Mark Epstein might go down in history

Jeffrey’s bother is apparently the only person who’s investigating if the government murdered his brother.

As Tucker Carlson and Epstein’s brother note, the bones in his neck that were broken are not seen in hangings, but are seen in strangulation. They also could have been broken by someone who knows how to instantly debilitate someone with a sharp, forceful blow to the throat.

Before I focussed the bulk of my freelance journalism and research on Covid falsehoods, I did a copious amount of research into the “Epstein Sex trafficking” saga.

My interest in both topics flowed from the same aspiration - namely, myriad Covid scandals and the Epstein scandal, if fully exposed, had the potential to “drain the swamp” and belatedly tell the public that our trusted leaders and officials are completely captured and corrupt - even evil.

I thus noted with great interest Tucker Carlson’s recent interview with Jeffrey Epstein’s brother.

In the past week, much of the media attention on the Epstein saga has focussed on recently-released court documents that name many of the possible clients or associates of Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation.

These names are important as they represent a Who’s Who of VIP world leaders from government and other sectors. 

Almost every person capable of critical thinking knows or strongly suspects that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell - for decades - were recruiting young women and girls to sexually service a cross-section of world leaders and perhaps blackmail them.

This elaborate and on-going operation was, in turn, ignored by agencies of the U.S. “Justice” System, which seemed to be determined to protect the careers and reputations of the likely “Johns.”

(The Epstein “sex-trafficking investigation” is apparently the only sex-trafficking operation in history where the mastermind of the criminal enterprise “trafficked” victims only to himself).

However, it now seems to be a given that the “Johns” or “Epstein associates” will never be exposed and face charges or public humiliation for participating in a prostitution ring that involved girls and women from ages 14 to their early 20s. 

For example, even today I am not aware of one likely repeat client who was interviewed by law enforcement or Justice Department officials.

This investigative disinterest stipulated, it’s still possible one crime involving Epstein might still have the potential to drain one segment of the corrupt Washington D.C. swamp. The crime that might produce seismic shocks to the system would be the murder of Jeffrey Epstein.

This scandal is a little more sinister than, say, Watergate …

After watching the interview with Jeffrey Epstein’s brother, Mark Epstein, I’m now almost 100-percent convinced agents of the U.S. government planned, executed and then covered-up the murder of Jeffrey Epstein. 

Furthermore, such a complex murder plot would have to have involved officials at the highest levels of government, including the attorney general of the United States, Bill Barr.

The government ordering a murder of a citizen allegedly in its “protected” custody would have to qualify as one of the most shocking scandals in U.S. history. 

Carlson’s interview with Mark Epstein was only 25 minutes, but in those 25 minutes, Mr. Epstein convincingly made numerous points that are jaw-dropping in their inferences. These points include:

* According to Mark Epstein, all of his efforts to find the truth have been stonewalled or blocked by officials. Indeed, it’s now clear to me that the most important person trying to find the truth about Jeffrey Epstein’s death is his brother - not any of the “truth-seeking” organizations in our government or the captured watchdog press.

* Mark Epstein points out that someone on the cellblock where his brother’s cell was located almost-certainly committed this murder. 

* Inexplicably, as pointed out by Mark Epstein, no official has provided him the names of the seven to 14 other inmates who were in this cellblock on the night of his brother’s death. One or more of these inmates would, of course, be the primary suspects for committing the crime.

* Michael Baden, the famed pathologist hired to review Jeffrey Epstein’s autopsy results, had previously made news by reporting the small bones broken in Epstein’s neck/throat area were not consistent with any hanging he’d seen. The previous conjecture was that someone broke these bones while assaulting Jeffrey Epstein, perhaps by strangling him.

* Mark Epstein said he thinks it’s possible that the murderer broke these bones with some kind of quick karate chop to the throat, which perhaps instantly demobilized (and silenced) Epstein. The criminal could have then staged the hanging from strips of jail clothing. (Pictures I’d never seen before showed a laundry room full of such clothing found in Epstein’s cell, which is strange for someone supposedly on “suicide watch.”)

* Mark Epstein pointed out that the autopsy revealed Epstein had been dead for “at least two hours” when jail employees finally found his body.

* He points out that since his brother was already obviously dead, official protocols should have resulted in his body being left in the cell so detectives could take photos and examine evidence as it was at the time of his death. Instead, his body was taken to the infirmary and, bizarrely, there are even pictures of medical officials trying to resuscitate him or intubate him hours after his death.

• For some reason, someone also put a hospital gown on Epstein’s body, when only a blanket would have been needed to cover his dead body.

More oddities from the crime scene, which wasn’t

treated like a crime scene …

* Mark Epstein notes that if his brother had been suspended by a contrived noose - tied to the top bunk of his bunk beds - blood would have flowed into his lower body and left bruises or discolored skin in these regions - which was not present.

* The indentions on Epstein’s throat also don’t match the V-shape one would expect to see if someone had been hanging from a bunk bed for at least two hours.

* Mark Epstein said the scars actually resemble someone strangled from a chord like Carlos was strangled in The Godfather.

* Mark Epstein strongly suggests that attorney general Bill Barr must be involved in either the crime or its cover-up, an opinion echoed by Carlson. 

Mark Epstein says Barr dismisses the murder scenario largely because he (Barr) said he personally watched hours of video footage that showed no one entered Epstein’s cell block. As has been previously reported, some of the key cameras weren’t working that night/morning. 

Mark Epstein also pointed out that the small windows on the cell block doors probably wouldn’t have allowed anyone to actually see into Epstein’s cell or view much of the spaces in that hallway/cellblock. (Also, most if not all of the fellow inmates would have been asleep when the crime occurred).

Mark Epstein points out someone could have ducked down and moved around in that area of the jail without being detected. Of course, as we’ve previously learned, the jail employees who were supposed to be keeping Epstein alive allegedly fell asleep during the night.

Regardless, the video footage that Bill Barr supposedly personally watched doesn’t definitively prove anything about the cause of death or a potential murderer getting into Epstein’s (perhaps open) cell.

* Mark Epstein says that every one of his excellent questions - questions any halfway competent real detective would have asked and pursued - were dismissed with the stock answer that a “thorough investigation had been performed.”

If this “investigation” was so thorough, why have so many of Mr. Epstein’s questions not been answered?

* Mark Epstein notes that the person who did the autopsy didn’t rule Jeffrey Epstein’s death a suicide. That person was a medical examiner who didn’t participate in the autopsy. She won’t answer any of his specific questions except for said stock answer.

• Mark Epstein and Carlson both suggest it’s possible the person who murdered Jeffrey Epstein had been intentionally moved to this cell block in the days or weeks before Epstein’s death. And then, perhaps, this person was moved out of the cellblock after Epstein’s death. If this is the case, we’d have more evidence of an elaborate, pre-meditated murder, which would not have been possible without jail or government officials moving this inmate into this cellblock.

• Mark Epstein said that everyone who had contact with his brother in the days and weeks before his death said he was not suicidal. He notes that a judicial ruling on Epstein’s appeal of his bond hearings was supposed to be released a couple of days after his death. Per Mark Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein thought he might have a chance to post bond and get out of jail. 

• This probably wouldn’t have happened, but it possibly could have. To Mark Epstein, it made no sense that his brother would commit suicide before this ruling was made.

* Mark Epstein also said, from information he’s been given, his brother had not previously attempted suicide (as reported), but was instead attacked by his cellmate. He went along with the attempted suicide story, probably to prevent another attack.

• And then we have the bizarre story that an inmate deemed an extreme suicide risk would have been left in a cell all by himself.

Great questions, terrible answers …

The above are just some of the excellent common-sense questions and points made by Mark Epstein.

Tucker Carlson added his own points by mentioning that, even today, nobody knows how Jeffrey Epstein made hundreds of millions of dollars and who he gave so much money to and why. Question: Has any investigator in the government ever heard the advice “follow the money?”

Until I watched this interview, I’d about given up hope any big scandal involving Jeffrey Epstein would ever be revealed to the public.

Jeffrey Epstein and his sidekick Ghislaine Maxwell, who isn’t telling what she really knows, could have probably brought down a big chunk of the world’s corrupt ruling class by themselves. They also could have shown that the U.S. government justice system is led by brazen criminals.

But dead men don’t talk. (Yes, I think Jeffrey Epstein is really dead. If anyone wants to see a real earth-rattling scandal wait until someone finds Jeffrey Epstein alive.)

The great surprise for me is that it might not be Jeffrey Epstein who gives us our “smoking gun.” Instead, it might be his brother, who apparently is the only person who wants to know if the U.S. government murdered his brother.

Of course, all of this is probably moot. What agency of the government would actually try to “prove” that Epstein was murdered?

Has anyone in Congress called for a special prosecutor or launched their own independent investigation?

If President Trump is re-elected, he could call for such an investigation, but this doesn’t mean it would happen. If it did, one of the prime suspects would be Trump’s own attorney general.

Still, Tucker Carlson deserves credit for putting this new avenue of investigation in front of the public. As Tucker points out, nobody in the watchdog press is curious about any of these questions.

If I was Mark Epstein and I thought my brother was perhaps guilty of nefarious crimes, I’d still want to know if my own government murdered him before he got a chance to defend himself in court.

Jeffrey Epstein is going to go down in the history books as one of our country’s great unsavory characters. 

It would certainly be an interesting plot twist if his brother went down in the same history books by showing citizens our own government committed murder and then went to elaborate lengths to cover-up its crimes.

Basically, I don’t care how or why the swamp gets drained; I just want it drained.