I should have noted that all the boldfaced text was done by me. "Emphasis added," as they say. I do that for people who just want to skim a long article. If they do, they might just read the boldfaced text.
Thanks, BJ. I did a quick and sloppy job presenting the excerpts, but I wanted to do my part to try to get this document seen by more readers ... because I appreciate the massive amount of research that went into producing it.
Very good summary of several plandemic aspects. I've been aware of these for 3 years having read and mostly listened to Ryan Christian, TLAV site, and others including David Icke.
So these mask advocates are saying a mask is able to filter out a submicroscopic particle, which virologists claim can only be seen by an electron microscope? When a mask is examined under a light microscope it is shown to have gaps between the various layers and yet it’s magically stopping particles measured in the range of 60-120 billionths of a meter? I think garlic necklaces might be more effective.
N95's or better do work because they use static electricity. You need to have the mask well fitted to your face and have the straps that go behind your head and not just your ears. Well fitted masks work plain and simple better than not wearing them but they are a difficult for many reasons for a lot of people.
Kelly, yeah but there is also the huge issue of rebreathing spent CO2 back into one’s lungs that is very damaging, not to mention having sweat, snot, bacteria & other nasty shit plastered to one’s face (& breathing all THAT in too). There isn’t anything that would “work” for me w/ this scam. NO THX
Thanks, Dee Dee, but with this one I just copied and pasted the findings of other researchers. One reason I wanted to do this is because I am convinced that "iatrogenic deaths" have been a massive killer world-wide. This of course has gotten zero mainstream press scrutiny ... or any attention from our government officials. So there are two massive scandals: 1) This (iatrogenic deaths) happened on a large scale, and 2) The people and organizations who should expose this scandal will NOT do this.
Agree and can not explain the "hush factor". It was divided there too. Nurses will only talk about it with the ones that refused or (privately). In the hospital, there is a strange silence like a boiled frog brainwashed stockholm syndrome, protect the ones that tried to kill you. It's extremely toxic.
Have you read John Dee's work on iatrogenic deaths? He has found (in UK) thatthe demise of the elderly peaked for several other things, eg dementia in the main couple of weeks of the scamdemic. Really does look like a cull
I don't know if I've seen his reporting but I need to find it. It rings true to me. The deaths among nursing home or "care home" residents exploded in a period of about four weeks ... AFTER the lockdowns to slow or stop the spread. In the spring outside of the typical "cold and flu" season. It just doesn't make sense even to someone whose last science class was in 11th grade.
Section 2: "The disease has had a larger impact on those most vulnerable (for example, those who already suffer from a medical condition) and those at older ages. Some of these deaths would have likely occurred over the duration of the year but have occurred earlier because of COVID-19. These deaths occurring earlier than expected could contribute to a period of deaths below the five-year average.”
Read it again and digest it properly.
“Some of these deaths would have likely occurred over the duration of the year but have occurred earlier because of COVID-19. “
I repeat: the redpilling of the good Dr Campbell was a pleasure to watch. A bit late in the Scam for me, but i only hope it reaches its logical completion; maybe it has.
Exactly, but then why stop with just wearing a mask, because really someone that concerned or hypervigilant with the air they breathe, needs to shut themselves in, remove themselves from society, hit the Peloton in their living space, order from Amazon, Uber Eats, stream their entertainment, etc . . .
The UK Gov admitted that at that time - 18 months into the "world's deadliest pandemic(TM) - they had no proof what they called SARAS-CoV-2 caused any health problems in humans.
Plus in other substacks on LFT and PCR tests they also admit they had NO virus stock of their own to calibrate the tests against and got it from a lab in Melbourne which is part of the WHO's influenza monitoring network.
And this is a good one - most deaths would have happened anyway:
Masking provokes many Westerners to fury, for reasons that escape me, though I have lived in Asia since 1967, where I first encountered (though never practiced) it.
The medical literature seems pretty clear about it and, at the macro level, looked at from where I live, the maskers certainly outlived the non-maskers.
Has Bill or anyone else analyses this meta-analysis? "Efficacy of face mask in preventing respiratory virus transmission: A systematic review and meta-analysis."
Bottom line, no one is preventing people from wearing as many masks as they want to, but forcing it onto the entire population including children for 2+ years is completely unacceptable for so many reasons I don't even know where to begin.
I've mentioned the anxiety-producing effects of lockdowns and misguided panic. I think it's called the Nocebo Effect, the opposite of the Placebo Effect. Basically, as I understand it, people get worked up into a panic and then this actually produces or contributes to future real health emergencies. It also produces symptoms that nurses and doctors mistake for a real ailment or illness, which causes them to start implementing all the iatrogenic treatments that killed so many patients. I agree. This has not gotten nearly enough attention. Also, some nurses and doctors were probably falsely afraid of their patients, which affected the care they received.
...and the protocol of mask wearing HCW's in clinical or surgical settings is hardly a comparison for the average joe with his ever handy mask hanging from the rear view mirror.
Kelly, Mask studies from the CDC web pages ( that had been the accepted guidelines for decades) concluded that there was no significant evidence either way regarding viral transfer... maybe performing surgery or slowing cough germs is a good use but stats from the last 3 years don't support the idea that masking "worked". It's normal to defend the idea if one "bought the pitch" so to speak.
A well fitted mask most definitely can work more than not wearing one. People with auto immune disorders have been doing this for years as well as people who need them for work. Nothing is perfect but they work better when fit tested.
The entire lot of CoVid protocols could have been the basis for a very good story in Grimms fairytales or at least the basis for another book by JK Rowling.
I should have noted that all the boldfaced text was done by me. "Emphasis added," as they say. I do that for people who just want to skim a long article. If they do, they might just read the boldfaced text.
Brilliant! A lot of TIME and effort when into this - I've forwarded it to everyone in my address book! Kudos!!
Thanks, BJ. I did a quick and sloppy job presenting the excerpts, but I wanted to do my part to try to get this document seen by more readers ... because I appreciate the massive amount of research that went into producing it.
Very good summary of several plandemic aspects. I've been aware of these for 3 years having read and mostly listened to Ryan Christian, TLAV site, and others including David Icke.
So these mask advocates are saying a mask is able to filter out a submicroscopic particle, which virologists claim can only be seen by an electron microscope? When a mask is examined under a light microscope it is shown to have gaps between the various layers and yet it’s magically stopping particles measured in the range of 60-120 billionths of a meter? I think garlic necklaces might be more effective.
N95's or better do work because they use static electricity. You need to have the mask well fitted to your face and have the straps that go behind your head and not just your ears. Well fitted masks work plain and simple better than not wearing them but they are a difficult for many reasons for a lot of people.
For a mask to filter out “viruses,” it effectively has to allow no air in. Suffocation is not the answer.
Well, it’s one answer.
Kelly, yeah but there is also the huge issue of rebreathing spent CO2 back into one’s lungs that is very damaging, not to mention having sweat, snot, bacteria & other nasty shit plastered to one’s face (& breathing all THAT in too). There isn’t anything that would “work” for me w/ this scam. NO THX
Thank-you for your impressive work on this important issue!
Thanks, Dee Dee, but with this one I just copied and pasted the findings of other researchers. One reason I wanted to do this is because I am convinced that "iatrogenic deaths" have been a massive killer world-wide. This of course has gotten zero mainstream press scrutiny ... or any attention from our government officials. So there are two massive scandals: 1) This (iatrogenic deaths) happened on a large scale, and 2) The people and organizations who should expose this scandal will NOT do this.
Agree and can not explain the "hush factor". It was divided there too. Nurses will only talk about it with the ones that refused or (privately). In the hospital, there is a strange silence like a boiled frog brainwashed stockholm syndrome, protect the ones that tried to kill you. It's extremely toxic.
Have you read John Dee's work on iatrogenic deaths? He has found (in UK) thatthe demise of the elderly peaked for several other things, eg dementia in the main couple of weeks of the scamdemic. Really does look like a cull
I don't know if I've seen his reporting but I need to find it. It rings true to me. The deaths among nursing home or "care home" residents exploded in a period of about four weeks ... AFTER the lockdowns to slow or stop the spread. In the spring outside of the typical "cold and flu" season. It just doesn't make sense even to someone whose last science class was in 11th grade.
From the ONS weekly death repott mid-2020:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/ons-admitted-in-mid-2020-most-covid
In this ONS weekly death report and a few others posted just before and after this one https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/weekending17july2020
Section 2: "The disease has had a larger impact on those most vulnerable (for example, those who already suffer from a medical condition) and those at older ages. Some of these deaths would have likely occurred over the duration of the year but have occurred earlier because of COVID-19. These deaths occurring earlier than expected could contribute to a period of deaths below the five-year average.”
Read it again and digest it properly.
“Some of these deaths would have likely occurred over the duration of the year but have occurred earlier because of COVID-19. “
"The Iatrogenesis Hypothesis - John Dee's Almanac" https://jdee.substack.com/p/the-iatrogenesis-hypothesis . This has all the links on it, the excess deaths by cause series is the one I was thinking of in my comment
https://open.substack.com/pub/elsaiselsa/p/now-found-in-most-lungs-microplastics?utm_source=direct&r=ykqw5&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I repeat: the redpilling of the good Dr Campbell was a pleasure to watch. A bit late in the Scam for me, but i only hope it reaches its logical completion; maybe it has.
The mask stopped spit from flying from one mouth to another.
Just like 6 ft of separation.
That is a good reason to wear them and keeping a distance, but if that's your reasoning, you should still be wearing them and keeping your distance.
Stopping spit from flying from 1 mouth to another, as has happened since mankind began & survived w/out the idiocy of masks & 6’?
Exactly, but then why stop with just wearing a mask, because really someone that concerned or hypervigilant with the air they breathe, needs to shut themselves in, remove themselves from society, hit the Peloton in their living space, order from Amazon, Uber Eats, stream their entertainment, etc . . .
My parents are still doing it
Something new
https://brownstone.org/articles/vax-gene-files-accidental-discovery/
When I wrote this in Oct 2022:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/ukhsa-states-that-they-have-no-proof
The UK Gov admitted that at that time - 18 months into the "world's deadliest pandemic(TM) - they had no proof what they called SARAS-CoV-2 caused any health problems in humans.
Plus in other substacks on LFT and PCR tests they also admit they had NO virus stock of their own to calibrate the tests against and got it from a lab in Melbourne which is part of the WHO's influenza monitoring network.
And this is a good one - most deaths would have happened anyway:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/ons-admitted-in-mid-2020-most-covid
And lockdowns were not required:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/cmo-whitty-on-21-july-2020
Masking provokes many Westerners to fury, for reasons that escape me, though I have lived in Asia since 1967, where I first encountered (though never practiced) it.
The medical literature seems pretty clear about it and, at the macro level, looked at from where I live, the maskers certainly outlived the non-maskers.
Has Bill or anyone else analyses this meta-analysis? "Efficacy of face mask in preventing respiratory virus transmission: A systematic review and meta-analysis."
By Mingming Liang a b 1, Liang Gao c 1, Ce Cheng d, Qin Zhou e, John Patrick Uy f, Kurt Heiner g, Chenyu Sun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101751
HIGHLIGHTS: At present, the epidemic of COVID-19 has caused global concern.
Masks protect HCWs and other populations against respiratory viral infection.
The effectiveness of masks has been proven in different settings, populations, and areas.
This meta review which includes studies from the covid era concluded that wearing a mask probably makes little to no difference: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub5/full
Bottom line, no one is preventing people from wearing as many masks as they want to, but forcing it onto the entire population including children for 2+ years is completely unacceptable for so many reasons I don't even know where to begin.
But, you're not a masker ?
I live in a masking community in SE Asia, and follow local customs. I've never had Covid and was arm twisted by my family into getting mRNA shots.
I've mentioned the anxiety-producing effects of lockdowns and misguided panic. I think it's called the Nocebo Effect, the opposite of the Placebo Effect. Basically, as I understand it, people get worked up into a panic and then this actually produces or contributes to future real health emergencies. It also produces symptoms that nurses and doctors mistake for a real ailment or illness, which causes them to start implementing all the iatrogenic treatments that killed so many patients. I agree. This has not gotten nearly enough attention. Also, some nurses and doctors were probably falsely afraid of their patients, which affected the care they received.
Bill, dear Bill. You always speak my/language. Keep it up, good patriot. You are far from alone in this. Got yer back.
...and the protocol of mask wearing HCW's in clinical or surgical settings is hardly a comparison for the average joe with his ever handy mask hanging from the rear view mirror.
Kelly, Mask studies from the CDC web pages ( that had been the accepted guidelines for decades) concluded that there was no significant evidence either way regarding viral transfer... maybe performing surgery or slowing cough germs is a good use but stats from the last 3 years don't support the idea that masking "worked". It's normal to defend the idea if one "bought the pitch" so to speak.
A well fitted mask most definitely can work more than not wearing one. People with auto immune disorders have been doing this for years as well as people who need them for work. Nothing is perfect but they work better when fit tested.
The entire lot of CoVid protocols could have been the basis for a very good story in Grimms fairytales or at least the basis for another book by JK Rowling.