As I pointed out in a previous article, one unexposed scandal leads to future scandals and rampant unnecessary misery. For example, if Bill Gates was an Epstein client and had been exposed as such pre-Covid, we might not have had Covid as we know it (Since Gates is/was THE money man for all aspects of the contrived pandemic).
One could go back further. If Bill Clinton was a repeat Epstein client and had been exposed as such before 2016, his wife Hillary would have never been a presidential candidate. If she wasn't a presidential candidate, she doesn't make Russia Gate a big faux scandal and Donald Trump doesn't get harassed for four years.
What might have been? We'll never know ... because our justice system is completely captured.
FWIW, this is why I'm working so hard to try to expose one Covid scandal (or one Epstein scandal) in the hopes this might help "drain the swamp." If that Great Purge were to happen, many of the corrupt "leaders" of our important organizations would not be in a position to screw up the world even more moving forward.
Also, Jeffrey Epstein didn't strike me as the type person who had the guts to commit suicide, especially via a method that must have been slow and extremely painful. I also think he would have thought that, somehow, he was going to walk or pull strings and get out again. For decades, he'd gotten away with his crimes.
1. The cameras went out through a system fault. Allegedly
2. Epstein, had he any intent to top himself, would not have known the cameras were down giving him an opportunity to commit suicide....
3. Anyone even suspected of having serious intent to commit suicide whilst in prison would have 24/7 human eyes on the suspect. I have done 'constant watches' on prisoners. THAT is how it works. 2 hrs to find him dead? Pull the other one.
4. Epstein would not have been general population but be 'protective custody' separated from all contact with other prisoners.
5. Obviously person/people working in the prison system have been paid to 'silence' Epstein. As Owain above points out: ''Occam's razor''
6. Which leads me to ask: What 'insurance' has la Maxwell got salted away which stops them doing a wet job on her too? Which would be made public on her demise.....
They’re hoping nobody is capable of separating their detest for Epstein from the probable malfeasance of law enforcement. But, why they allegedly murdered/silenced him needs to take precedence over the fact that he was a piece of shit. He was literally the man that knew too much. He was presumably silenced at the behest of people that were likely just as bad as he was, if not worse. Be great to look under that rock.
For those who are interested, Eric Weinstein did a podcast in 2020 describing his one meeting at Jeffrey Epstein's request. Weinstein is convinced he's a CIA construct. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJNjH4SP6vw
That was interesting, especially the bizarre details about his only meeting with Epstein. Epstein was definitely a "construct." He certainly wasn't a hedge fund genius.
Weinstein puts forth two interesting thought exercises. One, he points out the obvious "honey pot" elements of Epstein's operation. Such efforts have apparently been a staple of intelligence and espionage operations since the world got its first intelligence organizations.
The second component is Epstein's huge interest/fascination with certain people and organizations in the "Science" community. Weinstein correctly (I think) points out that Epstein's never-ending outreaches to these scientists might not have had anything to with his blackmail, easy-sex service to his "clients" or other "associates."
I still don't know why the tremendous interest in these people and organizations of science ... but this would also be a thread real investigators should pursue.
This is also the point that Eric Weinstein brought up. He know a lot of billionaires in his circle. But he doesn't know one billionaire who owns an island. Plus he did a lot of research into Epstein and he couldn't understand how he made all that money.
Socratic Method: Who would have the most to lose if it was ever revealed that Epstein was working for the CIA and/or Mossad? That would be the group that might have the strongest motive to silence this former partner.
Second question: Does the CIA ever eliminate potential threats?
these are swamps upon swamps, swamps all the way down (to hell I imagine). I don't think we will see the day when it all comes out. Someone on another Stack even suggested this swamp was why the covid swamp was opened. Or was it the other way around? It is all one big, stinking mess.
Mark Epstein mentioned an interview with David Schoen, a lawyer Jeffrey Epstein consulted while in jail, on the Crime Waves podcast. Schoen confirms many points made by Mark Epstein and offered some additional information consistent with homicide rather than suicide. Here's a link to the episode. https://www.crimewavespodcast.com/home/the-jeffrey-epstein-files-david-schoen-interview
It would be a good project to come up with a list of all the strange deaths/likely/possible murders that didn't create any interest in detectives, investigators or the watchdog press.
Where have the security guards gone to who “fell asleep” while Epstein “committed suicide”? I’ve never believed it from Day One. “Our” government lies to us about so many things.... Jeffrey Epstein had the goods on so many people, there is no way he decided to end his life in a County Jail cell..... pulllllease!
At this point maybe we should consider a different strategy than draining the swamp. Carpet bombing maybe? We just convince everyone that there is oil in the swamp, they might just bomb themselves to get it.
I saw this tidbit in Pierre Kory's Essay today. I have reproduced the pertinent statement at the bottom. If fits with your early release research so thought you might be interested.
Debate: Was Covid-19 A Pandemic Caused By A Novel Pathogen Or Was It Created Solely By Harmful Policies and Fear Propaganda?
In a What's App group chat, a number of data experts and scientists have been debating this question with front-line clinicians. Here I compile the debate arguments.
Pierre Kory, MD, MPA
Jan 9, 2024
“There was something (or somethings) different in circulation which we had not seen before, but was totally manageable if treated properly” - words/quote to this effect on one of our Spaces by @Lynn Fynn and some Frontline Drs have said they saw some different ‘stuff’ earlier in 2019.
Thanks, Fred. I saw that Substack article and have now made a few posts, presenting my theory that we did have a novel and contagious virus - it just wasn't a "deadly virus" ... thus no need for lockdowns and then vaccines. There was no real "health emergency." And my kicker? At least some officials must have known this all along. They concealed all the evidence of "early spread" to make sure the masses continued to think this WAS a "deadly" virus.
As I pointed out in a previous article, one unexposed scandal leads to future scandals and rampant unnecessary misery. For example, if Bill Gates was an Epstein client and had been exposed as such pre-Covid, we might not have had Covid as we know it (Since Gates is/was THE money man for all aspects of the contrived pandemic).
One could go back further. If Bill Clinton was a repeat Epstein client and had been exposed as such before 2016, his wife Hillary would have never been a presidential candidate. If she wasn't a presidential candidate, she doesn't make Russia Gate a big faux scandal and Donald Trump doesn't get harassed for four years.
What might have been? We'll never know ... because our justice system is completely captured.
Awesome point - so true.
FWIW, this is why I'm working so hard to try to expose one Covid scandal (or one Epstein scandal) in the hopes this might help "drain the swamp." If that Great Purge were to happen, many of the corrupt "leaders" of our important organizations would not be in a position to screw up the world even more moving forward.
Also, Jeffrey Epstein didn't strike me as the type person who had the guts to commit suicide, especially via a method that must have been slow and extremely painful. I also think he would have thought that, somehow, he was going to walk or pull strings and get out again. For decades, he'd gotten away with his crimes.
Occam's Razor.
1. The cameras went out through a system fault. Allegedly
2. Epstein, had he any intent to top himself, would not have known the cameras were down giving him an opportunity to commit suicide....
3. Anyone even suspected of having serious intent to commit suicide whilst in prison would have 24/7 human eyes on the suspect. I have done 'constant watches' on prisoners. THAT is how it works. 2 hrs to find him dead? Pull the other one.
4. Epstein would not have been general population but be 'protective custody' separated from all contact with other prisoners.
5. Obviously person/people working in the prison system have been paid to 'silence' Epstein. As Owain above points out: ''Occam's razor''
6. Which leads me to ask: What 'insurance' has la Maxwell got salted away which stops them doing a wet job on her too? Which would be made public on her demise.....
#6 - Interesting. But...
Wouldn't Epstein also have had a stash of said insurance? He must have. Was it compromised? By whom...Madame Maxwell, her father, 'others'?
Maybe sixty, seventy years down the road it might 'come out'.
ALL OF IT MUST GO. The agency, the people...everything. Better to have nothing.
Need to rethink the entire Intelligence and defense thing.
They don't work for us.
Bill Barr needs to see prison time.
They’re hoping nobody is capable of separating their detest for Epstein from the probable malfeasance of law enforcement. But, why they allegedly murdered/silenced him needs to take precedence over the fact that he was a piece of shit. He was literally the man that knew too much. He was presumably silenced at the behest of people that were likely just as bad as he was, if not worse. Be great to look under that rock.
For those who are interested, Eric Weinstein did a podcast in 2020 describing his one meeting at Jeffrey Epstein's request. Weinstein is convinced he's a CIA construct. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJNjH4SP6vw
That was interesting, especially the bizarre details about his only meeting with Epstein. Epstein was definitely a "construct." He certainly wasn't a hedge fund genius.
Weinstein puts forth two interesting thought exercises. One, he points out the obvious "honey pot" elements of Epstein's operation. Such efforts have apparently been a staple of intelligence and espionage operations since the world got its first intelligence organizations.
The second component is Epstein's huge interest/fascination with certain people and organizations in the "Science" community. Weinstein correctly (I think) points out that Epstein's never-ending outreaches to these scientists might not have had anything to with his blackmail, easy-sex service to his "clients" or other "associates."
I still don't know why the tremendous interest in these people and organizations of science ... but this would also be a thread real investigators should pursue.
I agree. It could be as simple as Epstein having a personal interest in science, and his elevated status gave him access to those people.
I wouldn't have minded meeting Stephen Hawking when he was alive, although I would probably embarrass myself in any conceivable conversation 🫤
There has never been a believable explanation of his wealth.
This is also the point that Eric Weinstein brought up. He know a lot of billionaires in his circle. But he doesn't know one billionaire who owns an island. Plus he did a lot of research into Epstein and he couldn't understand how he made all that money.
We also have a billionaire from Brooklyn, New York who for some reason bought the largest "ranch" in ... New Mexico. FWIW, It was a secluded ranch.
Most large ranches are secluded ;)
Much more than that. He had connections all over the map. Mossad, Unit 8200, FBI, American politicians. The list goes on.
Actually, he says a construct of some type, but he was leaning toward the CIA. Could be any of those others
Socratic Method: Who would have the most to lose if it was ever revealed that Epstein was working for the CIA and/or Mossad? That would be the group that might have the strongest motive to silence this former partner.
Second question: Does the CIA ever eliminate potential threats?
I assume your second question was rhetorical?
Si.
All of the above.
When you’re owned by the CIA, you only get to live as long as they allow it.
these are swamps upon swamps, swamps all the way down (to hell I imagine). I don't think we will see the day when it all comes out. Someone on another Stack even suggested this swamp was why the covid swamp was opened. Or was it the other way around? It is all one big, stinking mess.
Mark Epstein mentioned an interview with David Schoen, a lawyer Jeffrey Epstein consulted while in jail, on the Crime Waves podcast. Schoen confirms many points made by Mark Epstein and offered some additional information consistent with homicide rather than suicide. Here's a link to the episode. https://www.crimewavespodcast.com/home/the-jeffrey-epstein-files-david-schoen-interview
The same federal investigators are working the Seth Rich bump-off.
I've thought about him too.
Did you notice there was a distinct lack of curiosity about his death?
It would be a good project to come up with a list of all the strange deaths/likely/possible murders that didn't create any interest in detectives, investigators or the watchdog press.
Like Dr. Andrew Moulden?!?
Where have the security guards gone to who “fell asleep” while Epstein “committed suicide”? I’ve never believed it from Day One. “Our” government lies to us about so many things.... Jeffrey Epstein had the goods on so many people, there is no way he decided to end his life in a County Jail cell..... pulllllease!
I watched the Tucker interview on TCN, and it is shocking.
Have you red either of the Whitney Webb books on this?
https://www.amazon.com/One-Nation-Under-Blackmail-Intelligence/dp/1634243013?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
No, I haven't ... but I admire her work and need to. Thanks for the link.
At this point maybe we should consider a different strategy than draining the swamp. Carpet bombing maybe? We just convince everyone that there is oil in the swamp, they might just bomb themselves to get it.
We all know why the cameras were off.
https://images.app.goo.gl/yaS4aZzK2yovTTGp7
Once CIA, always CIA. That's Barr to a T.
My guess would be the CIA probably orchestrated this .... If something happens to me, I hope my readers don't let them get away with it.
https://jasonpowers.substack.com/p/barrdidit-epstein-and-dominion-voting
There are a lot of things and theories...but Barr hasn't kept his mouth shut.
Follow the liar.
Hi Bill
I saw this tidbit in Pierre Kory's Essay today. I have reproduced the pertinent statement at the bottom. If fits with your early release research so thought you might be interested.
Debate: Was Covid-19 A Pandemic Caused By A Novel Pathogen Or Was It Created Solely By Harmful Policies and Fear Propaganda?
In a What's App group chat, a number of data experts and scientists have been debating this question with front-line clinicians. Here I compile the debate arguments.
Pierre Kory, MD, MPA
Jan 9, 2024
“There was something (or somethings) different in circulation which we had not seen before, but was totally manageable if treated properly” - words/quote to this effect on one of our Spaces by @Lynn Fynn and some Frontline Drs have said they saw some different ‘stuff’ earlier in 2019.
Thanks, Fred. I saw that Substack article and have now made a few posts, presenting my theory that we did have a novel and contagious virus - it just wasn't a "deadly virus" ... thus no need for lockdowns and then vaccines. There was no real "health emergency." And my kicker? At least some officials must have known this all along. They concealed all the evidence of "early spread" to make sure the masses continued to think this WAS a "deadly" virus.