The military might be Covid’s major villain

The ‘emergency’ that allowed the DoD to circumvent normal medical safety measures wasn’t an emergency at all.

The Pentagon and Dept. of Defense leveraged fear of terrorist attacks after 9-11 into a massive program to provide “bio-defense” against weaponized viruses, which would require mandatory vaccines to protect military personnel and “national security.” So the military was protecting us all and had to take charge of the ‘war’ on evil viruses.

Debbie Lerman of The Brownstone Institute has written perhaps the most-important summary showing how the U.S. military took over the Covid response and circumvented all previous safety measures designed to protect the population from unsafe and non-effective medical products (like “vaccines.”)

Debbie’s article builds on the “invaluable work” of Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt, who Debbie notes, “have been trying to draw attention to this shocking legal and regulatory framework for a long time.”

To Debbie’s analysis, I’d add my opinion that nothing that happened would have happened if “early spread” had been acknowledged.

The marketing message for the vaccines wasn’t subtle: This is a national emergency and you will very possibly die if you don’t get these shots

Debbie’s article points out:

“In December 2020 the following facts were known about Covid-19 without a reasonable doubt: 

• The infection fatality rate (IFR) for the entire population was less than 1%.

• The IFR for anyone under 55 was 0.01% or lower.

• The IFR for children was near zero.

Debbie continues: “A disease that has significant potential to affect national security has to be very severe, especially in its effect on the military. Yet in December 2020 military-aged people were known to be at nearly no risk from Covid-19. And still the HHS Secretary determined that there was an emergency that warranted EUA for the mRNA vaccines. And all military personnel were mandated to get the injections.”

No threat to military or to children ….

I made the same point in this article, where I noted that only nine active duty U.S. military personnel - out of 1.34 million active duty service members - had (allegedly) died from Covid in the first 13 months of the pandemic.

Regarding the mortality risk to children, in this article, I noted that the mortality risk for healthy children is greater than 1-in-1 million (A random child would be more likely to be struck by lightning than die from Covid).

Also, in my opinion, the IFR for the “entire population” was/is much lower than “1 percent.” I also firmly believe a more accurate IFR assessment could have been made as early as March 15, 2020, when most countries imposed draconian lockdowns to slow virus spread and thus, in their opinion, “save millions of lives.”

In short, the justification for lockdowns was that they would prevent cases, which would prevent huge number of cases that progressed to death.

Nobody knows the real IFR because nobody knows

the real number of early cases

My contrarian belief is that nobody really knows how many people had already been infected by this virus as of mid-March 2020 so the public didn’t know the real mortality risk (IFR) from this virus.

I also believe at least some public health officials must have known the real IFR was either much lower than publicly stated or that a real investigation into “early spread” would prove this so they knew they could not perform such a legitimate investigation.

I believe the Covid PCR test must qualify as the greatest fraud in medical history and was used to massively inflate the number of Covid “cases.” 

Even though I think the diagnostic value of the PCR tests was massively over-stated, I still think it’s very possible that millions of people had already been infected with this novel virus by the date of the lockdowns and, most importantly, had NOT died after being infected.

If this was a super-contagious virus (which I think it was), the number of infected people wouldn’t have been limited or “isolated” to just a few households or towns; huge numbers of people had probably been infected by the beginning of spring 2020.

It’s not the ‘case numbers’ that blow up the authorized narrative …

But the number of  real or likely early “cases” is not what  blows up or debunks the authorized Covid narrative … what blows up the narrative is the fact hardly anyone was dying from this virus.

“Early Spread” = “Numerous infected people” … but, boldface this point,  “very few if any Covid deaths.”

If millions of people had, in fact, already been infected by the date of the lockdowns and no spike in excess deaths had been observed by, say, March 1, 2020, the only conclusion I can make is that this virus is and was not deadly.

Re: “millions” of cases …

Millions (plural) of previously infected Americans would equate to just two million cases, which would be less than one percent of the U.S. population being infected by March 2020. 

The results of the Red Cross antibody study - where 2.03 percent of one sample tested positive for antibodies Dec. 13-16, 2019 - extrapolated to the nation, equals more than 7.4 million cases …. by the end of November. That is, these blood donors didn’t suddenly develop antibodies the day they gave blood in mid-December.

It’s beyond dispute that no major spike in “excess deaths” had been observed by early March 2020.

If one uses the tiny number of “Covid deaths” before March 2020 as the IFR or CFR numerator and uses a denominator of “millions” of actual cases, one gets a mortality risk that is infinitesimal. 

My main point is this virus should not have been considered a “health threat” to 99.9 percent of the population and it certainly wasn’t a “national security” threat, which was the justification for the military to take over vaccine development, procurement and distribution.

The “emergency” used to activate the “Emergency Use Authorization” provisions was not an “emergency” at all.

Summarizing …

Debbie Lerman’s excellent article shows the public the elaborate and prolonged contractural machinations that had to occur to let the military effectively take over the Covid response.

As Debbie points out, the experts who matter also said this virus was naturally-occurring, which reveals to anyone who’s paying attention that the military will take over even when the virus-creating “enemy” is not Russia, Iran or China … but some bats.

With this article, I’m simply pointing out that no grave public health “emergency - to the military or the public - existed in America.  “National security” was not being put at risk by a virus that, over months, had infected millions of people without killing hardly anyone.

Debbie’s article shows us that the producers of this pandemic and the usual suspects in the Military Industrial Complex went to great lengths to legally “authorize” their draconian Covid responses, which provided liability cover for all the key players. 

However, after going to all this trouble, they also had to show this virus posed a grave “emergency” to the military and/or the public.

Definitive evidence of a contagious virus that had caused very few deaths would have scuttled the entire painstaking operation. 

As I keep writing, “early spread” simply cannot be “confirmed” … because this would also confirm no or few “early deaths” occurred. “Almost no deaths” does not equal a  dire “emergency” to national defense.

A Final Question …

If the virus that causes Covid killed such a tiny percentage of people in the four or so months the virus was spreading widely (November 2019 through February 2020), what suddenly changed and killed so many people after April 2020?

I’d note that “Covid deaths” never stopped occurring. If I’m right that early spread happened, this would mean Covid - in its early months - did not kill many people at all, despite infecting millions of people.

It seems to me this initial “death rate” should have remained constant or even gone down as treatments should have improved, early diagnosis should have occurred and future virus mutations should not have been as deadly as the earliest form of the virus. (Plus, 80 percent of the population was now vaccinated).

Still, the “Covid deaths” never stopped and actually accelerated in Year Two of the official pandemic. 

I believe evidence of early spread tells us many shocking things. One of my conclusions is that the “vaccines” created to prevent Covid deaths must have caused many deaths.

But it’s not just the vaccines that caused the huge spike in excess deaths that began after the lockdowns. 

Many factors contributed to this spike in excess deaths and all of these factors can be traced to the experts’ response to the virus … not to the virus itself, which “early spread” tells us was largely benign.

As Covid deaths never stopped and I’m convinced “early spread” shows us Covid is/was not overly lethal, I can only conclude that other factors must explain the vast majority of alleged “Covid deaths” that are still happening.

It wasn’t a novel virus that posed a threat to national security, it was the response of the national security establishment that killed and harmed most “Covid” victims.

As usual in today’s upside-down world, the alleged hero or savior was almost certainly the villain and real killer.