I actually made three posts at Alex's site. Here is my first post, which is getting a large number of "likes" ... so maybe my contrarian investigation is "moving the needle?"
I still think one of the most important goals for Fauci and his team of prevaricators was to cover-up and conceal any evidence this virus was already circulating widely in the world by late 2019 ... If "confirmed" or definitive evidence this was happening had been revealed to the public:
1) There would have been no need for lockdowns to "slow" or "stop" spread. This result would have been seen as impossible to achieve.
2) Everyone would know the real IFR for Covid was the same or lower than ILI/flu. Thus no mortality risk to 99 percent of world inhabitants. (That is, a very-contagious virus WAS spreading and making many people sick, this virus just wasn't killing hardly anyone.)
3) Many people would have already been infected and thus already had natural immunity.
4) The case for mandatory vaccines for an experimental, rushed "vaccine" would not be nearly as compelling.
In short, the entire narrative about this virus would be completely different.
Instead, Fauci and his lieutenants pushed the preposterous narrative that "spread" began at the Wuhan live market in December 2019.
This "authorized" story kept investigators from going backwards and looking for early cases. This also kept the focus only on China as the origination point, when the real origination event could have happened in America ... or Ukraine or maybe China ... but much earlier.
In my mind, there are many reasons real investigations into early cases have been off-limits. But Fauci et al DID effectively control the narrative on the start-date and location of virus spread. This took the focus off of Fauci and his collaborators. No investigator was looking for their fingerprints on this origination event.
So the likely virus architects or "mad scientists" in America who must have been deeply involved ... were protected. That is, this narrative-control effort WORKED ... with a giant and vital assist from the captured mainstream press, which has also refused to investigate all the copious evidence of "early spread."
Remember the Greenspring Retirement community outbreak of June and July of 2019? A severe respiratory pathogen outbreak where multiple staff and elderly got infected, three died? The staff were incredulous that such a respiratory outbreak would occur in SUMMER. It was reported in our press and you can still find the reporting of it online. I remember David Muir of ABC news talking about it. Then nothing. Do you recall this instance, Bill Rice, Jr? I’m curious. I’ve mentioned it before here on your stack, but you did not respond. Greenspring is about 60 miles from Fort Detrick. I’m pretty sure the thing was leaked here first… So are a lot of other people.
Sorry I didn't reply, Mel. I must have missed that post. Yes, I'm aware of that outbreak, which did get a little coverage at the time. I thought more than three residents died (I've saved some stories on this and could check). That's where I would start my American investigation ... and I would zoom in on Ft. Detrick, as one of my collaborators (who lives near this fort) has. People don't know or recall that Ft. Detrick was shut down in July 2019 for safety issues. And that vaping outbreak hasn't been investigated enough IMO.
So true, Bill. Obviously, if “we” were at fault and it got accidentally released here first, the thugs in our spy agencies devised a devious plan to take and release it in China where Fauci had outsourced GoF experimentation behind everyone’s back after the moratorium. They also must have given Iran a little gift. I’m so tired of the Mike Pompeo types in these spy agencies. They do so much damage to people and planet.
Why did the US cover up early spread? The virus was created in US then the US military was infected and sent to the war games in Wuhan. We have met the enemy and they are us.
I just found a long article from June 2020, where the author goes into depth on this possibility. Instead of maybe the virus being seeded or accidentally released, he thinks it might have been injected into soldiers via a vaccine. I hadn't read that theory. And I have still yet to read one article that said any of all the many people who got sick at those Military Games ever received an antibody test? My question: Why not?
In my wide ranging possibilities mind I consider that the powers to be might have tested their virus first or by accident it was transmitted early and they used that opportunity to secretly monitor the effect prior to sending it to Wuhan Military Games.
I have lost te article where this was stated. It is not amongst the many that I later saved. Do keep in mind that what I and others say but cannot prove will start as conspiracy theories however as we have all seen, the last year has proven many of the conspiracy theories that came before.
"MYTH: COVID-19 was circulating last summer at Greenspring, an assisted living facility in Springfield.
Fact: Testing of specimens collected during the outbreak of respiratory illness at Greenspring in July 2019 showed several bacteria, including Haemophilus influenzae (H. flu) and rhinovirus, the cause of the common cold. There is no need to re-investigate the outbreak."
Anyway, I would have a few questions: Why is there no need to re-investigate the outbreak? Couldn't they re-test the samples for SARS-2? Or have the samples meanwhile been disposed or "misplaced"? Or did they actually test them for SARS-2 and didn't like the results? But I guess these are just conspiracy theories.
That figures… Plausible deniability reigns supreme. But, but, but we couldn’t possibly re-investigate when it was just the common cold. In June. That killed people. That scores got sick from…All at once.
"America's Trusted Doctor" ??? Has there ever been any one in the history of the United States that has a more deleterious effect on as many Americans as Doktor Fauci? Its difficult for me to find words to convey my contempt for this pompous ass megalomaniac Doktor Fauci. This is so-called Doktor (science himself) who is and will go down in history as the father of the covid-19 pandemic!
Fauci will be a professor at the school of medicine in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Georgetown University. He will also work in the McCourt School of Public Policy. You can't make this stuff up. He will be teaching future doctors to be Josef Mengeles
I was a young man in the 1970’s when the Watergate investigation was all over the news. For a fairly harmless office break in and an embarrassing cover up, every journalist worth mentioning rushed to get a piece of the real scoop. Fast forward exactly 50 years and you see a class of reporters who seemed more interested in the size of Kim Kardashian’s butt than finding out what was really happening. All they wanted to do was parrot the WHO-CDC provided script. Never waste a good crisis, especially when it’s one you created.
David Martin first presented the essential smoking gun that Peter Dozshak left when he met with medical cabal insiders sometime in 2015. He pitched the virus, the pandemic, the media hype, and most of all the highly profitable vaccine saying that with the right amount of hoopla and terrifying reports, investors will jump in head first if the see the financial benefits opportunity being offered. Some day maybe we’ll discover just how much planning went into the atrocity. One thing is obvious- the code of silence they demanded was as tight lipped as what the planners of the Manhattan Project kept.
Looking forward to reading it Bill. I was living in DC at the time not too far from where the fabled break in occurred. Over the years I’ve heard numerous reports and the like about the motivation the “plumbers” had since Nixon was immensely popular which the ensuing election landslide proved. The DNC certainly didn’t have any secrets hidden there to sway the election. But everything from JFK assassination files to UFO matters were the alleged bait they were after. The investigation hoopla always seemed over the top and silly to me. Hard to believe that it was the biggest story of the decade while the biggest one at present is being hushed.
So how does this CNN Health article from November, 2019 fit within your theory?
Consider an interesting story from CNN that came out in November, 2019, an important time frame in the evolution of the lab leak/wet market story. Note the discussion about the need to develop a new type of all-purpose vaccine, a desire to test it widely, one that focused on a protein they link to a particular virus...like, say, a spike protein. Fauci is frequently quoted in it:
Building a better flu vaccine – one you don’t have to get every year
"But a universal flu shot would theoretically cover every strain of the flu using what’s known as an ice cream cone approach."
"Last spring, doctors at the NIH started testing universal flu shots on Sonn and other study participants to see how their bodies respond.
“I have a personal connection to the flu,” Sonn explained. “My grandfather was orphaned due to the flu epidemic in April 1919.”
The 1918-1919 Spanish flu pandemic infected a third of the world’s population and killed 50 million people.
Losing his parents at 6 years old left a mark on Sonn’s grandfather, and subsequently on Sonn himself.
“He really had great trust in science and medical research, so I know he would be proud I’m taking part in this,” Sonn said.
One of the most useful things about the universal flu shot is that if it works out as hoped, it will also protect against flu pandemics like the one that killed Sonn’s great-grandparents.
In a flu pandemic, a new strain of flu virus emerges. Since very few people have immunity to it, it can spread quickly and easily.
There have been four flu pandemics in the past century: in 1918-1919; in 1957-1958; in 1968; and in 2009.
The research got an extra push in September when President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at developing a better flu vaccine.
Fauci said it could take less time – but still many years – to develop a semi-universal flu shot, which would protect against not all flu viruses, but rather a group of flu viruses."
"The faster and more precise method is not to grow the virus at all and instead just create the virus’ protein, he said.
“We clone the gene that codes for the specific protein we want,” Fauci said. “I don’t even want to see the virus. I just need the sequence of that virus, the genetic map of that virus. And you could send that to me by email.”
That’s the technology that’s being used to create the vaccines being trialed on participants like Sonn right now.
“We feel like we’re pioneers, and our volunteers are pioneers,” Ledgerwood said."
How does that CNN piece from November, 2019 read in hindsight now? And integrate with your theory or any of the current theories, lab leak, wet market?
Very interesting. Thanks for this link. I don't know how this might factor into early spread (unless this new universal vaccine trial was used to seed Covid ... surely that didn't happen?).
I'm also extremely interested in the flu vaccine, which I've come to believe is the 2nd greatest vaccine scam in history.
Every dang public health agency is really a "Flu Vaccine Promotion Agency" ... And in this story Fauci himself admits that this vaccine is only "10 (!) to 60 percent effective" ... And that's probably a lie.
And buried in the story is this sentence:
"That’s another reason the flu vaccine has the low effectiveness rates it has today."
CNN's journalist is admitting the flu vaccine is really ineffective ... but still every media story I've ever read on flu says, "It's not too late to get your flu shot."
We're all supposed to believe flu shots have saved millions of lives.
If the flu vaccine had been exposed as the scam it is before Covid, we might not have had so many people lining up to get the Covid "vaccine." (So thanks MSM for your great skepticism).
I also think the flu vaccines in the winter and fall of 2020-2021 probably/perhaps somehow contributed to the big spike in "Covid deaths." This huge spike in deaths all started happening after senior citizens started getting that year's tflu shots. But we know this possibility will never be investigated.
Do you have any thoughts on how this new "universal vaccine" might factor into an "early spread" investigation?
Without investigative resources I have a theory, speculation, my thoughts about it.
I take the information I linked to above, the CNN story and the pharmaceutical industry stories and combine it with other information I've read. Like this paper that Anthony Fauci himself co-authored and published earlier this year:
Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses
Cell Host & Microbe, Anthony Fauci, January 11, 2023
The paper is very consistent with Fauci's remarks in the 2019 CNN piece, except his claims of fewer vaccines being needed then to more being needed now..
I'm also informed about what the mRNA biotech platform is intended to be - a sort of hardware/operating system of vaccine theory. That application programs can be downloaded onto with "boosters" that are specific to a virus, variant. Their goal, those with good intentions anyways, is to shorten the length of time from recognition of a novel infectious agent to production and distribution of 'protection' from it. As quick as writing some code into a new software update and then having people download it into the mRNA hardware/operating system they already have in their body. Instead of having to use chicken eggs or even mammalian cells as growing mediums, just code. Like the spikey image of a coronavirus, a Most Wanted poster goes out and programmers design an application that looks out for spike proteins in that configuration. The program update (booster) tells the mRNA to instruct the host body to manufacture that spike protein to produce an immune response. Believing that by acting quickly the drift of any variant will be smaller, making the vaccines more effective. That's the theory of vaccination and the experiments in biotech they are trying to achieve.
Now, all that being said, the goal of the more benevolent minded in the field, what was the purpose of the new type of flu vaccine deployed in 2019? What I describe as the goal based on what Fauci described in 2019 on CNN and in his 2023 paper cannot be achieved on the platform that the pharmaceutical industry was describing in those 2019 publications. What those changes in the 2019 flu vaccine did was make the 2019 flu vaccine more dangerous, pushing the H3N2 variant widely in the population, using mammalian cells to grow it in instead of chicken eggs, believing that change would make it more easily taken up and more effective replication inside the body, using live-attenuated virus, known to shed and spread. That combination makes the 2019 vaccine a very suspicious actor in a particularly virulent flu season that preceded the CV mania, as the combined death total of CV and flu in 2020 was similar to a bad flu season. As bad as it was, without CV testing and fear-porn news coverage the increased deaths from it wouldn't have been newsworthy.
But...all the fear-porn news coverage - brought to you by Pfizer - and testing gave public officials the impetus to grant experimental mRNA biotechnology EUA civil immunity for damages and a public willing to roll up their sleeves. Be "Pioneers" as the CNN article describes. And the increase in deaths from that biotech are newsworthy, but not in the news - brought to you by Pfizer.
My theory of the case is the 2019 flu vaccine was the predicate for the mRNA experiment. The whole GOF China lab leak vs wet market debate a distraction, the con that set up the bigger con. And both Big Pharma and Military-Industrial complex (both are inexorably linked) win the race to profit off of human misery. Disease and war are good for business. Same story as always. And, as always, the totalitarians are Johnny-on-the-spot to take advantage of human misery. Power and greed. Avarice. Ego. Pride. The deadly sins of man. What say you?
And let's layer in this information that preceded November, 2019, describing the new formulation of the 2019 flu vaccine? Just coincidence? Not related?
- This publication describes a brand-new style of flu vaccine that came online for the 2019-2020 flu season. Very virulent variant. Mammalian cell-based instead of egg-based. Claims that it was studied for efficacy...but no mention of safety trials:
"A new cell-based seasonal influenza vaccine has been issued marketing approval by the European Commission and will be available for the 2019/2020 flu season.
Flucelvax® Tetra (Seqirus) is the first cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) to be made available in Europe and is licensed for use in individuals aged nine years and older.
To date, there have been no randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of QIVc and standard egg-based quadrivalent vaccines (QIVe)"
“This real-world study, along with other emerging evidence, indicates that cell-based influenza vaccines may result in better influenza-related outcomes compared to standard egg-based vaccine options in some seasons"
"In the UK, the potential advantages of QIVc, which is cultured in mammalian cells rather than eggs"
“We are pleased to be bringing Flucelvax Tetra to the UK next season and have sufficient capacity at our cell-based manufacturing facility in the US to also ensure supply in September 2019"
- This article is interesting. It says that they added live-attenuated influenza vaccines to the schedule. It goes on to say that flu vaccines most definitely, positively, absolutely don't cause the flu, and by that definition won't shed...even after all of the science on vaccines admit that live-attenuated vaccines do shed. Curious:
"The 2019–2020 influenza vaccine recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) have remained mostly the same, with the exception of adding the LAIV to the immunization schedule."
- These articles tell us about the WHO's process is and what they decided the 2019-2020 vaccine recommendations would be. I'll note that the first link speaks to concerns with preparing for H3N2 from the prior year, while the second link says they ended up not developing that specific strain of vaccines, after all, and the third link says they went ahead and included the H3N2 variant, after all:
"They were also all on-board with “The Most Important Thing” - which was rolling out the new mRNA “vaccines.”
Early spread or not - in my opinion - I believe the above was the main reason. Firstly, by those who profited insanely from it and will in the future. But that is a relatively small group that couldn't have pulled it off alone.
They convinced thousands of influential people including many head of states that don't know anything about where, how, when and why and don't even want to know (plausible deniability). I believe, the majority of the powerful people were convinced that the mRNA technology is an amazing future technology that will do more good than harm. You don't have enough greedy immoral powerful people in the world to pull this off alone. They need the goodie-goodies on board and do their bidding for them. And the bidding they did and still do.
The goodie-goodies (Religion: Scientism) do know how bad these vaccines are. Of course, they do. But they have been convinced, that this is just a phase, collateral damage for the greater good to perfect this amazing new technology.
I don't buy into all this satanic evil fear-mongering some apply. You don't need a majority of evil people to do evil. (a strange unhelpful concept anyway). The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
I always keep in mind that Epstein Island could have been used as a blackmail tool for, amongst other efforts, to facilitate launching the deadly covid vaccine by creating a group of accomplices amongst government and industry.
The point I keep making about the Epstein "non-investigation," is what if they had exposed and disgraced Bill Gates (a possible regular client) many years ago?
Take away Gates' contributions and the Covid story isn't nearly as tragic. So there are consequences from not pursuing real investigations or real justice. Tragic ones.
If antibodies were found in December 2019 blood samples, why didn't they keep testing samples from each prior month to determine which month had zero blood donations with Covid antibodies.
I've been asking the same question for 3+ years. "Okay, we have a tranche of positive blood from WA, OR and CA collected Dec. 13-16, 2019. Now let's go find some blood collected, say, the last week of November 2019 ... in the same three states ... but also some more states."
They never tested any archived "Red Cross blood" from my state of Alabama, where 25 percent of the population was sick from "something" in December 2019 and January 2020. What would an antibody test from "archived" Alabama blood (collected in mid-January 2020) have revealed?
I really think all the things they didn't do but could have done is the smoking gun. They didn't do any of this extra testing because they KNEW the results that extra testing would produce.
That's the same reason they never interview anyone who had Covid symptoms and later tested positive for antibodies. If they did investigate these possible "early" cases, they might have no choice but to "confirm" they did have Covid when they thought they did. That would blow up the entire faux narrative.
Sorry for the late reply- responses went into my junk mail. Agreed. If there were cases going back to say summer 2019, the whole pandemic narrative would fall apart. For instance, when the NY Times recently said mortality is returning to normal, if the virus was around in the summer/fall of 2019 then why did mortality not increase until March 2020? We know many of the 2020 excess deaths were due to medical error and lockdowns. It's the same old story...intentionally do not look into it bc they know exactly what they will find.
But I keep saying these antibody tests are rather unspecific because there is a lot of cross reactivity. So this doesn't mean SARS-2 was around as early as 2018, although it remains a possibility.
One issue that you haven't covered is that President Trump had a memo sitting on his desk prior to 2020 (I believe it was early November) stating that intelligence reported an unknown virus of concern circulating in China. I remember reading about the memo after it was reported in 2020.
March 2020 or so, the Seattle flu study was finding something that was not simple flu, or “covid”, and told to stick to the purpose of their study, flu. It was reported in the Seattle Times. In fact, a big deal was made of the woman in charge for her flu study work.
For example, the CDC and NIH knew they had tranches of archived Red Cross blood they could test for Covid antibodies. One tranche of available blood was collected Dec. 13-16, 2019 in CA, WA and OR.
-----------
And that was four months before we did anything at all to slow the spread. Holiday travel, basketball games, bars, churches -- in 2019 we spent four months doing all the stuff they told was "too dangerous" in winter 2020 and 2021..........and we didn't even notice the virus circulating.
Authoreyezing is one of the great authorities on everything strange that happened at Ft. Detrick. She has been very helpful in our on-going investigation into "early spread."
The "powers that be" are interested in control and money, nothing new there. These men and women, many working in government, saw the pandemic "emergency" as a great opportunity to test fear as a weapon, to exercise mass control on a national scale. How easily will Americans give up their civil liberties? The answer, quite frankly, was scary.
In my humble opinion Covid 19 may have always been an intentional release to permit the deadly vaccine to be able to be distributed. Why else would they take successful drugs Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquin (used successfully by Trump) off the market! Too convenient for my liking.
Too many "Professionals" channelling the jab into arms despite all the correct warnings of its deadliness from the beginning.
Of note in EVOL news today is that Brevard County in Florida has passed a resolution to ban the Covid 19 vaccines. They cite the long list of serious side effects and deaths resulting from the jab. I am surprised this has taken so long. Bless Ron DeSantis.
Perhaps those who read the Foundation Triology will appreciate the possiblity that Covid 19 could be a mission in Mathematical Sociology to predict the future outcome of a desired effect, however in this case the goal is not to save mankind.
I should tell readers that after I hit "send" on these stories, I often go back and keep editing them ... by trying to better-clarify certain points or add a new sentence or two that I wish I would have included.
I mention this only because some people might want to go back and read the "improved" versions of my essays/articles as I think these edits/additions might enhance my arguments.
I actually made three posts at Alex's site. Here is my first post, which is getting a large number of "likes" ... so maybe my contrarian investigation is "moving the needle?"
I still think one of the most important goals for Fauci and his team of prevaricators was to cover-up and conceal any evidence this virus was already circulating widely in the world by late 2019 ... If "confirmed" or definitive evidence this was happening had been revealed to the public:
1) There would have been no need for lockdowns to "slow" or "stop" spread. This result would have been seen as impossible to achieve.
2) Everyone would know the real IFR for Covid was the same or lower than ILI/flu. Thus no mortality risk to 99 percent of world inhabitants. (That is, a very-contagious virus WAS spreading and making many people sick, this virus just wasn't killing hardly anyone.)
3) Many people would have already been infected and thus already had natural immunity.
4) The case for mandatory vaccines for an experimental, rushed "vaccine" would not be nearly as compelling.
In short, the entire narrative about this virus would be completely different.
Instead, Fauci and his lieutenants pushed the preposterous narrative that "spread" began at the Wuhan live market in December 2019.
This "authorized" story kept investigators from going backwards and looking for early cases. This also kept the focus only on China as the origination point, when the real origination event could have happened in America ... or Ukraine or maybe China ... but much earlier.
In my mind, there are many reasons real investigations into early cases have been off-limits. But Fauci et al DID effectively control the narrative on the start-date and location of virus spread. This took the focus off of Fauci and his collaborators. No investigator was looking for their fingerprints on this origination event.
So the likely virus architects or "mad scientists" in America who must have been deeply involved ... were protected. That is, this narrative-control effort WORKED ... with a giant and vital assist from the captured mainstream press, which has also refused to investigate all the copious evidence of "early spread."
Remember the Greenspring Retirement community outbreak of June and July of 2019? A severe respiratory pathogen outbreak where multiple staff and elderly got infected, three died? The staff were incredulous that such a respiratory outbreak would occur in SUMMER. It was reported in our press and you can still find the reporting of it online. I remember David Muir of ABC news talking about it. Then nothing. Do you recall this instance, Bill Rice, Jr? I’m curious. I’ve mentioned it before here on your stack, but you did not respond. Greenspring is about 60 miles from Fort Detrick. I’m pretty sure the thing was leaked here first… So are a lot of other people.
Sorry I didn't reply, Mel. I must have missed that post. Yes, I'm aware of that outbreak, which did get a little coverage at the time. I thought more than three residents died (I've saved some stories on this and could check). That's where I would start my American investigation ... and I would zoom in on Ft. Detrick, as one of my collaborators (who lives near this fort) has. People don't know or recall that Ft. Detrick was shut down in July 2019 for safety issues. And that vaping outbreak hasn't been investigated enough IMO.
So true, Bill. Obviously, if “we” were at fault and it got accidentally released here first, the thugs in our spy agencies devised a devious plan to take and release it in China where Fauci had outsourced GoF experimentation behind everyone’s back after the moratorium. They also must have given Iran a little gift. I’m so tired of the Mike Pompeo types in these spy agencies. They do so much damage to people and planet.
Why did the US cover up early spread? The virus was created in US then the US military was infected and sent to the war games in Wuhan. We have met the enemy and they are us.
I just found a long article from June 2020, where the author goes into depth on this possibility. Instead of maybe the virus being seeded or accidentally released, he thinks it might have been injected into soldiers via a vaccine. I hadn't read that theory. And I have still yet to read one article that said any of all the many people who got sick at those Military Games ever received an antibody test? My question: Why not?
In my wide ranging possibilities mind I consider that the powers to be might have tested their virus first or by accident it was transmitted early and they used that opportunity to secretly monitor the effect prior to sending it to Wuhan Military Games.
A lot of speculative fantasizing in these comments--claims without evidence, hearsay, "I just found a long article...where the author...thinks...."
The Canadian soldiers who came back from Wuhan Military Games were told not to talk about their illness.
Without evidence, your claims mean nothing.
I have lost te article where this was stated. It is not amongst the many that I later saved. Do keep in mind that what I and others say but cannot prove will start as conspiracy theories however as we have all seen, the last year has proven many of the conspiracy theories that came before.
Here is another article concerning Canadian Troops denied antibody test. Hope it helps your work.
https://financialpost.com/diane-francis/diane-francis-canadian-forces-have-right-to-know-if-they-got-covid-at-the-2019-military-world-games-in-wuhan
Yup
Yep, later they conveniently concluded, quote:
"MYTH: COVID-19 was circulating last summer at Greenspring, an assisted living facility in Springfield.
Fact: Testing of specimens collected during the outbreak of respiratory illness at Greenspring in July 2019 showed several bacteria, including Haemophilus influenzae (H. flu) and rhinovirus, the cause of the common cold. There is no need to re-investigate the outbreak."
They've scrubbed that page but here is a copy: https://web.archive.org/web/20200415000000*/https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/covid19/rumor-control
Anyway, I would have a few questions: Why is there no need to re-investigate the outbreak? Couldn't they re-test the samples for SARS-2? Or have the samples meanwhile been disposed or "misplaced"? Or did they actually test them for SARS-2 and didn't like the results? But I guess these are just conspiracy theories.
That figures… Plausible deniability reigns supreme. But, but, but we couldn’t possibly re-investigate when it was just the common cold. In June. That killed people. That scores got sick from…All at once.
"America's Trusted Doctor" ??? Has there ever been any one in the history of the United States that has a more deleterious effect on as many Americans as Doktor Fauci? Its difficult for me to find words to convey my contempt for this pompous ass megalomaniac Doktor Fauci. This is so-called Doktor (science himself) who is and will go down in history as the father of the covid-19 pandemic!
Fauci will be a professor at the school of medicine in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Georgetown University. He will also work in the McCourt School of Public Policy. You can't make this stuff up. He will be teaching future doctors to be Josef Mengeles
That's one of the surreal lessons of our New Normal: Crime actually pays ... quite handsomely ... even if you perpetrated "crimes against humanity."
I was a young man in the 1970’s when the Watergate investigation was all over the news. For a fairly harmless office break in and an embarrassing cover up, every journalist worth mentioning rushed to get a piece of the real scoop. Fast forward exactly 50 years and you see a class of reporters who seemed more interested in the size of Kim Kardashian’s butt than finding out what was really happening. All they wanted to do was parrot the WHO-CDC provided script. Never waste a good crisis, especially when it’s one you created.
David Martin first presented the essential smoking gun that Peter Dozshak left when he met with medical cabal insiders sometime in 2015. He pitched the virus, the pandemic, the media hype, and most of all the highly profitable vaccine saying that with the right amount of hoopla and terrifying reports, investors will jump in head first if the see the financial benefits opportunity being offered. Some day maybe we’ll discover just how much planning went into the atrocity. One thing is obvious- the code of silence they demanded was as tight lipped as what the planners of the Manhattan Project kept.
Jeff, did you see this story I wrote many months ago? I compared the Watergate scandal to all the off-limits Covid scandals.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/wheres-the-woodward-and-bernstein?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Looking forward to reading it Bill. I was living in DC at the time not too far from where the fabled break in occurred. Over the years I’ve heard numerous reports and the like about the motivation the “plumbers” had since Nixon was immensely popular which the ensuing election landslide proved. The DNC certainly didn’t have any secrets hidden there to sway the election. But everything from JFK assassination files to UFO matters were the alleged bait they were after. The investigation hoopla always seemed over the top and silly to me. Hard to believe that it was the biggest story of the decade while the biggest one at present is being hushed.
Excellent observations Bill. I posted my two cents in the comments there.
So how does this CNN Health article from November, 2019 fit within your theory?
Consider an interesting story from CNN that came out in November, 2019, an important time frame in the evolution of the lab leak/wet market story. Note the discussion about the need to develop a new type of all-purpose vaccine, a desire to test it widely, one that focused on a protein they link to a particular virus...like, say, a spike protein. Fauci is frequently quoted in it:
Building a better flu vaccine – one you don’t have to get every year
CNN Health, November 29, 2019
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/29/health/universal-flu-vaccine/index.html
[selected excerpts}
"But a universal flu shot would theoretically cover every strain of the flu using what’s known as an ice cream cone approach."
"Last spring, doctors at the NIH started testing universal flu shots on Sonn and other study participants to see how their bodies respond.
“I have a personal connection to the flu,” Sonn explained. “My grandfather was orphaned due to the flu epidemic in April 1919.”
The 1918-1919 Spanish flu pandemic infected a third of the world’s population and killed 50 million people.
Losing his parents at 6 years old left a mark on Sonn’s grandfather, and subsequently on Sonn himself.
“He really had great trust in science and medical research, so I know he would be proud I’m taking part in this,” Sonn said.
One of the most useful things about the universal flu shot is that if it works out as hoped, it will also protect against flu pandemics like the one that killed Sonn’s great-grandparents.
In a flu pandemic, a new strain of flu virus emerges. Since very few people have immunity to it, it can spread quickly and easily.
There have been four flu pandemics in the past century: in 1918-1919; in 1957-1958; in 1968; and in 2009.
The research got an extra push in September when President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at developing a better flu vaccine.
Fauci said it could take less time – but still many years – to develop a semi-universal flu shot, which would protect against not all flu viruses, but rather a group of flu viruses."
"The faster and more precise method is not to grow the virus at all and instead just create the virus’ protein, he said.
“We clone the gene that codes for the specific protein we want,” Fauci said. “I don’t even want to see the virus. I just need the sequence of that virus, the genetic map of that virus. And you could send that to me by email.”
That’s the technology that’s being used to create the vaccines being trialed on participants like Sonn right now.
“We feel like we’re pioneers, and our volunteers are pioneers,” Ledgerwood said."
How does that CNN piece from November, 2019 read in hindsight now? And integrate with your theory or any of the current theories, lab leak, wet market?
Very interesting. Thanks for this link. I don't know how this might factor into early spread (unless this new universal vaccine trial was used to seed Covid ... surely that didn't happen?).
I'm also extremely interested in the flu vaccine, which I've come to believe is the 2nd greatest vaccine scam in history.
Every dang public health agency is really a "Flu Vaccine Promotion Agency" ... And in this story Fauci himself admits that this vaccine is only "10 (!) to 60 percent effective" ... And that's probably a lie.
And buried in the story is this sentence:
"That’s another reason the flu vaccine has the low effectiveness rates it has today."
CNN's journalist is admitting the flu vaccine is really ineffective ... but still every media story I've ever read on flu says, "It's not too late to get your flu shot."
We're all supposed to believe flu shots have saved millions of lives.
If the flu vaccine had been exposed as the scam it is before Covid, we might not have had so many people lining up to get the Covid "vaccine." (So thanks MSM for your great skepticism).
I also think the flu vaccines in the winter and fall of 2020-2021 probably/perhaps somehow contributed to the big spike in "Covid deaths." This huge spike in deaths all started happening after senior citizens started getting that year's tflu shots. But we know this possibility will never be investigated.
Do you have any thoughts on how this new "universal vaccine" might factor into an "early spread" investigation?
Without investigative resources I have a theory, speculation, my thoughts about it.
I take the information I linked to above, the CNN story and the pharmaceutical industry stories and combine it with other information I've read. Like this paper that Anthony Fauci himself co-authored and published earlier this year:
Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses
Cell Host & Microbe, Anthony Fauci, January 11, 2023
https://www.cell.com/cell-host-microbe/fulltext/S1931-3128(22)00572-8
The paper is very consistent with Fauci's remarks in the 2019 CNN piece, except his claims of fewer vaccines being needed then to more being needed now..
I'm also informed about what the mRNA biotech platform is intended to be - a sort of hardware/operating system of vaccine theory. That application programs can be downloaded onto with "boosters" that are specific to a virus, variant. Their goal, those with good intentions anyways, is to shorten the length of time from recognition of a novel infectious agent to production and distribution of 'protection' from it. As quick as writing some code into a new software update and then having people download it into the mRNA hardware/operating system they already have in their body. Instead of having to use chicken eggs or even mammalian cells as growing mediums, just code. Like the spikey image of a coronavirus, a Most Wanted poster goes out and programmers design an application that looks out for spike proteins in that configuration. The program update (booster) tells the mRNA to instruct the host body to manufacture that spike protein to produce an immune response. Believing that by acting quickly the drift of any variant will be smaller, making the vaccines more effective. That's the theory of vaccination and the experiments in biotech they are trying to achieve.
Now, all that being said, the goal of the more benevolent minded in the field, what was the purpose of the new type of flu vaccine deployed in 2019? What I describe as the goal based on what Fauci described in 2019 on CNN and in his 2023 paper cannot be achieved on the platform that the pharmaceutical industry was describing in those 2019 publications. What those changes in the 2019 flu vaccine did was make the 2019 flu vaccine more dangerous, pushing the H3N2 variant widely in the population, using mammalian cells to grow it in instead of chicken eggs, believing that change would make it more easily taken up and more effective replication inside the body, using live-attenuated virus, known to shed and spread. That combination makes the 2019 vaccine a very suspicious actor in a particularly virulent flu season that preceded the CV mania, as the combined death total of CV and flu in 2020 was similar to a bad flu season. As bad as it was, without CV testing and fear-porn news coverage the increased deaths from it wouldn't have been newsworthy.
But...all the fear-porn news coverage - brought to you by Pfizer - and testing gave public officials the impetus to grant experimental mRNA biotechnology EUA civil immunity for damages and a public willing to roll up their sleeves. Be "Pioneers" as the CNN article describes. And the increase in deaths from that biotech are newsworthy, but not in the news - brought to you by Pfizer.
My theory of the case is the 2019 flu vaccine was the predicate for the mRNA experiment. The whole GOF China lab leak vs wet market debate a distraction, the con that set up the bigger con. And both Big Pharma and Military-Industrial complex (both are inexorably linked) win the race to profit off of human misery. Disease and war are good for business. Same story as always. And, as always, the totalitarians are Johnny-on-the-spot to take advantage of human misery. Power and greed. Avarice. Ego. Pride. The deadly sins of man. What say you?
And good pick ups from the CNN story. Back when saying such things wasn't deemed dangerous dis/misinformation and censored.
And let's layer in this information that preceded November, 2019, describing the new formulation of the 2019 flu vaccine? Just coincidence? Not related?
- This publication describes a brand-new style of flu vaccine that came online for the 2019-2020 flu season. Very virulent variant. Mammalian cell-based instead of egg-based. Claims that it was studied for efficacy...but no mention of safety trials:
https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/news/first-cell-based-quadrivalent-vaccine-available-for-2019-2020-flu-season
"A new cell-based seasonal influenza vaccine has been issued marketing approval by the European Commission and will be available for the 2019/2020 flu season.
Flucelvax® Tetra (Seqirus) is the first cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) to be made available in Europe and is licensed for use in individuals aged nine years and older.
To date, there have been no randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of QIVc and standard egg-based quadrivalent vaccines (QIVe)"
“This real-world study, along with other emerging evidence, indicates that cell-based influenza vaccines may result in better influenza-related outcomes compared to standard egg-based vaccine options in some seasons"
"In the UK, the potential advantages of QIVc, which is cultured in mammalian cells rather than eggs"
“We are pleased to be bringing Flucelvax Tetra to the UK next season and have sufficient capacity at our cell-based manufacturing facility in the US to also ensure supply in September 2019"
- This article is interesting. It says that they added live-attenuated influenza vaccines to the schedule. It goes on to say that flu vaccines most definitely, positively, absolutely don't cause the flu, and by that definition won't shed...even after all of the science on vaccines admit that live-attenuated vaccines do shed. Curious:
https://www.uspharmacist.com/article/20192020-influenza-vaccine-update
"The 2019–2020 influenza vaccine recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) have remained mostly the same, with the exception of adding the LAIV to the immunization schedule."
- These articles tell us about the WHO's process is and what they decided the 2019-2020 vaccine recommendations would be. I'll note that the first link speaks to concerns with preparing for H3N2 from the prior year, while the second link says they ended up not developing that specific strain of vaccines, after all, and the third link says they went ahead and included the H3N2 variant, after all:
https://elemental.medium.com/inside-the-making-of-the-flu-vaccine-c5d6f8cd174c
https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/who-vaccine-recommendations-are-used-pharmaceutical-companies-develop-produce-and-license-influenza
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/918053
Nice summary.
"They were also all on-board with “The Most Important Thing” - which was rolling out the new mRNA “vaccines.”
Early spread or not - in my opinion - I believe the above was the main reason. Firstly, by those who profited insanely from it and will in the future. But that is a relatively small group that couldn't have pulled it off alone.
They convinced thousands of influential people including many head of states that don't know anything about where, how, when and why and don't even want to know (plausible deniability). I believe, the majority of the powerful people were convinced that the mRNA technology is an amazing future technology that will do more good than harm. You don't have enough greedy immoral powerful people in the world to pull this off alone. They need the goodie-goodies on board and do their bidding for them. And the bidding they did and still do.
The goodie-goodies (Religion: Scientism) do know how bad these vaccines are. Of course, they do. But they have been convinced, that this is just a phase, collateral damage for the greater good to perfect this amazing new technology.
I don't buy into all this satanic evil fear-mongering some apply. You don't need a majority of evil people to do evil. (a strange unhelpful concept anyway). The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
I always keep in mind that Epstein Island could have been used as a blackmail tool for, amongst other efforts, to facilitate launching the deadly covid vaccine by creating a group of accomplices amongst government and industry.
The point I keep making about the Epstein "non-investigation," is what if they had exposed and disgraced Bill Gates (a possible regular client) many years ago?
Take away Gates' contributions and the Covid story isn't nearly as tragic. So there are consequences from not pursuing real investigations or real justice. Tragic ones.
If antibodies were found in December 2019 blood samples, why didn't they keep testing samples from each prior month to determine which month had zero blood donations with Covid antibodies.
I've been asking the same question for 3+ years. "Okay, we have a tranche of positive blood from WA, OR and CA collected Dec. 13-16, 2019. Now let's go find some blood collected, say, the last week of November 2019 ... in the same three states ... but also some more states."
They never tested any archived "Red Cross blood" from my state of Alabama, where 25 percent of the population was sick from "something" in December 2019 and January 2020. What would an antibody test from "archived" Alabama blood (collected in mid-January 2020) have revealed?
I really think all the things they didn't do but could have done is the smoking gun. They didn't do any of this extra testing because they KNEW the results that extra testing would produce.
That's the same reason they never interview anyone who had Covid symptoms and later tested positive for antibodies. If they did investigate these possible "early" cases, they might have no choice but to "confirm" they did have Covid when they thought they did. That would blow up the entire faux narrative.
Sorry for the late reply- responses went into my junk mail. Agreed. If there were cases going back to say summer 2019, the whole pandemic narrative would fall apart. For instance, when the NY Times recently said mortality is returning to normal, if the virus was around in the summer/fall of 2019 then why did mortality not increase until March 2020? We know many of the 2020 excess deaths were due to medical error and lockdowns. It's the same old story...intentionally do not look into it bc they know exactly what they will find.
They sort of did that in Italy and got positive results for samples from March 2019 (IgG) and October 2018 (IgA): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113979
But I keep saying these antibody tests are rather unspecific because there is a lot of cross reactivity. So this doesn't mean SARS-2 was around as early as 2018, although it remains a possibility.
One issue that you haven't covered is that President Trump had a memo sitting on his desk prior to 2020 (I believe it was early November) stating that intelligence reported an unknown virus of concern circulating in China. I remember reading about the memo after it was reported in 2020.
March 2020 or so, the Seattle flu study was finding something that was not simple flu, or “covid”, and told to stick to the purpose of their study, flu. It was reported in the Seattle Times. In fact, a big deal was made of the woman in charge for her flu study work.
For example, the CDC and NIH knew they had tranches of archived Red Cross blood they could test for Covid antibodies. One tranche of available blood was collected Dec. 13-16, 2019 in CA, WA and OR.
-----------
And that was four months before we did anything at all to slow the spread. Holiday travel, basketball games, bars, churches -- in 2019 we spent four months doing all the stuff they told was "too dangerous" in winter 2020 and 2021..........and we didn't even notice the virus circulating.
Authoreyezing is one of the great authorities on everything strange that happened at Ft. Detrick. She has been very helpful in our on-going investigation into "early spread."
The "powers that be" are interested in control and money, nothing new there. These men and women, many working in government, saw the pandemic "emergency" as a great opportunity to test fear as a weapon, to exercise mass control on a national scale. How easily will Americans give up their civil liberties? The answer, quite frankly, was scary.
Great work.
In my humble opinion Covid 19 may have always been an intentional release to permit the deadly vaccine to be able to be distributed. Why else would they take successful drugs Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquin (used successfully by Trump) off the market! Too convenient for my liking.
Too many "Professionals" channelling the jab into arms despite all the correct warnings of its deadliness from the beginning.
Of note in EVOL news today is that Brevard County in Florida has passed a resolution to ban the Covid 19 vaccines. They cite the long list of serious side effects and deaths resulting from the jab. I am surprised this has taken so long. Bless Ron DeSantis.
Perhaps those who read the Foundation Triology will appreciate the possiblity that Covid 19 could be a mission in Mathematical Sociology to predict the future outcome of a desired effect, however in this case the goal is not to save mankind.
EDIT: I just added a new last sentence to this article, one I think succinctly makes my main argument:
Also, for emphasis: “Confirmed evidence of early spread” = “Authorized Narrative destroyed.”
I should tell readers that after I hit "send" on these stories, I often go back and keep editing them ... by trying to better-clarify certain points or add a new sentence or two that I wish I would have included.
I mention this only because some people might want to go back and read the "improved" versions of my essays/articles as I think these edits/additions might enhance my arguments.
Covid was a bioweapon.
Covid was part of a gene therapy experiment.
MrNA is the future of the medical industry.
Liars don't stop.
They change the lie.