Also, I should have mentioned in our podcast interview that the results of the CDC's "Red Cross Antibody Study" weren't published until Nov. 30, 2020 - 11 1/2 months AFTER the first tranche of donors had donated blood that was later tested for antibodies.
To this day, nobody in the public knows WHEN these vials of blood were tested for antibodies. I maintain it should not take 11 1/2 months to test 700 or so vials of blood for antibodies.
I think the results were intentionally concealed - and the testing intentionally delayed - to conceal evidence of early wide spread.
Samples of "archived" blood SHOULD and COULD have been tested BEFORE the lockdowns were ordered. For example, if President Trump knew in early March 2020 that at least 2 percent of the country had ALREADY been infected, would he have signed off on lockdowns to "stop" or "prevent" spread?
I don't think so.
And officials should have tested samples of blood from all states and regions of the U.S. For example, in the Deep South - where ILI percentages b/w November 2019 and early February 2020 were far more elevated than in previous flu seasons (except the season of 2017-2018 and only for the month of January that year).
I always look at things that should have happened but didn't. I call this the "dog that didn't bark" evidence.
Bill, you are correct. But let's add the missing link: the entire event was a DoD lead bioweapons attack with worldwide political and media support.
If hundreds of drastic answers with unusual and damaging decisions were all made in lockstep and all identical outcomes, and all involved have hidden evidence of negative outcomes, and all corporations have DoD contracts, and all parties are given immunity, and all evidence is suppressed, well then maybe something more than a health response occurred.
Dr. Davis Martin had the receipts on the virus and bioweapons shot patents, awarded years before the event (201?) started.
Our own govt attempted mass genocide, an arguably succeeded far beyond any other attempt in history.
Once you see it as a bioweapons attack with a psyop component, everything makes sense.
There is some research in BC, Canada, ongoing wth antibody sampling from 2020 and later. I haven't seen the unpublished data yet, but do recall an article in 2021 looking at population level antibodies.
A previous comment I offered, that video exposure would enhance your Substack prominence may well be true. Report back after a month or so, I hope your subscriptions increase.
All living things react to changes in electro-magnetic radiation.
Fifth generation telecommunications rolled out its infrastructure during the latter half of 2019 and switched on in sequence, with Wuhan leading the way. 10,000 new towers fired up 5G to service millions of new smart phones in time for the United Nations Military Games held in that city in October 2019.
The participants noticed that one country did not field a team - Great Britain. The Union Jack was missing from the event. During her bicycle race, Maatje Benassi collapsed breathless and was taken to hospital. Wuhan streets were strangely quiet. A city of 8 million?
The city of Tehran, in Iran trialled their installation of 5G. It triggered a wave of respiratory illnesses and was rapidly shut down. The news from Iran was so scant that most people never heard about it.
The town of Bergamo in Northern Italy soon followed suit and switched on their new 5G mobile phone services in a densely packed industrial area.
At the time, Wuhan was reporting large numbers of people arriving in hospitals suffering from breathing difficulties. As required by the W.H.O., a PCR recombined sequence of RNA was computer generated from a patient fluid sample and labelled as the spike protein of a ‘novel coronavirus’. The world was alerted to a pandemic in February of 2020.
Bergamo and the surrounding district was beginning to see alarming numbers of people attending hospital, struggling to breathe but by then, under orders from the W.H.O., the doctors were ordered to treat their patients with a protocol designed for a viral infection.
When other places in Europe switched on their 5G telecommunications, there was a marked increase in breathless patients turning up at hospitals. London was next to experience 5G and the accompanying spike in hospitalisations. Then New York, with its very dense population registered a massive spike in illness and deaths. All this is verifiable and highly memorable. We were all paying close attention at the time, weren’t we?
One astute doctor, in Spain, was sufficiently alerted that he conducted a study and, by April of 2020, he had found that the outbreaks of illness and deaths were following EXACTLY the roll out of 5G both chronologically and geographically. The demarcation lines of which were remarkable, following borders between countries. Not something that a contagion might be expected to do.
Yes, I noticed immediately upon lockdown there were bucket trucks everywhere very quickly installing 5g tech on every pole. Before the end of March my state gov put out a statement saying that a certain state city seemed to be a hotspot, having more and earlier “covid” cases . I wondered if there was a connection and googled it…. That city happened to be the state test city, with early release of 5g waves. People I mentioned this to just rolled their eyes.
great discussion Bill, excellent. I have written about this also. and we have discussed this. 100% whatever it was and it is not for sure any covid virus....was around way before that taxed out immune systems
Indeed a bright star! Great interview Bill, and now we just have to hope that Kennedy doesn't get his "teeth pulled" by those RINO's taking money from big pharma.
I subscribed to this theory as early as January of 2020.
"It's already inside the house," was my response to those who were trying to inflict a fear and panic narrative on us. But after five years I have arrived at a different conclusion. The way a pandemic would work is that first comes the pandemic, then comes the announcement of it. Instead, we saw an inversion of that. Announcements of a pandemic, and then three months later, we officially announce a "soft lockdown" in our little corner of the world.
1. There was no novel deadly virus.
2. That many of the symptoms synonymous with Covid are also shared with the cold and flu, which miraculously disappeared in 2020.
3. These various tests are false tests. Antibody tests, and PCR tests, all live under the assumption that "testing this sequence of DNA" is only exclusive to COVID-19. Where we know that there are many organisms and genetic material of human beings that have not been mapped.
Essentially, it's like saying that finding a positive, is like getting one "hit" in the game Battleship and determining the aircraft carrier was targeted, when in fact there are many other pieces on the board. In this case, the Battleship board is quite a bit bigger.
A lion share of extra deaths were due to horrible hospital protocols, not disease.
There could have been another source to the spikes in death in certain places around the globe. First of all, do we know for sure this uptake in deaths were real at all? Do we really trust the data from China? Northern Italy? New York?
There was certainly “a” virus (not necessarily novel) spreading in Feb of 2020. Every year, a group of about 20 guys goes to Laughlin on Super Bowl weekend. As I write this, I am preparing to leave tomorrow for the 2025 festivities. My best friend and I drove there in perfect health (for 70-year-olds). We had our fun, and on the drive home he started coughing. By the end of the 4-hour trip I was coughing, too. We both ended up being sick for about a week. During the weekend’s debauchery, one of our group related how, the previous November of 2020, he had had “either the worst cold or the weirdest flu I ever had”. His symptoms, I later realized, were classic for Original Recipe Covid. As for my friend, after getting vaccinated in 2021, by summer he had a portal vein thrombosis (blood clot near the liver). It was huge and the doctor said it looked “strange”. He was in hospital for two weeks. After discharge, he did okay. Until April of 2022, when he was diagnosed with liver failure. He died July 7th. We know it wasn’t the vaccines because the vax stays in the arm and it never causes weird clots, does it?
How many 5G towers do you think you drove past on your journeys to the Super Bowl? How much unnatural electro-magnetic radiation do you think a human being can take before breaking down? How many passengers were using their smart phones in the vehicle? And how many phones did you see being used at the game?
I have much greater confidence in the validity of the antibody tests than I do the 40-cycle PCR tests.
Antibody tests have been used for decades and are not/were not "new technology."
Whether one believes they pick up on "prior infections" or not, it seems like public health officials would have been clamoring to test every "archived" blood tranche they could find.
I've also pointed out the CDC could have tested all 10,000-plus of its own employees for antibodies by late February and early March 2020 - before they called for global lockdowns to "stop spread."
If they'd done that, I wonder what THOSE early antibody tests would have revealed?
Visits to doctors' offices in Georgia in the last week of December 2019 showed that 12.2 percent of these sick patients had ILI symptoms. The historic or expected baseline for ILI was 2.6 percent.
I think hundreds of CDC employees had probably already been infected by this virus.
The reason the CDC didn't order antibody tests for its own employees was ... to not provide any evidence of "early spread."
FWIW, no CDC employee (that I am aware of) has ever died "from Covid.'
The CDC Infection Fatality Rate for Covid is thus 0-in-10,000 (0.0000 percent) - not 1 percent or 3.4 percent.
Perhaps early spread, but of what? No physical proof of a novel virus or that it even was a virus. Perhaps environmental factors, toxins, other pathogens combined with government and media induced fear and hysteria, false diagnoses, falsified medical records, PCR tests that do not, and cannot detect/diagnose or prove illness, exacerbated by harmful, deadly universal medical protocols?
That's the other hypothesis - there never was a "novel virus." The whole thing was made up, probably using bogus PCR tests.
I've always said this theory is possible and can't be ruled out. However, I think - based on my own research and dot-connecting - there was a new virus circulating - it just wasn't a particularly "deadly" virus.
What coronavirus IS "deadly?" Even the flu isn't nearly as deadly as the CDC says it is.
It makes sense to me that you could have had a new virus that made lots of people sick - some with different or "strange" symptoms, but it didn't kill many people, certainly not enough people for a surge in deaths to be noticed between November 2019 and early March 2020.
However, if my hypothesis is true, someone would have noticed a big spike in the number of "sick" people ... Well, I noticed this. This DID happen.
It is possible that the virus theory, which was proposed over a 100 years ago in opposition to the other prevailing theory, which was that environmental causes, toxins, nutrition and life style was what makes people sick, is correct. However, other than universal, unquestioning acceptance and promotion as a settled science dogma, there is no actual proof of a non living, sub microscopic entity that has never been physically sampled or viewed directly, being responsible for making humans sick. There is however a lot of money made as a result of promoting the virus theory as opposed to the environmental theory. In addition, there are numerous studies over the past hundred years or more trying to prove that infections, ostensibly from viruses, can be transmitted directly from human to human contact. These studies all failed to prove that transmission theory. Science is never settled and if people stop questioning there would never be any progress. One who questions might notice that there has been a huge one sided increase in the development of treatments and drugs as opposed to cures. There is little money to be made in curing diseases.
Yes ..the belief that viruses have EVER been isolated as an independent variable or have EVER been "isolated" by other than aberrant lab processes, is beyond Silly, its fraud'.
We notice spikes of people getting sick in previous years as well..
Pre Covid, there were spikes and trough years of disease, but most people do not report diseases they get. Can you think of, before Covid, all the times you have been sick. How many of those times did you go to the hospital? How many times were you tested?
In November of 2019, how many people were reporting to the hospital with their flu/cold disease? In 2020, how much was this amped up by the emerging Covid narrative? How does the rise in reports of illness in 2019 correlate with other cold and flu seasons? Also how much of our population was primed already with previous fear and panic reports of bird flu, swine flu, and other flus. Does the rise in such sensational narratives correlate reporting them?
If you cannot produce the "virus" as an independent variable, and then prove its transmission and infection ..then you cannot prosecute.
And cytopathic effects created by aberrant lab processes is not proof of "virus" causation and only a fool, or someone with other motivations would claim that past and contemporary lab isolation practice is not ignorance at best, and fraud at worst. .
The world ...medical professionals included, have been brainwashed into simply believing that effect (symptom) is proof of cause (virus) and their defense is, no lay correspondence will be entered into.
I agree if there are such entities as viruses that cause infection in humans, it was possibly novel as in human manufactured, and in effect well before the official declared date. Even if that was the case the virus did not cause a pandemic, was never lethal absent the usual at risk groups, but nevertheless served the cause of the DOD who were responsible for this hoax in order to take down the Trump administration and prepare for future such operations.
Very early on in the pandemic I read somewhere about findings in Italy in which a cancer study had been ongoing on, so there were blood samples taken around the country in 2019. antibodies to Covid were discovered and somebody did an analysis given the date and pattern of the blood samples and antibodies.
According to that analysis, Covid would have been spreading throughout Italy for at least a year (if I recall correctly) before the “official pandemic.”
An early large outbreak in northern Italy could have likely been related to the number of Chinese immigrants working in the Italian fashion industry These workers came directly from the Wuhan area.
I wish I could cite the Italian study, but I can’t remember where I read about it at this point.
I used to refer to this a lot in the comment threads on Berenson’s SubStack.
I've got that study somewhere. It found a big percentage of "early cases" - I can't remember the figure, but they dated to well before November 2019, I think.
I didn't realize until later this story and interview were behind a "pay wall." So I appreciate the coverage, but this makes the "reach" of my message go down about 96 percent.
Also, I should have mentioned in our podcast interview that the results of the CDC's "Red Cross Antibody Study" weren't published until Nov. 30, 2020 - 11 1/2 months AFTER the first tranche of donors had donated blood that was later tested for antibodies.
To this day, nobody in the public knows WHEN these vials of blood were tested for antibodies. I maintain it should not take 11 1/2 months to test 700 or so vials of blood for antibodies.
I think the results were intentionally concealed - and the testing intentionally delayed - to conceal evidence of early wide spread.
Samples of "archived" blood SHOULD and COULD have been tested BEFORE the lockdowns were ordered. For example, if President Trump knew in early March 2020 that at least 2 percent of the country had ALREADY been infected, would he have signed off on lockdowns to "stop" or "prevent" spread?
I don't think so.
And officials should have tested samples of blood from all states and regions of the U.S. For example, in the Deep South - where ILI percentages b/w November 2019 and early February 2020 were far more elevated than in previous flu seasons (except the season of 2017-2018 and only for the month of January that year).
I always look at things that should have happened but didn't. I call this the "dog that didn't bark" evidence.
Bill, you are correct. But let's add the missing link: the entire event was a DoD lead bioweapons attack with worldwide political and media support.
If hundreds of drastic answers with unusual and damaging decisions were all made in lockstep and all identical outcomes, and all involved have hidden evidence of negative outcomes, and all corporations have DoD contracts, and all parties are given immunity, and all evidence is suppressed, well then maybe something more than a health response occurred.
Dr. Davis Martin had the receipts on the virus and bioweapons shot patents, awarded years before the event (201?) started.
Our own govt attempted mass genocide, an arguably succeeded far beyond any other attempt in history.
Once you see it as a bioweapons attack with a psyop component, everything makes sense.
There is some research in BC, Canada, ongoing wth antibody sampling from 2020 and later. I haven't seen the unpublished data yet, but do recall an article in 2021 looking at population level antibodies.
A previous comment I offered, that video exposure would enhance your Substack prominence may well be true. Report back after a month or so, I hope your subscriptions increase.
All living things react to changes in electro-magnetic radiation.
Fifth generation telecommunications rolled out its infrastructure during the latter half of 2019 and switched on in sequence, with Wuhan leading the way. 10,000 new towers fired up 5G to service millions of new smart phones in time for the United Nations Military Games held in that city in October 2019.
The participants noticed that one country did not field a team - Great Britain. The Union Jack was missing from the event. During her bicycle race, Maatje Benassi collapsed breathless and was taken to hospital. Wuhan streets were strangely quiet. A city of 8 million?
The city of Tehran, in Iran trialled their installation of 5G. It triggered a wave of respiratory illnesses and was rapidly shut down. The news from Iran was so scant that most people never heard about it.
The town of Bergamo in Northern Italy soon followed suit and switched on their new 5G mobile phone services in a densely packed industrial area.
At the time, Wuhan was reporting large numbers of people arriving in hospitals suffering from breathing difficulties. As required by the W.H.O., a PCR recombined sequence of RNA was computer generated from a patient fluid sample and labelled as the spike protein of a ‘novel coronavirus’. The world was alerted to a pandemic in February of 2020.
Bergamo and the surrounding district was beginning to see alarming numbers of people attending hospital, struggling to breathe but by then, under orders from the W.H.O., the doctors were ordered to treat their patients with a protocol designed for a viral infection.
Read on: https://francesleader.substack.com/p/the-fifth-generation-weapon
When other places in Europe switched on their 5G telecommunications, there was a marked increase in breathless patients turning up at hospitals. London was next to experience 5G and the accompanying spike in hospitalisations. Then New York, with its very dense population registered a massive spike in illness and deaths. All this is verifiable and highly memorable. We were all paying close attention at the time, weren’t we?
One astute doctor, in Spain, was sufficiently alerted that he conducted a study and, by April of 2020, he had found that the outbreaks of illness and deaths were following EXACTLY the roll out of 5G both chronologically and geographically. The demarcation lines of which were remarkable, following borders between countries. Not something that a contagion might be expected to do.
IF THERE WAS NO 5G - THERE WAS NO ILLNESS!
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/the-fifth-generation-weapon
That's interesting. Thanks for the summary and the link.
Yes, I noticed immediately upon lockdown there were bucket trucks everywhere very quickly installing 5g tech on every pole. Before the end of March my state gov put out a statement saying that a certain state city seemed to be a hotspot, having more and earlier “covid” cases . I wondered if there was a connection and googled it…. That city happened to be the state test city, with early release of 5g waves. People I mentioned this to just rolled their eyes.
It was clear and observable but oh so taboo to say it.
Terrific interview, Bill. I loved it. You are a bright star in our truth firmament. Thank you, sir!
great discussion Bill, excellent. I have written about this also. and we have discussed this. 100% whatever it was and it is not for sure any covid virus....was around way before that taxed out immune systems
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/the-fifth-generation-weapon
Indeed a bright star! Great interview Bill, and now we just have to hope that Kennedy doesn't get his "teeth pulled" by those RINO's taking money from big pharma.
Again, wonderful interview!
Thanks, Jeffrey.
Thanks, Bill, for doing this important work and doing it well.
It's a shame that we all weren't able to get more media access back in 2020.
I subscribed to this theory as early as January of 2020.
"It's already inside the house," was my response to those who were trying to inflict a fear and panic narrative on us. But after five years I have arrived at a different conclusion. The way a pandemic would work is that first comes the pandemic, then comes the announcement of it. Instead, we saw an inversion of that. Announcements of a pandemic, and then three months later, we officially announce a "soft lockdown" in our little corner of the world.
1. There was no novel deadly virus.
2. That many of the symptoms synonymous with Covid are also shared with the cold and flu, which miraculously disappeared in 2020.
3. These various tests are false tests. Antibody tests, and PCR tests, all live under the assumption that "testing this sequence of DNA" is only exclusive to COVID-19. Where we know that there are many organisms and genetic material of human beings that have not been mapped.
Essentially, it's like saying that finding a positive, is like getting one "hit" in the game Battleship and determining the aircraft carrier was targeted, when in fact there are many other pieces on the board. In this case, the Battleship board is quite a bit bigger.
A lion share of extra deaths were due to horrible hospital protocols, not disease.
There could have been another source to the spikes in death in certain places around the globe. First of all, do we know for sure this uptake in deaths were real at all? Do we really trust the data from China? Northern Italy? New York?
"A lion share of extra deaths were due to horrible hospital protocols, not disease."
The no-virus group and the "non-deadly virus/early spread group" (my group) both agree on this statement.
We can't trust it at all.
Congratulations Bill! Hope your growth gives you statistical headaches 🤪!
There was certainly “a” virus (not necessarily novel) spreading in Feb of 2020. Every year, a group of about 20 guys goes to Laughlin on Super Bowl weekend. As I write this, I am preparing to leave tomorrow for the 2025 festivities. My best friend and I drove there in perfect health (for 70-year-olds). We had our fun, and on the drive home he started coughing. By the end of the 4-hour trip I was coughing, too. We both ended up being sick for about a week. During the weekend’s debauchery, one of our group related how, the previous November of 2020, he had had “either the worst cold or the weirdest flu I ever had”. His symptoms, I later realized, were classic for Original Recipe Covid. As for my friend, after getting vaccinated in 2021, by summer he had a portal vein thrombosis (blood clot near the liver). It was huge and the doctor said it looked “strange”. He was in hospital for two weeks. After discharge, he did okay. Until April of 2022, when he was diagnosed with liver failure. He died July 7th. We know it wasn’t the vaccines because the vax stays in the arm and it never causes weird clots, does it?
A correction: my friend got his weird “flu”in November of 2019, not 2020. My bad.
How many 5G towers do you think you drove past on your journeys to the Super Bowl? How much unnatural electro-magnetic radiation do you think a human being can take before breaking down? How many passengers were using their smart phones in the vehicle? And how many phones did you see being used at the game?
The weapon is in your pocket.
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/the-fifth-generation-weapon
How can one test an antibody for a virus that hasn't been properly isolated?
I have much greater confidence in the validity of the antibody tests than I do the 40-cycle PCR tests.
Antibody tests have been used for decades and are not/were not "new technology."
Whether one believes they pick up on "prior infections" or not, it seems like public health officials would have been clamoring to test every "archived" blood tranche they could find.
I've also pointed out the CDC could have tested all 10,000-plus of its own employees for antibodies by late February and early March 2020 - before they called for global lockdowns to "stop spread."
If they'd done that, I wonder what THOSE early antibody tests would have revealed?
Visits to doctors' offices in Georgia in the last week of December 2019 showed that 12.2 percent of these sick patients had ILI symptoms. The historic or expected baseline for ILI was 2.6 percent.
I think hundreds of CDC employees had probably already been infected by this virus.
The reason the CDC didn't order antibody tests for its own employees was ... to not provide any evidence of "early spread."
FWIW, no CDC employee (that I am aware of) has ever died "from Covid.'
The CDC Infection Fatality Rate for Covid is thus 0-in-10,000 (0.0000 percent) - not 1 percent or 3.4 percent.
How can you test for an antibody for something that hasn't been properly isolated? You can't search for something that hasn't been properly defined.
If it haven't been properly isolated, suggest your sheriff change the locks in his jail.
Or even improperly isolated....
That is what is being unsaid here isn't it?
Along with the NLP, that somewhere, there is/are actual viruses.
And along with endorsements of shill McCullough, your spidey senses tingle, don't they? :-)
Go down to your local lockup and get some to test it and antibodies against it.
Perhaps early spread, but of what? No physical proof of a novel virus or that it even was a virus. Perhaps environmental factors, toxins, other pathogens combined with government and media induced fear and hysteria, false diagnoses, falsified medical records, PCR tests that do not, and cannot detect/diagnose or prove illness, exacerbated by harmful, deadly universal medical protocols?
That's the other hypothesis - there never was a "novel virus." The whole thing was made up, probably using bogus PCR tests.
I've always said this theory is possible and can't be ruled out. However, I think - based on my own research and dot-connecting - there was a new virus circulating - it just wasn't a particularly "deadly" virus.
What coronavirus IS "deadly?" Even the flu isn't nearly as deadly as the CDC says it is.
It makes sense to me that you could have had a new virus that made lots of people sick - some with different or "strange" symptoms, but it didn't kill many people, certainly not enough people for a surge in deaths to be noticed between November 2019 and early March 2020.
However, if my hypothesis is true, someone would have noticed a big spike in the number of "sick" people ... Well, I noticed this. This DID happen.
Handled with grace, as is your usual Bill. Viruses exist and they can make people sick.
It is possible that the virus theory, which was proposed over a 100 years ago in opposition to the other prevailing theory, which was that environmental causes, toxins, nutrition and life style was what makes people sick, is correct. However, other than universal, unquestioning acceptance and promotion as a settled science dogma, there is no actual proof of a non living, sub microscopic entity that has never been physically sampled or viewed directly, being responsible for making humans sick. There is however a lot of money made as a result of promoting the virus theory as opposed to the environmental theory. In addition, there are numerous studies over the past hundred years or more trying to prove that infections, ostensibly from viruses, can be transmitted directly from human to human contact. These studies all failed to prove that transmission theory. Science is never settled and if people stop questioning there would never be any progress. One who questions might notice that there has been a huge one sided increase in the development of treatments and drugs as opposed to cures. There is little money to be made in curing diseases.
Bullshit!
Hahaha. Silly.
Yes ..the belief that viruses have EVER been isolated as an independent variable or have EVER been "isolated" by other than aberrant lab processes, is beyond Silly, its fraud'.
Ok! You do you!
We notice spikes of people getting sick in previous years as well..
Pre Covid, there were spikes and trough years of disease, but most people do not report diseases they get. Can you think of, before Covid, all the times you have been sick. How many of those times did you go to the hospital? How many times were you tested?
In November of 2019, how many people were reporting to the hospital with their flu/cold disease? In 2020, how much was this amped up by the emerging Covid narrative? How does the rise in reports of illness in 2019 correlate with other cold and flu seasons? Also how much of our population was primed already with previous fear and panic reports of bird flu, swine flu, and other flus. Does the rise in such sensational narratives correlate reporting them?
Yes..if the media is of one voice ..the public is of one belief.
Habeas corpus ...bring the body before the court.
If you cannot produce the "virus" as an independent variable, and then prove its transmission and infection ..then you cannot prosecute.
And cytopathic effects created by aberrant lab processes is not proof of "virus" causation and only a fool, or someone with other motivations would claim that past and contemporary lab isolation practice is not ignorance at best, and fraud at worst. .
The world ...medical professionals included, have been brainwashed into simply believing that effect (symptom) is proof of cause (virus) and their defense is, no lay correspondence will be entered into.
I agree if there are such entities as viruses that cause infection in humans, it was possibly novel as in human manufactured, and in effect well before the official declared date. Even if that was the case the virus did not cause a pandemic, was never lethal absent the usual at risk groups, but nevertheless served the cause of the DOD who were responsible for this hoax in order to take down the Trump administration and prepare for future such operations.
How are viruses isolated Bill?
Did you check your local library's fiction holdings for this novel?
It is not found in the fiction section, but can be located in the not settled science section.
Very early on in the pandemic I read somewhere about findings in Italy in which a cancer study had been ongoing on, so there were blood samples taken around the country in 2019. antibodies to Covid were discovered and somebody did an analysis given the date and pattern of the blood samples and antibodies.
According to that analysis, Covid would have been spreading throughout Italy for at least a year (if I recall correctly) before the “official pandemic.”
An early large outbreak in northern Italy could have likely been related to the number of Chinese immigrants working in the Italian fashion industry These workers came directly from the Wuhan area.
I wish I could cite the Italian study, but I can’t remember where I read about it at this point.
I used to refer to this a lot in the comment threads on Berenson’s SubStack.
I've got that study somewhere. It found a big percentage of "early cases" - I can't remember the figure, but they dated to well before November 2019, I think.
Don’t blame the Chinese…. read this study: https://stateofthenation.co/?p=12846
I tend not to "like" paywalled articles.
I didn't realize until later this story and interview were behind a "pay wall." So I appreciate the coverage, but this makes the "reach" of my message go down about 96 percent.
Regarding the origin of the virus:
Check out this SubStack from Peter McMillan
https://substack.com/home/post/p-157910324
In that article he links to this website:
https://puremediaaustralia.org/f/an-unholy-triadthe-birth-of-a-plague