I should have noted that all the boldfaced text was done by me. "Emphasis added," as they say. I do that for people who just want to skim a long article. If they do, they might just read the boldfaced text.
Very good summary of several plandemic aspects. I've been aware of these for 3 years having read and mostly listened to Ryan Christian, TLAV site, and others including David Icke.
So these mask advocates are saying a mask is able to filter out a submicroscopic particle, which virologists claim can only be seen by an electron microscope? When a mask is examined under a light microscope it is shown to have gaps between the various layers and yet it’s magically stopping particles measured in the range of 60-120 billionths of a meter? I think garlic necklaces might be more effective.
Have you read John Dee's work on iatrogenic deaths? He has found (in UK) thatthe demise of the elderly peaked for several other things, eg dementia in the main couple of weeks of the scamdemic. Really does look like a cull
I repeat: the redpilling of the good Dr Campbell was a pleasure to watch. A bit late in the Scam for me, but i only hope it reaches its logical completion; maybe it has.
The UK Gov admitted that at that time - 18 months into the "world's deadliest pandemic(TM) - they had no proof what they called SARAS-CoV-2 caused any health problems in humans.
Plus in other substacks on LFT and PCR tests they also admit they had NO virus stock of their own to calibrate the tests against and got it from a lab in Melbourne which is part of the WHO's influenza monitoring network.
And this is a good one - most deaths would have happened anyway:
Masking provokes many Westerners to fury, for reasons that escape me, though I have lived in Asia since 1967, where I first encountered (though never practiced) it.
The medical literature seems pretty clear about it and, at the macro level, looked at from where I live, the maskers certainly outlived the non-maskers.
Has Bill or anyone else analyses this meta-analysis? "Efficacy of face mask in preventing respiratory virus transmission: A systematic review and meta-analysis."
I should have noted that all the boldfaced text was done by me. "Emphasis added," as they say. I do that for people who just want to skim a long article. If they do, they might just read the boldfaced text.
Brilliant! A lot of TIME and effort when into this - I've forwarded it to everyone in my address book! Kudos!!
Very good summary of several plandemic aspects. I've been aware of these for 3 years having read and mostly listened to Ryan Christian, TLAV site, and others including David Icke.
So these mask advocates are saying a mask is able to filter out a submicroscopic particle, which virologists claim can only be seen by an electron microscope? When a mask is examined under a light microscope it is shown to have gaps between the various layers and yet it’s magically stopping particles measured in the range of 60-120 billionths of a meter? I think garlic necklaces might be more effective.
Thank-you for your impressive work on this important issue!
Have you read John Dee's work on iatrogenic deaths? He has found (in UK) thatthe demise of the elderly peaked for several other things, eg dementia in the main couple of weeks of the scamdemic. Really does look like a cull
https://open.substack.com/pub/elsaiselsa/p/now-found-in-most-lungs-microplastics?utm_source=direct&r=ykqw5&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I repeat: the redpilling of the good Dr Campbell was a pleasure to watch. A bit late in the Scam for me, but i only hope it reaches its logical completion; maybe it has.
The mask stopped spit from flying from one mouth to another.
Just like 6 ft of separation.
That is a good reason to wear them and keeping a distance, but if that's your reasoning, you should still be wearing them and keeping your distance.
Something new
https://brownstone.org/articles/vax-gene-files-accidental-discovery/
When I wrote this in Oct 2022:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/ukhsa-states-that-they-have-no-proof
The UK Gov admitted that at that time - 18 months into the "world's deadliest pandemic(TM) - they had no proof what they called SARAS-CoV-2 caused any health problems in humans.
Plus in other substacks on LFT and PCR tests they also admit they had NO virus stock of their own to calibrate the tests against and got it from a lab in Melbourne which is part of the WHO's influenza monitoring network.
And this is a good one - most deaths would have happened anyway:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/ons-admitted-in-mid-2020-most-covid
And lockdowns were not required:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/cmo-whitty-on-21-july-2020
Masking provokes many Westerners to fury, for reasons that escape me, though I have lived in Asia since 1967, where I first encountered (though never practiced) it.
The medical literature seems pretty clear about it and, at the macro level, looked at from where I live, the maskers certainly outlived the non-maskers.
Has Bill or anyone else analyses this meta-analysis? "Efficacy of face mask in preventing respiratory virus transmission: A systematic review and meta-analysis."
By Mingming Liang a b 1, Liang Gao c 1, Ce Cheng d, Qin Zhou e, John Patrick Uy f, Kurt Heiner g, Chenyu Sun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101751
HIGHLIGHTS: At present, the epidemic of COVID-19 has caused global concern.
Masks protect HCWs and other populations against respiratory viral infection.
The effectiveness of masks has been proven in different settings, populations, and areas.