When considering world trends and how every important organization is completely captured, it’s impossible to avoid bleak conclusions.
However, one of my iron-clad maxims is “The Law of Opposite Effects." This maxim tells us that whatever the stated purpose of our rulers' myriad programs, the opposite result will invariably happen.
It occurs to me all of our rulers' programs share one goal - the acquisition of more control. The “logic”- to protect “the people,” our rulers have to possess more control.
My Maxim tells me our rulers might be left stunned when their endless campaigns for more control end up leaving them disgraced and banished from positions of power.
Now for the good news …
If what our rulers really want is more control and power, according to my maxim, it follows that they are going to get the opposite.
In a recent column for The Epoch Times, Jeffrey Tucker acknowledges he knows several “very smart people” who are now seriously considering the possibility the country might break up in the future.
So far, no American political leader has been brave enough to mention the S-word as a possible solution to the 50 issues that polarize the nation’s citizens. However, if this idea, like a virus, did start to spread (aka “go viral”) that might be curtains for the “control” crowd.
The people I’m writing about want to control 334 million Americans … not 177 million.
Somehow, I think Bill Gates, George Soros, the Global-Health-Treaty crowd, the Digital Currency crowd, the Davos crowd, The Censor-More crowd and the Fight-Climate-Change crowd wouldn’t be pleased if half the American population simply said, “No thank you. We’ll pass on your extra controls …”
Alas, I don’t get the impression our rulers are too worried about secession becoming a serious debating topic, which is another scary thought as this tells me our shadow rulers are supremely confident they’ve got all the dissident/dissent scenarios covered.
Still, my maxim’s practically infallible. If our leaders want more control …. They are going to get the opposite - which means, at some point, they will lose their precious control.
You could add ‘life and death’ to the grievance list …
At the end of 2023, my humble wish is that our crooked and immoral leaders lose their power and control …. before they kill us all.
Two hundred and fifty years ago, Thomas Jefferson and America’s Founding Fathers cited issues like freedom, democracy and liberty in filing for a divorce from England.
Those were excellent reasons, but today you could throw in “life and death” issues as well.
A certain percentage of Americans understand that our leaders are already killing off large swaths of the population.
Exploding excess death numbers, plunging life expectancy figures and decreasing birth rates confirm this. The only question is how many “extra” people have died in the world in the last couple of years. Is it “only” one million people … or 17 million?
Those deaths are just from the response to a pandemic and don’t include people who are sick, disabled or will die a premature death in the months and years to come.
Given enough time, inflation and economic devastation will kill more people than the response to the pandemic did.
The economic body counts are already rising in Third-World nations nobody hears about. But more people in rich countries will increasingly die from suicides, drug addiction, murders, domestic abuse, inability to pay for health care and general despair and depression.
It’s also obvious the Covid vaccine death numbers aren’t restricted to people who “died suddenly” two weeks after they got their “life-saving” shots. People are dying under mysterious circumstances years after they got their shots.
Total control leads to … permanent death
The only reason 90 percent of people got these unnecessary shots is because the Powers that Be had obtained so much control (and, inexplicably, public trust).
Hopefully, more Americans can see that ceding even more control to these“leaders” guarantees a horrific body count. In fact, the only reason the death counts are not considered horrific already is that, by universal decree of the Captured Establishment, “We can’t talk about that.”
I saved the scariest part for last …
Moving forward from Covid, our rulers are back to fighting the peril of Climate Change (although they’re still working around the clock to give us amazing new “vaccines.”)
Our rulers assure us they're going to "save the planet." This mantra terrifies me because, per my Maxim, this means what they are really going to do is ... destroy the planet.
I admit it’s hard to kill an entire planet, but the people in leadership positions can kill many of the planet’s inhabitants.
The easiest way to do that would be to start a series of events that ended in a global nuclear war.
Last night I watched a documentary on Oppenheimer and was struck by a statement that hydrogen bombs are 1,000 times more powerful than the atom bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima.
If America detonated 50 hydrogen bombs and Russia and China detonated 100 bombs, that would be 150 hydrogen bombs detonating - perhaps in a matter of hours.
Each bomb blast would kill at least a million people, almost instantly, and then the radiation would kill many more people months and years afterwords.
A nuclear war might kill 300 million people directly and the Mad Max-type economic carnage would kill five times as many people.
Global nuclear war would, conservatively, kill billions of people around the world. And, unlike Covid, the average victim wouldn’t be 82. The children who might be vaporized could be our own.
If Bill Gates is worried about planet “over-population,” a good nuclear war will nip a large part of that problem in the bud in a couple of hours.
Some people will say our leaders aren’t that stupid. There’s no way we could have a global war that escalated to a nuclear holocaust. I used to think the same thing … but not anymore.
History tells us we had at least two other world wars. Every war escalates for ridiculous reasons. Economic strife can make wars more likely and one country’s leaders are likely to scapegoat another country for causing our problems.
I’m also confident that our leaders are more obtuse and evil than they’ve perhaps ever been … so, yes, I do think this unthinkable scenario should no longer be unthinkable.
The likely villains for our next war won’t be Iraq, Afghanistan or Vietnam. They’ll probably be Russia and China.
Plus, with our woke military, I’m not sure America could win a conventional war with any formidable military adversary, which probably makes a nuclear war even more likely.
I’m not predicting this, but it no longer seems farfetched …
To be clear, I’m not saying this apocalyptic scenario is going to happen. But I am saying it seems much more likely that something this cataclysmic could happen.
And I keep thinking about our leaders who are so adamant they are going to “save the planet.”
It remains repugnant to me that the people who directly and indirectly caused the deaths of millions of people are credited with saving millions of lives.
The same leaders incessantly advertise their superior virtue by letting everyone know how much more they they care about “the planet.” Critics, like myself, who continue to point out that these leaders are the gravest threat to people who live on the planet, will continue to be attacked.
When rulers who have been wrong about every important issue and who never stop seeking more power tell me they are going to save the planet, why wouldn’t I conclude they are going to do all they can to destroy it?
Speaking for myself, I now take these people at their word - but, first, I inverse their words. When they say they are going to do (Great Thing) A, I know (Terrible Thing) B must be coming … Unless we stop them in time.
I know they want more control.
I know that on the big issues they’re almost always wrong and their solutions routinely produce carnage and misery.
According to The Law of Opposite Effects, the good news is they’re probably going to lose their control.
What we don’t know at the moment is if our rulers will destroy the planet before they lose their control.
The best and easiest way to “save the planet” is to expose and then purge all the captured and toxic rulers. The sooner this happens, the better. But let’s don’t wait too long.
Some "Cutting room floor" text (free to all subscribers!)
Two more examples of The Law of Opposite Effects …
Our trusted rulers and experts said the Covid shots would “save millions of lives,” which everyone should have known would KILL millions of people.
The same experts said the shots would prevent infections from Covid. The opposite of the word “prevent” is “cause.” When they said the shots would prevent cases, we should have known they would cause more cases.
A few examples of The Law of Opposite Effects doing its thing…
The “War on Poverty” ensured …. rampant and generational poverty. (The Soup Kitchens were replaced with the SNAP cards).
The Creation of the Federal Department of Education … ensured future generations would be less educated than previous generations.
Fighting a pandemic to “save millions of lives” ultimately killed millions of people and left tens of millions of people in worse health than before the war on the pandemic.