I should have highlighted this Mercury News exclusive years ago. This article provides even more evidence that “early spread” in America should not be viewed as an insignificant 'theory.'
I actually think Covid and any spreading virus had already peaked by the time the lockdowns were ordered to "slow" or "stop" the spread in mid-March 2020.
I'm not the only one who thinks this. Two doctors (spouses) think the same thing and shared this view with their state's health agency. In their opinion, "30 percent" of the sick patients they saw (those who tested negative for flu*) from November 2019-February 2020 had Covid.
After the lockdowns, they didn't see any patients with the symptoms they saw all the time in the weeks and months before the lockdowns.
If we are right, one has to ask "what killed all these alleged Covid victims." It wasn't a deadly virus. It was the hospital protocols and the Nocebo Effect.
I think this is also an important story, another one I probably should have published earlier.
* I should note that someone can have Covid and the flu at the same time. In other words, just because you test positive for the flu doesn't mean you don't have Covid.
Yep. Remdesivir (aka "Run-death-is-near") as part of the standard treatment protocol sure helped increase those CNN 24/7 Covid death counters. I've lost track of how many people should spend the rest of their lives in prison over this mass democide. Too many people to count.
I agree. And the only thing which would cause mass casualties is fear among the public, anxiety attacks leading to inability to breath, leading people to the ER + NIH protocols. This is why the deaths started spiking in late March. It wasn't covid deaths - it was all cause deaths. Or one could go with the Emma Woodhouse theory that all of those deaths are fake numbers, which I haven't seen evidence for. Just mho.
Thanks, Lisa. That's the stunning and scary conclusion/take-away to me. If Covid wasn't killing 98 percent of these "Covid victims," what did? My answer: It was democide.
And no expert has proffered a convincing explanation that would credibly explain why the spike in "Covid deaths" would explode 12 months after the virus first began to circulate. Shouldn't variants or future strains of a virus be less lethal?
These deaths also spiked even though almost everyone was wearing masks, practicing social distancing, etc.
Readers please note the photo I ran with this story. The photo shows Tim McCain in an ICU unit hooked up to the ECMO device. As I understand it, ECMO pulls blood out of the body, oxygenates it and then re-filters it back into the body. Tim was put on ECMO in Day 2 of his hospitalization because many of his organs were failing.
Skip forward many months and I found a story about a Covid patient in Arizona whose life was "saved" by the same ECMO device. The story said this was believed to be the first Covid patient whose life was saved by ECMO.
I say, "Not so." Tim McCain had been saved by it in early January 2020. This anecdote illustrates the importance of doctors sharing Covid information with other doctors and scientists. However, this didn't happen in Tim's case because nobody who mattered "confirmed" this man had a severe case of early Covid. Instead - via a conspiracy - they covered up this almost-certain early case.
This cover-up probably costs many lives that could have been saved if details of Tim's case had been widely disseminated in the medical world.
I should have added that I emailed the author of these two Mercury News articles and shared with her summaries and links to my "early spread" stories. Paraphrasing from memory, I told her "what you have obviously documented is a virus (or illness) that was wide-spread. My research supports this. Please contact me if you want more information. I hope you follow-up on my freelance reporting and research."
Curiously to me, she never replied to my email. That is, I don't think an author who wrote an important "early spread" article, really wants to follow or connect all of these dots. Early spread is still taboo in MSM newsrooms.
Google AI tells me that one unique factor of the Spanish Flu is that it disproportionately killed and effected "healthy young adults." The average age of death might have been .... in the 20s! To me, that would be a real, scary pandemic.
Almost no healthy young people died from Covid.
I read one article that said older people might have had immunity or some immunity because they had lived through the Russian Flu (circa 1889) - which happened 28 years earlier.
I think tens of millions of Americans had developed natural immunity to Covid by the end of March 2020. That makes one wonder why there was such a huge spike in "Covid deaths" in the second year of the pandemic - beginning around November 2020 and peaking around December 2020 and January 2021.
I think so many people getting that year's flu shot (the 2020-2021 shot) in September and October 2020 might somehow explain many of the subsequent 2nd year deaths. I don't think the flu would have killed this many people, but it would have sent many to the hospital - which was the last place they needed to be.
I do think the flu shot can cause flu symptoms and the flu shots of 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 were different formulations than normal, according to some of my readers.
The flu shot has gotten a complete pass in any effort to explain the spike in "Covid deaths" in Year 2 of a virus.
“Google AI tells me that one unique factor of the Spanish Flu is that it disproportionately killed and affected "healthy young adults." The average age of death might have been .... in the 20s! To me, that would be a real, scary pandemic.”
It has long been known that many of these died from what was later learned to be lethal over doses of aspirin. It was a new miracle drug and they believed that if a few were great, that more was better and thus killed off a great many. Masks were also known to have perverse effects even then and proved to be another cause of the high death count.
There have been surveys and studies at different points along the West cast of the US that indicate that a large number of residents there did infractions have antibodies against covid at this time as you suggest. So do waste water samples from various regions of the world.
And don’t forget the Uss Roosevelt antibody study of crew members. 60 percent (!) tested positive for antibodies in April 2020. IMO, there's no way ALL of these sailors had been infected in the prior 30 days. Many had been infected months earlier.
The Navy and CDC should have done antibody studies of crew members on every naval vessel. If they'd done this - and didn't rig the antibody tests - I think just about every ship would have had similar "positive" percentages.
That’s right, and they had been at see for a few months so where, when and how were they infected? There were several other vessels of other navies that reported similar at that time.
Exactly. How did the virus get on the ship? And when did it get on the ship?
My educated conjecture: Sailors boarded that ship around January 15, 2020 who were already infected. There was a big "Norovirus" outbreak on that ship in February 2020, per a buried footnote I found in one report on the Roosevelt saga. Was that the first big outbreak of Covid on that ship?
Hang on a second here. It’s possible that “early Covid” is a thing that everyone overlooked. Your reasoning is sound; however, I reminded that the reasoning behind every informal fallacy is also sound. It’s the false premise that makes it fallacious. In this case, we need to be very, very careful when we conclusively diagnose disease, contemporaneously or ex post facto, based upon antibody tests or PCR. These techniques are NOT determinative of disease. There’s actually large amounts of data to support an equally plausible theory that these “diagnoses” were actually a consequence of the power of suggestion (in the minds of medical professionals as well as the layperson) bolstered by perverse financial incentives and a general reluctance to go against the prevailing narrative as an act of career preservation. Historically, human affairs in general and epidemics specifically are littered with examples of this type of group think. Again, there may be something to what you’re saying, but we must be cautious, especially when, now that everyone is beginning to see the sordid nature of the whole thing, you can expect limited hangouts that attribute everything to incompetence or ignorance while directing the discussion away from fraud and criminal intent. We must be careful not to retrospectively conclude that, “actually there may have been witches long before the Salem trials discovered them to exist within our midst.”
That’s right, and they had been at sea for a few months so where, when and how were they infected? There were several other vessels of other navies that reported similar at that time.
One paragraph in one of the stories I re-published notes that The Spanish Flu killed up to 50 million people. I've long noted the Spanish Flu killed Americans of all ages - In fact, many victims were young or in their 20s. Eighty percent of “Covid deaths” occurred among citizens 65 or older.
This makes me think Covid was not like the Spanish Flu, which seemed to be a threat to everyone.
People nowadays forget that in the days before antibiotics, (developed after WW2) bacterial pneumonia, supervening on a bad respiratory infection, was a killer. There is no need to look much further than this.
I hope a few readers who haven't read it yet will read my in-depth feature story on Tim and Brandie McCain's early cases. The story was finally published by UnCoverDC (after 30 news organizations passed on this story).
Evidence Tim McCain, who nearly died had Covid includes:
He tested positive for a Covid antibody test in late April 2020. His wife, who was also "very sick" in late December 2019, eventually got three antibody tests - all positive. Covid has 11 signature symptoms. Tim had all 11, plus at least five "clinical markers" of a severe case. The ICU nurse who was in charge of his care later told Brandie McCain that Tim "definitely!" had Covid and was not surprised at all when the positive antibody tests came back.
Officials with the Alabama Department of Public Health know all about his case because I told the key official in an interview and emailed her this story. Still, nobody ever called the McCains and requested an interview or asked to look at Tim's 1,000-page medical records. (Brandie left two phone messages with this official, pleading with this official (Dr. Karen Landers) to at least talk to them.
Nobody at the hospital that treated Tim for 25 days in ICU would talk to me.
I also think Tim survived only because the hospital wasn't using the Covid protocols it would begin using two months later.
They seemed to be the one they followed. One of those I taught with in a medical vocational school is an infectious disease expert. He said it was all political, that all in his field knew it was all bogus but no one could speak out about it. That was May 2020 in Tokyo.
The World Military Games were in mid-to-late October. I wrote a big story about that covered-up outbreak a couple of months ago. People who got sick weren't supposed to talk about this to the press and, bizarrely, nobody got an antibody test. If so many people got sick in October at those games, I theorize the virus must have been wide-spread in Wuhan when the athletes got there. So that would suggest the virus was spreading in September 2019 in Wuhan.
One thing is certain. The "Wet Market" Theory - and spread starting in late December 2019 - is a crock. That's the theory Fauci and company wanted to push for some reason.
Personally, I think they might have been covering up "early spread" ... in America.
If one believes in "early spread," this would prove the virus wasn't particularly deadly. Yes, some people (like these six) did die, but the number of deaths weren't anything out of the ordinary.
You couldn't convince the country to lock down and then get these "Warp Speed" mRNA vaccines if everyone knew the virus had already been circling around the country and world for many months. "Proven early spread" kills the Fear Narrative, which kills the Vaccine Roll-out.
So they had to conceal all evidence of early spread ... and did just this.
In a future thought-exercise essay, I'm going to highlight one "known knowable" about Covid. That known knowable is that EVERYONE who mattered in government and public health was strongly wedded to and pushing the narrative that this pandemic started in one city - in late December 2019 - and it started from natural origins (bats that were carriers).
If nothing else, my early spread articles debunk most of this official narrative as there is copious evidence of cases before late December 2019 and in cities and states all around the world, outside of Wuhan.
So a big question for me is: Why was it so important to these people to push this bogus narrative?
I also now know everything these people say is a lie. Because I know this, I can at least figure out what claims are definitely false.
Per this "logic" or premise, the virus must have started to spread earlier and, also, it wasn't caused by bats.
The US is planning to attack China, just as soon as it can pass the Ukraine proxy war on Russia to its European vassal puppets. Blaming it for a viral biowarfare attack is a perfect pretext.
China has long been on the war path with the US and just about everyone else. They have a huge chip on their collective shoulder and have given themselves the belief that they must subjugate the would to prove themselves to themselves. Unless someone guide them off this path, there will be war, regardless. Of the wishes and preparation or lack there of on the part of the US. If the US does in fact prepared for it and lets China know we are ready and willing to accept their invitation, then we can hope that at least for the time being, China will delay. But as soon as China believes it is ready, there will be war, unless, again, some one can peacefully guide them off the warpath.
Cannot agree I am afraid. History shows the US as the aggressor always, but acting through deception and proxy wars. The US is collapsing economically while the economy of China has grown. If the US cannot "contain" China now, it will never be able to. Hence the drive for war, and the pivot through Iran to Asia.
BS. China has long been encroaching upon the territorial waters of its neighbors, most recently leading to the collision between two of its vessels as they tried to ram a Philippine Coast Guard vessel.
Guess I was late to the party. I only almost died, and not until 02 March 2020. But what would the death certificate have said had I been scraped off the kitchen floor?
One African ruler ordered his medical officials to test various animals and fruits for Covid with a PCR test. They found all kinds of non-human positives.
I was as sick as a dog from Jan. 20-28th, 2020. I felt so awful I went to the doctor, which I almost never do. I got a flu test, which was negative.
I've never had Covid since so I think I might have acquired natural immunity.
25 percent of Troy, Alabama seemed to have "flu-like" symptoms in December and January.
When Tim and Brandie got sick in late December 2019, Brandie said it seemed like "half" of Sylacauga, Alabama was sick at the same time. Five people were living in their house at the time. All five got sick at the same time. The only ones who didn't get very sick were the McCains' two teenage children.
Maybe. But it was a historically bad “flu” year and the vast majority of sick people who got a flu test tested negative for flu ... All weeks and months before official COVID. This is a strange “coincidence” to me. Also, a record number of flu tests were given that flu season, proving a vast number of patients went to the doctor with flu/covid symptoms. IMO the symptoms should matter. With Covid all that mattered was the results of a dubious PCR test.
Born in 1970, class of 88, I, as most in school during this time had flu most every school season. I was never once tested for flu in the US. It was until after in came to Japan in 2000 that I would ever be tested for flu, and only twice in the 25 years since I landed here again. Unless the test results would change treatment, tests used to not be given.
For all other diseases that are epidemic or pandemic, presenting to hospital with symptoms consistent with the disease was the first step to being diagnosed with the disease in question. It was not the only condition that needs to be met. All other possibilities need to be ruled out AND known contact with a known carrier of the disease are also required. This is standard and is why SARS, the first one, went away, few met all three of these criteria. But with covid, they just broomed these as they did all the established protocols for dealing with a pandemic respiratory disease.
A close friend of ours had a covid like illness in Dec 2019 in Vermont and had to be hospitalized for several days. Thank God the infamous “covid protocols” had not been implemented yet. She survived. Her husband never got sick with it.
One of many case studies that caught my attention was that of an elderly man who lives in my hometown. Per his daughter and other sources, this man was hospitalized in a Montgomery ICU for much of the month of December 2019. He also nearly died several times.
He was given multiple flu tests, all negative. Several family members who visited him quickly got sick with the same ILI/Covid symptoms as this man.
He eventually recovered and neither he nor his sick family members ever caught Covid (as far as I am aware).
I think he also had "early Covid" and could have died from his severe case in December 2019.
I have also saved many reader comments from people who think family members (usually elderly) probably died from early Covid.
Another common anecdote provided by many people who think they had early Covid is that "I felt like I was going to die." They didn't, but at one time, they felt like that.
When Tim McCain got sick in December 2019, his family was living with a friend, who also became very sick at the same time as Tim. (However, the friend was never hospitalized).
The friend told Tim on New Year's Eve, "This thing is going to kill us both."
Unfortunately, that man never got a Covid antibody test, but I'd bet a nice dinner that he also had Covid, just like Tim and his wife.
I do not think highlighting this at the time would have made any difference. It was already known to have been so widely spread that it was too late to keep it from doing so. In March 2020, it was reported that then Crown Prince Charles has covid. For more detail on what this means for the covid saga, no one is allowed near royals if even those they are near have a slight cold. A friend of mine in Great Britain had a couple of years before the panic received an invitation to tea with the Queen. This was a yearly net where a largish number of common area were invited and that year she scored an invite. She was excited to be invited and looked forward to it as one may image. Sadly, her sister came down with a cold, so she could not go because someone near her was not in perfect health. They are extremely protective of the health of their. Royal and if these protections are not up to the task, none will be. It also meant that covid was already too widely spread to do anything about it.
In the same news cycle it was also reported than a teenaged boy for one of the remote and isolated tribes was brought to a town sick. He had covid. If true, then it further proved that all efforts to prevent the spread of covid were going to be too little too late and a massive waste of time, effort and resources. Yet, these two cases, and many others were used to ramp up the fear. Worse, this was done world wide. The entire medical establishment of the entire planet drank the cool aid and ignored all they knew about infectious diseases, how to handle epidemics and pandemics, and their own nations differing portals for the same and followed the same play book. They knew what they were doing, though many may not have known why, they only knew that if they didn’t go along, their careers and lives would be ruined.
So, I do not think that highlighting these 6 deaths would have changed anything. They people pushing the fear campaign knew and most everyone else to panicked to take note of what we published.
You might be interested in another one of my 'early spread" findings. A lady from the UK made a post at some UK website, saying that she was hospitalized in November and December 2019 with all the Covid symptoms and nearly died. This lady said she got a Covid antibody test as soon as they were available in her country (probably late April or early May 2020) and tested positive for "prior infection" from Covid-19.
I believe her. Why would she lie about this? She could have been one of the earliest known "Covid cases" - and she was in the UK. I think I'm the only journalist in the world who picked up on this eye-opening Reader Comment.
I also found many other Reader Comments from people who say they were very sick in the "fall" or winter of 2019 and later tested positive for antibodies. One man in the San Francisco area made a post in the NY Times (in May 2020) and said he got two different antibody tests in late April from two different labs and both were positive (he even named the labs in his post). He said he was sick in the "fall" of 2019 and felt like he was going to die at the time. I kept sending this "news tip" to the NY Times and they never followed up with me. The paper could find this man's real name and address as he was a paid subscriber to the paper and only paid subscribers could make Reader Comments.
Again, all possible "early spread" cases are TABOO and off-limits to real inquiry. That's the tell.
Well, we KNOW that the effort to highlight these six "January 2020 deaths" didn't make any difference. This story WAS run by a major news organization and was picked up by a couple of prominent newspapers, including the NY Times and, also, curiously, "Stars and Stripes."
What WOULD or could have made a huge difference is if the results of the Red Cross antibody study had been released BEFORE the lockdowns. The key finding from that study was that 2.4 percent of blood donors in CA, WA and OR had Covid antibodies by November 2019.
I've always maintained those antibody results could have been released by early March 2020. China was using Covid antibody tests in January 2020. Surely, American science could have come up with a good Covid antibody test by some point in February 2020.
Officials already had the "archived" blood from December 2019 sitting in a refrigerator. Public health officials should have put that antibody test on the fast-track to see how "prevalent" this virus already was. Fauci and Birx and the CDC director should have told President Trump, "Mr. President, extrapolating from this study, we think millions of Americans have already been infected by now. Lockdowns would be futile, etc."
FWIW, results of that study weren't published until Nov. 30, 2020- almost a year after the blood had been donated, collected and saved!
Officials could have also tested archived blood from all over the country, from different sections of the country and blood drawn at different times. They could have done random antibody tests of, say, CDC employees ... in February 2020. All the things responsible and competent scientists could and should have done ... they didn't do.
They either already knew all about early spread or didn't want to find out if this could have happened. Either possibility has sinister implications.
This point alone indicates to me that the whole thing, whatever it was, was just a step in a long process that needed to be done to reach a common goal, and we will not like the goal.
There are evidences all around the World of for example specific Covid antibodies or residues as early as October 2019, so spread must start earlier. In US in 2019 there was "epidemic" of similar symptoms and many deaths that was attributed electronic cigarettes using and some biological lab was closed in similar time. Every good AI chat will give you sources and links. So it started in September or even in Summer 2019. What does it mean? I don't know. Do you?
You are right. Some of these antibody studies (from France and Italy) found positives from September 2019, even August. I've also written about the Vaping illnesses and strange outbreaks in Virginia assisted-living facilities (in April of 2020, I think).
"What does it mean?" Great question. I think it means a novel virus was spreading around the world many months earlier than the public has been told and everyone in government has been trying to conceal this evidence. To me, the most-likely reason they would conceal this evidence (or not bother to investigate these likely cases) is that some people in government KNOW this virus was spreading in 2019 in America. The obvious take-away to me is that this virus probably escaped from an America lab, which would mean our "mad scientists" are responsible for these "crimes against humanity."
Of course, they would do anything and everything in their power to cover this up or concoct a bogus "cover story" (the pandemic started in China in December 2019 and its "origins" can be traced to infected bats.)
I also think the main goal was to create and roll-out a new mRNA Covid "vaccine." If early spread was "confirmed" everyone would know this virus was not particularly deadly and had already spread around the world. There would be no need for this vaccine.
A sub-goal, or maybe the main objective, might have been expediting "digital surveillance," censorship and, ultimately, digital currency.
Wide-spread acknowledgement of early spread would have scuttled all their plans and also made every real virus sleuth look hard at the possibility this virus originated in America.
... Everyone has looked into the "Where?" question and the authorized answer is "Wuhan, China." Some people are looking into the "How?" question (lab escape or natural origins). However, almost nobody who matters is looking into the "When?" question.
Per my hypothesis, the reason for this is because the answer to that question might give us the answers to all the other questions. The "When?" question is off-limits - which is a giant tell or "red flag" to me.
The people who matter don't want anyone looking hard into this question. I say serious people should investigate those things we're told we should not investigate.
- On 31 Dec 2019 China informs about 44 cases of pneumonia of unknown etiology. For such big population like Wuhan it's like nothing.
- On 11 Jan 2020 Professor Zhang Yongzhen’s team published the genome sequence on open platform. So eleven days later they have genome of virus? There were 44 ppl ill and they research a genome of virus? It was... Saturday
- On 12 Jan 2020, 41 cases with novel coronavirus infection have been preliminarily diagnosed in Wuhan City. Of the 41 cases reported, seven are severely ill. It's Sunday. In scale of the China or the World it's nothing.
- On 13 Jan 2020 Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine for 41 ill and 7 severely in Wuhan was designed. It was Monday.
- The same day 13 Jan 2020 the NIH's National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), said it intended to run clinical trials using Moderna's mRNA-1273 candidate. Still 2 days after publication of some genome in Wuhan which was suspected pathogen of 41 people illness in Wuhan China.
Another important point: The reason almost all of the "early cases" in America were found in people who had recently travelled to China is that ... per CDC testing guidelines, the ONLY people being given the scarce PCR tests were ... people who had recently been to China.
What if the CDC and public officials had been testing every sick American with a PCR test in January 2020? We don't know what those test results would have told us, but one can guess.
I also think this is why a cross-section of the population did NOT receive any PCR tests ... until AFTER the lockdowns.
He who controls the test - and who gets tested or doesn't get tested - basically controlled the entire Covid narrative - which was that this virus originated in Wuhan, China in "late December 2019."
Also, almost nobody could get a Covid antibody test until late April and early May 2020. I think that decision was also intentional - a protocol that was also designed and enforced to "conceal evidence of early spread."
Readers please note the photo I ran with my latest “early spread” story. The photo shows Tim McCain in an ICU unit hooked up to the ECMO device. As I understand it, ECMO pulls blood out of the body, oxygenates it and then re-filters it back into the body. On Jan. 4, 2020, Tim was put on ECMO in Day 2 of his hospitalization because many of his organs were failing.
Skip forward many months and I found a story about a Covid patient in Arizona whose life was "saved" by the same ECMO device. The story said this was believed to be the first Covid patient whose life was saved by ECMO.
I say, "Not so." Tim McCain had been saved by it in early January 2020. This anecdote illustrates the importance of doctors sharing Covid information with other doctors and scientists. However, this didn't happen in Tim's case because nobody who mattered "confirmed" this man had a severe case of early Covid. Instead - via a conspiracy - they covered up this almost-certain early case.
This cover-up probably costs many lives that could have been saved IF details of Tim's case had been widely disseminated in the medical world ... which, of course, they weren't.
Bill, have you investigated germ vs terrain theory? There's a lot more to this story than we know. From my limited understanding of the subject I've read that medical researchers are unable to deliberately infect symptom free individuals by taking body fluid samples from people suffering from colds and flu. In other words contagion can't be spread deliberately, or it would appear so. So what exactly is the mechanism for a respiratory illness to spread amongst a population? Since we know that PCR tests are unreliable what exactly are scientists identifying when they say someone has caught a cold virus? My gut feeling thinks that the symptoms of illness that we exhibit when we have a cold or severe flu are manifestations of the body's innate ability to detoxify itself. It's the medical treatment afterwards that determines how well one recovers or in the case of covid doesn't recover. The fear of illness is more often than not the common denominator imo. Psychologically the population was infected with a mass psychosis which affected everyone from the general public to the medical profession itself. Sheldrake's morphic resonance theory may give us a clue to help unravel the mystery of contagion.
Thanks, James. I'll partially address your thoughts in an upcoming "thought-exercise" essay. As I've written, i'm certainly open to the theory that viruses either don't exist at all or, are not "contagious." The "detoxification" sub-theory is interesting. I just want better answers on why so many people all "detoxify' at the exact same time. If someone can put forth a plausible theory explaining this, the no-virus theory might resonate with even more people.
I actually think Covid and any spreading virus had already peaked by the time the lockdowns were ordered to "slow" or "stop" the spread in mid-March 2020.
I'm not the only one who thinks this. Two doctors (spouses) think the same thing and shared this view with their state's health agency. In their opinion, "30 percent" of the sick patients they saw (those who tested negative for flu*) from November 2019-February 2020 had Covid.
After the lockdowns, they didn't see any patients with the symptoms they saw all the time in the weeks and months before the lockdowns.
If we are right, one has to ask "what killed all these alleged Covid victims." It wasn't a deadly virus. It was the hospital protocols and the Nocebo Effect.
I think this is also an important story, another one I probably should have published earlier.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/exclusive-physicians-provided-public
* I should note that someone can have Covid and the flu at the same time. In other words, just because you test positive for the flu doesn't mean you don't have Covid.
Yep. Remdesivir (aka "Run-death-is-near") as part of the standard treatment protocol sure helped increase those CNN 24/7 Covid death counters. I've lost track of how many people should spend the rest of their lives in prison over this mass democide. Too many people to count.
Where are our "fearless" plaintiff trial lawyers?
Hiding in fear.
I agree. And the only thing which would cause mass casualties is fear among the public, anxiety attacks leading to inability to breath, leading people to the ER + NIH protocols. This is why the deaths started spiking in late March. It wasn't covid deaths - it was all cause deaths. Or one could go with the Emma Woodhouse theory that all of those deaths are fake numbers, which I haven't seen evidence for. Just mho.
Thanks, Lisa. That's the stunning and scary conclusion/take-away to me. If Covid wasn't killing 98 percent of these "Covid victims," what did? My answer: It was democide.
And no expert has proffered a convincing explanation that would credibly explain why the spike in "Covid deaths" would explode 12 months after the virus first began to circulate. Shouldn't variants or future strains of a virus be less lethal?
These deaths also spiked even though almost everyone was wearing masks, practicing social distancing, etc.
Readers please note the photo I ran with this story. The photo shows Tim McCain in an ICU unit hooked up to the ECMO device. As I understand it, ECMO pulls blood out of the body, oxygenates it and then re-filters it back into the body. Tim was put on ECMO in Day 2 of his hospitalization because many of his organs were failing.
Skip forward many months and I found a story about a Covid patient in Arizona whose life was "saved" by the same ECMO device. The story said this was believed to be the first Covid patient whose life was saved by ECMO.
I say, "Not so." Tim McCain had been saved by it in early January 2020. This anecdote illustrates the importance of doctors sharing Covid information with other doctors and scientists. However, this didn't happen in Tim's case because nobody who mattered "confirmed" this man had a severe case of early Covid. Instead - via a conspiracy - they covered up this almost-certain early case.
This cover-up probably costs many lives that could have been saved if details of Tim's case had been widely disseminated in the medical world.
I should have added that I emailed the author of these two Mercury News articles and shared with her summaries and links to my "early spread" stories. Paraphrasing from memory, I told her "what you have obviously documented is a virus (or illness) that was wide-spread. My research supports this. Please contact me if you want more information. I hope you follow-up on my freelance reporting and research."
Curiously to me, she never replied to my email. That is, I don't think an author who wrote an important "early spread" article, really wants to follow or connect all of these dots. Early spread is still taboo in MSM newsrooms.
Google AI tells me that one unique factor of the Spanish Flu is that it disproportionately killed and effected "healthy young adults." The average age of death might have been .... in the 20s! To me, that would be a real, scary pandemic.
Almost no healthy young people died from Covid.
I read one article that said older people might have had immunity or some immunity because they had lived through the Russian Flu (circa 1889) - which happened 28 years earlier.
I think tens of millions of Americans had developed natural immunity to Covid by the end of March 2020. That makes one wonder why there was such a huge spike in "Covid deaths" in the second year of the pandemic - beginning around November 2020 and peaking around December 2020 and January 2021.
I think so many people getting that year's flu shot (the 2020-2021 shot) in September and October 2020 might somehow explain many of the subsequent 2nd year deaths. I don't think the flu would have killed this many people, but it would have sent many to the hospital - which was the last place they needed to be.
I do think the flu shot can cause flu symptoms and the flu shots of 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 were different formulations than normal, according to some of my readers.
The flu shot has gotten a complete pass in any effort to explain the spike in "Covid deaths" in Year 2 of a virus.
Almost no one healthy at any age has died from this coronavirus.
“Google AI tells me that one unique factor of the Spanish Flu is that it disproportionately killed and affected "healthy young adults." The average age of death might have been .... in the 20s! To me, that would be a real, scary pandemic.”
It has long been known that many of these died from what was later learned to be lethal over doses of aspirin. It was a new miracle drug and they believed that if a few were great, that more was better and thus killed off a great many. Masks were also known to have perverse effects even then and proved to be another cause of the high death count.
There have been surveys and studies at different points along the West cast of the US that indicate that a large number of residents there did infractions have antibodies against covid at this time as you suggest. So do waste water samples from various regions of the world.
And don’t forget the Uss Roosevelt antibody study of crew members. 60 percent (!) tested positive for antibodies in April 2020. IMO, there's no way ALL of these sailors had been infected in the prior 30 days. Many had been infected months earlier.
The Navy and CDC should have done antibody studies of crew members on every naval vessel. If they'd done this - and didn't rig the antibody tests - I think just about every ship would have had similar "positive" percentages.
That’s right, and they had been at see for a few months so where, when and how were they infected? There were several other vessels of other navies that reported similar at that time.
Exactly. How did the virus get on the ship? And when did it get on the ship?
My educated conjecture: Sailors boarded that ship around January 15, 2020 who were already infected. There was a big "Norovirus" outbreak on that ship in February 2020, per a buried footnote I found in one report on the Roosevelt saga. Was that the first big outbreak of Covid on that ship?
Hang on a second here. It’s possible that “early Covid” is a thing that everyone overlooked. Your reasoning is sound; however, I reminded that the reasoning behind every informal fallacy is also sound. It’s the false premise that makes it fallacious. In this case, we need to be very, very careful when we conclusively diagnose disease, contemporaneously or ex post facto, based upon antibody tests or PCR. These techniques are NOT determinative of disease. There’s actually large amounts of data to support an equally plausible theory that these “diagnoses” were actually a consequence of the power of suggestion (in the minds of medical professionals as well as the layperson) bolstered by perverse financial incentives and a general reluctance to go against the prevailing narrative as an act of career preservation. Historically, human affairs in general and epidemics specifically are littered with examples of this type of group think. Again, there may be something to what you’re saying, but we must be cautious, especially when, now that everyone is beginning to see the sordid nature of the whole thing, you can expect limited hangouts that attribute everything to incompetence or ignorance while directing the discussion away from fraud and criminal intent. We must be careful not to retrospectively conclude that, “actually there may have been witches long before the Salem trials discovered them to exist within our midst.”
Many deaths were dubiously attributed to the Spanish Flu.
Inter alia, many deaths are said to have been caused by major overdoses of aspirin, which was new at that time.
That’s right, and they had been at sea for a few months so where, when and how were they infected? There were several other vessels of other navies that reported similar at that time.
One paragraph in one of the stories I re-published notes that The Spanish Flu killed up to 50 million people. I've long noted the Spanish Flu killed Americans of all ages - In fact, many victims were young or in their 20s. Eighty percent of “Covid deaths” occurred among citizens 65 or older.
This makes me think Covid was not like the Spanish Flu, which seemed to be a threat to everyone.
Lots of Spanish flu deaths were actually from overdosing of aspirin at that time, the new "wonder" drug.
I've read that. The Spanish Flu also didn't start in Spain. It probably started in America.
People nowadays forget that in the days before antibiotics, (developed after WW2) bacterial pneumonia, supervening on a bad respiratory infection, was a killer. There is no need to look much further than this.
I hope a few readers who haven't read it yet will read my in-depth feature story on Tim and Brandie McCain's early cases. The story was finally published by UnCoverDC (after 30 news organizations passed on this story).
Evidence Tim McCain, who nearly died had Covid includes:
He tested positive for a Covid antibody test in late April 2020. His wife, who was also "very sick" in late December 2019, eventually got three antibody tests - all positive. Covid has 11 signature symptoms. Tim had all 11, plus at least five "clinical markers" of a severe case. The ICU nurse who was in charge of his care later told Brandie McCain that Tim "definitely!" had Covid and was not surprised at all when the positive antibody tests came back.
Officials with the Alabama Department of Public Health know all about his case because I told the key official in an interview and emailed her this story. Still, nobody ever called the McCains and requested an interview or asked to look at Tim's 1,000-page medical records. (Brandie left two phone messages with this official, pleading with this official (Dr. Karen Landers) to at least talk to them.
Nobody at the hospital that treated Tim for 25 days in ICU would talk to me.
I also think Tim survived only because the hospital wasn't using the Covid protocols it would begin using two months later.
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/06/25/an-alabama-man-nearly-died-from-covid-19-the-first-week-in-january#google_vignette
Yes, because they knew or were afraid of finding out.
My first Covid Maxim; "Never investigate that which you do not want to 'confirm.' "
They seemed to be the one they followed. One of those I taught with in a medical vocational school is an infectious disease expert. He said it was all political, that all in his field knew it was all bogus but no one could speak out about it. That was May 2020 in Tokyo.
Another great story Bill!
What a fabulous article! Thank you Bill!
I still think it was brought back from those military games in China in September of '19. It then spread around military bases all over the country .
The World Military Games were in mid-to-late October. I wrote a big story about that covered-up outbreak a couple of months ago. People who got sick weren't supposed to talk about this to the press and, bizarrely, nobody got an antibody test. If so many people got sick in October at those games, I theorize the virus must have been wide-spread in Wuhan when the athletes got there. So that would suggest the virus was spreading in September 2019 in Wuhan.
One thing is certain. The "Wet Market" Theory - and spread starting in late December 2019 - is a crock. That's the theory Fauci and company wanted to push for some reason.
Personally, I think they might have been covering up "early spread" ... in America.
If one believes in "early spread," this would prove the virus wasn't particularly deadly. Yes, some people (like these six) did die, but the number of deaths weren't anything out of the ordinary.
You couldn't convince the country to lock down and then get these "Warp Speed" mRNA vaccines if everyone knew the virus had already been circling around the country and world for many months. "Proven early spread" kills the Fear Narrative, which kills the Vaccine Roll-out.
So they had to conceal all evidence of early spread ... and did just this.
In a future thought-exercise essay, I'm going to highlight one "known knowable" about Covid. That known knowable is that EVERYONE who mattered in government and public health was strongly wedded to and pushing the narrative that this pandemic started in one city - in late December 2019 - and it started from natural origins (bats that were carriers).
If nothing else, my early spread articles debunk most of this official narrative as there is copious evidence of cases before late December 2019 and in cities and states all around the world, outside of Wuhan.
So a big question for me is: Why was it so important to these people to push this bogus narrative?
I also now know everything these people say is a lie. Because I know this, I can at least figure out what claims are definitely false.
Per this "logic" or premise, the virus must have started to spread earlier and, also, it wasn't caused by bats.
The US is planning to attack China, just as soon as it can pass the Ukraine proxy war on Russia to its European vassal puppets. Blaming it for a viral biowarfare attack is a perfect pretext.
China has long been on the war path with the US and just about everyone else. They have a huge chip on their collective shoulder and have given themselves the belief that they must subjugate the would to prove themselves to themselves. Unless someone guide them off this path, there will be war, regardless. Of the wishes and preparation or lack there of on the part of the US. If the US does in fact prepared for it and lets China know we are ready and willing to accept their invitation, then we can hope that at least for the time being, China will delay. But as soon as China believes it is ready, there will be war, unless, again, some one can peacefully guide them off the warpath.
Cannot agree I am afraid. History shows the US as the aggressor always, but acting through deception and proxy wars. The US is collapsing economically while the economy of China has grown. If the US cannot "contain" China now, it will never be able to. Hence the drive for war, and the pivot through Iran to Asia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJZIuRrvXSY&ab_channel=TheNewAtlas
BS. China has long been encroaching upon the territorial waters of its neighbors, most recently leading to the collision between two of its vessels as they tried to ram a Philippine Coast Guard vessel.
And the US? What is it doing in SE Asia, so far from its own borders if not aggressively extending its own geopolitical power?
Guess I was late to the party. I only almost died, and not until 02 March 2020. But what would the death certificate have said had I been scraped off the kitchen floor?
Covid. If you died in a motor vehicle accident, Covid. If you were murdered, covid. If, heaven forbid, you took your own life, covid.
One African ruler ordered his medical officials to test various animals and fruits for Covid with a PCR test. They found all kinds of non-human positives.
That leader later died mysteriously.
I recall that fish were given the PCR test”test” and found to have covid. I don’t remember where though.
I was as sick as a dog from Jan. 20-28th, 2020. I felt so awful I went to the doctor, which I almost never do. I got a flu test, which was negative.
I've never had Covid since so I think I might have acquired natural immunity.
25 percent of Troy, Alabama seemed to have "flu-like" symptoms in December and January.
When Tim and Brandie got sick in late December 2019, Brandie said it seemed like "half" of Sylacauga, Alabama was sick at the same time. Five people were living in their house at the time. All five got sick at the same time. The only ones who didn't get very sick were the McCains' two teenage children.
Just like in a bad flu year, no?
Maybe. But it was a historically bad “flu” year and the vast majority of sick people who got a flu test tested negative for flu ... All weeks and months before official COVID. This is a strange “coincidence” to me. Also, a record number of flu tests were given that flu season, proving a vast number of patients went to the doctor with flu/covid symptoms. IMO the symptoms should matter. With Covid all that mattered was the results of a dubious PCR test.
Born in 1970, class of 88, I, as most in school during this time had flu most every school season. I was never once tested for flu in the US. It was until after in came to Japan in 2000 that I would ever be tested for flu, and only twice in the 25 years since I landed here again. Unless the test results would change treatment, tests used to not be given.
For all other diseases that are epidemic or pandemic, presenting to hospital with symptoms consistent with the disease was the first step to being diagnosed with the disease in question. It was not the only condition that needs to be met. All other possibilities need to be ruled out AND known contact with a known carrier of the disease are also required. This is standard and is why SARS, the first one, went away, few met all three of these criteria. But with covid, they just broomed these as they did all the established protocols for dealing with a pandemic respiratory disease.
A close friend of ours had a covid like illness in Dec 2019 in Vermont and had to be hospitalized for several days. Thank God the infamous “covid protocols” had not been implemented yet. She survived. Her husband never got sick with it.
One of many case studies that caught my attention was that of an elderly man who lives in my hometown. Per his daughter and other sources, this man was hospitalized in a Montgomery ICU for much of the month of December 2019. He also nearly died several times.
He was given multiple flu tests, all negative. Several family members who visited him quickly got sick with the same ILI/Covid symptoms as this man.
He eventually recovered and neither he nor his sick family members ever caught Covid (as far as I am aware).
I think he also had "early Covid" and could have died from his severe case in December 2019.
I have also saved many reader comments from people who think family members (usually elderly) probably died from early Covid.
Another common anecdote provided by many people who think they had early Covid is that "I felt like I was going to die." They didn't, but at one time, they felt like that.
When Tim McCain got sick in December 2019, his family was living with a friend, who also became very sick at the same time as Tim. (However, the friend was never hospitalized).
The friend told Tim on New Year's Eve, "This thing is going to kill us both."
Unfortunately, that man never got a Covid antibody test, but I'd bet a nice dinner that he also had Covid, just like Tim and his wife.
I do not think highlighting this at the time would have made any difference. It was already known to have been so widely spread that it was too late to keep it from doing so. In March 2020, it was reported that then Crown Prince Charles has covid. For more detail on what this means for the covid saga, no one is allowed near royals if even those they are near have a slight cold. A friend of mine in Great Britain had a couple of years before the panic received an invitation to tea with the Queen. This was a yearly net where a largish number of common area were invited and that year she scored an invite. She was excited to be invited and looked forward to it as one may image. Sadly, her sister came down with a cold, so she could not go because someone near her was not in perfect health. They are extremely protective of the health of their. Royal and if these protections are not up to the task, none will be. It also meant that covid was already too widely spread to do anything about it.
In the same news cycle it was also reported than a teenaged boy for one of the remote and isolated tribes was brought to a town sick. He had covid. If true, then it further proved that all efforts to prevent the spread of covid were going to be too little too late and a massive waste of time, effort and resources. Yet, these two cases, and many others were used to ramp up the fear. Worse, this was done world wide. The entire medical establishment of the entire planet drank the cool aid and ignored all they knew about infectious diseases, how to handle epidemics and pandemics, and their own nations differing portals for the same and followed the same play book. They knew what they were doing, though many may not have known why, they only knew that if they didn’t go along, their careers and lives would be ruined.
So, I do not think that highlighting these 6 deaths would have changed anything. They people pushing the fear campaign knew and most everyone else to panicked to take note of what we published.
You might be interested in another one of my 'early spread" findings. A lady from the UK made a post at some UK website, saying that she was hospitalized in November and December 2019 with all the Covid symptoms and nearly died. This lady said she got a Covid antibody test as soon as they were available in her country (probably late April or early May 2020) and tested positive for "prior infection" from Covid-19.
I believe her. Why would she lie about this? She could have been one of the earliest known "Covid cases" - and she was in the UK. I think I'm the only journalist in the world who picked up on this eye-opening Reader Comment.
I also found many other Reader Comments from people who say they were very sick in the "fall" or winter of 2019 and later tested positive for antibodies. One man in the San Francisco area made a post in the NY Times (in May 2020) and said he got two different antibody tests in late April from two different labs and both were positive (he even named the labs in his post). He said he was sick in the "fall" of 2019 and felt like he was going to die at the time. I kept sending this "news tip" to the NY Times and they never followed up with me. The paper could find this man's real name and address as he was a paid subscriber to the paper and only paid subscribers could make Reader Comments.
Again, all possible "early spread" cases are TABOO and off-limits to real inquiry. That's the tell.
Exactly, that is the tell. They did not do their due diligence. None of them did. Or those few who did were silenced.
Well, we KNOW that the effort to highlight these six "January 2020 deaths" didn't make any difference. This story WAS run by a major news organization and was picked up by a couple of prominent newspapers, including the NY Times and, also, curiously, "Stars and Stripes."
What WOULD or could have made a huge difference is if the results of the Red Cross antibody study had been released BEFORE the lockdowns. The key finding from that study was that 2.4 percent of blood donors in CA, WA and OR had Covid antibodies by November 2019.
I've always maintained those antibody results could have been released by early March 2020. China was using Covid antibody tests in January 2020. Surely, American science could have come up with a good Covid antibody test by some point in February 2020.
Officials already had the "archived" blood from December 2019 sitting in a refrigerator. Public health officials should have put that antibody test on the fast-track to see how "prevalent" this virus already was. Fauci and Birx and the CDC director should have told President Trump, "Mr. President, extrapolating from this study, we think millions of Americans have already been infected by now. Lockdowns would be futile, etc."
FWIW, results of that study weren't published until Nov. 30, 2020- almost a year after the blood had been donated, collected and saved!
Officials could have also tested archived blood from all over the country, from different sections of the country and blood drawn at different times. They could have done random antibody tests of, say, CDC employees ... in February 2020. All the things responsible and competent scientists could and should have done ... they didn't do.
They either already knew all about early spread or didn't want to find out if this could have happened. Either possibility has sinister implications.
Yep yep yep and yep. AND this is true for every country on the planet.
Good point. 100 percent conformity that shouldn’t happen.
This point alone indicates to me that the whole thing, whatever it was, was just a step in a long process that needed to be done to reach a common goal, and we will not like the goal.
There are evidences all around the World of for example specific Covid antibodies or residues as early as October 2019, so spread must start earlier. In US in 2019 there was "epidemic" of similar symptoms and many deaths that was attributed electronic cigarettes using and some biological lab was closed in similar time. Every good AI chat will give you sources and links. So it started in September or even in Summer 2019. What does it mean? I don't know. Do you?
You are right. Some of these antibody studies (from France and Italy) found positives from September 2019, even August. I've also written about the Vaping illnesses and strange outbreaks in Virginia assisted-living facilities (in April of 2020, I think).
"What does it mean?" Great question. I think it means a novel virus was spreading around the world many months earlier than the public has been told and everyone in government has been trying to conceal this evidence. To me, the most-likely reason they would conceal this evidence (or not bother to investigate these likely cases) is that some people in government KNOW this virus was spreading in 2019 in America. The obvious take-away to me is that this virus probably escaped from an America lab, which would mean our "mad scientists" are responsible for these "crimes against humanity."
Of course, they would do anything and everything in their power to cover this up or concoct a bogus "cover story" (the pandemic started in China in December 2019 and its "origins" can be traced to infected bats.)
I also think the main goal was to create and roll-out a new mRNA Covid "vaccine." If early spread was "confirmed" everyone would know this virus was not particularly deadly and had already spread around the world. There would be no need for this vaccine.
A sub-goal, or maybe the main objective, might have been expediting "digital surveillance," censorship and, ultimately, digital currency.
Wide-spread acknowledgement of early spread would have scuttled all their plans and also made every real virus sleuth look hard at the possibility this virus originated in America.
... Everyone has looked into the "Where?" question and the authorized answer is "Wuhan, China." Some people are looking into the "How?" question (lab escape or natural origins). However, almost nobody who matters is looking into the "When?" question.
Per my hypothesis, the reason for this is because the answer to that question might give us the answers to all the other questions. The "When?" question is off-limits - which is a giant tell or "red flag" to me.
The people who matter don't want anyone looking hard into this question. I say serious people should investigate those things we're told we should not investigate.
There might be another interesting sequence.
- On 31 Dec 2019 China informs about 44 cases of pneumonia of unknown etiology. For such big population like Wuhan it's like nothing.
- On 11 Jan 2020 Professor Zhang Yongzhen’s team published the genome sequence on open platform. So eleven days later they have genome of virus? There were 44 ppl ill and they research a genome of virus? It was... Saturday
- On 12 Jan 2020, 41 cases with novel coronavirus infection have been preliminarily diagnosed in Wuhan City. Of the 41 cases reported, seven are severely ill. It's Sunday. In scale of the China or the World it's nothing.
- On 13 Jan 2020 Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine for 41 ill and 7 severely in Wuhan was designed. It was Monday.
- The same day 13 Jan 2020 the NIH's National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), said it intended to run clinical trials using Moderna's mRNA-1273 candidate. Still 2 days after publication of some genome in Wuhan which was suspected pathogen of 41 people illness in Wuhan China.
---> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9031633/How-coronavirus-vaccine-designed-JANUARY.html
Tlove yout passion & work.
Please take little offense, yet the WORLD will not care about a ½ dozen months if 30+ years of planning expose & sanction the liable.
1st, Only & Last #Covid Audit
https://WHOtoSTOP.com
Another important point: The reason almost all of the "early cases" in America were found in people who had recently travelled to China is that ... per CDC testing guidelines, the ONLY people being given the scarce PCR tests were ... people who had recently been to China.
What if the CDC and public officials had been testing every sick American with a PCR test in January 2020? We don't know what those test results would have told us, but one can guess.
I also think this is why a cross-section of the population did NOT receive any PCR tests ... until AFTER the lockdowns.
He who controls the test - and who gets tested or doesn't get tested - basically controlled the entire Covid narrative - which was that this virus originated in Wuhan, China in "late December 2019."
Also, almost nobody could get a Covid antibody test until late April and early May 2020. I think that decision was also intentional - a protocol that was also designed and enforced to "conceal evidence of early spread."
Readers please note the photo I ran with my latest “early spread” story. The photo shows Tim McCain in an ICU unit hooked up to the ECMO device. As I understand it, ECMO pulls blood out of the body, oxygenates it and then re-filters it back into the body. On Jan. 4, 2020, Tim was put on ECMO in Day 2 of his hospitalization because many of his organs were failing.
Skip forward many months and I found a story about a Covid patient in Arizona whose life was "saved" by the same ECMO device. The story said this was believed to be the first Covid patient whose life was saved by ECMO.
I say, "Not so." Tim McCain had been saved by it in early January 2020. This anecdote illustrates the importance of doctors sharing Covid information with other doctors and scientists. However, this didn't happen in Tim's case because nobody who mattered "confirmed" this man had a severe case of early Covid. Instead - via a conspiracy - they covered up this almost-certain early case.
This cover-up probably costs many lives that could have been saved IF details of Tim's case had been widely disseminated in the medical world ... which, of course, they weren't.
Bill, have you investigated germ vs terrain theory? There's a lot more to this story than we know. From my limited understanding of the subject I've read that medical researchers are unable to deliberately infect symptom free individuals by taking body fluid samples from people suffering from colds and flu. In other words contagion can't be spread deliberately, or it would appear so. So what exactly is the mechanism for a respiratory illness to spread amongst a population? Since we know that PCR tests are unreliable what exactly are scientists identifying when they say someone has caught a cold virus? My gut feeling thinks that the symptoms of illness that we exhibit when we have a cold or severe flu are manifestations of the body's innate ability to detoxify itself. It's the medical treatment afterwards that determines how well one recovers or in the case of covid doesn't recover. The fear of illness is more often than not the common denominator imo. Psychologically the population was infected with a mass psychosis which affected everyone from the general public to the medical profession itself. Sheldrake's morphic resonance theory may give us a clue to help unravel the mystery of contagion.
Thanks, James. I'll partially address your thoughts in an upcoming "thought-exercise" essay. As I've written, i'm certainly open to the theory that viruses either don't exist at all or, are not "contagious." The "detoxification" sub-theory is interesting. I just want better answers on why so many people all "detoxify' at the exact same time. If someone can put forth a plausible theory explaining this, the no-virus theory might resonate with even more people.
I look forward to your article with interest.
What about the statistically-suspicious "From Covid ?" or "With Covid ?"
Yes!