Bonus Content - A Subscriber Spike from “out of no where”
I would like to publicly thank Dr. Meryl Nass for cross-posting my last dispatch on “What I really think happened with Covid.”
Because of this random act of kindness, out of the blue, my newsletter netted more than 110 (!) new subscribers, including at least three paid subscribers.
I should note that, prior to linking to my column at her newsletter, Dr. Nass first emailed me and said she wasn’t able to cross-post my column. She also told me she hadn’t been getting my articles. Later, though, she figured out a work-around and figured out a way to cross-post this particular column.
Sticking with the theme of today’s dispatch, my take-away from this event is that, apparently, I have NOT “lost my Mojo” as a Covid Contrarian newsletter author.
That is, when my articles DO reach a significant audience of people who think like my real live, human being readers do, I can STILL generate a flood of new subscribers, “likes” and “Reader Comments” - just like I used to in the first two years I published this newsletter. (Just like still happens with all my liberal Substack colleagues who are setting subscription records these days).
For context, for the past nine months or so when I published a new article I lose, on average, 3 to 5 subscribers and had lost 10 net subscribers with my previous article.
So Friday’s dispatch would be one of those interesting “changes” I try to quantify and highlight in my articles.
If nothing else - per my “logic” - this example might seem to debunk the conventional wisdom that I was now losing subscribers (or no longer gaining any new subscribers) because of “Covid fatigue” or that people in our cohort of thinkers were only culling subscribers due to “over-saturation” of (free) newsletters.
While I think these explanations carry some weight and make some logical sense, I always thought they couldn’t be the only reason my newsletter had experienced such a dramatic reversal in subscribers and Page View metrics.
That is, it’s possible something else must/might be going on here and that my hypothesis that “narrative control” is the key to the continued rule of the world’s captured leaders might be accurate.
In a future article, I might explore other “logical” conclusions that flow from this case study. It will be interesting to see if, with today’s dispatch, I “revert to the norm” or mean and again go back to losing many subscribers with my new articles.
Again, thank you Dr. Nass - and to Dr. Nass’s readers who read (and I guess enjoyed) this particular piece.
That is awesome Bill. I really think Substack is working hard to sidetrack all of us questioning the covid narrative. I wonder if they may be intercepting comments and messages too? It may explain why I seem to be in a wasteland for engagement. Or maybe it is just normal ... it's me.
I should note that many people - probably growing numbers of people - think there never was any "novel virus" or that viruses that cause people to become "sick" don't even exist.
I've always covered my hypothesis by allowing this "could be possible." That is, my imagination is vivid enough to conceive a pandemic that didn't even need a virus to work.
If the "no-virus" group is right, the crimes against humanity that ensued would be even more sinister and shocking.
So I've also thought that my group and the no-virus group shouldn't waste our time fighting among ourselves. Per either scenario, the Bad Guys were/are the Deep State and the Science Experts.
Our goal should be to first expose, then discredit, then purge these people from leadership positions. If we don't, we're going to be in even worse trouble going forward.
You are a talented writer & salute all your efforts to really find the actual truth. I must admit, I lean towards viruses not existing. My perspective changed in 2024. Not saying I am correct in changing my perspective. After spending hundreds of hours researching the Biodigital convergence, I believe it is intertwined with the entire pandemic playbook.
Yes, I think it is much more sinister. I sincerely appreciate your courage to write this articles.
Thanks for this comment Bill. I am not necessarily a no virus person, but I think you are right to keep an open mind. The psyops were in full force all the way through this. Your reasoning is sound so far. Keep up the good investigating.
I find it remarkable how people always underestimate the scale of sinister. What kind of “force” has the global resources and reach, the motivation, and the centuries of patience to try to pull off the Covid virus/vaccine scam? Seriously, it is long past the time to consider motivated sinister forces that have been active, and depopulating the planet for millennia. Just read translations of some of the 5,000 year old Sumerian tablets that have been sitting in museums and universities and private collections for 150 years, since being unearthed in Iraq back in the 1800s. Systemic human depopulation via planned and executed plague, famine, and draught by a dominant controlling force is a consistent narrative that had been meticulously rewritten generation after generation for over 2,000 years in Mesopotamia. Planned systemic controlled human depopulation is a very old narrative, clearly described and documented by the Sumerians, Akkadians, Assyrians, and Babylonians. Or we just ignore the ancient narratives that describe exactly what is going on today, because that is too crazy sinister. Just remember, they define crazy, they define normal, and they always have.
The evidence for the "no-virus" folks is tainted by U.S. 2018-19 unacknowledged covid cases and resulting natural immunity, about which the "experts" lied to promote jabs and still deny. The disappeared "flu" season of 2020-21 [all "covid," zero flu] and CDC-made PCR tests add to the "no-virus" observations. Real life observations are the big missing from the Scamdemic.
Great piece, Bill. It's been interesting watching you accumulate evidence for early spread. Back in the early days of the plandemic you were one of the few people hollering "earlier" --- and that is still true.
Thank you, Russell, I will note that, if nothing else, all the evidence or "conventional wisdom" that has emerged since I started researching the Early Spread Hypothesis (in April 2020) has perfectly jibed with my early conclusions.
Even Robert Redfield, the former director of the CDC, has done several interviews where he now says "spread" began in China in August or September 2019. I will say that Dr. Redfield doesn't say much (or anything) about all the copious evidence of early spread in America or outside of China. This evidence is still "taboo" - which I think is a tell or a red flag.
Excellent post. What I found so deeply strange was this insistence that even people who had recovered from covid be mandated to take the experimental shots, that natural immunity was no good. It's like logic, common sense— all out the window and up the chimney. Meanwhile we were supposed to disinvite perfectly healthy family members from Thanksgiving, Christmas, weddings and funerals, but going out into big crowds to protest racism is OK. Oh, and we were supposed to welcome boys who pretend to be girls to girls' swim meets and girls' locker rooms and slam the girls who object. Makes no sense, didn't then, doesn't now. I can only conclude that it's really about demoralizing people by humiliating them.
If you are interested in math Bill here is a Pubmed publication on how a virus spreads. I don't have time to dig into it myself (I've got 4 projects to get out today) however if one were to play around with the virus spread formula one might be able to separate the bogus Covid deaths and Iatrogenic deaths.
Thanks, Fred. As I think Covid was probably peaking in December 2019 and January 2020, the number of "Covid deaths" should have been peaking about 25 days after these people were, in fact, infected. (I think 25 days is the average approximate time from "Covid" infection to Covid death, per the experts and various studies.)
This timeline from infection (or onset of symptoms) to death should have remained constant, per my critical thinking deductions.
The evidence that far more people had "Covid" symptoms in November, December 2019 and January and early Feburary 2020 is almost overwhelming or undeniable to me.
So another key to the operation is this apparent narrative that (observed, respiratory) "symptoms" ... don't matter at all. All that mattered was a positive PCR test result - but nobody was getting a PCR test when ILI symptoms in virtually all 50 U.S. states were spiking far above the expected pipeline.
The bottom-line to me (that makes my evidence "fit") is that the virus didn't change at all. All that changed is the prevalence of the PCR tests and the new and very different hospital protocols (as well as the levels of panic, which was contrived and concocted ... IMO.
The Iatrogenic Death Scandal is the Scandal that hasn't gotten nearly enough attention. IMO.
IMO What actually happened to millions of people is that maybe 10 to 20 percent of the population got sick in the fall and winter of 2019 through about the sixth week of 2020 - and these people were sick from two days to 3 weeks - but these people got better and didn't die (although some people no doubt died).
Basically, real Covid was missed because it seemed just like a bad flu season. This "flu season" WAS more contagious (and was worse) than almost all of the previous 20 or so flu seasons.
(The flu season of 2017-2018 was also very bad, but even in that flu season cases only spiked for about six weeks (around January 2018). This was different than the 2019-2020 flu season, where cases of ILI spiked way above the expected baseline in the first days of November and were far above expected baseline all the way through February - for about 27 weeks - a record period of time.
I also don't think everyone who got sick in this time period had Covid, but I bet 20 to 30 percent of these sick people did.
Kinda disagree about geniuses. "Genius" implies more an innate ability, understanding of something, like consistent intuition or preternatural knowledge. This kind of knowledge doesn't have to go through the discursive reasoning steps that the typical human intellect does. It "just knows." It's not to say that a genius doesn't reason (like the rest of us), only that it has a really big head start.
The process of reasoning helps the rest of us keep up.
I might be a true genius then because I was in the group that almost instantly said, "all of this narrative is completely off." I wasn't sure why it was off or wrong; I just knew it was. I then went to work trying to "prove" this. As it turns out, I used the early spread hypothesis to try to do this or as my starting point. My intuition was, thus, "early spread" matters.
My husband and I were ill in Oct 2019 with something odd - so tired, short of breath…took about two weeks to pass. Never saw a doctor because it wasn’t that bad. My mom and brother were ill with something similar in December 2019 - they too just got thru it without a doctor. In retrospect we all suspect it was Covid. We never got it again. They took the shots and have had it twice since. My brother is disabled from polymyalgia rheumatica now and mom has dementia.
As an old intuitive I, like many others, knew at gut level that the whole thing was a fraud. And my refusal to cooperate caused a lot of grief among those who were controlled through fear. Today, I still refer to The Covid Crime as "The Great Culling." I'll never be convinced otherwise.
Wunderbar...viruses that spread on the four winds and unproven contagion alive and well. If we agree that the covid response was a deadly mRNA injection, then millions have been murdered and those responsible must be put in prison for life, at least. Otherwise, another pandemic will occur and the results will be even worse from forced mRNA injections.
So where is the virus now? The presumed CoV-2 (covid 19)? Please explain how viruses come and go, where they come from, how they evolve, how some viruses are coming and going about every year and others like CoV-1 have been long gone for over 20 years.
What happened to the regular "flu" virus that was virtually nonexistent in 2020 and 2021...something that has never occurred in all the years of hearing "get your damn vaccine" all year long. Answers please, not guesses, assumptions and inferences. I can get those from the medical mafia.
You don't want to argue about the existence of viruses, which by the way has never been scientifically proven using REAL science, and here we are. If the virus was created in lab, millions still died whether from the virus or the resulting mRNA injections. Murder was committed....any way you look at it. And with the prep act still in full force, the murderers are running scott free to do the nasty deed again.
1. You hear new virus is spreading. First (or second) thing you want to know, society wants to know, is "What portion of society is immune to it?".
It is important information. It can be obtained very quickly by (> 1000 probes) random tests on population. A week and we would know, what percentage of us is immune.
Yet this simple research wasn't made in first wave of "pandemic". Why?
2. So virus went into populations. It wasn't dangerous in terms of society although might cause some deaths. If it happen than we would have power and wanted to have some more power and money, and know all of this, what we could do?
- We could use it to create a world panic. In order to:
- Earn a lot of money, so increase our power.
Of course it can't be so simple. Can't it?
Now 2 things:
a) How many cases of respiratory illness of unknown etiology happens every year/month in Wuhan China?
b) How many working days passed between publication of Chinese scientists Zhang Yongzhen genetic code of the virus that caused illness of some 40 ppl in Wuhan (how many millions lives there?), to publish information by American firm (Moderna?) that they have developed vaccine (at least as as a complete genome project)? And how many working days to acknowledge it by US government institution?
Bonus Content - A Subscriber Spike from “out of no where”
I would like to publicly thank Dr. Meryl Nass for cross-posting my last dispatch on “What I really think happened with Covid.”
Because of this random act of kindness, out of the blue, my newsletter netted more than 110 (!) new subscribers, including at least three paid subscribers.
I should note that, prior to linking to my column at her newsletter, Dr. Nass first emailed me and said she wasn’t able to cross-post my column. She also told me she hadn’t been getting my articles. Later, though, she figured out a work-around and figured out a way to cross-post this particular column.
Sticking with the theme of today’s dispatch, my take-away from this event is that, apparently, I have NOT “lost my Mojo” as a Covid Contrarian newsletter author.
That is, when my articles DO reach a significant audience of people who think like my real live, human being readers do, I can STILL generate a flood of new subscribers, “likes” and “Reader Comments” - just like I used to in the first two years I published this newsletter. (Just like still happens with all my liberal Substack colleagues who are setting subscription records these days).
For context, for the past nine months or so when I published a new article I lose, on average, 3 to 5 subscribers and had lost 10 net subscribers with my previous article.
So Friday’s dispatch would be one of those interesting “changes” I try to quantify and highlight in my articles.
If nothing else - per my “logic” - this example might seem to debunk the conventional wisdom that I was now losing subscribers (or no longer gaining any new subscribers) because of “Covid fatigue” or that people in our cohort of thinkers were only culling subscribers due to “over-saturation” of (free) newsletters.
While I think these explanations carry some weight and make some logical sense, I always thought they couldn’t be the only reason my newsletter had experienced such a dramatic reversal in subscribers and Page View metrics.
That is, it’s possible something else must/might be going on here and that my hypothesis that “narrative control” is the key to the continued rule of the world’s captured leaders might be accurate.
In a future article, I might explore other “logical” conclusions that flow from this case study. It will be interesting to see if, with today’s dispatch, I “revert to the norm” or mean and again go back to losing many subscribers with my new articles.
Again, thank you Dr. Nass - and to Dr. Nass’s readers who read (and I guess enjoyed) this particular piece.
That is awesome Bill. I really think Substack is working hard to sidetrack all of us questioning the covid narrative. I wonder if they may be intercepting comments and messages too? It may explain why I seem to be in a wasteland for engagement. Or maybe it is just normal ... it's me.
.
Glad you got a boost Bill!
I should note that many people - probably growing numbers of people - think there never was any "novel virus" or that viruses that cause people to become "sick" don't even exist.
I've always covered my hypothesis by allowing this "could be possible." That is, my imagination is vivid enough to conceive a pandemic that didn't even need a virus to work.
If the "no-virus" group is right, the crimes against humanity that ensued would be even more sinister and shocking.
So I've also thought that my group and the no-virus group shouldn't waste our time fighting among ourselves. Per either scenario, the Bad Guys were/are the Deep State and the Science Experts.
Our goal should be to first expose, then discredit, then purge these people from leadership positions. If we don't, we're going to be in even worse trouble going forward.
You are a talented writer & salute all your efforts to really find the actual truth. I must admit, I lean towards viruses not existing. My perspective changed in 2024. Not saying I am correct in changing my perspective. After spending hundreds of hours researching the Biodigital convergence, I believe it is intertwined with the entire pandemic playbook.
Yes, I think it is much more sinister. I sincerely appreciate your courage to write this articles.
Thanks for this comment Bill. I am not necessarily a no virus person, but I think you are right to keep an open mind. The psyops were in full force all the way through this. Your reasoning is sound so far. Keep up the good investigating.
I find it remarkable how people always underestimate the scale of sinister. What kind of “force” has the global resources and reach, the motivation, and the centuries of patience to try to pull off the Covid virus/vaccine scam? Seriously, it is long past the time to consider motivated sinister forces that have been active, and depopulating the planet for millennia. Just read translations of some of the 5,000 year old Sumerian tablets that have been sitting in museums and universities and private collections for 150 years, since being unearthed in Iraq back in the 1800s. Systemic human depopulation via planned and executed plague, famine, and draught by a dominant controlling force is a consistent narrative that had been meticulously rewritten generation after generation for over 2,000 years in Mesopotamia. Planned systemic controlled human depopulation is a very old narrative, clearly described and documented by the Sumerians, Akkadians, Assyrians, and Babylonians. Or we just ignore the ancient narratives that describe exactly what is going on today, because that is too crazy sinister. Just remember, they define crazy, they define normal, and they always have.
The evidence for the "no-virus" folks is tainted by U.S. 2018-19 unacknowledged covid cases and resulting natural immunity, about which the "experts" lied to promote jabs and still deny. The disappeared "flu" season of 2020-21 [all "covid," zero flu] and CDC-made PCR tests add to the "no-virus" observations. Real life observations are the big missing from the Scamdemic.
Great piece, Bill. It's been interesting watching you accumulate evidence for early spread. Back in the early days of the plandemic you were one of the few people hollering "earlier" --- and that is still true.
Thank you, Russell, I will note that, if nothing else, all the evidence or "conventional wisdom" that has emerged since I started researching the Early Spread Hypothesis (in April 2020) has perfectly jibed with my early conclusions.
Even Robert Redfield, the former director of the CDC, has done several interviews where he now says "spread" began in China in August or September 2019. I will say that Dr. Redfield doesn't say much (or anything) about all the copious evidence of early spread in America or outside of China. This evidence is still "taboo" - which I think is a tell or a red flag.
You may not be a total genius… but you did marry one.
A real genius would marry a real genius. It would be ungenius-like for a genius to marry a dufus. Hey, You ought to start a Substack.
Why? Just to get shadow banned? 😂
My sentiments exactly, Carrie.
Excellent post. What I found so deeply strange was this insistence that even people who had recovered from covid be mandated to take the experimental shots, that natural immunity was no good. It's like logic, common sense— all out the window and up the chimney. Meanwhile we were supposed to disinvite perfectly healthy family members from Thanksgiving, Christmas, weddings and funerals, but going out into big crowds to protest racism is OK. Oh, and we were supposed to welcome boys who pretend to be girls to girls' swim meets and girls' locker rooms and slam the girls who object. Makes no sense, didn't then, doesn't now. I can only conclude that it's really about demoralizing people by humiliating them.
That insistence caused a family rift.
Nice deduction Bill
Here is an Alternate theory to conside
How the illusion of a pandemic was created in 2020 - with lessons learned from the illegal Havana Syndrome experiments: https://substack.com/@tritorch/note/c-84761968
Missing video: Dr. Tom Cowan: 5G Radio Frequency and the COVID-19 Connection: https://old.bitchute.com/video/LY6dTOr8PW7s/ [11mins]
Keep up the good work, Mr. Rice!
Just for the heck of it, here is my article on one title containing a dozen lies:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/one-article-one-title-a-dozen-lies
If you are interested in math Bill here is a Pubmed publication on how a virus spreads. I don't have time to dig into it myself (I've got 4 projects to get out today) however if one were to play around with the virus spread formula one might be able to separate the bogus Covid deaths and Iatrogenic deaths.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10537511/pdf/viruses-15-01788.pdf
Thanks, Fred. As I think Covid was probably peaking in December 2019 and January 2020, the number of "Covid deaths" should have been peaking about 25 days after these people were, in fact, infected. (I think 25 days is the average approximate time from "Covid" infection to Covid death, per the experts and various studies.)
This timeline from infection (or onset of symptoms) to death should have remained constant, per my critical thinking deductions.
The evidence that far more people had "Covid" symptoms in November, December 2019 and January and early Feburary 2020 is almost overwhelming or undeniable to me.
So another key to the operation is this apparent narrative that (observed, respiratory) "symptoms" ... don't matter at all. All that mattered was a positive PCR test result - but nobody was getting a PCR test when ILI symptoms in virtually all 50 U.S. states were spiking far above the expected pipeline.
The bottom-line to me (that makes my evidence "fit") is that the virus didn't change at all. All that changed is the prevalence of the PCR tests and the new and very different hospital protocols (as well as the levels of panic, which was contrived and concocted ... IMO.
The Iatrogenic Death Scandal is the Scandal that hasn't gotten nearly enough attention. IMO.
IMO What actually happened to millions of people is that maybe 10 to 20 percent of the population got sick in the fall and winter of 2019 through about the sixth week of 2020 - and these people were sick from two days to 3 weeks - but these people got better and didn't die (although some people no doubt died).
Basically, real Covid was missed because it seemed just like a bad flu season. This "flu season" WAS more contagious (and was worse) than almost all of the previous 20 or so flu seasons.
(The flu season of 2017-2018 was also very bad, but even in that flu season cases only spiked for about six weeks (around January 2018). This was different than the 2019-2020 flu season, where cases of ILI spiked way above the expected baseline in the first days of November and were far above expected baseline all the way through February - for about 27 weeks - a record period of time.
I also don't think everyone who got sick in this time period had Covid, but I bet 20 to 30 percent of these sick people did.
Viruses haven't troubled me much since I started taking 20,000 IU of vitamin D daily during winter side of the solstices.
"He's dead, Jim."
So Sad!
THIS!!!
Kinda disagree about geniuses. "Genius" implies more an innate ability, understanding of something, like consistent intuition or preternatural knowledge. This kind of knowledge doesn't have to go through the discursive reasoning steps that the typical human intellect does. It "just knows." It's not to say that a genius doesn't reason (like the rest of us), only that it has a really big head start.
The process of reasoning helps the rest of us keep up.
/imho
I might be a true genius then because I was in the group that almost instantly said, "all of this narrative is completely off." I wasn't sure why it was off or wrong; I just knew it was. I then went to work trying to "prove" this. As it turns out, I used the early spread hypothesis to try to do this or as my starting point. My intuition was, thus, "early spread" matters.
My husband and I were ill in Oct 2019 with something odd - so tired, short of breath…took about two weeks to pass. Never saw a doctor because it wasn’t that bad. My mom and brother were ill with something similar in December 2019 - they too just got thru it without a doctor. In retrospect we all suspect it was Covid. We never got it again. They took the shots and have had it twice since. My brother is disabled from polymyalgia rheumatica now and mom has dementia.
As an old intuitive I, like many others, knew at gut level that the whole thing was a fraud. And my refusal to cooperate caused a lot of grief among those who were controlled through fear. Today, I still refer to The Covid Crime as "The Great Culling." I'll never be convinced otherwise.
Wunderbar...viruses that spread on the four winds and unproven contagion alive and well. If we agree that the covid response was a deadly mRNA injection, then millions have been murdered and those responsible must be put in prison for life, at least. Otherwise, another pandemic will occur and the results will be even worse from forced mRNA injections.
So where is the virus now? The presumed CoV-2 (covid 19)? Please explain how viruses come and go, where they come from, how they evolve, how some viruses are coming and going about every year and others like CoV-1 have been long gone for over 20 years.
What happened to the regular "flu" virus that was virtually nonexistent in 2020 and 2021...something that has never occurred in all the years of hearing "get your damn vaccine" all year long. Answers please, not guesses, assumptions and inferences. I can get those from the medical mafia.
You don't want to argue about the existence of viruses, which by the way has never been scientifically proven using REAL science, and here we are. If the virus was created in lab, millions still died whether from the virus or the resulting mRNA injections. Murder was committed....any way you look at it. And with the prep act still in full force, the murderers are running scott free to do the nasty deed again.
Brilliant.
1. You hear new virus is spreading. First (or second) thing you want to know, society wants to know, is "What portion of society is immune to it?".
It is important information. It can be obtained very quickly by (> 1000 probes) random tests on population. A week and we would know, what percentage of us is immune.
Yet this simple research wasn't made in first wave of "pandemic". Why?
2. So virus went into populations. It wasn't dangerous in terms of society although might cause some deaths. If it happen than we would have power and wanted to have some more power and money, and know all of this, what we could do?
- We could use it to create a world panic. In order to:
- Earn a lot of money, so increase our power.
Of course it can't be so simple. Can't it?
Now 2 things:
a) How many cases of respiratory illness of unknown etiology happens every year/month in Wuhan China?
b) How many working days passed between publication of Chinese scientists Zhang Yongzhen genetic code of the virus that caused illness of some 40 ppl in Wuhan (how many millions lives there?), to publish information by American firm (Moderna?) that they have developed vaccine (at least as as a complete genome project)? And how many working days to acknowledge it by US government institution?
The Pink Floyd had that song: https://youtu.be/-0kcet4aPpQ