The Essential ‘Early Spread’ Questions
If only one person or organization that mattered would ask these questions …
In my last article, I employed the Socratic Method to ask if the Socratic Method should be outlawed.
In today’s article, I use the Socratic Method to test the possible “truth” of my hypothesis that many people had already been infected by a novel coronavirus months before the lockdowns designed to slow or “interrupt” “virus spread.”
I appreciate readers who take the time to think about these questions.
***
If you believe a novel coronavirus exists, was/is this virus particularly contagious … and lethal?
If there’s no such thing as viruses or there was no “novel” coronavirus, what exactly was the Covid-19 pandemic?
About the PCR test …
Do all or most people who tested positive for Covid-19 have a medical case?
Did most people who tested positive for Covid from the PCR test actually require “medical” treatment?
Excluding a positive PCR Covid-19 test or “DNA sequencing,” is there any other way to “confirm” someone was infected by this novel virus?
Is it possible we wouldn’t have had a terrifying pandemic if the Covid-19 PCR test hadn’t been created, patented and (eventually) widely administered?
If the PCR tests are iron-clad proof of Covid,
what about the antibody tests?
Are positive antibody tests another way to identify if someone had contracted the novel coronavirus that caused the disease Covid-19?
Did every person in the world who had Covid symptoms before mid January 2020 and who later tested positive for Covid antibodies receive a false positive result from these tests?
Did every one of these people contract an asymptomatic form of Covid-19 in the weeks before they received a positive antibody test?
If someone experienced “Covid-like symptoms” months before receiving a positive antibody test, should this be considered important information?
If several people received more than one positive antibody test, does this provide possible evidence their first positive result was not a “false positive?”
Should individuals who had possible early Covid (based on positive antibody results) have been tested repeatedly for antibodies?
Did this happen?
Why didn’t this happen?
Do public health officials not trust Covid antibody tests?
Why do doctors and scientists use antibody tests if their results are considered junk science or not credible?
How many people tested positive for antibodies and might have had Covid before the first “confirmed” PCR cases in their states?
Did testing labs or clinics report this information to state and federal public health agencies?
Have public health officials ever reported these numbers to the public?
Are the hundreds of people identified in my reporting who tested positive for Covid antibodies in late April or May 2020 the only people who might have had early Covid?
Asked differently: Isn’t it likely I haven’t identified every person in the world who could have had early Covid?
Have public health agencies been “transparent” in reporting important public health information?
The virus origin detectives did NOT spring into action …
How many people who report receiving positive antibody tests in April or May 2020 were ever interviewed by public health officials?
Could these people have been questioned?
Could officials have examined the medical records of these individuals?
Why didn’t they?
Could more tranches of archived blood have been tested for Covid antibodies?
Why didn’t this happen?
Had American scientists not created a Covid antibody test by March 1, 2020?
If so, why not?
When did the CDC test archived Red Cross blood samples for antibodies and why did it take nearly one year to report these results to the public? (Results from the one antibody study of archived Red Cross blood showed at least 39 Americans - 2.03 of those who gave blood in three states in mid-December 2019 - had Covid antibodies by November 2019).
If virus spread really began in China, why did
the virus spread so slowly?
If a novel coronavirus emerged (or escaped) from Wuhan China in September, October, November or December 2019, wouldn't this virus have begun to “spread” beyond Wuhan in a matter of days or weeks?
Did every person in Wuhan who was infected by this virus stay in Wuhan?
Could citizens of China have been infected by the novel coronavirus before the U.S. travel ban on Chinese citizens (on January 30, 2020)?
Is it possible the virus could have spread from China before January 30?
What is/or was the R-ought number for the novel coronavirus? (This number estimates the number of people who will later become infected from one original infected person).
Is this number more than one or two people?
In my research, I’ve found numerous examples of people who became sick in November or December 2019 - people who later tested positive for antibodies - who report that other people in their close contacts also got sick at the same time with the same symptoms. Some of these people (such as spouses) also later tested positive for antibodies.
The R-ought number for these people would be at least three or four. That is, an unknown infected person infected another unknown infected person, who then infected a known infected person (based on known positive antibody results). This known person later (seemingly or perhaps) infected other people or reported other people who became sick at the same time with the same symptoms.
Wouldn’t all of these examples represent cases of likely or possible “virus spread?”
Would a contagious virus that had infected a minimum of three or four people NOT infect other people in these same communities?
Are we supposed to believe transmission of this virus suddenly stopped in these infection clusters or communities? If so, why or how did this happen?
If people in many states WERE infected in 2019,
does this connote virus “spread?”
In my research, I easily identified early cases (based on positive antibody results) in at least 16 U.S. states. If none of these people had travelled to China, where and how did they contract this novel virus?
How did the virus - in November and December 2019 - infect people from Washington and California to New Jersey and New York to Alabama, Florida, Texas and Nebraska … if the virus was not being transmitted person-to-person?
If early spread was occurring outside of China, what implications would flow from this knowledge?
If just one of person in the world had Covid before the first person in China, wouldn’t this debunk the “settled science” that Covid originated in China?
Does the above question perhaps explain why early spread investigations outside of China have not been conducted and are seemingly considered off-limits or taboo to virus origins detectives?
If one Covid case was “confirmed” before the first case in China, wouldn’t the entire Covid-19 narrative be dramatically different today?
Would lockdowns have been ordered if officials recognized many people had already been infected?
Asked differently, why would public health officials lock down the entire world if they knew the virus had already spread around the world?
Would the Infection Fatality Rate and Case Fatality Rate be dramatically different if the denominator (number of people who had really been infected) was massively larger?
Would the fear of Covid be much smaller if everyone in the public knew this virus wasn’t killing people?
Why would younger, healthy people not at risk of Covid death need an experimental Covid vaccine to prevent their death … if they knew hardly anyone in their age group had died from this novel virus?
If antibodies do fade in many people …
Are the studies that say, in many people, Covid antibodies fade to undetectable levels in two or three months accurate?
If these studies are accurate, is it possible antibody tests given in late April and May 2020, aren’t picking up all the people who might have been infected in, say, November, December 2019 and January 2020?
Is it possible many more people had “prior infections” than the positive antibody results we do know about are telling us?
Is it possible the number of “false negatives” from antibody tests might be higher than the number of so-called “false positives?”
Do Covid symptoms matter?
Are symptoms of Covid-19 similar to the symptoms of the flu or any Influenza Like Illness (ILI)?
Is it possible that some percentage of people who had symptoms associated with Covid 19 actually had Covid-19?
Were far more people in America sick with these symptoms in the fall and winter of 2019-2020 compared to the previous 10 to 40 “flu seasons?”
In the “influenza season” of 2019-2020, did outbreaks of ILI begin earlier and last longer than in previous flu seasons?
According to the CDC and weekly ILI reports from state health agencies, was ILI “severe” and “widespread” in almost every U.S. state in December 2019 and January and early February 2020?
Is it true the CDC later significantly revised (downward) its estimates of the number of Americans who had contracted an ILI in the flu season of 2019-2020?
Why did the CDC do this?
How can public health officials rule out “early Covid” for people who were sick with Covid symptoms before Covid was supposed to be in their state or country?
Were Covid PCR tests available to test these sick people between November 2019 and mid-January 2020?
How many Americans think or suspect they might have had early Covid in this time span? Is this number just a few people or millions of people?
How many of the people who suspect they had early Covid cite unique symptoms, specific symptoms they’d never experienced with previous bouts of flu or ILI?
Has a study ever been done to see how many people who think they had early Covid later contracted PCR-confirmed Covid?
If large numbers of people in this group never developed “confirmed” PCR Covid, is it possible they’d acquired natural immunity when they were previously sick with Covid symptoms?
Is every person who thinks they might have had “early Covid” … wrong?
How do we know for sure these people didn’t have Covid?
Why did this particular contagious respiratory virus
spread so rapidly in the spring?
Is it true that respiratory virus typically spread through the population between November and February (and usually peak in the month of January)?
Why did the novel coronavirus allegedly begin to spread rapidly through the American population in March and April 2020?
If this contagious and deadly virus had escaped from China in November or December 2019 (or earlier), wouldn’t we expect more people around the world to have contracted this virus and died from it by March 15, 2020?
Why didn’t any public health official ever consider the possibility the virus had begun spreading outside of China by December 2019 (or earlier)?
Didn’t public health officials tell the public this virus was far more contagious and deadly than the flu? If so, why didn’t anyone notice any spike in all-cause deaths until March 2020?
Did the virus suddenly become more contagious and more deadly … in a few weeks in late February or early March?
If so, how did this virus suddenly become more contagious and more lethal? Is this typical of other respiratory viruses?
Before Covid, had we ever had a flu season that suddenly began to kill large numbers of people … in April?
Were public health officials telling the truth when they said this virus was a grave threat to everyone of all ages?
Why was this deadly virus primarily fatal to only people 82 or older with multiple co-morbid conditions?
By March 15, 2020 (the lockdown dates), did public health officials already know the vast majority of alleged “Covid deaths” occurred among the very old and those with multiple co-morbid conditions?
Again, if the virus was so contagious and deadly and had escaped from China months earlier, why wasn’t there a spike of deaths in, say, America before the middle of March 2020?
If lockdowns slowed or interrupted virus spread (and thus future deaths), why did all the historic spikes in deaths (in a few big cities) occur weeks after the lockdowns had been implemented?
Officials with the CDC stated they could find no evidence that “community spread” occurred in America until mid to latter February 2020.
How hard did officials look for such evidence and why did they ignore hundreds of examples of people who had tested positive for antibodies and had signature Covid symptoms before mid-January 2020?
Are officials saying that everyone who had Covid symptoms in November, December 2019 and January 2020 didn’t really have Covid?
Or if officials acknowledge some people might have been infected earlier, are they saying the virus didn’t spread beyond their hometowns or households (e.g. virus “spread” was “limited” … if it occurred at all)?
… And/or the virus wasn’t nearly as deadly in its earlier form.
What is their theory on why the virus wasn’t as contagious or deadly for those who were infected earlier?
Why do most people continue to believe what these experts say about virus origins and virus spread?
If these officials were lying about the origins of virus spread (or are too obtuse or lazy to figure out this virus may have spreading around the world weeks and months before “latter January 2020”), would the same experts lie about other “facts” about Covid-19?
Summary/Conclusion …
According to my utilization of the Socratic Method, the following had to be “true” to confirm the “authorized narrative” regarding virus origins:
* Without question, virus spread began in Wuhan China in December 2019 … or (now) perhaps November or maybe October or September 2019.
Prior to mid-January 2020, this contagious virus had not spread far outside of China.
People who were infected in Wuhan stayed in Wuhan.
* Lockdowns in mid-March 2020 could and did prevent virus spread (and thus saved millions of deaths).
* Any possible early cases in countries like America were the result of later “false positive” antibody tests and weren’t really Covid. All of the positive antibody tests (even the government’s own tests) were junk science and should not have been trusted. In fact, it’s strange any antibody tests were given at all if the results are so dubious or don’t matter.
* Public health officials did not have any valid reason to investigate possible early cases as officials already knew the first cases of Covid originated only from China (and date to only December or maybe November 2019).
* The fact millions of people experienced Covid symptom in the weeks and months before official Covid arrived is simply a coincidence and everyone who thinks they might have had early Covid is … wrong.
In America, community spread didn’t begin until the last half of February 2020.
The only way to “confirm” an early case of Covid is via a PCR test … and the first PCR test wasn’t administered in America until mid-January 2020. Thus, nobody in America could have had Covid before mid-January 2020.
My last questions …
Should I be able to ask these questions?
If not, why not?
Why is a credible or real investigation into the origins of virus spread off-limits to all public health officials and all members of the “watchdog” mainstream press?
This is a fairly long article, but it includes only a fraction of the questions that I think need to be asked about the likely real "birthdate" of virus spread. This article (like my previous article on The Socratic Method) shows that one question produces other important questions. I actually think this is why the Censorship Industrial Complex created by our rulers is so important to them. They don't want one or two good questions to lead to other good questions.
Kary Mullis fully debunked PCR as a diagnostic tool. Call me silly but I’ll take his word over all the media talking heads trying to convince me otherwise.
It is clear to my silly mind that PCR’s limited scope and poor reliability was exploited to further a manufactured agenda designed to take everyone’s eye off the ball for the purposes of furthering a predetermined plan.
I’ve no doubt covid had been circulating long ahead of March 2020. Weren’t the talking heads warning us of a particularly nasty flu season ramping up in 2019? Was it the flu? Or did they release a viral chimera?
The timing of it all is highly questionable. How convenient after trying every trick in the book they (and by “they” I include China, University Administrators, Politicians, and corporate executives) could not dial back the spread of Nationalism that was beginning to eclipse Globalism.
The virus in many ways really did reset their agenda. Thus, even though I have no proof I find it impossible to believe it was a cowinkydink. The real big question in my mind is, was covid really a laboratory construct? (Bonus points for figuring out how it was spread) Or did they destabilize the entire world with a huge propaganda campaign over the flu?
Regardless, the vicious disregard for human life was on display for those willing to look under the veil of forcible mandates, propaganda, and clinical blinders.
Lots died, were injured, and were made economically poorer needlessly. Knowing that should send a signal that going forward nothing is off the table.
Young and old. Men and women. Boys and girls. Children and infants. They’re all expendable. Game pieces used by a relative few that hold the strings of power to advance an agenda that you or I have absolutely no say in.
If the Pandemic proved anything it is, the American Republic is slated for destruction and there can be no democracy anywhere in the world. Big Brother knows best.