Case, death and hospitalization estimates are always dramatically ‘revised;’ the 2019-2020 data should not be believed & the flu “vaccine” clearly doesn’t work … plus other contrarian points.
Hi, Bill. I haven't read even half the article yet, but I couldn't contain my compulsion to add some basic info about the flu vaccines and their purpose.
First, the flu vaccine typically has negative efficacy, which means more people taking the shot get the flu than not. Which is about the same category of efficacy of all preventative vaccines that are hoisted upon us.
Second, the flu fear campaign to get you to juice up seems to me to be a milder variant of the one used to panic most people into getting the COVID death jabs. My next point will probably explain the amplification for COVID...
Third, the COVID psyop was across the board, all-in support from every entity, not just the Big Pharma mafia typical players. You did notice the chyron case and death toll streams at the bottom of every media outlet's video, right? Who organized all that data reporting in real time? That's not something you get without either fake data or multi-industry- and government-wide agreement on data format and reporting. Media, hospitals, clinics, state and local governments, feds... everyone instantly on the same page. And the PCR test all being conducted at 35 cycles when it's well documented it's unreliable even as a high level diagnostic tool at more than 29 cycles (Fraud Fauci even admitted that).
So... all the fear used for flu shots for years was just getting everyone on the same page for the big psyop, kind of like a real world version of the tabletop exercise. It's all part of a multi-decade plan roll out and escalation.
Finally, the entire purpose of all of this is to poison all of us. None of the vaccine efficacy data holds up, especially the legend of the smallpox and other plague eliminations the jab marketers have successfully taken credit for. All those diseases had already stopped killing people BEFORE those jabs where introduced. Just like you found here, if you control what data is displayed, you can rig the stats. Back then, they just started tracking death trends about 6-12 months before those jabs were introduced, so it looks like they stopped deaths. But if you look 1-2 yrs before that and include those deaths, the curve is already at the tail end near the bottom of deaths, with the jab juice having no statistical impact.
The whole thing is a scam, and I think Dr. David Martin's position is correct: they're all designed to harm and kill us slowly while extracting any wealth remaining. As Sasha Latypova and Katheryn Watt have proven, we're worth more to our gov't dead than alive.
OK, sorry. Back to the flu and the damages done there... all of which I think was just psyop training while getting rich for the big one...
... Also, I appreciate you highlighting the view that the flu vaccine efficacy is "negative." That is, the flu shot causes more people to have ILI symptoms. I think the huge spike in "Covid cases" in the second year of Covid (beginning around November 2020) could be tied to the roll-out of the 2020-2021 flu vaccine, which Freedom Fox tells me was a different type of flu shot.
There was a huge push to get more people to get their flu shots that season.
It's also possible the spike in ILI in 2019-2020 was at least partially tied to the roll-out of the 2019-2020 flu shot. I hope to expound on this theory in a story in the very near future. That's another story I don't think the Powers that Be will like and another story that will probably get only a couple of comments - which makes me think I might be dropping bombs over a particularly-vulnerable target.
Thanks, J Boss. I was starting to think this was going to be the first story I ever published that generated no comments. Your comment is great. I think just like you do. The flu "vaccine" program is a bigger deal than most people think. I love your point about the coordinated messages and stats. What a "tell" that is.
"One of these flu seasons is not like the others" .... Re: The ILI-percentage chart, note that …
2019-2020 is higher than all other flu seasons beginning in Week 40 of 2019 (which is late September). The graph’s ascent/slope is noticeably steeper in October 2019/November. The graph then goes vertical in early December 2019 and peaks in late December, which would be around Christmas (when Tim and Brandie McCain both got very sick). Also, the peak of “early Covid” would have occurred during the Christmas holidays. This means that the “school closing” data I have highlighted actually doesn’t capture when most Americans were “becoming sick.” This is because students and teachers were out on Christmas vacation and, thus, schools didn’t need to close “due to illness.”
In other words, the school closing statistics could have been even higher than 2,866 schools. (The peak of the 2017-2018 flu season happened after school had resumed. Still the 2019-2020 flu season produced approximately 50 percent more school closings than “the worst flu season in 40 years.”)
There is another major spike in late January/early February 2020, when it seems like 25 percent of Troy, Alabama (myself and two of my kids included.) The 2019-2020 ILI percentages are always much higher than the other seven flu seasons (except for six weeks around January 2018, when that flu season peaked.)
However, notice how the 2017-2018 Flu season peaked and then “dropped off a cliff.” This did NOT happen with the 2019-2020 season. Instead, there was another major spike in February and early March (before the lockdowns).
The reason 2019-2020 fell off a cliff around week 14 is this was after the lockdowns and everyone was advised to stay home and officials stopped testing for flu or ILI (the so-called “disappearing flu.”
Still, I think Covid - based on ILI symptoms - probably peaked in late February/Early March 2020.
In my opinion, any novel virus was already tapering out on its own at the time we had the lockdowns to “slow” or “stop spread.”
My next story will again highlight another key metric that’s gotten zero MSM attention - the fact that far more flu tests were given in the 2019-2020 season.
More flu tests were given to patients by doctors in 2019-2020 than all 27 weeks of the prior flu season - by huge margins.
Even if they ever had a “vaccine” that did work, I wouldn’t matter. I’m never getting another one as long as I live.
I’m trying to convince my friend not to get the flu shot this fall that her employer, Cleveland Clinic mandates she receive.
I have the Cleveland Clinic study bookmarked that shows the more covid shots one gets, the more likely they are to get covid.
Can anyone send me a link to the study they also did showing that their employees who got the flu shot last season had almost a 30% better chance of getting the flu?
But I don't think there can be any squabbling amongst those with discernment - that something is "more than amiss" with respect to the whole "Covid Episode" lets call it over the last five years we all have experienced. What baffles the minds is none have yet been held accountable - the testimony above speaks to one of the "players" - Ralph Baric, UNC-Chapel Hill - School of Public Health - same place I got my degree when he was there - and I think this testimony is damning and very revealing and tis high time some get held accountable - even if it means going up the ladder to the very top.
You know - Lady Libra - holds the scales - she suffers no fools.
Warm Regards Bill - keep going - keep sharing - I'll do the best I can and I'll learn along the way - but if at the end of the day - the pursuit is the "truth" - then that is like the same difference as pursuing peace!
Warm Regards,
Ken
ps - the best statistics professor I ever had - I remember him well was at UNC-Chapel Hill - it was a biostatistics class - and that professor was top-notch.
I should add I ain't no "Tarhill" nor a "Tarheel" either, but I did go to NC State undergraduate and had graduate studies at UNC-Chapel Thrill as I refer to it - just like Baric did - that swimmer scholarship fella!
Uh....moreover - I got my MSPH from Chapel Thrill - and was considered a fine student when there and I walked the halls with Baric - had I known then.....gracious me.
I should have noted that re: "flu deaths," the reasons these death figures is so high is that the CDC conflates "pneumonia deaths" with "flu deaths." Almost all of the flu deaths are, more technically or accurately "pneumonia deaths." The CDC obviously grouped these deaths into one heading to ... sell more flu vaccines.
Thanks Bill - this is an important article. I note the 2018-19 flu numbers also look very weirdly high compared to normal. I previously had understood that armies of flu hunters all over the world had been very diligently tracking flu incidence in each country with established scientific methods for many years.... but now I have to wonder if most of it is just, at best bad-science-BS data, or at worst deliberately manipulated numbers.
Maybe flu tracking used to be serious historically, but got taken over by the dark side more recently? (I vaguely remember seeing a documentary from several years ago about drs i think in india (?) whose job was to go around testing and tracking influenza - they seemed like serious and well meaning people). However I also can't really see much practical point in tracking flu numbers.... (unless one is trying to market a flu jab...)?
Hi, Bill. I haven't read even half the article yet, but I couldn't contain my compulsion to add some basic info about the flu vaccines and their purpose.
First, the flu vaccine typically has negative efficacy, which means more people taking the shot get the flu than not. Which is about the same category of efficacy of all preventative vaccines that are hoisted upon us.
Second, the flu fear campaign to get you to juice up seems to me to be a milder variant of the one used to panic most people into getting the COVID death jabs. My next point will probably explain the amplification for COVID...
Third, the COVID psyop was across the board, all-in support from every entity, not just the Big Pharma mafia typical players. You did notice the chyron case and death toll streams at the bottom of every media outlet's video, right? Who organized all that data reporting in real time? That's not something you get without either fake data or multi-industry- and government-wide agreement on data format and reporting. Media, hospitals, clinics, state and local governments, feds... everyone instantly on the same page. And the PCR test all being conducted at 35 cycles when it's well documented it's unreliable even as a high level diagnostic tool at more than 29 cycles (Fraud Fauci even admitted that).
So... all the fear used for flu shots for years was just getting everyone on the same page for the big psyop, kind of like a real world version of the tabletop exercise. It's all part of a multi-decade plan roll out and escalation.
Finally, the entire purpose of all of this is to poison all of us. None of the vaccine efficacy data holds up, especially the legend of the smallpox and other plague eliminations the jab marketers have successfully taken credit for. All those diseases had already stopped killing people BEFORE those jabs where introduced. Just like you found here, if you control what data is displayed, you can rig the stats. Back then, they just started tracking death trends about 6-12 months before those jabs were introduced, so it looks like they stopped deaths. But if you look 1-2 yrs before that and include those deaths, the curve is already at the tail end near the bottom of deaths, with the jab juice having no statistical impact.
The whole thing is a scam, and I think Dr. David Martin's position is correct: they're all designed to harm and kill us slowly while extracting any wealth remaining. As Sasha Latypova and Katheryn Watt have proven, we're worth more to our gov't dead than alive.
OK, sorry. Back to the flu and the damages done there... all of which I think was just psyop training while getting rich for the big one...
... Also, I appreciate you highlighting the view that the flu vaccine efficacy is "negative." That is, the flu shot causes more people to have ILI symptoms. I think the huge spike in "Covid cases" in the second year of Covid (beginning around November 2020) could be tied to the roll-out of the 2020-2021 flu vaccine, which Freedom Fox tells me was a different type of flu shot.
There was a huge push to get more people to get their flu shots that season.
It's also possible the spike in ILI in 2019-2020 was at least partially tied to the roll-out of the 2019-2020 flu shot. I hope to expound on this theory in a story in the very near future. That's another story I don't think the Powers that Be will like and another story that will probably get only a couple of comments - which makes me think I might be dropping bombs over a particularly-vulnerable target.
Thanks, J Boss. I was starting to think this was going to be the first story I ever published that generated no comments. Your comment is great. I think just like you do. The flu "vaccine" program is a bigger deal than most people think. I love your point about the coordinated messages and stats. What a "tell" that is.
"One of these flu seasons is not like the others" .... Re: The ILI-percentage chart, note that …
2019-2020 is higher than all other flu seasons beginning in Week 40 of 2019 (which is late September). The graph’s ascent/slope is noticeably steeper in October 2019/November. The graph then goes vertical in early December 2019 and peaks in late December, which would be around Christmas (when Tim and Brandie McCain both got very sick). Also, the peak of “early Covid” would have occurred during the Christmas holidays. This means that the “school closing” data I have highlighted actually doesn’t capture when most Americans were “becoming sick.” This is because students and teachers were out on Christmas vacation and, thus, schools didn’t need to close “due to illness.”
In other words, the school closing statistics could have been even higher than 2,866 schools. (The peak of the 2017-2018 flu season happened after school had resumed. Still the 2019-2020 flu season produced approximately 50 percent more school closings than “the worst flu season in 40 years.”)
There is another major spike in late January/early February 2020, when it seems like 25 percent of Troy, Alabama (myself and two of my kids included.) The 2019-2020 ILI percentages are always much higher than the other seven flu seasons (except for six weeks around January 2018, when that flu season peaked.)
However, notice how the 2017-2018 Flu season peaked and then “dropped off a cliff.” This did NOT happen with the 2019-2020 season. Instead, there was another major spike in February and early March (before the lockdowns).
The reason 2019-2020 fell off a cliff around week 14 is this was after the lockdowns and everyone was advised to stay home and officials stopped testing for flu or ILI (the so-called “disappearing flu.”
Still, I think Covid - based on ILI symptoms - probably peaked in late February/Early March 2020.
In my opinion, any novel virus was already tapering out on its own at the time we had the lockdowns to “slow” or “stop spread.”
My next story will again highlight another key metric that’s gotten zero MSM attention - the fact that far more flu tests were given in the 2019-2020 season.
More flu tests were given to patients by doctors in 2019-2020 than all 27 weeks of the prior flu season - by huge margins.
Even if they ever had a “vaccine” that did work, I wouldn’t matter. I’m never getting another one as long as I live.
I’m trying to convince my friend not to get the flu shot this fall that her employer, Cleveland Clinic mandates she receive.
I have the Cleveland Clinic study bookmarked that shows the more covid shots one gets, the more likely they are to get covid.
Can anyone send me a link to the study they also did showing that their employees who got the flu shot last season had almost a 30% better chance of getting the flu?
That’s an important study - surprising it was even published. Not surprising that the msm ignored it.
I also never heard anyone claim to have asymptomatic flu.
We can squabble over statistics - I offer this long testimony as evidence of that:
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Baric-TI-Transcript.pdf
But I don't think there can be any squabbling amongst those with discernment - that something is "more than amiss" with respect to the whole "Covid Episode" lets call it over the last five years we all have experienced. What baffles the minds is none have yet been held accountable - the testimony above speaks to one of the "players" - Ralph Baric, UNC-Chapel Hill - School of Public Health - same place I got my degree when he was there - and I think this testimony is damning and very revealing and tis high time some get held accountable - even if it means going up the ladder to the very top.
You know - Lady Libra - holds the scales - she suffers no fools.
Warm Regards Bill - keep going - keep sharing - I'll do the best I can and I'll learn along the way - but if at the end of the day - the pursuit is the "truth" - then that is like the same difference as pursuing peace!
Warm Regards,
Ken
ps - the best statistics professor I ever had - I remember him well was at UNC-Chapel Hill - it was a biostatistics class - and that professor was top-notch.
I didn’t know u were a Tar Heel . Great point on Baric. He probably started all of this.
Well Bill - you ought have know that! But whatever - this is on my mind now:
https://substack.com/@buffaloken/note/c-149501199
~
I should add I ain't no "Tarhill" nor a "Tarheel" either, but I did go to NC State undergraduate and had graduate studies at UNC-Chapel Thrill as I refer to it - just like Baric did - that swimmer scholarship fella!
Uh....moreover - I got my MSPH from Chapel Thrill - and was considered a fine student when there and I walked the halls with Baric - had I known then.....gracious me.
~
Go Bills!
🦬😈
I should have noted that re: "flu deaths," the reasons these death figures is so high is that the CDC conflates "pneumonia deaths" with "flu deaths." Almost all of the flu deaths are, more technically or accurately "pneumonia deaths." The CDC obviously grouped these deaths into one heading to ... sell more flu vaccines.
Thanks Bill - this is an important article. I note the 2018-19 flu numbers also look very weirdly high compared to normal. I previously had understood that armies of flu hunters all over the world had been very diligently tracking flu incidence in each country with established scientific methods for many years.... but now I have to wonder if most of it is just, at best bad-science-BS data, or at worst deliberately manipulated numbers.
Maybe flu tracking used to be serious historically, but got taken over by the dark side more recently? (I vaguely remember seeing a documentary from several years ago about drs i think in india (?) whose job was to go around testing and tracking influenza - they seemed like serious and well meaning people). However I also can't really see much practical point in tracking flu numbers.... (unless one is trying to market a flu jab...)?