I won't even post/link this article to my Facebook account. What would would be the point? Still, if my 1500 "followers" happened to read it, I bet half of them would like it. They would probably be afraid to hit the "like" button or share button, but still.
Very revealing in today's news is Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook doing spin control saying he was just following orders from the government to 'silence vaccine critics' and 'origins of covid counter narratives'. He had the resources to do his own investigation at the time but did not do so. I expect to see a lot more celebrities back track on their support for the dangerous vaccines. Too late for the many killed and debilitated by the jabs.
When you allow government to decide what is and isn't permissible speech, it's no surprise that dissent is quickly thrown into the 'impermissible' bucket.
This is literally the reason for the First Amendment (at least the speech part of it). The founders knew that tyrannical governments attempt to control information and aggressively attack those who don't go along. (Think government's raid on Project Veritas over a non-stolen diary that they didn't even have any longer.)
And "somebody" finally got to the Murdochs ... and Tucker Carlson was gone from network TV. Of course, I see his latest Twitter post reached more than 80 million people. So the Law of Opposite Effects kicks in again.
Also, RFK, Jr. is still reaching tens of millions of potential voters ... on the unbanned platforms. I suspect the Powers that Be are not amused. Since they do not fight fair - and they don't want the masses coming at them with pitchforks - they are probably going to pick up on their Censorship game.
I just saw a video of RFK jr going after event 201 saying 'why are they all CIA agents' and my jaw dropped. This guy. No words. Absolutely on point, the man for now.
100% they will pick up the censorship as we get closer to the election. They're probably trying to figure out ways to make "spreading disinformation" an offense that forfeits your right to vote.
Citizen Free Press linked to a story today, saying that Fox News has already served Tucker for doing his Twitter programs. The inference is that the Powers that Be want to keep him silent until his contract runs out in 2025 - AFTER the presidential election. Hmm.
Now that liberal supporter Blackrock owns almost as much of FOX as Murdoch perhaps they are the instigators of FOX releasing Tucker and the overall new tone I've noted on the FOX News website. It is definately toning down the conservative viewpoint in my opinion. Time will tell.
I really loathe the entire idea of "hate speech". Who gets to determine what is hate speech? I read an article by someone on Substack today who tried to tell us that free speech is a good thing but hate speech was also a good thing to ban. Where does one draw the line in hate speech as to what is acceptable and what isn't? I don't think any 2 people would agree on what is and what isn't hate speech. Like it or not (and I don't like hateful comments) people ARE entitled to be rude and say hateful things. If you make an exception to free speech, where does it stop? Having opened the door to banning some speech - who gets to determine what should be banned and why? That's my 2 cents.
What I love about Substack and this certainly includes all the readers is how refreshing it is when the truth is not only allowed but is celebrated. Compare the conversations here with what you find in the comments in say Fakebook or that melting pot of intelligence Twitter. Don’t you find it astounding how when people speak truth to one another, they really seem to get along and enjoy it.
I've run into some issues here...there are a few truths that are hard to cross. Mainly questioning the 'freedom heroes.' No sir, that's not done. The ones who appreciate it though, really appreciate it.
Post Haste Bill . I'm putting this one in my trunk under the floor boards before the smoke police come and get us here in Canada ; the covidians have cracked open those N95 multipurpose masks again .
Ha! I read a good, contrarian piece recently that argued that the N95 masks are more dangerous that the baby blue masks that are littering every parking lot in North America.
Everyday, I pick up those lovely masks , break the ear threads and put them in the garbage .
Looking forward to your contrarian piece Bill about the N95's since I seem to dove tail with your contrarian nature . Our school boards are keeping the kids inside the school systems because of the smoke, and of course , the forest fires are deemed due to "climate change" regardless of the area where I have relatives who were evacuated , say two kids set a tire on fire and then rolled it down the forested hill , along with a man who came into the hospital with gasoline burns, and another woman spotted setting a fire in a can that got out of control - just to name a few who probably have no idea about climate change . However , our government is right there saying "it's an opportunity that can't be missed" again. Also saw a clip of retired firefighters in Nova Scotia who weren't allowed to help ??? Eerily from Canada as we burn with every opportunity politically -signing off with a smoke signal ... that could be politically incorrect .
Bill you have the nicest rants I have ever read. You are 'Southern nice' and I love it.
Permission (ha) to add another list? This is what I have seen cause the most Substack comment hysteria.
"The things thou shalt not say when one is in the freedom not-a-movement (please note these are NOT necessarily what I believe, just what I have noticed):"
2. Questioning ANY 'freedom heroes,' particlarly if they previously promoted jabbing and suddenly had an 'epiphany.' One must be FULLY on board with the heroes.
3. Viruses exist
4. One may get a vaccine in the future
5. Sending your child to public school
6. There is no connection between 5G and covid
7. There is no controlled opposition or 'white hats.'
8. There will be no justice.
9. It's not pharma's fault, or China, it's our government(s).
Well, I'm glad you just telling us what can't be said versus what you actually think.
Thanks for the advice. As much as they want to stop communication, word is already out and now bounce-back (or as I prefer to call it - Justified Retribution) is on the way - no pendulum swings in one direction for ever and when it gets too far out, it gets pulled back. This time is going to be one for the ages.....
Oh man isn't this a sad reality. That's what I fear if Trump gets in a second/third (whatever) time. People will be partying and take their eyes off the ball and not understand that sir brought in warp speed. What's next? "Some people wanted CBDC! And I did it faster than anyone else!" wtaf
I don't disagree and that is why this time I think buffering the pendulum to keep from swinging too far in the other direction is going to be important - so I hope all that happens!
buffering hasn't worked. the communists gain more ground every year. Things are mainstream now that were considered vile and immoral in the past. Not many years ago there wasn't a national pride month. President Bill Clinton officially declared June as Gay and Lesbian Pride Month in 2000. President Barack Obama expanded the observance in 2011 to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month. Now they are going after children. Pride month is just one aspect of the depravity.
I know history sometimes repeats itself, but it doesn't have to endlessly, and moreover, I ain't all that worried about the commies! I'm not looking for some enemy around every corner and I don't care if somebody is "gay". I care about things close to home the most. I don't give a flip what consenting adults do in the bedroom - tis none of my business. I do care about children and I vehemently went on record opposing approval of experimental medicine upon them. The vote was 21-0 even though it should have been 0-21.
While I find myself in agreement with the majority of your list, I would like to state that people staying the hell away from me in store lines has been a true gift from the scamdemic.
Thanks, David. I just saw that because I've already gotten several new subscribers from Brownstone. No, Brownstone does not pay for articles. That's okay though. That site is doing God's Work as far as I am concerned. I'm still flattered I'm part of the "Brownstone Writers Group."
A lot more people have discovered Brownstone in the last three years.
Very interesting article. This is a topic I haven't thought about much. I have corresponded with the author of the article, Ryan of the Mises Institute. He's an impressive fellow who thinks like I do. He makes his case with this article - It was a quid pro quo. The Jacksonians got political support for allowing future supporters to steal others' land.
Bill- you have researched so much detail to support your Covid statements, but I do not remember seeing a similar approach to election fraud. Please explain in a bit more detail your belief:
“Massive election fraud probably did occur in 2020, especially in major ‘Blue cities’ in key swing states.”
I have that same gut-feeling but seemingly all potential claims were disputed. Your thoughts please.
I haven't researched this in-depth so it's just my "Spidey Sense." There's no way a candidate with dementia who barely campaigned could have gotten so many votes in my opinion. It's all the Covid voting reforms - mail-in ballots and huge surge in absentee ballots - that I think were used to rig the election. All the ways that one could rig an election were probably used. My main thought is everything that is corrupt - that you would not think is possible - is now possible and being done. It's beyond brazen - election fraud, vaccine fraud, Jan. 6 fraud, RussiaGate fraud, Epstein cover-up, Green New Deal scams, mass censorship, etc.
Exactly. Never (sincerely) investigate what you don't want to confirm. And most of the "investigations" these days are scams.
And I'll make another prediction: The 2024 election will be even more rigged. I still don't think Americans understand how corrupt the country has become ... How brazen these people and organizations now are. Plus, to implement the rest of their program, they HAVE to win this next election.
“AIDS was never a threat to straight people or people who don’t share drug needles.”
Not to be a pain in the butt - however, there is something that needs to be pointed out. I've had many trainings in AIDS prevention and my husband is a virologist/immunologist who studied every bit of info that came out about AIDS - he also worked for Public Health Dept. in PA, which was the agency which tried to prevent epidemics, pandemics, and the like. As such he was first to get new info on AIDS and how to prevent its spread. It is known that there are many women who got AIDS from their husband/partner who had an affair with another man and didn't tell the woman. It is transmissable through body fluids is why it can be spread this way. This was also in one of the AIDS prevention trainings I went to. So, yes, AIDS can very well be a threat to straight people who don't share drug needles.
No, he may be bi, though - but I wasn't talking about the husband, I was talking about the WIFE who is straight and unknowingly was married to a bi husband. This happened to alot of women btw, as I learned in the AIDS training who got their info directly from Public Health Dept., etc. Those are the ones who keep the stats on who got AIDS and how.
Here's a little prohibited speech that many seem deathly afraid to verbalize, or perhaps even too horrific to contemplate in their own minds. Systemic election fraud of course became perfectly evident the minute vote counting stopped in states which were about to determine a presidential election, followed by in your face ballot box stuffing. Just to be clear, that means self serving criminal authoritarians installed themselves in the executive branch of your nation by violating the most fundamental law of your land (the pitiful puppet who sometimes warms a chair in the Oval Office is nothing more than that). The expanding lawlessness you are experiencing in DC now should come as no surprise. Absent valid elections the American people can expect to be subjected to progressively more extreme dictate and tyranny. That is your future. COVID and injection dictates were just your first little taste.
Yup, this. Meaning, censorship. Censorship of the truth. Whenever I hear someone say something such as, “We are now ALLOWED or PERMITTED” to say, enter a business unmasked or unjabbed”, I cringe. People seem to be unaware that they are ALLOWING their rights and free will to be usurped. Censorship is a major tool in this crime.
I won't even post/link this article to my Facebook account. What would would be the point? Still, if my 1500 "followers" happened to read it, I bet half of them would like it. They would probably be afraid to hit the "like" button or share button, but still.
By 2021 I'd completely given up on Faceplant, everything I posted on that sh*thole was being deleted... why even bother posting anything on there?
Total waste of time.
SAD!
Very revealing in today's news is Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook doing spin control saying he was just following orders from the government to 'silence vaccine critics' and 'origins of covid counter narratives'. He had the resources to do his own investigation at the time but did not do so. I expect to see a lot more celebrities back track on their support for the dangerous vaccines. Too late for the many killed and debilitated by the jabs.
When you allow government to decide what is and isn't permissible speech, it's no surprise that dissent is quickly thrown into the 'impermissible' bucket.
This is literally the reason for the First Amendment (at least the speech part of it). The founders knew that tyrannical governments attempt to control information and aggressively attack those who don't go along. (Think government's raid on Project Veritas over a non-stolen diary that they didn't even have any longer.)
And "somebody" finally got to the Murdochs ... and Tucker Carlson was gone from network TV. Of course, I see his latest Twitter post reached more than 80 million people. So the Law of Opposite Effects kicks in again.
Also, RFK, Jr. is still reaching tens of millions of potential voters ... on the unbanned platforms. I suspect the Powers that Be are not amused. Since they do not fight fair - and they don't want the masses coming at them with pitchforks - they are probably going to pick up on their Censorship game.
I just saw a video of RFK jr going after event 201 saying 'why are they all CIA agents' and my jaw dropped. This guy. No words. Absolutely on point, the man for now.
So far, RFK, Jr. is NOT "going wobbly." To cite a popular Tom Petty song, it seems clear that he "won't back down ... Gonna stand my ground." Yea!
100% they will pick up the censorship as we get closer to the election. They're probably trying to figure out ways to make "spreading disinformation" an offense that forfeits your right to vote.
Citizen Free Press linked to a story today, saying that Fox News has already served Tucker for doing his Twitter programs. The inference is that the Powers that Be want to keep him silent until his contract runs out in 2025 - AFTER the presidential election. Hmm.
Which is laughable on a number of levels. FOX is trying to claim that Tucker can't talk about what's happening in the world.........
I know, but it's still interesting (revealing) that they are apparently trying to silence him for as long as possible.
To use my chess-game analogy, Tucker is clearly a "power piece" in this game.
Now that liberal supporter Blackrock owns almost as much of FOX as Murdoch perhaps they are the instigators of FOX releasing Tucker and the overall new tone I've noted on the FOX News website. It is definately toning down the conservative viewpoint in my opinion. Time will tell.
I've picked up on this "BlackRock owns large shares in just about all the important companies" reality as well, Fred. Follow the money.
I really loathe the entire idea of "hate speech". Who gets to determine what is hate speech? I read an article by someone on Substack today who tried to tell us that free speech is a good thing but hate speech was also a good thing to ban. Where does one draw the line in hate speech as to what is acceptable and what isn't? I don't think any 2 people would agree on what is and what isn't hate speech. Like it or not (and I don't like hateful comments) people ARE entitled to be rude and say hateful things. If you make an exception to free speech, where does it stop? Having opened the door to banning some speech - who gets to determine what should be banned and why? That's my 2 cents.
Great article, Bill, keep them coming.
I always tell people that I will let them ban hate speech if they let me decide what it is.
No takers yet.
I like your snappy comeback. Can't imagine why no takers yet.
I'd like to think that maybe the point got drilled into their heads, but............
Agreed!
Meanwhile, in Australia...https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/australia-ban-swastikas-nazi-symbols-rcna88303
Wonder how they will police estate sales. That's where you get the best historical merch. No banning of Communist sickle and hammer though of course.
Or the crescent
What I love about Substack and this certainly includes all the readers is how refreshing it is when the truth is not only allowed but is celebrated. Compare the conversations here with what you find in the comments in say Fakebook or that melting pot of intelligence Twitter. Don’t you find it astounding how when people speak truth to one another, they really seem to get along and enjoy it.
Si. I read it for the Reader Comments ... like yours!
I've run into some issues here...there are a few truths that are hard to cross. Mainly questioning the 'freedom heroes.' No sir, that's not done. The ones who appreciate it though, really appreciate it.
Post Haste Bill . I'm putting this one in my trunk under the floor boards before the smoke police come and get us here in Canada ; the covidians have cracked open those N95 multipurpose masks again .
Ha! I read a good, contrarian piece recently that argued that the N95 masks are more dangerous that the baby blue masks that are littering every parking lot in North America.
Everyday, I pick up those lovely masks , break the ear threads and put them in the garbage .
Looking forward to your contrarian piece Bill about the N95's since I seem to dove tail with your contrarian nature . Our school boards are keeping the kids inside the school systems because of the smoke, and of course , the forest fires are deemed due to "climate change" regardless of the area where I have relatives who were evacuated , say two kids set a tire on fire and then rolled it down the forested hill , along with a man who came into the hospital with gasoline burns, and another woman spotted setting a fire in a can that got out of control - just to name a few who probably have no idea about climate change . However , our government is right there saying "it's an opportunity that can't be missed" again. Also saw a clip of retired firefighters in Nova Scotia who weren't allowed to help ??? Eerily from Canada as we burn with every opportunity politically -signing off with a smoke signal ... that could be politically incorrect .
Bill you have the nicest rants I have ever read. You are 'Southern nice' and I love it.
Permission (ha) to add another list? This is what I have seen cause the most Substack comment hysteria.
"The things thou shalt not say when one is in the freedom not-a-movement (please note these are NOT necessarily what I believe, just what I have noticed):"
1. Saying one disagrees with McCullough promoting mRNA tech 'subject to modification' (ok this was mine) https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/the-novelty-of-mrna-viral-vaccines
2. Questioning ANY 'freedom heroes,' particlarly if they previously promoted jabbing and suddenly had an 'epiphany.' One must be FULLY on board with the heroes.
3. Viruses exist
4. One may get a vaccine in the future
5. Sending your child to public school
6. There is no connection between 5G and covid
7. There is no controlled opposition or 'white hats.'
8. There will be no justice.
9. It's not pharma's fault, or China, it's our government(s).
10. Muslims are allies against the jabs.
11. There is/is not graphene oxide in the jabs
12. Weather weapons are real/fake
I like your list because it pushes buttons of people in several different tribes.
The article was not about comments, it was about the suppression of comments.
I hit you with a like, but I really meant that like! It was not a cursory like or a pity like, but a true like.
I like it.
Well, I'm glad you just telling us what can't be said versus what you actually think.
Thanks for the advice. As much as they want to stop communication, word is already out and now bounce-back (or as I prefer to call it - Justified Retribution) is on the way - no pendulum swings in one direction for ever and when it gets too far out, it gets pulled back. This time is going to be one for the ages.....
except that every time, the pendulum comes back to rest closer to the left side.
Oh man isn't this a sad reality. That's what I fear if Trump gets in a second/third (whatever) time. People will be partying and take their eyes off the ball and not understand that sir brought in warp speed. What's next? "Some people wanted CBDC! And I did it faster than anyone else!" wtaf
right. And people would say Trump didn't mandate the cbdc.
I don't disagree and that is why this time I think buffering the pendulum to keep from swinging too far in the other direction is going to be important - so I hope all that happens!
Peace,
BK
buffering hasn't worked. the communists gain more ground every year. Things are mainstream now that were considered vile and immoral in the past. Not many years ago there wasn't a national pride month. President Bill Clinton officially declared June as Gay and Lesbian Pride Month in 2000. President Barack Obama expanded the observance in 2011 to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month. Now they are going after children. Pride month is just one aspect of the depravity.
I know history sometimes repeats itself, but it doesn't have to endlessly, and moreover, I ain't all that worried about the commies! I'm not looking for some enemy around every corner and I don't care if somebody is "gay". I care about things close to home the most. I don't give a flip what consenting adults do in the bedroom - tis none of my business. I do care about children and I vehemently went on record opposing approval of experimental medicine upon them. The vote was 21-0 even though it should have been 0-21.
So - wilson....you got your views and I got mine.
Regards,
BK
While I find myself in agreement with the majority of your list, I would like to state that people staying the hell away from me in store lines has been a true gift from the scamdemic.
Ha!
Congrats
Picked up by Brownstone again.
Do they pay ?
Thanks, David. I just saw that because I've already gotten several new subscribers from Brownstone. No, Brownstone does not pay for articles. That's okay though. That site is doing God's Work as far as I am concerned. I'm still flattered I'm part of the "Brownstone Writers Group."
A lot more people have discovered Brownstone in the last three years.
Yes
100% agree.
I have suggested articles in the past, based on my interest, not necessarily yours.
I would like to continue this practice.
Consider this Misses article in relation to the new conservation rule being considered by the Bureau of Land Management.
It's deja vous all over again.
https://mises.org/wire/how-squatter-democracy-created-americas-first-welfare-program
https://www.blm.gov/public-lands-rule
Very interesting article. This is a topic I haven't thought about much. I have corresponded with the author of the article, Ryan of the Mises Institute. He's an impressive fellow who thinks like I do. He makes his case with this article - It was a quid pro quo. The Jacksonians got political support for allowing future supporters to steal others' land.
Gna happen again. The favored conservative groups will never give up the land once they get control.
At least the squatters of yore improved the land.
The new squatters will do nothing.
Oh wait, they will vote Democrat.
Bill- you have researched so much detail to support your Covid statements, but I do not remember seeing a similar approach to election fraud. Please explain in a bit more detail your belief:
“Massive election fraud probably did occur in 2020, especially in major ‘Blue cities’ in key swing states.”
I have that same gut-feeling but seemingly all potential claims were disputed. Your thoughts please.
I haven't researched this in-depth so it's just my "Spidey Sense." There's no way a candidate with dementia who barely campaigned could have gotten so many votes in my opinion. It's all the Covid voting reforms - mail-in ballots and huge surge in absentee ballots - that I think were used to rig the election. All the ways that one could rig an election were probably used. My main thought is everything that is corrupt - that you would not think is possible - is now possible and being done. It's beyond brazen - election fraud, vaccine fraud, Jan. 6 fraud, RussiaGate fraud, Epstein cover-up, Green New Deal scams, mass censorship, etc.
Thanks, my “spidey sense” feeling also. I do know that all purported LE and courts so quickly discounted claims without much, if any, investigation
Exactly. Never (sincerely) investigate what you don't want to confirm. And most of the "investigations" these days are scams.
And I'll make another prediction: The 2024 election will be even more rigged. I still don't think Americans understand how corrupt the country has become ... How brazen these people and organizations now are. Plus, to implement the rest of their program, they HAVE to win this next election.
They were disputed by the media not by the courts.
“AIDS was never a threat to straight people or people who don’t share drug needles.”
Not to be a pain in the butt - however, there is something that needs to be pointed out. I've had many trainings in AIDS prevention and my husband is a virologist/immunologist who studied every bit of info that came out about AIDS - he also worked for Public Health Dept. in PA, which was the agency which tried to prevent epidemics, pandemics, and the like. As such he was first to get new info on AIDS and how to prevent its spread. It is known that there are many women who got AIDS from their husband/partner who had an affair with another man and didn't tell the woman. It is transmissable through body fluids is why it can be spread this way. This was also in one of the AIDS prevention trainings I went to. So, yes, AIDS can very well be a threat to straight people who don't share drug needles.
Weeell... I suppose a husband who has a clandestine affair with another man isn't really straight. :)
No, he may be bi, though - but I wasn't talking about the husband, I was talking about the WIFE who is straight and unknowingly was married to a bi husband. This happened to alot of women btw, as I learned in the AIDS training who got their info directly from Public Health Dept., etc. Those are the ones who keep the stats on who got AIDS and how.
PS: Thanks, Bill! Yesterday was D-Day; 18-year-olds today now need a "safe space." smh
The gas chambers aren't showers.
Nothing changes.
Real and ostensible uses
Here's a little prohibited speech that many seem deathly afraid to verbalize, or perhaps even too horrific to contemplate in their own minds. Systemic election fraud of course became perfectly evident the minute vote counting stopped in states which were about to determine a presidential election, followed by in your face ballot box stuffing. Just to be clear, that means self serving criminal authoritarians installed themselves in the executive branch of your nation by violating the most fundamental law of your land (the pitiful puppet who sometimes warms a chair in the Oval Office is nothing more than that). The expanding lawlessness you are experiencing in DC now should come as no surprise. Absent valid elections the American people can expect to be subjected to progressively more extreme dictate and tyranny. That is your future. COVID and injection dictates were just your first little taste.
Yup, this. Meaning, censorship. Censorship of the truth. Whenever I hear someone say something such as, “We are now ALLOWED or PERMITTED” to say, enter a business unmasked or unjabbed”, I cringe. People seem to be unaware that they are ALLOWING their rights and free will to be usurped. Censorship is a major tool in this crime.