44 Comments

Would love to see Scientist, Ralph Baric, Chapel Hill, NC, ON THE STAND IN FRONT OF CONGRESS! He knows quite a lot about COVID and it’s origins 🤨.

Expand full comment

This individual is he who made this virus via gain of function tinkering ever since he got the US patent #7279327 over 20 years ago!

Read all about it....https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-7279327-B2

He a bad man.

Expand full comment

Not disagreeing that he's a bad man, but if I had a patent for Horse Water Wing Jackets, does that really prove that that Pegasus is real?

Expand full comment

Why do you believe he would tell the truth about anything?

Expand full comment

People under congressional oath can contradict themselves like Fauci. Lying to Congress is jail time. It’s recorded on the congressional record too.

Expand full comment

Your programming was successful.

A+

Expand full comment

FauxQi lied to Congress. Obviously, nothing will happen.

Expand full comment

The real question (since we both agree the virus was kicking around long before we had tests) is: Did the 'experts' know this and choose to ignore it, just like any number of other things that would have 'ended' the pandemic?

Expand full comment

That is the real question. My strong hunch is that SOME of the experts had to know this. They didn't just ignore it, they actively did everything they could to cover up and conceal this evidence.

Expand full comment

Agreed!

Expand full comment

Assumption + two favoured ‘scientists’ who agree = Consensus = ‘The Science’ = Government policy.

Expand full comment

Dr Paul Alexander put it on his substack today too

Expand full comment

Over Here, there's the corny version: Never ASSUME - because it makes an ASS out of YoU and ME!

Cheers!

Expand full comment

"Over Here" where? That's been around the US for ages. Teaches you how to spell, too. 😉

Expand full comment

Hi Bill. I’ve only recently discovered your stellar blog here. I was wondering if you’d heard about the Greenspring Retirement respiratory “outbreak” in June and July of 2019? I think the story is still up on the internet. Three residents ended up dying, scores sick and staff all sick too and they remarked that “it was out of the ordinary for such a respiratory outbreak in summer.” Then we did not hear much else about it after that. I’ve often wondered if that was the infamous SARSCov2. The retirement facility was some 60 miles from Ft Detrick, which is also intriguing to say the least! Lots of folks I know caught a bad bug in the autumn and early winter of 2019. I think you are right on the money. Cheers and best of health to you and yours in 2023!

Expand full comment

Thanks, Mel. Yes, I have read some about that outbreak at that nursing home. That and the strange events at Ft. Detrick have never been fully investigated as possible key pieces of any "early spread" puzzle. Per the theme of today's articles, there's no need to investigate such events as we all know the spread originated from that live market in Wuhan (in December 2019). It's the power of the false assumption. If you find more details, please forward to me. I'm pretty sure the Washington Post or NY Times isn't interested.

Expand full comment

Bill, I think I sent you 2 articles from June & July 2019, some months ago. I’ve always felt that’s the true early spread, although I can certainly be wrong!

Expand full comment

Thanks, Cindi. I hope I saved what you sent me. It's hard to keep up with all the stories and anecdotes that support my hypothesis. On the actual "start date" of spread, I keep going back further and further. One of my readers said one of her friends had antibody evidence of infection from March 2019. She said the hospital that treated him called him and 2021 and said they had saved a sample of his blood because of his strange previous respiratory illness. They then tested the blood for Covid - positive!

What would that mean if that story is true?

Expand full comment

If the articles about Ft. Detrick & a nursing home outbreak nearby as of June 2019, based on what you said in your article today that something like a virus doesn’t just appear suddenly in a vacuum; it perhaps starts slow & innocuous until it builds up steam? So if there was something going on in June 2019, that would surely mean it was here even earlier. Didn’t the Davos set have a “mock” pandemic exercise in Oct or Nov 2019 & conveniently it “came over” 6 weeks or so later + a brand new “vaccine” was ready to go not long after? To me, all of that means this was well planned in at least early 2019 & probably much earlier. But I am making some assumptions!

Expand full comment

Just re-sent the 2 articles

Expand full comment

You emailed them to me? Maybe it went to my spam email. I haven't seen it yet, but I'll check. I want to start doing some real digging on these topics, just because nobody else is.

Expand full comment

I’m having some issue w/ your gmail? It didn’t go through?

Expand full comment

"Yes, I have read some about that outbreak at that nursing home."

I was about 800 yards away from the first one!

Now, if you were afraid of bats and bat expectorant, would you rush out to the nearest trendy Californian grocer to buy up all of the fresh basil and chicken breasts? I didn't even know that the Flu d'état existed until I was shoulder to shoulder with countless individuals prepared to quareteen themselves against a virus that they didn't have.

Apparently when the plague that's going to end mankind breaks out, people head straight to the grocery store! Later I learned that you can't catch the Flu d'état at grocery stores, so I really dodged a bullet!

Unfortunately, I was unable to have basil chicken for dinner that night, and I have yet to catch this trendy virus. Serves me right for not having a social media account to post such things to.

Expand full comment

Or, one could argue that the numbers were never there and it was a hoax.

http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2020/march/16/the-coronavirus-hoax/

Hitchens Razor: One does not need to scientifically deconstruct something that is not scientifically constructed.

Masks?

6 feet?

Experimental mRNA therapy?

The jab is the malady

Expand full comment

You had also posted (11/7/22) about testing of "archived" donated blood that also revealed the virus was circulating earlier than we were told...

Expand full comment

Yes, the one study of archived Red Cross blood showed 2.03 percent of donors in CA, OR and WA had Covid antibodies when they donated blood Dec. 13-16, 2019. If they already had antibodies by that date, they must have been infected by November 2019 or earlier. That's a hugely important study/result. The results weren't published until Nov. 30, 2020- almost 12 months after the people donated the blood. Why the year delay?

And why didn't they test any other tranches of 'archived" blood?

The questions answer themselves in my opinion. The officials do not like evidence of early spread. Wonder why?

Expand full comment

ZeroHedge put this out...Hmmm...interesting...who are these National Security Experts? 🧐

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/national-security-experts-criticize-media-scientists-who-dismissed-covid-19-lab-leak

Expand full comment

Thanks for this nice analysis Bill.

Regarding those assumptions, you know, the ones that need to be tested, here is a nice little piece from today featuring RFK, Jr. and a Yale epidemiologist named Harvey Risch, PhD, who is clearly one of the good guys. Lotsa good guys have emerged and are still emerging!

Risch has published over 400 peer reviewed scientific research articles articles and has been on the editorial board of over 60 scientific publications.

"Yale Scientist Tells RFK, Jr.: 'Theories are not Science'"

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/yale-scientist-harvey-risch-rfk-jr-podcast/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=68d9b3d6-2e25-4d03-82a3-fc3bbaf2eeec

Regarding peer review, your peers are reviewing you, Bill, and we like your publications.

Expand full comment

Thanks, Johnnny. I love Children's Health Defense.

Expand full comment

I could also save everyone some grief. In typical Hollywood fashion, they made Dinosaurs invincible, but in real life you would be able to kill them the same way you'd kill a crocodile. Admittedly, it wouldn't be nearly as thrilling if kooky Jeff G could drop old T-Rex with a 45 pistol.

Back to the early virus; a friend of mine got it in December 2019 on a trip to Los Angeles, so it was definitely roaming around the US much earlier than announced. IMHO, the entire covid drama was a political/DOD operation with a specific goal, which was to scare people badly enough they'd abdicate their personal rights, constitutional or otherwise, to authorities for political gain and profit. They succeeded.

Expand full comment

The SADs part of Covid-19.

There is still more that we don't know than what we do.

Expand full comment

Over Here? Think James Cagney> George M. Cohan>

Expand full comment

Bill are you following the new bombshells about the DOD plotting the blame on China in that January? There are allegations it’s our virus and did not come out of Wuhan which we all know already. I say look at the Ukraine.

Expand full comment

Just watched one of the podcast interviews I guess you provided. The legal documents analyzed by the journalist Sasha? That was interesting. In the Browsnstone Writers Group more and more people are talking about how Defense people and organizations took over the pandemic effort. It seems like Big Science and the Military Industrial Complex have merged. That's about the worst possible thing that could happen.

Expand full comment

It’s huge. This info and what you have done on when Covid started will tie it all in together.

Expand full comment

I saw it too. That’s why I mentioned Ralph Baric of Chapel Hill, NC. That rabbit hole has some major twists but does end up in China...some how some way.

Also, Gordon Chow has some real good insight info about what’s going on in China now on Epoch.

Expand full comment

No, haven't seen anything yet. But I haven't been surfing the web. Please share any links about this. Thanks, Joe.

Expand full comment

Sounds like you are assuming that this “virus“ has been purified and isolated. Heed your own advice.

Expand full comment

I do assume the coronavirus and the disease Covid are real. In science and investigative journalism, you have to make some assumptions. It doesn't both me that others doubt this and I don't rule out your position. I'll keep working on my hypothesis and others can keep working on your hypothesis.

Expand full comment

"In science and investigative journalism, you have to make some assumptions"

That's a new one for me, the science part anyway.

I guess college is different than it was when I got my Baccalaureate degree in Science.

Expand full comment

When you assume, you make an ass out of you, (and in journalism) your editor.

But it would seem that both science and journalism have changed since my college years.

Expand full comment

Let's get weird and stop trying to promise safety in an insistently unpreditable environment, full of competing interests trying to limit narrative and placate the cowardly with unachievable promises.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lZy3teNY84

If normal, new or otherwise, were the soluton to we little beasts of optimistic godliness and easy savagery, we wouldn't need such things as representative government to limit our bodies, science to encourage our minds, art to inspire empathy and objective truth to undermine our subjective reality.

Foundation is option, perception is control; break out the tree saws and work on the limbs beneath us.

Expand full comment