I won't even post/link this article to my Facebook account. What would would be the point? Still, if my 1500 "followers" happened to read it, I bet half of them would like it. They would probably be afraid to hit the "like" button or share button, but still.
When you allow government to decide what is and isn't permissible speech, it's no surprise that dissent is quickly thrown into the 'impermissible' bucket.
This is literally the reason for the First Amendment (at least the speech part of it). The founders knew that tyrannical governments attempt to control information and aggressively attack those who don't go along. (Think government's raid on Project Veritas over a non-stolen diary that they didn't even have any longer.)
I really loathe the entire idea of "hate speech". Who gets to determine what is hate speech? I read an article by someone on Substack today who tried to tell us that free speech is a good thing but hate speech was also a good thing to ban. Where does one draw the line in hate speech as to what is acceptable and what isn't? I don't think any 2 people would agree on what is and what isn't hate speech. Like it or not (and I don't like hateful comments) people ARE entitled to be rude and say hateful things. If you make an exception to free speech, where does it stop? Having opened the door to banning some speech - who gets to determine what should be banned and why? That's my 2 cents.
What I love about Substack and this certainly includes all the readers is how refreshing it is when the truth is not only allowed but is celebrated. Compare the conversations here with what you find in the comments in say Fakebook or that melting pot of intelligence Twitter. Don’t you find it astounding how when people speak truth to one another, they really seem to get along and enjoy it.
Post Haste Bill . I'm putting this one in my trunk under the floor boards before the smoke police come and get us here in Canada ; the covidians have cracked open those N95 multipurpose masks again .
Bill you have the nicest rants I have ever read. You are 'Southern nice' and I love it.
Permission (ha) to add another list? This is what I have seen cause the most Substack comment hysteria.
"The things thou shalt not say when one is in the freedom not-a-movement (please note these are NOT necessarily what I believe, just what I have noticed):"
2. Questioning ANY 'freedom heroes,' particlarly if they previously promoted jabbing and suddenly had an 'epiphany.' One must be FULLY on board with the heroes.
3. Viruses exist
4. One may get a vaccine in the future
5. Sending your child to public school
6. There is no connection between 5G and covid
7. There is no controlled opposition or 'white hats.'
8. There will be no justice.
9. It's not pharma's fault, or China, it's our government(s).
Well, I'm glad you just telling us what can't be said versus what you actually think.
Thanks for the advice. As much as they want to stop communication, word is already out and now bounce-back (or as I prefer to call it - Justified Retribution) is on the way - no pendulum swings in one direction for ever and when it gets too far out, it gets pulled back. This time is going to be one for the ages.....
While I find myself in agreement with the majority of your list, I would like to state that people staying the hell away from me in store lines has been a true gift from the scamdemic.
Bill- you have researched so much detail to support your Covid statements, but I do not remember seeing a similar approach to election fraud. Please explain in a bit more detail your belief:
“Massive election fraud probably did occur in 2020, especially in major ‘Blue cities’ in key swing states.”
I have that same gut-feeling but seemingly all potential claims were disputed. Your thoughts please.
“AIDS was never a threat to straight people or people who don’t share drug needles.”
Not to be a pain in the butt - however, there is something that needs to be pointed out. I've had many trainings in AIDS prevention and my husband is a virologist/immunologist who studied every bit of info that came out about AIDS - he also worked for Public Health Dept. in PA, which was the agency which tried to prevent epidemics, pandemics, and the like. As such he was first to get new info on AIDS and how to prevent its spread. It is known that there are many women who got AIDS from their husband/partner who had an affair with another man and didn't tell the woman. It is transmissable through body fluids is why it can be spread this way. This was also in one of the AIDS prevention trainings I went to. So, yes, AIDS can very well be a threat to straight people who don't share drug needles.
Here's a little prohibited speech that many seem deathly afraid to verbalize, or perhaps even too horrific to contemplate in their own minds. Systemic election fraud of course became perfectly evident the minute vote counting stopped in states which were about to determine a presidential election, followed by in your face ballot box stuffing. Just to be clear, that means self serving criminal authoritarians installed themselves in the executive branch of your nation by violating the most fundamental law of your land (the pitiful puppet who sometimes warms a chair in the Oval Office is nothing more than that). The expanding lawlessness you are experiencing in DC now should come as no surprise. Absent valid elections the American people can expect to be subjected to progressively more extreme dictate and tyranny. That is your future. COVID and injection dictates were just your first little taste.
I won't even post/link this article to my Facebook account. What would would be the point? Still, if my 1500 "followers" happened to read it, I bet half of them would like it. They would probably be afraid to hit the "like" button or share button, but still.
When you allow government to decide what is and isn't permissible speech, it's no surprise that dissent is quickly thrown into the 'impermissible' bucket.
This is literally the reason for the First Amendment (at least the speech part of it). The founders knew that tyrannical governments attempt to control information and aggressively attack those who don't go along. (Think government's raid on Project Veritas over a non-stolen diary that they didn't even have any longer.)
I really loathe the entire idea of "hate speech". Who gets to determine what is hate speech? I read an article by someone on Substack today who tried to tell us that free speech is a good thing but hate speech was also a good thing to ban. Where does one draw the line in hate speech as to what is acceptable and what isn't? I don't think any 2 people would agree on what is and what isn't hate speech. Like it or not (and I don't like hateful comments) people ARE entitled to be rude and say hateful things. If you make an exception to free speech, where does it stop? Having opened the door to banning some speech - who gets to determine what should be banned and why? That's my 2 cents.
Great article, Bill, keep them coming.
What I love about Substack and this certainly includes all the readers is how refreshing it is when the truth is not only allowed but is celebrated. Compare the conversations here with what you find in the comments in say Fakebook or that melting pot of intelligence Twitter. Don’t you find it astounding how when people speak truth to one another, they really seem to get along and enjoy it.
Post Haste Bill . I'm putting this one in my trunk under the floor boards before the smoke police come and get us here in Canada ; the covidians have cracked open those N95 multipurpose masks again .
Bill you have the nicest rants I have ever read. You are 'Southern nice' and I love it.
Permission (ha) to add another list? This is what I have seen cause the most Substack comment hysteria.
"The things thou shalt not say when one is in the freedom not-a-movement (please note these are NOT necessarily what I believe, just what I have noticed):"
1. Saying one disagrees with McCullough promoting mRNA tech 'subject to modification' (ok this was mine) https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/the-novelty-of-mrna-viral-vaccines
2. Questioning ANY 'freedom heroes,' particlarly if they previously promoted jabbing and suddenly had an 'epiphany.' One must be FULLY on board with the heroes.
3. Viruses exist
4. One may get a vaccine in the future
5. Sending your child to public school
6. There is no connection between 5G and covid
7. There is no controlled opposition or 'white hats.'
8. There will be no justice.
9. It's not pharma's fault, or China, it's our government(s).
10. Muslims are allies against the jabs.
11. There is/is not graphene oxide in the jabs
12. Weather weapons are real/fake
I hit you with a like, but I really meant that like! It was not a cursory like or a pity like, but a true like.
Well, I'm glad you just telling us what can't be said versus what you actually think.
Thanks for the advice. As much as they want to stop communication, word is already out and now bounce-back (or as I prefer to call it - Justified Retribution) is on the way - no pendulum swings in one direction for ever and when it gets too far out, it gets pulled back. This time is going to be one for the ages.....
While I find myself in agreement with the majority of your list, I would like to state that people staying the hell away from me in store lines has been a true gift from the scamdemic.
Congrats
Picked up by Brownstone again.
Do they pay ?
Bill- you have researched so much detail to support your Covid statements, but I do not remember seeing a similar approach to election fraud. Please explain in a bit more detail your belief:
“Massive election fraud probably did occur in 2020, especially in major ‘Blue cities’ in key swing states.”
I have that same gut-feeling but seemingly all potential claims were disputed. Your thoughts please.
“AIDS was never a threat to straight people or people who don’t share drug needles.”
Not to be a pain in the butt - however, there is something that needs to be pointed out. I've had many trainings in AIDS prevention and my husband is a virologist/immunologist who studied every bit of info that came out about AIDS - he also worked for Public Health Dept. in PA, which was the agency which tried to prevent epidemics, pandemics, and the like. As such he was first to get new info on AIDS and how to prevent its spread. It is known that there are many women who got AIDS from their husband/partner who had an affair with another man and didn't tell the woman. It is transmissable through body fluids is why it can be spread this way. This was also in one of the AIDS prevention trainings I went to. So, yes, AIDS can very well be a threat to straight people who don't share drug needles.
There’s also the thing where one somehow has to have the “right background” to comment about some topics. Which is ludicrous.
PS: Thanks, Bill! Yesterday was D-Day; 18-year-olds today now need a "safe space." smh
The gas chambers aren't showers.
Nothing changes.
Here's a little prohibited speech that many seem deathly afraid to verbalize, or perhaps even too horrific to contemplate in their own minds. Systemic election fraud of course became perfectly evident the minute vote counting stopped in states which were about to determine a presidential election, followed by in your face ballot box stuffing. Just to be clear, that means self serving criminal authoritarians installed themselves in the executive branch of your nation by violating the most fundamental law of your land (the pitiful puppet who sometimes warms a chair in the Oval Office is nothing more than that). The expanding lawlessness you are experiencing in DC now should come as no surprise. Absent valid elections the American people can expect to be subjected to progressively more extreme dictate and tyranny. That is your future. COVID and injection dictates were just your first little taste.