by local government agencies, illegally. Simply for speaking out against the narrative that was being pushed. I’ll check with him and see if there is a video anywhere. He was arrested (unjustly, and it was finally dismissed), for speaking out. We also have video testimony from a high schooler re: the lockdowns. His best friend committed suicide and he himself was put on suicide watch because of treatment of them during lockdowns by the schools. It is sickening what happened. Our neighbor’s 13yr old committed suicide because of the lockdowns as well. These things need to be more and more made public. We all know it. But the propaganda and censorship is astounding.
I really appreciate your comment, Annie Walker, thank you.
My project is only from 2021-March 31, 2023 because I want to give the archive a focus and also I have other commitments. I also focus on material that is already online.
But I do think that what you have is very important. For you, and for other readers here, I will say this: please do not underestimate the value of your testimony. It might seem that right now no one cares. But this will not be the case in the future. And right now your memory for details and chronology is fresh. This is a splendid moment to get it down for the record!
Video and audio can be important, of course, but I would really urge people to think in terms of text, and especially of text on paper as well. Yes, paper like anything else can be lost in time. However, text on paper does not require electricity nor any intermediating technology. Anyone can pick up it with in their hand and start reading. Many video and audio recordings from recent years have been lost already because the intermediating technology has changed. It is possible to take an old movie reel to put onto a digital file of some sort, but it's a trouble to do, it requires expertise, and it can be expensive. Most old video recordings, (remember those plastic book-sized boxes from the 80s and 90s?), get chucked as clutter.
With your material, it's possible to do any one or more of a wide menu of things, from starting a Substack to tweeting, to writing a book, making a documentary movie, and so on. There may also be a group-- or why not start a group?-- to collect testimonies.
But at the modest end of things, simply documenting one's own experience, can also be very, very worthwhile. Make sure it's in a safe place, and if someone comes upon it after your time, they know what it is and what you want to have happen to it.
Alas, and I have some horror stories, many historically valuable papers get chucked in the dumpster when the heirs are overwhelmed with digging out clutter.
Your local historical association, or local history section of your local library-- don't under estimate it. Right now, who knows, probably they wouldn't want anything counter-narrative in most places. But that, in time, will change.
I would add, if you have some important materials, depending on what they are, you might also look into placing them with larger institutional archives. For example, many universities maintain specialized archives on given subjects, individuals, locales, etc. Right now anything "counter cooties narrative" is a super-sensitive subject, but as I say, I expect this will change. Above all, don't think your testimony doesn't matter, it does matter, there will be someone who will want to read it.
Shes's going to need to be sure to have hard (or print) copies because they can enter and alter information on anything digital that's connected to teh web and it's in teh government's best interest to eliminate things like this and they will try to.
Might I also recommend providing a copy or 2 to trusted sources so you're not the only one with teh hard copy. I would not put it past our government or more specifically it's agencies, to do whatever is necessary to make something go away. Call it conspiratorial if you like but I like to see it as being prepared. Investigative journalists typically do this so they alone don't have something some p[arty would like to see disappear.
Fabulous Bill with your finding of this remarkable woman's work . So thrilled she identified the remarkable work of the Canadian National Citizen's inquiry . I will be chipping away with her links .
Thanks, Linelle. She is amazing. It takes me all day to transcribe a 90-minute interview I record on tape! I hate transcribing recorded interviews. But she has done this almost 400 times ... so every word is correctly preserved for posterity!
So necessary to have , since according to Dr Jessica Rose - they are scrub a dubbing many things ! I am just thrilled Bill with your find here . I will send it to others here in Canada who write some substacks .. all 3 maybe ?
Thank you. I hope people share this one widely. I hope a few of our worthless officials and mainstream media "journalists" see this too - and take the time to read (and think about) some of those transcripts.
Thanks Bill Rice, Jr. and Transcriber B, great stuff! We need a whole army of transcribers, documenting the past and present.
If you're typing it all manually, you could consider automating the transcribing, save a lot of work, because you only have to do the proofreading.
Speech recognition has made a quantum leap recently, and Whisper (https://github.com/openai/whisper) is one solution, which works really well. It's open source and free to download and install on your own computer. 10 minutes of video with ~1600 words can be automatically transcribed in about 80 seconds.
It outputs not only the raw text, but also a file with timestamps in SRT-subtitle format, so you can play the video with subtitles, for easier proofreading.
See the resulting transcribed text (the-1-thing-that-stops-your.txt) and a sample of the subtitle version (the-1-thing-that-stops-your.srt) in the next comments.
The first few lines of the-1-thing-that-stops-your.srt subtitle file in SRT format. If you want to try it, you need to add a blank line before each line number (the lines with "1", "2", "3", etc.) since the line breaks are removed by the Substack comment system:
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:08,960
Let's talk about the top thing that can stop your ability to lose your midsection, your belly fat,
2
00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:13,360
and you're probably thinking it's sugar, right, or carbs, but there's something else that's
3
00:00:14,480 --> 00:00:19,520
of equal magnitude in preventing you from losing your belly fat. So let's say, for example,
4
00:00:19,520 --> 00:00:24,960
you're at the gym, you're doing exercise, you're doing sit-ups, and this midsection just does
5
00:00:24,960 --> 00:00:29,600
not come off no matter what. And when I go to the gym, I do see a lot of people exercising
Fantastic work! And it is work! It's very ouch, my hat tip to you, Transcriber B!
I recently transcribed a speech that aired on C-SPAN in 2000 by an author who had been a DOJ Nazi hunter prosecutor. It was about the history of the Bush family, Prescott Bush, father to George HW Bush and George W Bush. And his role as Hitler's banker before, *during* and after WWII to the biggest war profiteers:
John Loftus - Unholy Trinity: The Vatican, The Nazis, and the Swiss Banks
It came with a rough transcript C-SPAN provided, sort of a voice-to-text rendition. Which was helpful, but needed a whole lot of correction, not recognizing names and other less common sayings, words, terrible punctuation and grammar. Even with the head start that took many hours, researching acronyms, like-sounding names.
I'm currently trying to do the same thing with the Senate confirmation hearings for Justice Clarence Thomas in 1991, Sen. Joe Biden presiding as Chairman. When the issue of Natural Law vs. Positive Law came up:
While C-SPAN provides the voice-to-text rendition, it gets time-consuming, just like the speech was. And the entire hearing has many gems that are relevant today, 30+ years later, as we watch the rule of law as we knew it get shredded, turned to pulp, then reformed into a legal process with the same words but completely different meanings. Like Positive Law tends to do. Unlike Natural Law. Which is eternal in its clarity and meaning:
This will be the subject of an upcoming FF piece when I finish it. We have much to learn from the archives of history. A Supreme Court confirmation hearing from decades ago with sparring between two key figures of today gains newfound relevance. As will the work of Transcriber B. Hopefully not three decades hence. Just sharing that I have great appreciation for what you're doing!
Thank you for your great work Freedom Fox! Open Source, free speech-to-text software such as https://github.com/openai/whisper has gotten pretty good recently, if you're interested.
I'll add a sample from the video you refer to in a comment below, transcribed with Whisper. It has problems with names such as Harriman ("Haramun") and Thyssen ("Tissel"), but the rest looks correct. 5 minutes of video transcribed in 40 seconds.
Thank you, Nick! I'll check it out. C-SPAN's speech-to-text is terrible. It was easier than transcribing without it, but not by much after fixing its errors.
The install process includes ffmpeg, which is great, since it can extract part of a video, if you need to only transcribe a part of it. For my example above, I used ffmpeg to extract a new 10 minute video (from 20 minute to 30 minute mark) like this:
Perhaps you could consider creating a post about this great tool, after you tried it? It could make a big difference, almost like a super power. But the thing is, people need to know it exists, and that it's realistic for them to install and use.
Thanks, Mel. I think it might be one of my most important ... because I know how important the ultimate "historical record" is.
Also, as TB noted, this could project could help "change the narrative" .... today .... if the right people read these transcripts and took the interview subjects seriously.
That's my fantasy for now. If someone were to sit down and actually look at the list of transcripts, they would see that there are too many jab injury testimonies, too many doctor and nurse and expert testimonies-- all those "small multiples"--- they simply could not deny that there is something grossly wrong with the official "narrative."
Another important side effect is that search engines can index the full text of the videos, allowing more people to find the information. Of course, this only happens if search engine crawlers are being sent there in the first place, and secondarily, provided that they are not blocked by the web site.
Loved your taking the time to interview Transcriber B. One of your best posts and yet probably it consumed much less time than some of your more time consuming projects. Great read.
Please know this ma'am, intelligent people read. I refuse to watch someone talk. Most of them are performing. So you please keep doing what you're doing. It's imperative work.
Thank you, devoalan. I prefer text, too. I'll keep at it for a while longer, but it has a cap, March 31, 2023. As I mentioned in the interview, I know that others are also working hard to gather and preserve video, audio and text. May more be inspired to do so also!
Thank you so much for interviewing her! I have subscribed to her stack and bookmarked her website. I am so glad someone thought to do this and I am thrilled to have an archive of testimony like the one from the pulmonary nurse in SC. I watched that when it first came out and thought that this needs to be saved. I really appreciate transcripts too because I much prefer to read rather than watch video. 🙏
Unless defeated teh current political leadership, that is majority cop-opted/owned by private welathy interest, will re-write history to tell a very different story. They've already tried to claim "no one made you get the shot". Thus she needs not only a hard copy but multiple given to others because not only will they alter anything she's placed on any website (that or shut teh site down) they will raid her home and confiscate any hard copies she has. To date Covid is there biggest and most blatant screw-up so they will do whatever they can to try and cover it up as time moves on and they can cover up history. How many Millennials today even know half of the important parts of history that previous generations were taught like how the US interned thousands of Japanese Americans during WW2? Or how teh Nazi's are more like how the progressives are today and not those fighting against teh aggressives that are called Nazis and fascists?
True. Even so what Bandit was referring to is the continued re-writing to pervert the words even more so. It's hard to know what it's original and what is not unless one can read and comprehend the original text written in Biblical Hebrew. It's more than just being able to translate the words themselves but to also differentiate between the meanings of those words. If you were to translate the original Biblical Hebrew into English there would still be many arts that would be incomprehensible to us because were ignorant of history at that time, how the meaning of somethings now don't align with what they meant then. It's very tricky. Doesn't mean you shouldn't read teh Bible but know that it has been tampered with. Ideally one will be guided to understand it correctly.
On this subject we must pay attention to what is happening to our US Constitution in jurisprudence today. It is being redefined in ways that will make it even more unrecognizable in the near future. Far worse than what we've already experienced with so much "penumbra" linguistic revisions of it and an imagining of it as a "living, breathing document."
The Behavioral Scientists - propagandists informed by psychology and symbolism, linguistics - have painted a bullseye on it and are endeavoring to make collectivist authoritarianism not only constitutional, but the basis of it. Turning a governing contract that was created to protect individual liberty and freedom into a governing contract that dictates to the people what few rights they have. The whole Orwellian "war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength" redefinition of our Republic.
Cass Sunstein is a major force behind this, and much of the expanded reliance on behaviorism in law, the pandemic being the latest, most extreme imposition of it to date. Sunstein was a major player in the Obama administration and remains one in the Biden administration with several of his proteges in it, and in this government's ruling partner, Big Tech. Along with his wife promoting color revolutions around the world. As a law professor today at Harvard Law School he has recently penned these two papers that detail how to turn the US Constitution into a boot on the faces of American citizens, not by re-writing the words per se, but by rewriting the *definitions* of the words. They dress it up, put lipstick and a wig on it to make it sound so beneficent and high-minded. But it's conforming totalitarianism to the constitution, or vice-versa:
They're not going to stop on their own. The courts are not there to protect us. We, The People have to stop them. And not give them our consent to be governed by tyrants.
I call it DSD, Dynamically Shifting Definitions. What this means is tha the Left will use different versions of the definition of a word based on the context, the scenario. They're able to do this and truly believe what they are doing is just because they've been thru 12 years of public education indoctrination with an additional 4 or more years worth of upgrades in college. They are a generation of Manchurian Candiates who instead of being programmed to assassinate are programed to be activists/soldiers for collectivist governance. So in their mind they believe a word can have multiple definitions and it's not conflicting. Additionally you have people like Sunstein who are trying to officially redefine words legally making the new definition enforceable by law. The Left has been trying for decades to redefine the text of 2A to have it mean something other than what it means and they've done a fairly convincing job of it. The Feds are implementing false flag shooting's and encouraging them to within urban areas that have gang issues so as to provide the media with more examples that can be pushed out to the people to make it appear as if people are being shot every day on every street in every city be it small town USA or a major city all so as to create hysteria to bring about a willingness to support gun confiscation and a banning of the 2A.
Fear is the mind killer as quoted in Frank Herbert's excellent DUNE series.
The People and the States. While not all states I do believe some number of state level legislators will push back on the Feds. Get a Few more Kriti Noem's and Ron DeSantis into the Governors offices and teh Feds are going to find themselves fighting the states. I firmly believe we may see large scale efforts in several states to secede from teh US and reform as anew nation founded on the same constitution but with revisions (ie better and more explicit language in the 2A to make it clear it's meant for individuals), based on lessons learned, that will make it that much harder for the corrupt to eventually take over. There is no system that can guarantee to keep the wealthy from capturing and corrupting it because human behavior is what it is so the best you can do is to make it as difficult as possible so it takes a very long time.
Yes, the church wanted to keep the people ignorant, unable to read the Bible, so they would be dependent on the Church or more specifically those in it. When John Wycliffe translated in 1384 it greatly changed the balance of power. Once those you serve can understand what you do it becomes very difficult to continue to mislead them.
I don't think Covid was a screwup, it went very well "according to plan". My concern is what is next in their planning? Intentionally set wild fires that send toxic smoke to New York? Poisoning the food supply with mRNA? Reducing food availability so more people starve to death and fight over food? Maybe support for encouraging gender transformation so as to sterilize the population. I am sure the puppet masters have more plans in the works.
Operation Covid was a partial win but a very small win. There were 2 primary goals:
1) Implement a physical monitoring & tracking system nationally; the vaccine passport
2) set the precedent that the Federal government can mandate the drugging of the public at least during a declared emergency if not at any time
Num1 effectively failed save for a few cities and even in those the system was not fully implemented and even in those cities if any publicly accessible places are still requiring the vaxx pass I'd be surprised.
Num2 failed. They were able to get a very large percentage of Americans to not only voluntarily take the Jab (with a smaller percentage willing to get boosters too) but to also promote it and shame those who refused too. Where they failed and epically is with the courts when groups challenged the presidents attempt to use OSHA as cover to mandate vaccination of companies with 100+ or more employees. By making it all the way to SCOTUS and being ruled against the president now or future can no longer try this again. Any future attempt at mandating drugging of the public would require a different approach such as passing legislation saying the Federal Government can do this but even then if it made its way to SCOTUS I expect it would fail to at least with the current make up of SCOTUS. Not only can the president not do this for private sector entities with employees but he can't even do it to Federal employees.
While I say mandate "drugging" of the public they won't do that initially. Instead what they will do is mandate a singular drug and it will be a vaccine because vaccines in general are largely trusted by the majority of the public, so much so that they don't question any new vaccine(s) introduced to the system even though the FDA ends up recalling %30 of all new drugs it approves. Since the Childhood Vaccine Protection act was passed in 1986 which gave vaccine manufacturers Federal protection from being liable for any/all harm caused by any vaccine, the number of mandatory vaccines for kids (for access to the public education system you are required to help fund) has gone from 4 to over 60 (varied based on state). That’s a greater than 10 times increase in just 4 decades. The normal period for the development, testing and approval for a drug is between 10-15 years. It’s absurd how quickly the number of vaccines has increased and it all is due to the manufacturers being liable free and because it gets added to the mandatory list for kids.
None of that is to say they won't try a pandemic #2. After all they still can shoot for completing the vaxx pass system which they will need before they can move us to a more Federally controlled state like in China. The end goal is to convert us to something akin to what the CCP uses in China; a social credit score system enforced via the widespread monitoring and tracking of the citizenry. It's not just the Democrats who are on board with this but a sizeable percent of the Republicans too. It's mainly the wealthy and politically connected Republicans and mainly in the Senate as opposed to the house; persons like Mitt Romney and Mitch McConnel. So they will have to find some way of implementing that and sooner rather that later.
They also have to find some way to set the precedent that they can mandate drugging of the public even if it's just during an emergency and even if it's only for very specific emergencies with very specific requirements. They just have to get that foot in the door for once they do they will then be able to expand that over time as the government typically does as just as they did with OSHA; using it as cover to mandate the covid vaccine. OSHA is a perfect example of the danger of allowing the Feds any additional powers or an extension of the existing Federal system. OSHA was created under the guise of providing protection for workers and while that was needed at the time the creation of the OSHA agency gave the Feds access to interfere with private sector operations and use that access for more than it was intended as they ALWAYS do. There is no agency or department that has never expanded is reach and power over time.
Apologies if this is lengthy but I am very passionate about this topic of government over reach and despite what’s happened I’m very excited to see how many Americans have had their eyes forced open and by the government and the corrupted and co-opted Media due to each over reaching by so much that it triggered the public into awakening from the walking sleep it was operating in.
My thought is the puppet masters knew that they would not succeed in injecting the entire population in the first of several "control" manuevers (call it depopulation). They got as many as the could and will now move on to another strategy such as poisoning and reducing the food supply and get another group, and continue until they return to another pandemic where they can mandate everyone get a shot (which occurred in the 19teens when a $5.00 fine was imposed if you didn't get the vaccine, a lot of money in those days). The remaining holdouts may well be "quarantined" (sent to concentration camps) at that point. I agree that a pandemic is the easiest way to get people to agree to a "life saving" vaccine. This is my "conspiracy theory". Albert Spence's testimony was very revealing about genocidal guidance for the CDC.
$5 back then is roughly around $175 today (thank you inflation) which no small amount but not soo much that those with more money couldn't opt out from participating in. It's one method they use to coerce the regular people into participating in something while letting teh wealthy skip it.
I would agree with you if they had left it at voluntary only but they not only went for mandatory after the voluntary participants were dealt with but they pushed hard on that, like as if it were a do or die kind of thing. You see I don't believe covid was planned but an opportunity. I believe covid was a real leak that they opted to take advantage of. Think about like this, if you're planning to execute a pandemic you will be taking on teh risk that the release could be traced back and exposed. If however there was naturally occurring leak of a similar virus, something impacting breathing, that would be the perfect opportunity to reduce your risk of exposure because you're then using something you didn't setup. Look at how the government initially reacted to covid; no big deal. Within 30 days they did a 180 degree turn around. They also seemed somewhat unprepared for it. There was tings ready to go because there was plan to do this but not just yet. If this was planned I'd have expected them to be for taking it very serious from the start.
I believe covid was an opportunity they took but due to it being far less deadly then what was needed, and them not realizing this until after things were in motion, they ended up having to spend billions in marketing and advertising to convince the public is was far deadlier then it was but even so because it keep getting less deadly with each mutation it to where they simply could not keep convincing enough percentage of the population and so Covid Narrative Collapse Syndrome swept across the nation defeating their narrative for all but those who I call the covid faithful. Also refereed to sometimes as covidiots and or the Branch Covidians (named after teh Branch Davidians a religious sect ) as well as few other titles I can't recall.
And so they lost the battle due they are own lack of realizing that covid was not as deadly a virus would be needed to make a plan like this work. You have to get not just a majority covinced but a large enough so that those who aren't convinced can be coerced by the majority into bending the knee until you get down to the small percent of die-hards who will never bend the knee and at that point you'll have a large enough percent on board that you can then imprison these few without public pushback.
As an engineer I have to forecast how designs will work in the end. For example which parts of the building will have poorer than average air conditioning control because there are more or less windows. A similar situation is present in any future planning such as a planned pandemic. The instigators can anticipate reactions and where the resistance will be, how their evil planning will progress. As the rollout continues they can tinker with the plan, timing of planned introductions, etc. Issac Asimov's Foundation Series is my primer for this concept.
I agree, the release of Covid virus is still up in the air for me too. I lean towards a planned creation and release. There is still the issue of a mysterious illness at the Wuhan military games in October 2019. Even if the origin was accidental my thought is it did not precede the planned release date by much.
Every month I run across more information pointing to a plandemic such as Transcriber B's transcription of Albert Spence's testimony of deadly changes to Covid patient treatment (instituted by the CDC).
Germany instituted control of the population and roundup/annihilation of the target population successfully in the 1930's. I see it happening again but this time it is a greater genocide. Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Germany also banned guns and took control of the media. Sound familiar?
This is my conspiracy theory and as time continues on more evidence emerges that I may be on the right track. Todays reveals were Transcriber B's posting and a 2021 report being declassified that Dominion voting machines in Georgia were definately tampered with.
Speaking of just within the US, had they not acted the way they did the first month I too would assume it was planned but they treated it lie it was no big deal until a month later when they did a 180 and all of a sudden it was the Black Plague 2.0 . Add to that they had to market to teh public that it was more deadly than it really was and I can't see the covid leaked from the wuhan lab as a globally planned event. I can believe it may be a China planned thing since there was the games in Oct 2019 which would be an ideal place to spread it so it could go global. I can also see China not being advanced enough to try and make their own more potent version of covid (after all the US was funding the lab) and in the process make something that was actually less effective. They released something they were expecting to do more damage globally than it did. I can easily see them having done this deliberately and having a working vaccine that they would give to their own citizens at some point after covid had decimated enough of the other nations people. With the level of control they have I can believe they probably gave this vaccine to some if not all of their military personal immediately so that once other nations specifically the US, had been decimated they could send in their military for an invasion. If you were head of the CCP and believed you were sending out something that would kill half or more of a nations population that would be more than enough to give you the upper hand for a non-nuclear war. On the other hand I can also see them just bumbling this thing and truly accidentally letting it get out. With China I believe either scenario is possible.
What I can't believe with the established history they have of executing this plan so far for the last 100 (if not more) years is that the Elite would bumble it as badly as has played out. They are smarter and better organized and coordinated than that.
number 1, vax passes are still required in some areas of the world for travel etc
Number 2, It was world wide co ordinated (even to the lockdown day in most countries) and top health officials had planned this in UK europe and other places. I have seen correspondence of at least 5 planning the date they would all do this
I'm speaking only of the US. There were different outcomes in teh various nations and of course it was global because it started out in China and leaked to their nations. I don't remember exactly what it was called but in teh Fall of 2019 there was an event where various representatives (soldiers) from teh different nations including China met for some kind of competition. If this was pre-planned they did a piss poor job at the start and while I despise them I know better than to think their less intelligent then they really are. had this been pre-planned they would have used something that would be deadly enough so that they wouldn't need to spend billions to convince people its more deadly than it is.
Maybe virus "spread" began in China, but maybe it didn't. It's certainly no sure thing and definitely shouldn't be considered as "settled science." Of course that IS the "authorized narrative," which is all that matters.
Who's to say it didn't leak in wuhan and shortly after another version of it or simply more of it was leaked elsewhere by another nation. The only thing we can with certainty is that we will never know what really happened, at least not in our lifetime. They've kept JFK assassination info classified for 6 decades and that's just the assassination of 1 person. Imagine what they'd do to keep secret a semi-planned to planed globe wide pandemic effort.
I wish what you said about the courts and precedent was true. But it's not. The mandated jabs were only struck down (the ones that were, others like for health care workers remain) based on process issues, not recognizing any rights. They didn't follow proper procedures was the justification given for rejecting the mandates. They didn't go through proper public comment for regulatory changes or public testimony for legislation. That's it. If they wish to make them permanent that's all they have to do. And they learned they can get away with violating those conditions for at least two years before the courts will challenge them. We did not get good legal precedents set by those rulings. Just a reprieve.
There wasn't 1 single reason given for all the various covid mandate lawsuits that went thru the courts. Some were due to the lack of proper procedure as you said but some were for other reasons. I forget which group pf military personnel it was but they won because teh Biden administration refused to recognize their religious exemption.
With regards to teh lawsuits against OSHA's mandates, the high court [SCOTUS] called the rule a "significant encroachment into the lives—and health—of a vast number of employees." The Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act does not plainly authorize the rule, the court stated.
OSHA ruling is a process ruling. Religious exemption ruling wasn't explicitly for religious exemption rights, it was because the Biden administration made a mockery of the entire religious exemption 'process' by setting up a demonstrable charade of religious exemption qualifications, not that there was even a right to refuse the jabs. It was the structure, the process for all of the rulings, not an upholding of the right to refuse the jabs; the i's and t's weren't dotted and crossed.
Well form what I understand the courts have gotten bad about that kind of thing. Constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes is always going on about how cowardly our Federal courts are when it comes to things that might challenge the deep state like the various election lawsuits people try to bring. That said i still believe another attempt to try and mandate using the same methodology and reasons as before will be even harder to do.
Thank you, Bill, I sincerely appreciate your interest, and your questions.
Thank you, TB. You gave me a good (and important) exclusive!
See my post above. I am in awe, and so grateful for you to do this (and why didn't I think of it)...you have my admiration and deepest thanks.
(PS, I cannot tell you how many times I have watched Micheals cafe locked out video with the
question "why aren't people angry?)
I am so thankful for your work. I went to subscribe to your substack but they only had free subscriptions which is unusual for substack. Is there a way to pay for your substack as I like to support such hard work and dedication to getting the truth out there.
Thank you, Fred Jewett, this is so kind of you to say. What I do is a gift and yes, indeed, that is unusual for a substack. But I decided from the very beginning that I would ask for no money, nor take any. But I would suggest subscribing to hard working reporters who cover free speech issues, such as Bill Rice Jr. here. We really need more of this!
Thanks for your reply. I am a paid subscriber to Bill's Substack along with 3 others that you recommend on your home page. Thankyou for your service!
Fred was one of my first paid subscribers and one of my greatest supporters and benefactors. It's nice to know so many good people want to help others who are working for the same goals.
Thank you!
Great idea. Have you seen the Canadian healthcare workers’ video that Jessica Rose pointed to the other day? Horrendous testimony on what has happened in Canada.
This one, yes? The Hidden Healthcare Crisis SOS
https://rumble.com/v2nnfji-the-hidden-healthcare-crisis-sos.html
Of course, TB had it!
Just luck that I saw it. I really recommend it. The Filipino-Canadian man who speaks at the end was just brilliant.
Yes. Tragic what they have done!
I haven't but would like to. Thanks.
See what I wrote Mrs B. You are so, so appreciated. And I even gave you a shoutout to 'our' Senator Rennick x
Oh my gosh, thank you. ❤️
Off topic, but I appreciate The Brownstone Institute picking up my recent article about Dr. Hotez running from a Covid debate with Robert Kennedy, Jr.
For those who have not yet discovered The Brownstone Institute, I am confident you'll love it.
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-great-debate-that-will-not-happen/
Do you think they will be interested in publishing Australia's gain of function research program? No one in Australia will pick it up. I don't want recognition. I just want people to know about this.
Maybe. Have I read this one yet? Send me a link and I'll forward to Brownstone or at least make a post in the Writer's Group email thread.
Yep. I'll send it to you again though.
While Fauci and Rand Paul were arguing in Senate hearings whether the US 'did gain of function,' Australia was openly modifying lethal organisms to make them even more lethal and transmissable - doing exactly what they were arguing about. Rand Paul wasn't even interested when I sent him my article. No one really seems to be. It's so hot that no one wants to touch it, even though it is completely out in the open. https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australias-gain-of-function-research
I just made a post at the Brownstone Writers Group email thread. I included your post and link. Thanks for not giving up!
Strangely enough they just emailed me wow. Hopefully the Australian biolabs get the same attention as the Ukraine biolabs...oh God what have I done...
All right! Some "messages in a bottle" might get found ... and acted upon? That's why I keep throwing them out into the ocean!
I appreciate Citizen Free Press picking up this story. While many Substack regulars are very familiar with Transcriber B, most of the world (sadly) knows nothing about her important work. By linking to this story, "Citizen Kane" is helping change that. IMO CFP has played a huge and brave role in educating millions of people about the real Covid story.
Crucial role. I owe Kane so much!
Your Hotez piece is fabulous--just discovered you as a writer, via Brownstone, which I'm trying to follow more. Perhaps you'll look at my latest, which really is my second or third most epic and greatest? https://pomocon.substack.com/p/adjunct-suppressors
Thanks be to God above for wonderful people like her!! Doing what she can. ❤️👍🏻🙏🏻
Amen Ross!
I too prefer reading, a speed reader from early on , unless Im doing something repetitive and can listen as I work
OMG thank you this is the FIRST time I have heard of her.
1. Does she need help?
2. Does she keep HARD paper copies?
3. What a freaking awesome idea, and as a librarian, she has zillion thanks from the bottom of my heart.
I wish I had thought of it...I have been keeping substacks and stuff, but VIDEOS? BRILLIANT.
Thanks for your kind comment, Duchess. In answer to your questions:
1. I work alone, however anyone can do what I do, and no doubt many people are. If you, or anyone reading this, would like to transcribe, I would suggest picking a specific subject and/or geographic area and/or time frame, and go to it. It's important to respect legal fair use, so best to avoid transcribing anything behind a pay wall, and if you're not sure, just stick with doing a brief excerpt (usually that falls within legal fair use). My other advice would be to always, always, whenever you can, give the source URL and title. Oh, and another thing: more isn't necessarily better. A small selection of well-selected and carefully made transcripts may prove more likely to survive and more useful to a future historian than a stack of stuff.
P.S. One area I haven't seen much of: lockdown testimonies 2020.
2. Yes I do have print outs and digital backups.
3. Thank you for your kind words, they make my day.
Great tips and encouragement for others. See, my readers come up with good questions I should have asked!
Yes this has been a very positive thread
Thank you for this work. It is so important. I have a testimony you may want. My husband was targeted and spied on by local government agencies, illegally. Simply for speaking out against the narrative that was being pushed. I’ll check with him and see if there is a video anywhere. He was arrested (unjustly, and it was finally dismissed), for speaking out. We also have video testimony from a high schooler re: the lockdowns. His best friend committed suicide and he himself was put on suicide watch because of treatment of them during lockdowns by the schools. It is sickening what happened. Our neighbor’s 13yr old committed suicide because of the lockdowns as well. These things need to be more and more made public. We all know it. But the propaganda and censorship is astounding.
I really appreciate your comment, Annie Walker, thank you.
My project is only from 2021-March 31, 2023 because I want to give the archive a focus and also I have other commitments. I also focus on material that is already online.
But I do think that what you have is very important. For you, and for other readers here, I will say this: please do not underestimate the value of your testimony. It might seem that right now no one cares. But this will not be the case in the future. And right now your memory for details and chronology is fresh. This is a splendid moment to get it down for the record!
Video and audio can be important, of course, but I would really urge people to think in terms of text, and especially of text on paper as well. Yes, paper like anything else can be lost in time. However, text on paper does not require electricity nor any intermediating technology. Anyone can pick up it with in their hand and start reading. Many video and audio recordings from recent years have been lost already because the intermediating technology has changed. It is possible to take an old movie reel to put onto a digital file of some sort, but it's a trouble to do, it requires expertise, and it can be expensive. Most old video recordings, (remember those plastic book-sized boxes from the 80s and 90s?), get chucked as clutter.
With your material, it's possible to do any one or more of a wide menu of things, from starting a Substack to tweeting, to writing a book, making a documentary movie, and so on. There may also be a group-- or why not start a group?-- to collect testimonies.
But at the modest end of things, simply documenting one's own experience, can also be very, very worthwhile. Make sure it's in a safe place, and if someone comes upon it after your time, they know what it is and what you want to have happen to it.
Alas, and I have some horror stories, many historically valuable papers get chucked in the dumpster when the heirs are overwhelmed with digging out clutter.
Your local historical association, or local history section of your local library-- don't under estimate it. Right now, who knows, probably they wouldn't want anything counter-narrative in most places. But that, in time, will change.
I would add, if you have some important materials, depending on what they are, you might also look into placing them with larger institutional archives. For example, many universities maintain specialized archives on given subjects, individuals, locales, etc. Right now anything "counter cooties narrative" is a super-sensitive subject, but as I say, I expect this will change. Above all, don't think your testimony doesn't matter, it does matter, there will be someone who will want to read it.
Shes's going to need to be sure to have hard (or print) copies because they can enter and alter information on anything digital that's connected to teh web and it's in teh government's best interest to eliminate things like this and they will try to.
That's the point, ultimately, it's on paper and it will go into institutional archives. Once the nuttiness passes.
Might I also recommend providing a copy or 2 to trusted sources so you're not the only one with teh hard copy. I would not put it past our government or more specifically it's agencies, to do whatever is necessary to make something go away. Call it conspiratorial if you like but I like to see it as being prepared. Investigative journalists typically do this so they alone don't have something some p[arty would like to see disappear.
No worries, I've got that covered.
😉
And searchable via AI. Love it.
Fabulous Bill with your finding of this remarkable woman's work . So thrilled she identified the remarkable work of the Canadian National Citizen's inquiry . I will be chipping away with her links .
Thanks, Linelle. She is amazing. It takes me all day to transcribe a 90-minute interview I record on tape! I hate transcribing recorded interviews. But she has done this almost 400 times ... so every word is correctly preserved for posterity!
So necessary to have , since according to Dr Jessica Rose - they are scrub a dubbing many things ! I am just thrilled Bill with your find here . I will send it to others here in Canada who write some substacks .. all 3 maybe ?
Thank you. I hope people share this one widely. I hope a few of our worthless officials and mainstream media "journalists" see this too - and take the time to read (and think about) some of those transcripts.
Thanks Bill Rice, Jr. and Transcriber B, great stuff! We need a whole army of transcribers, documenting the past and present.
If you're typing it all manually, you could consider automating the transcribing, save a lot of work, because you only have to do the proofreading.
Speech recognition has made a quantum leap recently, and Whisper (https://github.com/openai/whisper) is one solution, which works really well. It's open source and free to download and install on your own computer. 10 minutes of video with ~1600 words can be automatically transcribed in about 80 seconds.
Here's a great video to get you started: "How to Install & Use Whisper AI Voice to Text" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABFqbY_rmEk.
I'll post some more details in my next comment.
How to become a transcriber:
1. Set up Whisper on your computer
2. Download a video from Rumble, Bitchute, Odysee, etc.
3. Transcribe the audio to text with Whisper
4. Share the transcript on your Substack account, or own web site
For support, see https://github.com/openai/whisper/discussions
It can transcribe the video below, with 10 minutes of speech (~1600 words) in about 80 seconds on the fastest setting (least precise).
"The #1 Thing that STOPS Your Weight Loss"
https://odysee.com/@DrBerg:4/the-1-thing-that-stops-your-weight-loss:1
Here is the command to run from the command line:
$ whisper the-1-thing-that-stops-your.mp4 --model tiny
It outputs not only the raw text, but also a file with timestamps in SRT-subtitle format, so you can play the video with subtitles, for easier proofreading.
See the resulting transcribed text (the-1-thing-that-stops-your.txt) and a sample of the subtitle version (the-1-thing-that-stops-your.srt) in the next comments.
The first few lines of the-1-thing-that-stops-your.srt subtitle file in SRT format. If you want to try it, you need to add a blank line before each line number (the lines with "1", "2", "3", etc.) since the line breaks are removed by the Substack comment system:
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:08,960
Let's talk about the top thing that can stop your ability to lose your midsection, your belly fat,
2
00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:13,360
and you're probably thinking it's sugar, right, or carbs, but there's something else that's
3
00:00:14,480 --> 00:00:19,520
of equal magnitude in preventing you from losing your belly fat. So let's say, for example,
4
00:00:19,520 --> 00:00:24,960
you're at the gym, you're doing exercise, you're doing sit-ups, and this midsection just does
5
00:00:24,960 --> 00:00:29,600
not come off no matter what. And when I go to the gym, I do see a lot of people exercising
the-1-thing-that-stops-your.txt
"Let's talk about the top thing that can stop your ability to lose your midsection,
your belly fat. And you're probably thinking it's sugar, right? Or carbs. But there's something else
that's of equal magnitude in preventing you from losing your belly fat. So let's say for example,
you're at the gym. You're doing exercise. You're doing sit-ups. And this midsection just does
not come off no matter what. And when I go to the gym, I do see a lot of people exercising
for months without much loss. And there's also people on keto and people doing intermittent fasting,
that still just cannot lose that belly. So today we're going to talk about this really important
barrier in getting your stomach flat. But warning, you may actually not like one about the tell you
in fact you may click off after hearing this, but realize I'm going to give you some good news.
I'm going to give you a solution to this. I hate when someone gives you a video, a bad news, bad
things happening in the world, but they then don't give you a solution. So what am I talking about?
I'm talking about alcohol, specifically wine. A lot of people are drinking wine,
yet they're eating healthy and they're doing keto and they're doing fasting, but they
still just cannot lose their midsection. And a lot of times they'll hear the concept that,
you know, pure alcohol is not a car. So therefore it's keto friendly because ketosis is all
about lowering your carbohydrates. Or maybe they've heard that there's such a thing as keto friendly
wine because there's no residual sugars in the wine because a lot of times wine actually has
residual sugars, small amounts, but they still have sugar. And that also includes a category
of mixed drinks with added sugar or beer that has, you know, hidden sugars.
But typically if we look at pure alcohol, it's not a car, it's not a sugar, it's something else.
It doesn't even necessarily increase your blood sugars or even insulin directly.
Indirectly it creates very severe insulin resistance, but not directly. You know, I was
traveling recently and I was at the airport and I needed to get some water and all they had
is a bar. So I went to the bar and asked for some water and he said, you sure you don't want
to drink? I said, no, I'm good. Come on. You only live once. Go ahead and have a drink.
You know, you work hard. You play hard. So I think in a social setting it's a bit more difficult
to say now. You know, and you see these commercials where people are drinking alcohol and beer
and wine and they all look so healthy, they should probably show what a heavy drinker looks like
when he or she drinks alcohol, probably not the picture of health. So what is the problem with
drinking alcohol like wine for your belly? Well, it all has to do with this thing called the liver.
The liver cells called hepatocytes treat alcohol like a poison, so they have to get rid of it.
And there's a couple different things that it does. It initially turns it into a more reactive,
more poisonous thing, which I'm not going to get into the names of it, but it actually goes through
this process to try to get rid of alcohol. And the effect of this toxicity of alcohol on the
hepatocytes, the liver cell, is that it injures the liver cells. It creates trauma and it can kill
the liver cells. And in this process, this bowel chemical breakdown, you develop fat on that
liver cell, the hepatocytes, which then starts turning your liver into a fatty liver.
With that also comes a lot of inflammation and scarring as a byproduct. And if that keeps going
for a period of time, you can develop cirrhosis. And then that increases your risk of getting
liver cancer and all sorts of other issues. The other problem with alcohol is it greatly
increases your estrogen in men. And at the same time, it lowers your testosterone. And you
probably have heard of the benefits of drinking alcohol just in moderation. Recently, they found
that was just a marketing thing put out by industry. In fact, they found no benefits of drinking
any amount of alcohol at all. The other problem with alcohol is that it's an empty calorie. That's
alcohol has calories. Now, if you look at the quantitative calories in a gram, okay, like in a
carbohydrate, you have like four calories per gram. In protein, you have four calories per gram.
And a fat, you have nine calories per gram. Without alcohol, you have seven calories per gram.
So it's almost as much as fat calories. And it's not nutrient dense calories, it's empty
calories, which means it actually has to utilize certain nutrients to metabolize it. So it'll
use up certain nutrients like B1, B1, B8, other B vitamins, zinc, copper, things like that.
So alcohol depletes these nutrients, especially B1. So the more alcohol or wine that you drink,
the less B1 you're going to have. And that creates all sorts of other side issues like anxiety,
worry, excessive thinking when you're trying to go to bed at night, nervous, tension,
rest of the leg syndrome and just plain old fatigue as well as hangover. Now, 50% of the population
drinks alcohol. Okay, so chances are you're in that category. And 5% of that 50% are heavy
drinkers. And so this video is just all about increasing the awareness. Primarily focusing on your
belly because as that liver becomes more fat, that fat then has to then go somewhere. So it spills
off into around the organs as what's called ectopic fat. And then in between the organs as a
visual fat. And that's why the belly starts expanding. And if you're doing the ketogenic diet or
you're doing intermittent fasting and you're drinking alcohol on the weekends, whatever,
it's going to be really hard if not impossible to get rid of this belly fat because of what happens
to the liver after you drink alcohol. You have this effect where it blocks the ability to oxidize
or burn fat for a period of time a lot longer than you might think. So let's say, for example,
you had a couple glasses of wine. Don't expect to burn fat for probably 48 to 72 hours after
that episode. So let's say, for example, you don't drink on a daily basis. You just drink every
three days. Then alcohol really affects the brain cognitive wise, mood wise. It affects the
endocrine system, the hormone system I already mentioned, lowering of testosterone, increasing estrogen.
It also affects your gut. Okay, the gut micro biome, which has a whole bunch of other issues connected
with that. It affects the heart. It creates a lot of negative things. What should you be doing? Well,
realize the effects of alcohol and maybe you just want to stop it all together,
especially if you want to get rid of this belly. Okay. If you can't do that
because of these cravings you have, take a look at the real reason why you are drinking. Is it
to reduce stress? Is it more for social situations? Well, just avoid those environments where you
keep getting yourself into. Don't gather where other people are drinking. Find some friends
that are non-drinkers. Don't keep alcohol in the house. Find some other ways to reduce stress.
There's a lot of things like certain herbs and like lemon balm tea is a good one.
Ashwaganda herb is another good one. B1 is one of the best things for stress reduction.
Try to find a natural one and I found recently that if you take it right before bad,
boy, does it help your sleep as well? And you'll just go right to sleep and then you wake up and
you'll feel really refreshed. And especially if you have been drinking alcohol or especially wine,
you're going to find that it's going to fulfill a deficiency and you're just going to feel a lot
better within minutes usually. The other thing you could do if you just can't give up the alcohol
is to dilute the alcohol with maybe sparkling water. For example in your wine, just fill it up with
water so you have half and half. So now you're drinking half the amount which has half of the negative
effects. The other thing you can do is to take milk vessel before you go to this social activity
where you're, you know you're going to be drinking wine. What's so interesting about milk vessel
is that milk vessel protects the liver against poisons. Okay, Tylenol poisoning, snake bites,
poisoning from mushrooms. It's a very unique natural herb that can also help if someone has
cirrhosis or inflammation the liver or a fatty liver. And the last solution I'm going to recommend is
kombucha tea. Try to find one with the least amount of sugars. But kombucha tea has this interesting
texture feel like it's a carbonated beverage similar to beer. It's kind of thick, acidic
and it gives you a nice relaxed feeling. And it even has a little bit of alcohol in a very tiny
amount. But it's a good kind of a transitional product off alcohol. So just go ahead and get
some kombucha tea and use that as your substitute. So now that we covered the wine and alcohol
situation, there are some other things to also help you get rid of your belly fat. And if you haven't
seen this popular video, I've put it up right here, check it out."
Thank you for interviewing her. I was wondering who this hard-working person was.
Fantastic work! And it is work! It's very ouch, my hat tip to you, Transcriber B!
I recently transcribed a speech that aired on C-SPAN in 2000 by an author who had been a DOJ Nazi hunter prosecutor. It was about the history of the Bush family, Prescott Bush, father to George HW Bush and George W Bush. And his role as Hitler's banker before, *during* and after WWII to the biggest war profiteers:
John Loftus - Unholy Trinity: The Vatican, The Nazis, and the Swiss Banks
Sarasota Reading Festival, November 11, 2000
https://www.c-span.org/video/?160639-1/unholy-trinity-vatican-nazis-swiss-banks (47:59)
It came with a rough transcript C-SPAN provided, sort of a voice-to-text rendition. Which was helpful, but needed a whole lot of correction, not recognizing names and other less common sayings, words, terrible punctuation and grammar. Even with the head start that took many hours, researching acronyms, like-sounding names.
(my piece on this at: https://freedomfox.substack.com/p/knowing-the-true-adversary )
I'm currently trying to do the same thing with the Senate confirmation hearings for Justice Clarence Thomas in 1991, Sen. Joe Biden presiding as Chairman. When the issue of Natural Law vs. Positive Law came up:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4887077/user-clip-biden-natural-law
While C-SPAN provides the voice-to-text rendition, it gets time-consuming, just like the speech was. And the entire hearing has many gems that are relevant today, 30+ years later, as we watch the rule of law as we knew it get shredded, turned to pulp, then reformed into a legal process with the same words but completely different meanings. Like Positive Law tends to do. Unlike Natural Law. Which is eternal in its clarity and meaning:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?21107-1/thomas-confirmation-hearing-day-1-part-2
This will be the subject of an upcoming FF piece when I finish it. We have much to learn from the archives of history. A Supreme Court confirmation hearing from decades ago with sparring between two key figures of today gains newfound relevance. As will the work of Transcriber B. Hopefully not three decades hence. Just sharing that I have great appreciation for what you're doing!
Thank you. You do some fascinating work, you dear foxes, thank you for sharing this.
Thank you for your great work Freedom Fox! Open Source, free speech-to-text software such as https://github.com/openai/whisper has gotten pretty good recently, if you're interested.
I'll add a sample from the video you refer to in a comment below, transcribed with Whisper. It has problems with names such as Harriman ("Haramun") and Thyssen ("Tissel"), but the rest looks correct. 5 minutes of video transcribed in 40 seconds.
For more, see my comment https://billricejr.substack.com/p/q-and-a-with-transcriber-b/comment/17635765.
Here's a sample, from 20 minutes in:
Thank you, Nick! I'll check it out. C-SPAN's speech-to-text is terrible. It was easier than transcribing without it, but not by much after fixing its errors.
Thanks Fox! I just added a link to a great video explaining how to install and use Whisper: https://billricejr.substack.com/p/q-and-a-with-transcriber-b/comment/17657205.
The install process includes ffmpeg, which is great, since it can extract part of a video, if you need to only transcribe a part of it. For my example above, I used ffmpeg to extract a new 10 minute video (from 20 minute to 30 minute mark) like this:
ffmpeg -ss 00:20:00 -to 00:30:00 -i "Unholy Trinity.mp4" -c copy Unholy-Trinity-20-to-30-min.mp4
Perhaps you could consider creating a post about this great tool, after you tried it? It could make a big difference, almost like a super power. But the thing is, people need to know it exists, and that it's realistic for them to install and use.
"[...] of American officers to Israel, to walk the battlefield.
But there was a problem.
They couldn't find any holes on the tops of the Egyptian tanks.
They hadn't been hit from the sky at all.
They've been blown up from the side.
That was the first combat deployment of the Thomas.
And I tell that story illustrate that sometimes American Jews
don't know who your friends are and who your enemies are.
One of the old spies said that Henry Kissinger
should be compelled to change his religious affiliation
from Jewish to self-promotion.
That may be a bit unfair to poor Henry,
who was after all only following a consistent American
diplomatic policy of siding with the Arabs.
In the long run, it was about money.
There's a few pages in my book, The Secret War Against The Jews,
that talked about our unusual banking system,
so my intelligence friends had stumbled across.
I'm going to break a major news story today with you.
It seems that during World War II, the leading Nazi
and dustfielder secretly owned a bank in New York City.
That bank was dissolved in 1951.
However, the records are clear, the Nazi bank in Manhattan
was run by President Bush's father, Prescott Bush,
and by Herbert Walker, his grandfather.
The Bush family was on the wrong side of World War II.
Now, we need to put this in perspective.
These are serious, serious charges.
We have them the ownership of the Nazi bank
proof from three different sources.
The Bush membership in the board of that bank
is a matter of public record.
Let's put it back in context.
After World War I, the leading German steel magnet,
August Tissel, was very upset because the ally
sees some of his companies for war reparations.
And he was determined, never to have this happen the next war.
So we set up a series of banks, one in Berlin,
named after himself the August Tissel Bank,
one in Holland, which had been neutral during World War II.
That was the bank for a sheep-vote on handle.
And then a bank in Manhattan, the Union Banking Corp.
So no matter which side won the next war,
his corporations could move their stocks and bonds
and one bank to the other.
Now, he even trained his two sons,
that they would have to preserve the family business
in the next war.
So he told one son that he would be a Nazi
and the other son that he would be a neutral.
So no matter which side won the war, the Tissels would win.
Now, the first thing the Tissels and family needed was money.
So they went to a major investment
from Brown Brothers, Haramun, in Manhattan.
Now, this firm was founded by Herbert Walker.
[...]"
** A few lines from the subtitle file it also generates, can be used for proofreading:
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,080
of American officers to Israel, to walk the battlefield.
2
00:00:05,080 --> 00:00:06,680
But there was a problem.
3
00:00:06,680 --> 00:00:11,960
They couldn't find any holes on the tops of the Egyptian tanks.
4
00:00:11,960 --> 00:00:13,960
They hadn't been hit from the sky at all.
5
00:00:13,960 --> 00:00:15,560
They've been blown up from the side.
Your best post ever, IMO. THANK YOU. And a heartfelt thanks to Transcriber B. She is a precious gem among gems.
Thanks, Mel. I think it might be one of my most important ... because I know how important the ultimate "historical record" is.
Also, as TB noted, this could project could help "change the narrative" .... today .... if the right people read these transcripts and took the interview subjects seriously.
That's my fantasy for now. If someone were to sit down and actually look at the list of transcripts, they would see that there are too many jab injury testimonies, too many doctor and nurse and expert testimonies-- all those "small multiples"--- they simply could not deny that there is something grossly wrong with the official "narrative."
See Edward Tufte on the power of small multiples.
https://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/books_ei
May she continue to be able to do this and protected.
Transcriber B...most of the time I can’t stay awake for video😂So THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!
Good point, Aaron. I often (but not always) prefer to read the transcripts or text stories. It's much faster and easier.
Another important side effect is that search engines can index the full text of the videos, allowing more people to find the information. Of course, this only happens if search engine crawlers are being sent there in the first place, and secondarily, provided that they are not blocked by the web site.
Loved your taking the time to interview Transcriber B. One of your best posts and yet probably it consumed much less time than some of your more time consuming projects. Great read.
Please know this ma'am, intelligent people read. I refuse to watch someone talk. Most of them are performing. So you please keep doing what you're doing. It's imperative work.
Thank you, devoalan. I prefer text, too. I'll keep at it for a while longer, but it has a cap, March 31, 2023. As I mentioned in the interview, I know that others are also working hard to gather and preserve video, audio and text. May more be inspired to do so also!
Thank you so much for interviewing her! I have subscribed to her stack and bookmarked her website. I am so glad someone thought to do this and I am thrilled to have an archive of testimony like the one from the pulmonary nurse in SC. I watched that when it first came out and thought that this needs to be saved. I really appreciate transcripts too because I much prefer to read rather than watch video. 🙏
What a treasure she is, and you too for broadcasting her resources. Thank-you so much.
Unless defeated teh current political leadership, that is majority cop-opted/owned by private welathy interest, will re-write history to tell a very different story. They've already tried to claim "no one made you get the shot". Thus she needs not only a hard copy but multiple given to others because not only will they alter anything she's placed on any website (that or shut teh site down) they will raid her home and confiscate any hard copies she has. To date Covid is there biggest and most blatant screw-up so they will do whatever they can to try and cover it up as time moves on and they can cover up history. How many Millennials today even know half of the important parts of history that previous generations were taught like how the US interned thousands of Japanese Americans during WW2? Or how teh Nazi's are more like how the progressives are today and not those fighting against teh aggressives that are called Nazis and fascists?
Yep.
History gets written by the victors, however, then the victors pass on and history gets rewritten again-- and again-- and again.
Just imagine what we could have learned form it had the library of Alexander not been lost whether it have been by nature or man.
I read that they're rewriting the Bible on line.
Evil, evil, evil.
Well, to be fair, the Bible most know today, KJV, is the product of a whole lot of rewriting itself.
True. Even so what Bandit was referring to is the continued re-writing to pervert the words even more so. It's hard to know what it's original and what is not unless one can read and comprehend the original text written in Biblical Hebrew. It's more than just being able to translate the words themselves but to also differentiate between the meanings of those words. If you were to translate the original Biblical Hebrew into English there would still be many arts that would be incomprehensible to us because were ignorant of history at that time, how the meaning of somethings now don't align with what they meant then. It's very tricky. Doesn't mean you shouldn't read teh Bible but know that it has been tampered with. Ideally one will be guided to understand it correctly.
On this subject we must pay attention to what is happening to our US Constitution in jurisprudence today. It is being redefined in ways that will make it even more unrecognizable in the near future. Far worse than what we've already experienced with so much "penumbra" linguistic revisions of it and an imagining of it as a "living, breathing document."
The Behavioral Scientists - propagandists informed by psychology and symbolism, linguistics - have painted a bullseye on it and are endeavoring to make collectivist authoritarianism not only constitutional, but the basis of it. Turning a governing contract that was created to protect individual liberty and freedom into a governing contract that dictates to the people what few rights they have. The whole Orwellian "war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength" redefinition of our Republic.
Cass Sunstein is a major force behind this, and much of the expanded reliance on behaviorism in law, the pandemic being the latest, most extreme imposition of it to date. Sunstein was a major player in the Obama administration and remains one in the Biden administration with several of his proteges in it, and in this government's ruling partner, Big Tech. Along with his wife promoting color revolutions around the world. As a law professor today at Harvard Law School he has recently penned these two papers that detail how to turn the US Constitution into a boot on the faces of American citizens, not by re-writing the words per se, but by rewriting the *definitions* of the words. They dress it up, put lipstick and a wig on it to make it sound so beneficent and high-minded. But it's conforming totalitarianism to the constitution, or vice-versa:
https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/cass-r-sunstein/how-to-interpret-the-constitution/
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4405238
They're not going to stop on their own. The courts are not there to protect us. We, The People have to stop them. And not give them our consent to be governed by tyrants.
Hear! Hear! Freedom Fox.
I call it DSD, Dynamically Shifting Definitions. What this means is tha the Left will use different versions of the definition of a word based on the context, the scenario. They're able to do this and truly believe what they are doing is just because they've been thru 12 years of public education indoctrination with an additional 4 or more years worth of upgrades in college. They are a generation of Manchurian Candiates who instead of being programmed to assassinate are programed to be activists/soldiers for collectivist governance. So in their mind they believe a word can have multiple definitions and it's not conflicting. Additionally you have people like Sunstein who are trying to officially redefine words legally making the new definition enforceable by law. The Left has been trying for decades to redefine the text of 2A to have it mean something other than what it means and they've done a fairly convincing job of it. The Feds are implementing false flag shooting's and encouraging them to within urban areas that have gang issues so as to provide the media with more examples that can be pushed out to the people to make it appear as if people are being shot every day on every street in every city be it small town USA or a major city all so as to create hysteria to bring about a willingness to support gun confiscation and a banning of the 2A.
Fear is the mind killer as quoted in Frank Herbert's excellent DUNE series.
The People and the States. While not all states I do believe some number of state level legislators will push back on the Feds. Get a Few more Kriti Noem's and Ron DeSantis into the Governors offices and teh Feds are going to find themselves fighting the states. I firmly believe we may see large scale efforts in several states to secede from teh US and reform as anew nation founded on the same constitution but with revisions (ie better and more explicit language in the 2A to make it clear it's meant for individuals), based on lessons learned, that will make it that much harder for the corrupt to eventually take over. There is no system that can guarantee to keep the wealthy from capturing and corrupting it because human behavior is what it is so the best you can do is to make it as difficult as possible so it takes a very long time.
Amen!
I know, it's also mostly what the religious leaders made up to keep people under their thumb.
Yes, the church wanted to keep the people ignorant, unable to read the Bible, so they would be dependent on the Church or more specifically those in it. When John Wycliffe translated in 1384 it greatly changed the balance of power. Once those you serve can understand what you do it becomes very difficult to continue to mislead them.
Also why mass was held in latin. The people couldn't understand it.
And, IMO ONLY(!), in latin it sounds more like an incantation or spell.
Not just the Bible but many texts both fictional and non-fictional which is teh danger of not having print copies of everything.
Yes, here's why: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/here-is-the-depopulation-plan-the
I don't think Covid was a screwup, it went very well "according to plan". My concern is what is next in their planning? Intentionally set wild fires that send toxic smoke to New York? Poisoning the food supply with mRNA? Reducing food availability so more people starve to death and fight over food? Maybe support for encouraging gender transformation so as to sterilize the population. I am sure the puppet masters have more plans in the works.
Operation Covid was a partial win but a very small win. There were 2 primary goals:
1) Implement a physical monitoring & tracking system nationally; the vaccine passport
2) set the precedent that the Federal government can mandate the drugging of the public at least during a declared emergency if not at any time
Num1 effectively failed save for a few cities and even in those the system was not fully implemented and even in those cities if any publicly accessible places are still requiring the vaxx pass I'd be surprised.
Num2 failed. They were able to get a very large percentage of Americans to not only voluntarily take the Jab (with a smaller percentage willing to get boosters too) but to also promote it and shame those who refused too. Where they failed and epically is with the courts when groups challenged the presidents attempt to use OSHA as cover to mandate vaccination of companies with 100+ or more employees. By making it all the way to SCOTUS and being ruled against the president now or future can no longer try this again. Any future attempt at mandating drugging of the public would require a different approach such as passing legislation saying the Federal Government can do this but even then if it made its way to SCOTUS I expect it would fail to at least with the current make up of SCOTUS. Not only can the president not do this for private sector entities with employees but he can't even do it to Federal employees.
While I say mandate "drugging" of the public they won't do that initially. Instead what they will do is mandate a singular drug and it will be a vaccine because vaccines in general are largely trusted by the majority of the public, so much so that they don't question any new vaccine(s) introduced to the system even though the FDA ends up recalling %30 of all new drugs it approves. Since the Childhood Vaccine Protection act was passed in 1986 which gave vaccine manufacturers Federal protection from being liable for any/all harm caused by any vaccine, the number of mandatory vaccines for kids (for access to the public education system you are required to help fund) has gone from 4 to over 60 (varied based on state). That’s a greater than 10 times increase in just 4 decades. The normal period for the development, testing and approval for a drug is between 10-15 years. It’s absurd how quickly the number of vaccines has increased and it all is due to the manufacturers being liable free and because it gets added to the mandatory list for kids.
None of that is to say they won't try a pandemic #2. After all they still can shoot for completing the vaxx pass system which they will need before they can move us to a more Federally controlled state like in China. The end goal is to convert us to something akin to what the CCP uses in China; a social credit score system enforced via the widespread monitoring and tracking of the citizenry. It's not just the Democrats who are on board with this but a sizeable percent of the Republicans too. It's mainly the wealthy and politically connected Republicans and mainly in the Senate as opposed to the house; persons like Mitt Romney and Mitch McConnel. So they will have to find some way of implementing that and sooner rather that later.
They also have to find some way to set the precedent that they can mandate drugging of the public even if it's just during an emergency and even if it's only for very specific emergencies with very specific requirements. They just have to get that foot in the door for once they do they will then be able to expand that over time as the government typically does as just as they did with OSHA; using it as cover to mandate the covid vaccine. OSHA is a perfect example of the danger of allowing the Feds any additional powers or an extension of the existing Federal system. OSHA was created under the guise of providing protection for workers and while that was needed at the time the creation of the OSHA agency gave the Feds access to interfere with private sector operations and use that access for more than it was intended as they ALWAYS do. There is no agency or department that has never expanded is reach and power over time.
Apologies if this is lengthy but I am very passionate about this topic of government over reach and despite what’s happened I’m very excited to see how many Americans have had their eyes forced open and by the government and the corrupted and co-opted Media due to each over reaching by so much that it triggered the public into awakening from the walking sleep it was operating in.
My thought is the puppet masters knew that they would not succeed in injecting the entire population in the first of several "control" manuevers (call it depopulation). They got as many as the could and will now move on to another strategy such as poisoning and reducing the food supply and get another group, and continue until they return to another pandemic where they can mandate everyone get a shot (which occurred in the 19teens when a $5.00 fine was imposed if you didn't get the vaccine, a lot of money in those days). The remaining holdouts may well be "quarantined" (sent to concentration camps) at that point. I agree that a pandemic is the easiest way to get people to agree to a "life saving" vaccine. This is my "conspiracy theory". Albert Spence's testimony was very revealing about genocidal guidance for the CDC.
$5 back then is roughly around $175 today (thank you inflation) which no small amount but not soo much that those with more money couldn't opt out from participating in. It's one method they use to coerce the regular people into participating in something while letting teh wealthy skip it.
I would agree with you if they had left it at voluntary only but they not only went for mandatory after the voluntary participants were dealt with but they pushed hard on that, like as if it were a do or die kind of thing. You see I don't believe covid was planned but an opportunity. I believe covid was a real leak that they opted to take advantage of. Think about like this, if you're planning to execute a pandemic you will be taking on teh risk that the release could be traced back and exposed. If however there was naturally occurring leak of a similar virus, something impacting breathing, that would be the perfect opportunity to reduce your risk of exposure because you're then using something you didn't setup. Look at how the government initially reacted to covid; no big deal. Within 30 days they did a 180 degree turn around. They also seemed somewhat unprepared for it. There was tings ready to go because there was plan to do this but not just yet. If this was planned I'd have expected them to be for taking it very serious from the start.
I believe covid was an opportunity they took but due to it being far less deadly then what was needed, and them not realizing this until after things were in motion, they ended up having to spend billions in marketing and advertising to convince the public is was far deadlier then it was but even so because it keep getting less deadly with each mutation it to where they simply could not keep convincing enough percentage of the population and so Covid Narrative Collapse Syndrome swept across the nation defeating their narrative for all but those who I call the covid faithful. Also refereed to sometimes as covidiots and or the Branch Covidians (named after teh Branch Davidians a religious sect ) as well as few other titles I can't recall.
And so they lost the battle due they are own lack of realizing that covid was not as deadly a virus would be needed to make a plan like this work. You have to get not just a majority covinced but a large enough so that those who aren't convinced can be coerced by the majority into bending the knee until you get down to the small percent of die-hards who will never bend the knee and at that point you'll have a large enough percent on board that you can then imprison these few without public pushback.
As an engineer I have to forecast how designs will work in the end. For example which parts of the building will have poorer than average air conditioning control because there are more or less windows. A similar situation is present in any future planning such as a planned pandemic. The instigators can anticipate reactions and where the resistance will be, how their evil planning will progress. As the rollout continues they can tinker with the plan, timing of planned introductions, etc. Issac Asimov's Foundation Series is my primer for this concept.
I agree, the release of Covid virus is still up in the air for me too. I lean towards a planned creation and release. There is still the issue of a mysterious illness at the Wuhan military games in October 2019. Even if the origin was accidental my thought is it did not precede the planned release date by much.
Every month I run across more information pointing to a plandemic such as Transcriber B's transcription of Albert Spence's testimony of deadly changes to Covid patient treatment (instituted by the CDC).
Germany instituted control of the population and roundup/annihilation of the target population successfully in the 1930's. I see it happening again but this time it is a greater genocide. Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Germany also banned guns and took control of the media. Sound familiar?
This is my conspiracy theory and as time continues on more evidence emerges that I may be on the right track. Todays reveals were Transcriber B's posting and a 2021 report being declassified that Dominion voting machines in Georgia were definately tampered with.
Speaking of just within the US, had they not acted the way they did the first month I too would assume it was planned but they treated it lie it was no big deal until a month later when they did a 180 and all of a sudden it was the Black Plague 2.0 . Add to that they had to market to teh public that it was more deadly than it really was and I can't see the covid leaked from the wuhan lab as a globally planned event. I can believe it may be a China planned thing since there was the games in Oct 2019 which would be an ideal place to spread it so it could go global. I can also see China not being advanced enough to try and make their own more potent version of covid (after all the US was funding the lab) and in the process make something that was actually less effective. They released something they were expecting to do more damage globally than it did. I can easily see them having done this deliberately and having a working vaccine that they would give to their own citizens at some point after covid had decimated enough of the other nations people. With the level of control they have I can believe they probably gave this vaccine to some if not all of their military personal immediately so that once other nations specifically the US, had been decimated they could send in their military for an invasion. If you were head of the CCP and believed you were sending out something that would kill half or more of a nations population that would be more than enough to give you the upper hand for a non-nuclear war. On the other hand I can also see them just bumbling this thing and truly accidentally letting it get out. With China I believe either scenario is possible.
What I can't believe with the established history they have of executing this plan so far for the last 100 (if not more) years is that the Elite would bumble it as badly as has played out. They are smarter and better organized and coordinated than that.
number 1, vax passes are still required in some areas of the world for travel etc
Number 2, It was world wide co ordinated (even to the lockdown day in most countries) and top health officials had planned this in UK europe and other places. I have seen correspondence of at least 5 planning the date they would all do this
I'm speaking only of the US. There were different outcomes in teh various nations and of course it was global because it started out in China and leaked to their nations. I don't remember exactly what it was called but in teh Fall of 2019 there was an event where various representatives (soldiers) from teh different nations including China met for some kind of competition. If this was pre-planned they did a piss poor job at the start and while I despise them I know better than to think their less intelligent then they really are. had this been pre-planned they would have used something that would be deadly enough so that they wouldn't need to spend billions to convince people its more deadly than it is.
Maybe virus "spread" began in China, but maybe it didn't. It's certainly no sure thing and definitely shouldn't be considered as "settled science." Of course that IS the "authorized narrative," which is all that matters.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/case-zeroes-in-world-did-not-come?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Who's to say it didn't leak in wuhan and shortly after another version of it or simply more of it was leaked elsewhere by another nation. The only thing we can with certainty is that we will never know what really happened, at least not in our lifetime. They've kept JFK assassination info classified for 6 decades and that's just the assassination of 1 person. Imagine what they'd do to keep secret a semi-planned to planed globe wide pandemic effort.
I wish what you said about the courts and precedent was true. But it's not. The mandated jabs were only struck down (the ones that were, others like for health care workers remain) based on process issues, not recognizing any rights. They didn't follow proper procedures was the justification given for rejecting the mandates. They didn't go through proper public comment for regulatory changes or public testimony for legislation. That's it. If they wish to make them permanent that's all they have to do. And they learned they can get away with violating those conditions for at least two years before the courts will challenge them. We did not get good legal precedents set by those rulings. Just a reprieve.
There wasn't 1 single reason given for all the various covid mandate lawsuits that went thru the courts. Some were due to the lack of proper procedure as you said but some were for other reasons. I forget which group pf military personnel it was but they won because teh Biden administration refused to recognize their religious exemption.
With regards to teh lawsuits against OSHA's mandates, the high court [SCOTUS] called the rule a "significant encroachment into the lives—and health—of a vast number of employees." The Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act does not plainly authorize the rule, the court stated.
OSHA ruling is a process ruling. Religious exemption ruling wasn't explicitly for religious exemption rights, it was because the Biden administration made a mockery of the entire religious exemption 'process' by setting up a demonstrable charade of religious exemption qualifications, not that there was even a right to refuse the jabs. It was the structure, the process for all of the rulings, not an upholding of the right to refuse the jabs; the i's and t's weren't dotted and crossed.
Well form what I understand the courts have gotten bad about that kind of thing. Constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes is always going on about how cowardly our Federal courts are when it comes to things that might challenge the deep state like the various election lawsuits people try to bring. That said i still believe another attempt to try and mandate using the same methodology and reasons as before will be even harder to do.